Named queries in webservices - web-services

I want to retrieve all records with shelfId=1 and between two dates. I wrote a query like this in my webservice Its not working. can anyone please correct this one.
#NamedQuery(name = "BinEnvironment.BinEnvironmentByStartDateEndDate", query = "SELECT b FROM BinEnvironment b where shelfId ='?1' and dateTime between '1?' and '?2'")
Reply as soon as possible
Regards
Hema

There is a problem with your parameter declaration: you are trying to use the same param for shelfId and dateTime.
The declaration of parameters for the between case shoudl probably be between '?2' and '?3.
Please note the correct syntax (use ?1 instead of 1?):
Input parameters are designated by the question mark (?) prefix followed by an integer. For example: ?1.

Related

How to get and update Django object in one query?

To optimize a lot my database I would like to make as less as possible any query.
I'm trying to get an object, increment the field "count_limit" and make an If statement after on the Customer instance.
To achieve it I've made this query who worked well.
Customer.objects.filter(user=user).update(count_limit=F('count_limit') + 1)
So after this query, count_limit has been incremented by 1 as I wanted.
When I'm trying to get the Customer instance as a result of this query, it returns "1".
Is it possible to make both, update the instance and get it as a return object ?
Thanks a lot
The update() method will return the number of updated rows. If you are using Postgres, then you can use the returning clause with the raw query.
query = 'UPDATE customer SET count_limit=(customer.count_limit + 1) WHERE customer.user_id=%s returning *'
updated_obj = Customer.objects.raw(query, [user.id])
I don't know if this can be achieved by ORM, but suggestions will be appreciated.
Make sure that the table name in raw query is correct. If you haven't definer db_table in the meta class of your model, then by default it will be myapp_model.
And to prevent SQL injection, from the Docs:
Do not use string formatting on raw queries or quote placeholders in
your SQL strings!
Follow Docs on raw()
You are looking for F functions: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.0/ref/models/expressions/#f-expressions
Example from their documentation how to increase a counter
from django.db.models import F
reporter = Reporters.objects.get(name='Tintin')
reporter.stories_filed = F('stories_filed') + 1
reporter.save()

Get all fields from DB where value contains number using Django

How to get all field from DB where value have number?
Example valid: 1test, tes1t, test1
I suppose something like this: field__contains
You can do this with a regex query.
Model.objects.filter(value__regex=r'\d')
Use icontains: django docs.
objs = Model.objects.filter(value__icontains="1")
The equivalent of doing an sql ILIKE "%1%" (case insensitive)
contains may work just as well actually if it's a number, that's a simple LIKE
Edit: To answer your comment yes you'd need to loop over the numbers. See this question

Django startswith on fields

let's say that I have an Address model with a postcode field. I can lookup addresses with postcode starting with "123" with this line:
Address.objects.filter(postcode__startswith="123")
Now, I need to do this search the "other way around". I have an Address model with a postcode_prefix field, and I need to retrieve all the addresses for which postcode_prefix is a prefix of a given code, like "12345". So if in my db I had 2 addresses with postcode_prefix = "123" and "234", only the first one would be returned.
Something like:
Address.objects.filter("12345".startswith(postcode_prefix))
The problem is that this doesn't work.
The only solution I can come up with is to perform a filter on the first char, like:
Address.objects.filter(postcode_prefix__startswith="12345"[0])
and then, when I get the results, make a list comprehension that filters them properly, like this:
results = [r for r in results if "12345".startswith(r.postcode_prefix)]
Is there a better way to do it in django?
Edit: This does not answer the original question but how to word a query the other way around.
I think what you are trying to do with your "something like" line is properly written as this:
Address.objects.filter(postcode__startswith=postcode_prefix)
In SQL terms, what you want to achieve reads like ('12345' is the postcode you are searching for):
SELECT *
FROM address
WHERE '12345' LIKE postcode_prefix||'%'
This is not really a standard query and I do not see any possibility to achieve this in Django using only get()/filter().
However, Django offers a way to provide additional SQL clauses with extra():
postcode = '12345'
Address.objects.extra(where=["%s LIKE postcode_prefix||'%%'"], params=[postcode])
Please see the Django documentation on extra() for further reference. Also note that the extra contains pure SQL, so you need to make sure that the clause is valid for your database.
Hope this works for you.
Bit of a mouthful but you can do this by annotating your search value and then filtering against it. All happens pretty quickly in-database.
from django.db.models import Value as V, F, CharField
Address.objects.exclude(
postcode_prefix=''
).annotate(
postcode=Value('12345', output_field=CharField())
).filter(
postcode__startswith=F('postcode_prefix')
)
The exclude is only necessary if postcode_prefix can be empty. This would result in an SQL like '%', which would match every postcode.
I'm sure you could do this via a nice templated function these days too... But this is clean enough for me.
A possible alternative. (Have no idea how it compares to the accepted solution with a column as the second param to like, in execution time)
q=reduce(lambda a,b:a|b, [Q(postcode__startswith=postcode[:i+1]) for i in range(len(postcode))])
Thus, you generate all prefixes, and or them together...
The raw SQL query that would do that you need looks something like this:
select * from postal_code_table where '1234567' like postal_code||'%'
This query will select any postal_code from your table that is a substring of '1234567' and also must start from begining, ie: '123', '1234', etc.
Now to implement this in Django, the preferred method is using a custom look up:
from django.db.models.fields import Field
from django.db.models import Lookup
#Field.register_lookup
class LowerStartswithContainedBy(Lookup):
'''Postgres LIKE query statement'''
lookup_name = 'istartswithcontainedby'
def as_sql(self, compiler, connection):
lhs, lhs_params = self.process_lhs(compiler, connection)
rhs, rhs_params = self.process_rhs(compiler, connection)
params = lhs_params + rhs_params
return f"LOWER({rhs}) LIKE LOWER({lhs}) || '%%'", params
Now you can write a django query such as the following:
PostCode.objects.filter(code__istartswithcontainedby='1234567')
Similarly, if you are just looking for substring and do not require the startswith condition, simply modify the return line of as_sql method to the following:
return f"LOWER({rhs}) LIKE '%%' || LOWER({lhs}) || '%%'", params
For more detailed explanation, see my git gist Django custom lookup
A. If not the issue https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13363,
you could do this:
queryset.extra(select={'myconst': "'this superstring is myconst value'"}).filter(myconst__contains=F('myfield'))
Maybe, they will fix an issue and it can work.
B. If not the issue 16731 (sorry not providing full url, not enough rep, see another ticket above) you could filter by fields that added with '.annotate', with creation of custom aggreation function, like here:
http://coder.cl/2011/09/custom-aggregates-on-django/
C. Last and successful. I have managed to do this using monkeypatching of the following:
django.db.models.sql.Query.query_terms
django.db.models.fields.Field.get_prep_lookup
django.db.models.fields.Field.get_db_prep_lookup
django.db.models.sql.where.WhereNode.make_atom
Just defined custom lookup '_starts', which has reverse logic of '_startswith'

How To Utilize Doctrine2 Type Conversion on Native Query COLUMNS

Could not find anything on this-- seems like it should be straight forward though.
So the example the Doctrine2 docs give for type conversion on bound parameters looks like this:
$date = new \DateTime("2011-03-05 14:00:21");
$stmt = $conn->prepare("SELECT * FROM articles WHERE publish_date > ?");
$stmt->bindValue(1, $date, "datetime");
$stmt->execute();
What I want to do is specify the type conversion for one of the columns, but there is nothing in the documents or on StackOverflow that I could find. A pseudo-example of what this might look like:
$stmt = $conn -> prepare("SELECT datetime FROM articles WHERE id = 1");
$stmt -> setType(0, "date_type"); // 0 being the column position, "date_type" being the PHP type to convert to
If anybody knows how to do this, (this is SQL not DQL), I would greatly appreciate. Thank you.
This is not something that works at DBAL level. If you are using NativeSQL Queries in ORM, you can get that kind of conversion through hydration (see the NativeSQL section in the Doctrine ORM documentation) by using the HYDRATE_ARRAY mode and mapping some of the fetched fields to an entity. The fastest solution (if you don't intend to use ORM) is to iterate over the results and applying the type conversion manually by accessing Doctrine\DBAL\Types\Type::getType($someType)->convertToPhpValue($fetchedValue). It could be a valuable addition to ORM to be able to specify a third parameter stating the fetched type in Doctrine\ORM\Query\ResultSetMapping#addScalarResult.

Django Nested Filter Values

This line works and returns the value that I'm looking for:
logs = Log.objects.filter(filterURI=aFilter.uri).values()[0]['yk']
However, when I try to add another filter and do the same I get errors:
logs = Log.objects.filter(filterURI=aFilter.uri).filter(k=k-1).values()[0]['yk']
My understanding is that a object.filter returns a queryset but so does a 'filter of a filter'. So I should be able to do the 'values' call in the same way regardless of whether I have one filter or 1000.
What am I doing wrong here.
Thanks in advance.
I don't think the error is in the fact that you have two filters - it's in the actual second filter. k=k-1 will only work if you have both a model field and a local variable called k - the first is on the left of the expression, the second on the right.
If you want to refer to the model field on the right of the expression, use F:
.filter(k=(F('k')-1)