I am trying to output a three way frequency table. I am able to do this (roughly) with proc freq, but would like the control for variable to be joined. I thought proc tabulate would be a good way to customize the output. Basically I want to fill in the cells with frequency, and then customize the percents at a later time. So, have count and column percent in each cell. Is that doable with proc tabulate?
Right now I have:
proc freq data=have;
table group*age*level / norow nopercent;
run;
that gives me e.g.:
What I want:
Here is the code I am using:
proc tabulate data=ex1;
class age level group;
var age;
table age='Age Category',
mean=' '*group=''*level=''*F=10./ RTS=13.;
run;
Thanks!
You can certainly get close to that. You can't really get in 'one' cell, it needs to write each thing out to a different cell, but theoretically with some complex formatting (probably using CSS) you could remove the borders.
You can't use VAR and CLASS together, but since you're just doing percents, you don't need to use MEAN - you should just use N and COLPCTN. If you're dealing with already summarized data, you may need to do this differently - if so then post an example of your dataset (but that wouldn't work in PROC FREQ either without a FREQ statement).
data have;
do _t = 1 to 100;
age = ceil(3*rand('Uniform'));
group = floor(2*rand('Uniform'));
level = floor(5*rand('Uniform'));
output;
end;
drop _t;
run;
proc tabulate data=have;
class age level group;
table age='Age Category',
group=''*level=''*(n='n' colpctn='p')*F=10./ RTS=13.;
run;
This puts N and P (n and column %) in separate adjacent cells inside a single level.
Related
I'm a beginner in SAS and i have difficulties with this exercice:
I have a very simple table with 2 columns and three lines
I try to find the request that will return me the name of the most little people (so it must return titi)
All what I found is to return the most little size (157) but i don't want this, I want the name related to the most little value!
Could you help me please?
Larapa
A SQL having clause is a good one for this. SAS will automatically summarize the data and merge it back to the original table, giving you one a one-line table with the name of the smallest value of taille.
proc sql noprint;
create table want as
select nom
from have
having taille = min(taille)
;
quit;
Here are some other ways you can do it:
Using PROC MEANS:
proc means data=have noprint;
id nom;
output out=want
min(taille) = min_taille;
run;
Using sort and a data step to keep only the first observation:
proc sort data=have;
by taille;
run;
data want;
set have;
if(_N_ = 1);
run;
I'm doing a simple count of occurrences of a by-variable within a class variable, but cannot find a way to rename the total count across class variables. At the moment, the output dataset includes counts for all cluster2 within each group as well as the total count across all groups (i.e. the class variable used). However, the counts within classes are named, while the total is shown by an empty string.
Code:
proc means data=seeds noprint;
class group;
by cluster2;
id label2;
output out=seeds_counts (drop= _type_ _freq_) n(id)=count;
run;
Example of output file:
cluster2 group label2 count
7 area 1 20
7 sa area 1 15
7 sb area 1 5
15 area 15 42
15 sa area 15 18
....
Naturally, renaming the emtpy string to "Total" could be accomplished in a separate datastep, but I would like to do it directly in the Proc Means-step. It should be simple and trivial, but I haven't found a way so far. Afterwards, I want to transpose the dataset, which means that the emtpy string has to be changed, or it will be dropped in the proc transpose.
I don't know of a way to do it directly, but you can sort-of-cheat: you can tell SAS to show "Total" instead of missing.
proc format;
value $MissTotalF
' ' = 'Total'
other = [$CHAR12.];
quit;
proc means data=sashelp.class noprint;
class sex;
id age;
output out=sex_counts (drop= _type_ _freq_) n(age)=count;
format sex $MissTotalF.;
run;
For example. I'd also recommend using PROC TABULATE instead of PROC MEANS if you're just going for counts, though in this case it doesn't really make much difference.
The problem here is that if the variable in the class statement is numeric, then the resultant column will be numeric, therefore you can't add the word Total (unless you use a format, similar to the answer from #Joe). This will be why the value is missing, as the class variable can be either numeric or character.
Here's an example of a numeric class variable.
proc sort data=sashelp.class out=class;
by sex;
run;
proc means data=class noprint;
class age;
by sex;
output out=class_counts (drop= _:) n=count;
run;
Using proc tabulate can display the result pretty much how you want it, however the output dataset will have the same missing values, so won't really help. Here's a couple of examples.
proc tabulate data=class out=class_tabulate1 (drop=_:);
class sex age;
table sex*(age all='Total'),n='';
run;
proc tabulate data=class out=class_tabulate2 (drop=_:);
class sex age;
table sex,age*n='' all='Total';
run;
I think the best option to achieve your final goal is to add the nway option to proc means, which will remove the subtotals, then transpose the data and finally write a data step that creates the Total column by summing each row. It's 3 steps, but doesn't involve much coding.
Here is one method you could use by taking advantage of the _TYPE_ variable so that you can process the totals and details separately. You will still have trouble with PROC TRANSPOSE if there is a class with missing values (separate from the overall summary record).
proc means data=sashelp.class noprint;
class sex;
id age;
output out=sex_counts (drop= _freq_ ) n(age)=count;
run;
proc transpose data=sex_counts out=transpose prefix=count_ ;
where _type_=1 ;
id sex ;
var count;
run;
data transpose ;
merge transpose sex_counts(where=(_type_=0) keep=_type_ count);
rename count=count_Total;
drop _type_;
run;
I have the following problem. I need to run PROC FREQ on multiple variables, but I want the output to all be on the same table. Currently, a PROC FREQ statement with something like TABLES ERstatus Age Race, InsuranceStatus; will calculate frequencies for each variable and print them all on separate tables. I just want the data on ONE table.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
P.S. I tried using PROC TABULATE, but it didn't not calculate N correctly, so I'm not sure what I did wrong. Here is my code for PROC TABULATE. My variables are all categorical, so I just need to know N and percentages.
PROC TABULATE DATA = BCanalysis;
CLASS ERstatus PRstatus Race TumorStage InsuranceStatus;
TABLE (ERstatus PRstatus Race TumorStage) * (N COLPCTN), InsuranceStatus;
RUN;
The above code does not return the correct frequencies based on InsuranceStatus where 0 = insured and 1 = uninsured, but PROC FREQ does. Also doesn't calculate correctly with ROWPCTN. So any way that I can get PROC FREQ to calculate multiple variables on one table, or PROC TABULATE to return the correct frequencies, would be appreciated.
Here is a nice image of my output in a simplified analysis of only ERstatus and InsuranceStatus. You can see that PROC FREQ returns 204 people with an ERstatus of 1 and InsuranceStatus of 1. That's correct. The values in PROC TABULATE are not.
OUTPUT
I'll answer this separately as this is answering the other possible interpretation of the question; when it's clarified I'll delete one or the other.
If you want this in a single printed table, then you either need to use proc tabulate or you need to normalize your data - meaning put it in the form of variable | value. PROC FREQ is not capable of doing multiple one-way frequencies in a single table.
For PROC TABULATE, likely your issue is missing data. Any variable that is on the class statement will be checked for missingness, and if any rows are missing data for any of the class variables, those rows are entirely excluded from the tabulation for all variables.
You can override this by adding the missing option on the class statement, or in the table statement, or in the proc tabulate statement. So:
PROC TABULATE DATA = BCanalysis;
CLASS ERstatus PRstatus Race TumorStage InsuranceStatus/missing;
TABLE (ERstatus PRstatus Race TumorStage) * (N COLPCTN), InsuranceStatus;
RUN;
This will result in a slightly different appearance than on your table, though, as it will include the missing rows in places you probably do not want them, and they'll be factored against the colpctn when again you probably don't want them.
Typically some manipulation is then necessary; the easiest is to normalize your data and then run a tabulation (using PROC TABULATE or PROC FREQ, whichever is more appropriate; TABULATE has better percentaging options though) against that normalized dataset.
Let's say we have this:
data class;
set sashelp.class;
if _n_=5 then call missing(age);
if _n_=3 then call missing(sex);
run;
And we want these two tables in one table.
proc freq data=class;
tables age sex;
run;
If we do this:
proc tabulate data=class;
class age sex;
tables (age sex),(N colpctn);
run;
Then we get an N=17 total for both subtables - that's not what we want, we want N=18. Then we can do:
proc tabulate data=class;
class age sex/missing;
tables (age sex),(N colpctn);
run;
But that's not quite right either; I want F to have 8/18 = 44.44% and M 10/18 = 55.55%, not 42% and 53% with 5% allocated to the missing row.
The way I do this is to normalize the data. This means you get a dataset with 2 variables, varname and val, or whatever makes sense for your data, plus whatever identifier/demographic/whatnot variables you might have. val has to be character unless all of your values are numeric.
So for example here I normalize class with age and sex variables. I don't keep any identifiers, but you certainly could in your data, I imagine InsuranceStatus would be kept there if I understand what you're doing in that table. Once I have the normalized table, I just use those two variables, and carefully construct a denominator definition in proc tabulate to have the right basis for my pctn value. It's not quite the same as the single table before - the variable name is in its own column, not on top of the list of values - but honestly that looks better in my opinion.
data class_norm;
set class;
length val $2;
varname='age';
val=put(age,2. -l);
if not missing(age) then output;
varname='sex';
val=sex;
if not missing(sex) then output;
keep varname val;
run;
proc tabulate data=class_norm;
class varname val;
tables varname=' '*val=' ',n pctn<val>;
run;
If you want something better than this, you'll probably have to construct it in proc report. That gives you the most flexibility, but is the most onerous to program in also.
You can use ODS OUTPUT to get all of the PROC FREQ output to one dataset.
ods output onewayfreqs=class_freqs;
proc freq data=sashelp.class;
tables age sex;
run;
ods output close;
or
ods output crosstabfreqs=class_tabs;
proc freq data=sashelp.class;
tables sex*(height weight);
run;
ods output close;
Crosstabfreqs is the name of the cross-tab output, while one-way frequencies are onewayfreqs. You can use ods trace to find out the name if you forget it.
You may (probably will) still need to manipulate this dataset some to get the structure you want ultimately.
I have a dataset of about 800 observations. I want to get the frequency of 14 variables. I want to get the frequency of these variable by shape (an example). There are 3 different shapes.
An example of doing this one time would obviously be:
proc freq; tables color; by shape;run;
However, I do not want 42 frequency tables. I want one frequency table that has the list of 14 variables on the left side. The top heading will have shape1 shape2 shape3 with the frequencies of each variable underneath them.
It would look like I transposed the data sets by percentage and then stacked them on top of each other.
I have several sets of combinations where I need to do this. I have about 5 different groups of variables and I need to make tables using 3 different by groups (necessitating about 15 tables). The first example I discussed is one example of such groups.
Any help would be appreciated!
Using proc means and proc transpose. I give you some example. You can add more categories.
proc means data=sashelp.class nway n;
class sex age;
output out=class(drop=_freq_ _type_) n=freq;
run;
proc transpose data=class out=class(drop=_name_) prefix=AGE;
by sex;
var freq;
id age;
run;
data class_sum;
set class;
array a(*) age:;
age_sum = sum(of age:);
do i = 1 to dim(a);
a(i) = a(i) / age_sum;
end;
drop i;
run;
I've been trying to make my code more efficient and this is the original code, but I think it can be written in one step.
data TABLE;set ORIGINAL_DATA;
Multi=percent*total_units;
keep Multi Type;
proc sort; by Type;
proc means noprint data=TABLE1; by Type; var Multi;output out=Table2(drop= _type_ _freq_)sum=Multi;run;
proc means noprint data=Table1; var Multi;output out=Table3(drop= _type_ _freq_) sum=total ;run;
proc sql;
create table TABLE4as
select a.Type, a.Multi label="Multi", b.total label="total"
from TABLE2 a, TABLE3 b
order by Type;
quit;
data TABLE5;set TABLE4;
pct=(MULTI/total)*100;
run;
I am able to split up part of it, but I can't figure out how to get the PCT part in my code. This is what I have.
proc sql;
create table TABLE1 as
select distinct type, sum(percent*total_units) as MULTI label "MULTI",
MULTI/(percent*total_units)) as PCT
from ORIGINAL_DATA
group by type;
quit;
I had to edit some of the code but I think the general idea should make sense.
The main problem is I cannot call upon the MULTI column because it is just being created but I want to create a percentage of the total for each type.
The "SAS" way to do something like this is to use a CLASS statement with PROC MEANS. That will calculate statistics on all the interaction levels in the data (identified by the TYPE variable). The row where TYPE=0 will be the "total" value, representing the value of that statistic for the entire data set.
In your case, we can take advantage of the fact that PROC MEANS will create the output data set sorted by TYPE and by the variables listed in the CLASS statement. That means we can just read the first observation and save it's value for calculating percentages.
It's probably easier to just show some code:
data TABLE;
set ORIGINAL_DATA;
Multi = percent * total_units;
keep Multi Type;
run;
proc means noprint data=TABLE;
class Type;
var multi;
output out=next sum=;
run;
data want;
retain total;
set next;
if _n_ = 1 then do;
/* The first obs will be the _TYPE_=0 record */
total = multi;
delete;
end;
pct = (multi / total) * 100;
drop total _freq_ _type_;
run;
Notice that you do not need to sort the data before using PROC MEANS. That's because we are using a CLASS statement rather than a BY statement. The data step is using the first observation in the data set created by MEANS (the TYPE=0 record) to retain the total sum of your variable. The delete statement keeps it out of the result.
CLASS statements with PROC MEANS are very useful. Take a few minutes to read up on how the TYPE variable is calculated, especially if you try using more than one class variable.
You can skip the initial data step by using the WEIGHT option in VAR statement of PROC MEANS (this will effectively do the multiplication for you). You can also use PROC TABULATE instead of PROC MEANS, as tabulate can calculate the percentage. I believe the following code will produce your required output in one go.
ods noresults;
proc tabulate data=have out=want (drop=_: rename=(total_units_sum=total total_units_pctsum_0=pct));
class type;
var total_units / weight=percent;
table type, total_units*(sum pctsum);
run;
ods results;
If you need one step, maybe this will work, but it's not actually efficient, since it processes data twice, once for detail by TYPE, once for total.
proc sql;
create table TABLE1 as
select
d.type
, sum(d.percent*d.total_units) as MULTI label "MULTI"
, calculated MULTI/s.total as PCT
from ORIGINAL_DATA d,
( select sum(percent*total_units) as total
from ORIGINAL_DATA) s
group by type
;
quit;
For more efficiency, but in more than one steps you could simply replace tables withe views in your original code:
data TABLE; => data TABLE / view=TABLE;
create table TABLE4 => create view TABLE4