Build a project without "Makefile.am", just using Autoconf & Autoscan? - build

I recently read that "There are several ways to configure and build a project using Autotools."
Among them:
Autoconf and Autoscan:
- Makefile.in with project build rules and Makefile substitutions
Autoheader (usable in addition to all other tools)
- scans the project and generates a config.h file during project
configuration with platform specific macro definitions, no configuration
files needed
How do you build a project without "Makefile.am"? Just using Autoconf, Autoscan & maybe Autoheader.

As the link says, Makefile.in is the template for Makefile which would just have #FOO# macros for configure (via AC_CONFIG_FILES) to substitute. If the project is really simple, I can imagine it would work OK without automake.
All autoscan and autoheader do is help you build primitive configure.ac and config.h files for your project. You aren't required to use them either.

Related

Maintaining Makefiles and CMakeLists.txt

When you're working to very big projects with a large amount of people, maintaining both Makefiles and CMakeLists.txt could be very difficult. I know that CMakeLists.txt could generate Makefiles, but suppose that I want to compile my code by using make and in the same time, use an IDE to have a kind of intellisense. How can I achieve it?
In the scenario that I'm describing, CMakeLists.txt files will disappear, so I won't have the chance to generate solutions with them.
CMake is not a build manager!
It is a generator of files for other build managers!
So you can generate project for IDEs (Visual Studio, Xcode, CodeBlocks, ..) or generate MakeFile, or whatever you prefer and CMake supports. So I do not understand why do you maintain CMakeLists.txt and Makefiles at the same time.
Just maintain CMakeLists.txt and then generate respective Makefiles from it.
For details see CMake Documentation - generators:
Command-Line Build Tool Generators
These generators support command-line build tools. In order to use them, one must launch CMake from a command-line prompt whose environment is already configured for the chosen compiler and build tool.
Borland Makefiles
MSYS Makefiles
MinGW Makefiles
NMake Makefiles
NMake Makefiles JOM
Ninja
Unix Makefiles
Watcom WMake
Bottom line you should be able to generate files for IDE or Makefile for you favorite build manager without any complications.
In the scenario that I'm describing, CMakeLists.txt files will disappear, so I won't have the chance to generate solutions with them.
WAT? You are doing something very strange and most probably wrong and you didn't provide any details abut that.
Concerning intellisense I would say:
Visual Studio 2017 as built-in support for CMake, see announcement
CMake can generate a json file with all commands see CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS
so you can use it to have smart clang based completion in vim
QtCreator as built-in support for CMake so you'll have completion too.
Extra tip at first: Do not try to mix both handmade make files and CMake over the whole time of the project.
The normal way is to create the make files using cmake. The extra of cmake is the cross platform and in your case the nativ support by some IDEs, eg. QtCreator, CLion(awaik). For a wide range of other IDE cmake can generate the project files.
Example Workflow using QtCreator:
Create a simple CMakeLists.txt, at least with the name of the project
Load this into QtCreator
Add source files, update the CMakeLists.txt from within QtCreator
Build from within QtCreator, repeat
But the same CMakeLists.txt will be used to create the make file on command line. Or on your build server or CI system.

Is it possible to force CMake generate Visual Studio project on other project type generation?

I have a CMake project. It is a crossplatform project developed by a team of developers. Visual Studio and other make files are inside version control for library release and external developers.
Each time a file is added we need to recompile all project files for all platforms. How do I force CMake to generate new project files for all systems at once (if possible from inside CMakeLists.txt, not as command line arguments)?
I think it doesn't make sense for this to be possible within the CMakeLists.txt file. CMake is a makefile generator. Everything in the CMakeLists.txt file is configuring the makefile, and it can also be repurposed to make project files.
If the CMakeLists.txt file could also request to generate a different kind of makefile... it would be different from every other command in the CMakeLists.txt file in that it isn't describing the currently selected makefile.
If I were you I would just make a shell script, or a simple makefile, separate from CMake, which rebuilds each of the project files, by invoking CMake from command line with appropriate parameters.
Is the goal of the versioned CMake produced build scripts to not force developers to install CMake?
In any case: it's best to use the right tool for the right job. CMake is for producing build-files and the little scripting necessary to do so. Use a scripting environment (Bash, cmd.exe) to run CMake as necessary for all your platforms.
This keeps the CMake files clean (and readable, CMake scripting is hard to read) and provides clean separation of concerns.

Configuring a CMake project with dependencies on multiple other CMAKE projects

I have a CMAKE project that depends on other projects built with CMAKE. These are : glfw, oglplus, portaudio etc.
How should I set up my project to work well in a cross platform fashion? What is the recommended way to go about it? I have been trying to read the CMAKE documentation but could only find examples to simple scenarios.
Just add the dependencies to your project README and expect the user stored them (already compiled) in system scope.
Add CMake options to request the path to dependency files.
Use add_subdirectory to chain your project with dependencies.

Generate Find Cmake automatically and install it for importing

Is there any way to create a FindXXX.cmake automatically where XXX is my Cmake project? I see many projects that they created their FindXXX.cmake manually but I believe it's possible to create it automatically.
And, where I should install my project on Linux?
Thanks!
Take a look at CMake's project config file mechanism (along with the CMakePackageConfigHelper module; you might also want to take a look at this wiki page).
Find scripts are most useful for locating dependencies that are not aware of CMake themselves. If on the other hand the dependency was also built using CMake, you can let CMake auto-generate a project config file for you as part of that project's build process. This config file will allow you to refer to the targets of that project from an enclosing project as if they were being built as part of the enclosing project's CMake run. This is even more powerful than using find scripts, as it allows for example distinct handling of configurations beyond the debug/optimized options available to traditional find scripts.
On Windows, projects generating config files this way will register themselves with CMake, so that depending projects building on the same machine can find them automatically without any additional configuration. If you are building on non-Windows platforms (or you are building the two libraries on different machines) you will have to place the config file in a default directory (the docs for find_package describe which directories are searched) or explicitly point CMake to the location using CMAKE_MODULE_PATH.
Modern CMake-aware libraries should always prefer this approach over traditional find scripts. A prominent example of a library that does this already is Qt5.
CMake supports templating with configure_file() command.
Standard dirs where CMake searches for FindXXX.cmake modules are listed in the documentation of find_package() command.

How to handle subprojects with autotools?

I have some C++ project build by autotools.
The project uses some libraries, also written by me. Source of libraries are imported to the project as submodules of git. Each library has its own autotools files.
Say, I have:
src/<my src files>
modules/libfoo/
libbar/
Makefile.am
Configure.in
<other autotools junk>
What I want is to somehow include libraries into main project compilation chain. I guess that just including subdir to Makefile.am is not enough, because some checks can be reformed in configure.am.
You can run the configure scripts in the sub-modules by adding the AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS command to the top-level configure script. It tells the top-level script to descend into the sub directories and invoke the configure script found there. Then, you can just reference the built libraries from your Makefile.am.
Read this section of the GNU automake manual.