What Does Azure WebJob "Pending Restart" Mean? - azure-webjobs

What does "Pending Restart" mean? I have stopped and restarted my WebJob numerous times and that doesn't seem to fix it. Does it mean I have to restart my website? What caused my job to get in this state in the first place? Is there any way I can prevent this from happening in the future?

Usually, it means that the job fails to start (an exception?). Look in the jobs dashboard for logs.
Also, make sure that if the job is continuous, you actually have an infinite loop that keeps the process alive.

To add to Victor's answer, the continuous WebJob states are:
Initializing - The site was just started and the WebJob is doing it's initialization process.
Starting - The WebJob is starting up the process/script.
Running - The WebJob's process is running.
PendingRestart - The WebJob's process exited (for any good or bad reason) in less than 2 minutes since it started, for a continuous WebJob it's considered that something was probably not right with it (some exception during start-up probably as mentioned by Victor), at this point the system is waiting for 60 seconds before it'll restart the WebJob process (hence the name "pending restart").
Stopped - The WebJob was stopped (usually from the Azure portal) and is currently not running and will not be running until it is started again, best way to see this is as disabled.

Also, take a look at the webjob log, it should hold cue to what's been happening.
if the JOB is set to run continuously, once the process exits (say you are polling a queue and it's empty) the job shuts down and status changes to "pending restart". Azure Scheduler will typically restart the process in 60 seconds.

Try changing the target framework to .NET 4.5. This same issue was fixed for me when I changed the target framework from 4.6.1 to 4.5.

Had the same problem, found out that i need to keep my webjob alive, so I put a continous loop to keep it alive.

It means that application is failing after start. Check the App Service Application setting might have some problem. .. In my case i am passing date as a configuration and i entered wrong date like 20160431

This is just because Webjobs is failing or giving exception.
Make sure the Webjobs is continuous and you can check that in the log where it failing and can make the changes.
Process went down, waiting for 60 seconds
Status changed to Pending Restart

In my case, we got the deployment package prepared through the Visual Studio folder publish and deployed along with WebApp. Package created through 'Folder publish' lacked 'run.cmd' file in which command to invoke the console application (.exe) is available; this file is automatically created when we directly publish to Azure WebJob from Visual Studio.
After manually adding this to a package folder, the issue got fixed.

Related

How do you prevent a continuous webjob from restarting after an error occured?

I have a website with four continuous webjobs listening on different topics of a service bus.
If during the execution of one these webjobs, an error occurs and the process exits, how do I prevent the webjob to start up again (which in most cases would simply incur in the error again)?
I tried keeping a disable.job file in the root of each webjob folder, thinking that if I then ran the webjob manually it would override it, but instead it shuts down almost immediately after detecting that that file is present (I thought it would only check on an automatic restart).
There is no mechanism today to achieve that. If a continuous WebJob is not disabled, the WebJob engine will always try to restart if it crashes for any reason. That is what most users expect.
If you don't want that, one thing you could do is catch the exception in your WebJob, and simply do nothing (i.e. get in a Sleep loop). However, I would suggest getting to the bottom of the error, and seeing whether it can be avoided.

The operator or administrator has refused the request task scheduler

I have scheduled a C# console application in Task Scheduler of Windows 2012 R2. Application will run when executed it manually or Right click on scheduled task and click on Run, but it is failed when triggered by Task Scheduler with below error.
The operator or administrator has refused the request(0x800710E0)
I have followed below steps also after Google search
Selected "Run whether user logged in or not"
Unchecked "Start the task only if the computer is on AC power"
In my case, the error message "The operator or administrator has refused the request" meant that a previous instance of the task has still been running and the task was configured to not start a new instance if it's already running (the default configuration), so the Task Scheduler refused to start a new instance when the task was triggered.
You can find that option in a select box on the task's Settings tab, under the caption "If the task is already running, then the following rule applies". The default value is "Do not start a new instance".
But that error message is pretty confusing. From the other answers, you may see that it may mean many completely distinct errors. As is usual in Microsoft's products.
Tip
It's helpful to check the History tab of a task. That's where I have found out what's actually going on. There was an event "Launch request ignored, instance already running".
In my case, I had to redo the permissions on the task. Somehow it had lost the domain portion of the username. Instead of `DOMAIN\joeuser' it was just 'joeuser'. After a reset, it worked correctly as it had for the previous year.
In my case as per having a job setup with Task Scheduler as written about in the "Prevent a Task Scheduler Task from Executing on Setting Updates", I had a job setup to run every "X" minutes for a period of indefinitely.
Upon seeing the dreaded "The operator or administrator has refused the request" for the Last Run Result, I looked over the History tab and see detail indicating that is "missed its schedule".
The Solution
From the Settings tab of the job properties, I simply checked the option "Run task as soon as possible after a scheduled start is missed", and problem resolved; although, I did have to type in the credential again as well.
Note: This started occurring once a server was moved from a redundant backup server once hardware repair was completed back to the original hardware. The OS was Server 2012 R2 and the OS was moved to other hardware while repair was done on the production server but I didn't notice this there—maybe an oversight there though—not sure.
I know that #Sushmit-Patil found a solution, but I wanted to add a solution to my similar problem:
It turns out a prior process never exited (it was hanging around in memory because of a defect I had in my code). By default, Windows Task Scheduler won't run the process again if it's already running.
In addition to fixing the defect, in Task Scheduler, under the Settings tab, I set If the task is already running, then the following rule applies: to Run a new instance in parallel
1
Error occurred due to folder permission, I was creating CSV from my application, which was required folder permission to be granted. After giving Full Control to the folder error got resolved.
For me, the solution was to check Run with highest privileges in the properties.
In my case my task launches a PowerShell script--and it produced the "The operator or administrator has refused the request (0x800710E0)" error message as seen in the Task Scheduler's task-entry grid. My user name was correct, but when I dropped to a command prompt and simulated the task by running the PowerShell against my .ps1 file, I saw an Avast prompt that flagged my script as suspicious and wasn't allowing it to run. I created an Avast exception and now the task runs without any issue.
After turning on history I also had the error "Missed task start rejected: Task Scheduler did not launch task as it missed its schedule." but I didn't want the task to start when I woke up the computer, I wanted to figure out why the computer didn't wake up.
This answer helped me out -- by default Windows was waking for "Important Wake Timers Only" (system updates, but not my scheduled task).
In the setting Power Options > Edit Plan Settings > Change advanced power settings > Sleep > Allow wake timer change the option to "Enabled" and then your computer will wake up to run the task.
You can also do this from "settings". Probably earlier instance was already running and launching a new instance failed.
In my case, the error message "The operator or administrator has refused the request" appeared because the computer was in stand-by at the scheduled time (and the options "Wake the computer to run this task" and "Run task as soon as possible after a scheduled start was missed" were unchecked).
I had previously chosen "Enable All Tasks History" and a more useful error message appeared in the History tab: "Missed task start rejected: Task Scheduler did not launch task as it missed its schedule. Consider using the configuration option to start the task when available, if schedule is missed."
I have found what I believe to be a bizarre bug in Windows Server 2016 scheduler and maybe other Windows Server versions that produces the OP's error (and a workaround):
Here are the conditions:
You're using the "Monthly" option trigger in your task (I currently have all months selected and just a couple days chosen, e.g. 1st and 15th)
You have the "Synchronize across time zones" selected.
This was originally an issue I found back in November 2020 when my tasks were running twice all of a sudden after the DST time change (and this was a widely reported bug, but not an obvious solution). I never would have known, except that users started receiving duplicate emails from one of my tasks. In the history you would simply see the task running twice at what appeared to be exactly the same time. It worked fine before the time change. I forget all the troubleshooting I did then, but my end theory was that it was somehow confusing the time after the time change. The work around was to set the option "Synchronize across time zones" and all seemed well...
Fast forward to March when the DST time just changed back again and now I get every time the tasks with the Monthly option runs:
The operator or administrator has refused the request
The History tab on the task is also blank. If you change options and save, the History tab starts logging again and then sometimes stops if the task errors again. Weird.
One work around is to simply turn off the "Synchronize across time zones" option (tested). However, I don't recommend that option as I assume you'll have the duplicate running task issue again when the DST time changes again in November.
The one time I got an error to show in the History tab it stated:
Task Scheduler did not launch task "\EmailCampaign" as it missed its
schedule. Consider using the configuration option to start the task
when available, if schedule is missed.
Therefore, I went and set that option to start the task if the schedule is missed and all seems well. I figured I'd see the original error and then subsequently the task running, but no error any more either. It all just works.
I know this solution was reported above, but that's because most people's computers were asleep or something to that effect. My issue is on a production internet facing server that doesn't go to sleep, hibernate or anything related and only happens with specific conditions related to the Monthly trigger option. All my others tens of scheduled tasks work flawless.
I wrote a Powershell script to do a task. I was getting this error and landed here (as well as other lower ranked search results). The task would run manually and the first time it was triggered, but not on repeat even though I had it set up to end the task if it took longer than a minute.
My problem was caused by not providing an exit code in my powershell script. Task scheduler simply did not know the task had finished and would consider it still running. I could have simply allowed the next instance of the task to be started if the previous was not finished, but using the exit code is the 'right way'.
So I simply added a new line on the end of my PS1 --
exit
This topic is old but I had the same problem on windows server 2016.
My task executes a BAT script that zip a folder and upload on an external backup.
The task never ended because there was a "pause" at the end of my script. And my task was configured with "Dot not start a new instance" settings.
I solved my problem by removing the "pause". I don't know if it will be useful..

aws workflow re-run not working after some time

I wrote a workflow using aws flow framework for java. It is working fine. But I am facing an issue while trying to re-run this workflow after some time.
After registering this workflow's workers, re-run works fine till some time no matter how many times I try it but after that it suddenly stops working and gets stuck at DecisionTaskScheduled event and eventually times out. I checked the history and it shows "No Activities found for the given execution". Although if I manually re-register the activities, it again starts working. Please help me to fix this issue.
If a workflow execution is stuck at DecisionTaskScheduled event then workflow worker is not running or having some issue. I'm not sure what you mean by "registering workflow workers". Workflow type is registered only once and there is no need to reregister it. Workers are just running executing polls to SWF and processing decision tasks. Make sure that workflow worker is running and is not stuck for any reason.

How to prevent Azure WebJob from starting up after publishing?

We have an Azure Website setup with a "staging" deployment slot, and we use a continuous Azure WebJob to process long-running background jobs. It appears that when you publish to the Website (and include the WebJob binaries), that the WebJob will restart itself if it was previously stopped.
Our current deployment process looks like the following:
Deploy to STAGING
Immediately & Quickly stop the WebJob on
STAGING (try to prevent 2 WebJobs from processing messages)
Smoke test and verify code on STAGING works
Stop the PRODUCTION WebJob (let it drain off queue messages)
Swap between PRODUCTION and STAGING
Start the PRODUCTION WebJob (which was just the STAGING WebJob)
Is there a trick (say a flag file or something) to tell a WebJob NOT to start up after publishing?
To deploy a continuous WebJob in a stopped state simply add a file called disable.job at the root of your WebJob (binaries), this will tell the framework that the WebJob is currently stopped.
To view this behavior you can simply stop a continuous WebJob and see that this file is generated and placed at the WebJob's directory.
You can add Application Setting WEBJOBS_STOPPED to your staging slot and set it to 1. Make this setting 'Slot Setting' so that it is not swapped with production.
AFAIK, there is no out of the box solution for that. However, you can set an app setting and have the webjob code check for it when it starts. Also, you can use the HTTP_HOST variable to figure out the environment.

Spring Integration Pop3MailReceiver stops polling silently without logging why

Problem
I have a very basic configuration for a Spring integration mail adapter setup (below is the relevant sample):
<int:channel id="emailChannel">
<int:interceptors>
<int:wire-tap channel="logger"/>
</int:interceptors>
</int:channel>
<mail:inbound-channel-adapter id="popChannel"
store-uri="pop3://user:password#domain.net/INBOX"
channel="emailChannel"
should-delete-messages="true"
auto-startup="true">
<int:poller max-messages-per-poll="1" fixed-rate="30000"/>
</mail:inbound-channel-adapter>
<int:logging-channel-adapter id="logger" level="DEBUG"/>
<int:service-activator input-channel="emailChannel" ref="mailResultsProcessor" method="onMessage" />
This is working fine the majority of the time and I can see the logs showing the polling (and it works fine hooking into my mailResultsProcessor when a mail is there):
2013-08-13 08:19:29,748 [task-scheduler-3] DEBUG org.springframework.integration.mail.Pop3MailReceiver - opening folder [pop3://user:password#fomain.net/INBOX]
2013-08-13 08:19:29,796 [task-scheduler-3] INFO org.springframework.integration.mail.Pop3MailReceiver - attempting to receive mail from folder [INBOX]
2013-08-13 08:19:29,796 [task-scheduler-3] DEBUG org.springframework.integration.mail.Pop3MailReceiver - found 0 new messages
2013-08-13 08:19:29,796 [task-scheduler-3] DEBUG org.springframework.integration.mail.Pop3MailReceiver - Received 0 messages
2013-08-13 08:19:29,893 [task-scheduler-3] DEBUG org.springframework.integration.endpoint.SourcePollingChannelAdapter - Received no Message during the poll, returning 'false'
The problem I have is that the polling stops during the day, with no indication in the logs why it has stopped working. The only reason I can tell is the debug above is not present in the logs and E-Mails build up on the E-Mail account.
Questions
Has anyone seen this before and know how to resolve it?
Is there a change that I can make in my configuration to capture the issue into the log? I thought the logging channel adapter set to debug would have this covered.
Using version 2.2.3.RELEASE of Spring Integration on Tomcat 7, logs output default to catalina.out. Deployed on AWS standard tomcat 7 instance.
Most likely the poller thread is hung someplace upstream. With your configuration, the next poll won't happen until the current poll completes.
You can use jstack or VisualVM to get a thread dump to find out what the thread is doing.
Another possibility is you are suffering from poller thread starvation - if you have a lot of other polled elements in your application, and depending on their configuration. The default taskScheduler bean has only 10 threads.
You can add a task executor to the <poller/> so each poll is handed off to another thread, but be aware that that can result in concurrent polls if a polled task takes longer to execute than the polling rate.
To resolve this problem specifically I used the configuration below:
<mail:inbound-channel-adapter id="popChannel"
store-uri="pop3://***/INBOX"
channel="emailChannel"
should-delete-messages="true"
auto-startup="true">
<int:poller max-messages-per-poll="5" fixed-rate="60000" task-executor="pool"/>
</mail:inbound-channel-adapter>
<task:executor id="pool" pool-size="10" keep-alive="50"/>
Once moving to this approach we saw no further problems, and is with any use of pool the advantage is any Threads that become a problem are cleaned up and recreated.