i am using keycloak to login to my angular app instead of django rest API (simple token based authentication ) and i am following this below procedure and flow. so is correct? and i was using simple token(never expire) to for my django API from angular app, after implementing keycloak do i need to use jwt in angular app?
angular web page
click on login
went to keycloak login
login successful
and keycloak returned to angular app with access key, id token , refresh token etc..
what is the next flow , what i need to send to django API from angular app to verify the user if so how to do user.is_authenticated if user sigin up through keycloak because i dont have any user instance in my local django user model. what i need to send from django to angular my old token or keycloak token?
is there any django remote authentication required?
remote middleware required?
any help or suggestion please.
I am publishing a web application in WSO2 APP manager 1.0.0.After subscription, I am able to land on the login page of the application but once providing the credentials, blank page is seen.I would like to know if there are any configurations needed in the wso2 app manager for the server in which web app is running for invoking the web app properly.
When you say you were able to land on the 'login page' do you mean the login page of App Manager Login or the log in page of the Web App?
What are the errors/exceptions logged on the console?
If it is the App Manager log in page this could be related to incorrect service provider details recorded against the web application (Eg: incorrect Assertion Consumer URLs etc).
If you are referring to the Application's log in page, this could happen due to the App being secured with username/password.
When an App is secured, App Manager needs to send a JWT token as a HTTP header to the back-end Application once the user is authenticated.
In this case a few changes are required to be made in the App itself to support this.
The App should be modified to read the JWT token and identify the user and skip giving the login page.
The document [1] explains this in detail.
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/APPM100/Securing+Web+Applications+Using+JWT
I'm building an API using Django Rest Framework. Later this API is supposed to be consumed by iOS and Android devices. I want to allow my users to sign-up with oauth2-providers like Facebook and Google. In this case, they shouldn't have to create an account with my platform at all. But users should also be able to sign-up when not having a Facebook/Google account, for which I'm using django-oauth-toolkit, so I have my own oauth2-provider.
For external providers I'm using python-social-auth, which works fine and automatically creates the user objects.
I want the clients to authenticate by using bearer tokens, which works fine for users that signed up with my provider (django-oauth-toolkit provides authentication scheme and permission classes for Django REST Framework).
However, python-social-auth only implements session based authentication, so there is no straightforward way to make authenticated API requests on behalf of users that registered by an external oauth2 provider.
If I use an access_token that has been generated by django-oauth-toolkit, doing a request like this works:
curl -v -H "Authorization: Bearer <token_generated_by_django-oauth-toolkit>" http://localhost:8000/api/
However, the following doesn't work since there is no corresponding authentication scheme for Django REST Framework and the AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS provided by python-social-auth only work for session-based authentication:
curl -v -H "Authorization: Bearer <token_stored_by_python-social-auth>" http://localhost:8000/api/
Using the browseable API provided by Django REST Framework after authenticating with python-social-auth works just fine, only API calls without a session cookie don't work.
I'm wondering what the best approach is for this problem. The way I see it, I have basically two options:
A: When a user signs up with an external oauth2 provider (handled by python-social-auth), hook into the process to create an oauth2_provider.models.AccessToken and continue to use 'oauth2_provider.ext.rest_framework.OAuth2Authentication', now authenticating also users that registered with an external provider. This approach is suggested here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/django-rest-framework/ACKx1kY7kZM/YPWFA2DP9LwJ
B: Use python-social-auth for API request authentication. I could get my own users into python-social-auth by writing a custom backend and using register_by_access_token. However, since API calls cannot utilize Django sessions this would mean I would have to write an authentication scheme for Django Rest Framework that utilizes the data stored by python-social-auth. Some pointers on how to do this can be found here:
http://psa.matiasaguirre.net/docs/use_cases.html#signup-by-oauth-access-token
http://blog.wizer.fr/2013/11/angularjs-facebook-with-a-django-rest-api/
http://cbdev.blogspot.it/2014/02/facebook-login-with-angularjs-django.html
However, the way I understand it python-social-auth only verifies the token when doing a login and relies on the Django session afterwards. This would mean I would have to find a way to prevent python-social-auth from doing the whole oauth2-flow for each stateless API request and rather check against the data stored in the DB, which isn't really optimized for querying since it's stored as JSON (I could use UserSocialAuth.objects.get(extra_data__contains=) though).
I would also have to take care of verifying the scopes of an access token and use them to check permissions, something django-oauth-toolkit already does (TokenHasScope, required_scopes etc).
At the moment, I'm leaning towards using option A, since django-oauth-toolkit provides good integration with Django Rest Framework and I get everything I need out of the box. The only drawback is that I have to "inject" the access_tokens retrieved by python-social-auth into the AccessToken model of django-oauth-toolkit, which feels wrong somehow, but would probably be by far the easiest approach.
Does anybody have any objections on doing that or has maybe tackled the same problem in a different way? Am I missing something obvious and making my life harder than necessary?
If anybody has already integrated django-oauth-toolkit with python-social-auth and external oauth2 providers I would be very thankful for some pointers or opinions.
A lot of the difficulty in implementing OAuth comes down to understanding how the authorization flow is supposed to work. This is mostly because this is the "starting point" for logging in, and when working with a third-party backend (using something like Python Social Auth) you are actually doing this twice: once for your API and once for the third-party API.
Authorizing requests using your API and a third-party backend
The authentication process that you need is go through is:
Mobile App -> Your API : Authorization redirect
Your API -> Django Login : Displays login page
Django Login -> Facebook : User signs in
Facebook -> Django Login : User authorizes your API
Django Login -> Your API : User signs in
Your API -> Mobile App : User authorizes mobile app
I'm using "Facebook" as the third-party backend here, but the process is the same for any backend.
From the perspective of your mobile app, you are only redirecting to the /authorize url provided by Django OAuth Toolkit. From there, the mobile app waits until the callback url is reached, just like in the standard OAuth authorization flow. Almost everything else (Django login, social login, etc.) is handled by either Django OAuth Toolkit or Python Social Auth in the background.
This will also be compatible with pretty much any OAuth libraries that you use, and the authorization flow will work the same no matter what third party backend is used. It will even handle the (common) case where you need to be able to support Django's authentication backend (email/username and password) as well as a third-party login.
Mobile App -> Your API : Authorization redirect
Your API -> Django Login : Displays login page
Django Login -> Your API : User signs in
Your API -> Mobile App : User authorizes mobile app
What's also important to note here is that the mobile app (which could be any OAuth client) never receives the Facebook/third-party OAuth tokens. This is incredibly important, as it makes sure your API acts as an intermediary between the OAuth client and you user's social accounts.
Mobile App -> Your API : Authorization redirect
Your API -> Mobile App : Receives OAuth token
Mobile App -> Your API : Requests the display name
Your API -> Facebook : Requests the full name
Facebook -> Your API : Sends back the full name
Your API -> Mobile App : Send back a display name
Otherwise, the OAuth client would be able to bypass your API and make requests on your behalf to the third-party APIs.
Mobile App -> Your API : Authorization redirect
Your API -> Mobile App : Receives Facebook token
Mobile App -> Facebook : Requests all of the followers
Facebook -> Mobile App : Sends any requested data
You'll notice that at this point you would have lost all control over the third-party tokens. This is especially dangerous because most tokens can access a wide range of data, which opens the door to abuse and eventually goes down under your name. Most likely, those logging into your API/website did not intend on sharing their social information with the OAuth client, and were instead expecting you to keep that information private (as much as possible), but instead you are exposing that information to everyone.
Authenticating requests to your API
When the mobile application then uses your OAuth token to make requests to your API, all of the authentication happens through Django OAuth Toolkit (or your OAuth provider) in the background. All you see is that there is a User associated with your request.
Mobile App -> Your API : Sends request with OAuth token
Your API -> Django OAuth Toolkit : Verifies the token
Django OAuth Toolkit -> Your API : Returns the user who is authenticated
Your API -> Mobile App : Sends requested data back
This is important, because after the authorization stage it shouldn't make a difference if the user is coming from Facebook or Django's authentication system. Your API just needs a User to work with, and your OAuth provider should be able to handle the authentication and verification of the token.
This isn't much different from how Django REST framework authenticates the user when using session-backed authentication.
Web Browser -> Your API : Sends session cookie
Your API -> Django : Verifies session token
Django -> Your API : Returns session data
Your API -> Django : Verifies the user session
Django -> Your API : Returns the logged in user
Your API -> Web Browser : Returns the requested data
Again, all of this is handled by Django OAuth Toolkit and does not require extra work to implement.
Working with a native SDK
In most cases, you are going to be authenticating the user through your own website and using Python Social Auth to handle everything. But the one notable exception is when using a native SDK, as authentication and authorization is handled through the native system, which means you are bypassing your API entirely. This is great for applications which need to sign in with a third party, or applications which don't use your API at all, but it's a nightmare when both come together.
This is because your server can't validate the login and is forced to assume that the login is valid and genuine, which means it bypasses any and all security that Python Social Auth gives you.
Mobile App -> Facebook SDK : Opens the authorization prompt
Facebook SDK -> Mobile App : Gets the Facebook token
Mobile App -> Your API : Sends the Facebook token for authorization
Your API -> Django Login : Tries to validate the token
Django Login -> Your API : Returns a matching user
Your API -> Mobile App : Sends back an OAuth token for the user
You'll notice that this skips over your API during the authentication phase, and then forces your API to make assumptions about the token that is passed in. But there are definitely cases where this risk may be worth it, so you should evaluate that before throwing it out. It's a trade off between quick and native logins for your user and potentially handling bad or malicious tokens.
I solved it by using your A. option.
What I do is registering users that use a third party to sign up by their third party access token.
url(r'^register-by-token/(?P<backend>[^/]+)/$',
views.register_by_access_token),
This way, I can issue a GET request like this one:
GET http://localhost:8000/register-by-token/facebook/?access_token=123456
And register_by_access_token gets called. request.backend.do_auth will query the provider for the user info from the token and magically register a user account with the info or sign in the user if he's already registered.
Then, I create a token manually and return it as JSON for letting the client query my API.
from oauthlib.common import generate_token
...
#psa('social:complete')
def register_by_access_token(request, backend):
# This view expects an access_token GET parameter, if it's needed,
# request.backend and request.strategy will be loaded with the current
# backend and strategy.
third_party_token = request.GET.get('access_token')
user = request.backend.do_auth(third_party_token)
if user:
login(request, user)
# We get our app!
app = Application.objects.get(name="myapp")
# We delete the old token
try:
old = AccessToken.objects.get(user=user, application=app)
except:
pass
else:
old.delete()
# We create a new one
my_token = generate_token()
# We create the access token
# (we could create a refresh token too the same way)
AccessToken.objects.create(user=user,
application=app,
expires=now() + timedelta(days=365),
token=my_token)
return "OK" # you can return your token as JSON here
else:
return "ERROR"
I'm just not sure about the way I generate the token, is this good practice? Well, in the mean time, it works!!
Maybe django-rest-framework-social-oauth2 is what you're looking for. This package depends on python-social-auth and django-oauth-toolkit, which you already use. I quickly scanned through the documentation, and it seems to implement just what you are trying to do.
I was doing React Native with expo and Django with Django REST framework. This blogpost ended being the way I solved registration (signup) with facebook https://medium.com/#gabriel_gamil/react-native-expo-django-facebook-authentication-sign-in-83625c49da7
tldr; use django-rest-auth https://django-rest-auth.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html
use Django-allauth https://django-allauth.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
I'd created a django project for sign in with google using django-social-auth.
I'd followed the doc and created an app in google developer console with "OAuth 2.0" and added API's of
Gmail API, Google+ API, Google+ Domains API and Google+ Hangouts API
In Credentials I've set up AUTHORIZED REDIRECT URIS to my production server url "mysite.com".
I'd configured django settings with the "CLIENT ID" and "CLIENT SECRET". This set up works perfectly on my local server, user is created and the email is associated for the user.
But when I moved to the production server, I get the error
"400. That’s an error. OpenID auth request contains an unregistered domain: mysite.com".
Did any one else faces a similar issue?
I also had the similar issue and I fixed it as follows:
If your google login URL is /login/google/, change it to /login/google-oauth2/
Add the following redirect URIs in your google app settings
http://<your domain>/<social-auth-prefix-if-any>/complete/google-oauth2/
http://<your domain>/<social-auth-prefix-if-any>/associate/complete/google-oauth2/
Hope this helps.
I have a django application built for an organization. But, all the users have accounts in the organization's google apps. We have been keeping two separate user accounts for them (google apps and the django app), which is not very neat. Their django username is the same as their google apps username (the part before #domain.com).
I want to simply change the login page of my django app so that redirects to google apps for authentication (ie, openid type login). Additionally, when they are logged in I would like it to return the User with the same username, so that way existing users are logged into their original accounts (since they have stuff saved under those accounts). And new users will just have a new django account created with that username.
Not sure if anyone is familiar with googleappsauth. Its a django module to allow openid login to a google apps domain. This seems perfect for me. But, its telling me I need an openid endpoint defined. The documentation does not seem to indicate that that is required, but I'm not very familiar with OpenID so I'm kind of stuck??
GOOGLE_OPENID_ENDPOINT = 'https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/ud'
To get the Google OpenID endpoint, perform discovery by sending either a GET or HEAD HTTP request to https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id. When using a GET, we recommend setting the Accept header to application/xrds+xml. Google returns an XRDS document containing an OpenID provider endpoint URL.The endpoint address is annotated as:
<Service priority="0">
<Type>http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0/server</Type>
<URI>{Google's login endpoint URI}</URI>
</Service>
from: code.google.com
You can also use:
https://google.com/accounts/o8/site-xrds?hd=<domain>
However, be aware that this causes some problems if you use python-openid. Patches are available.