Can I call C++ code from Progress OpenEdge ABL? - c++

Is it possible to execute C++ code from within Progress ABL?
Specifically, I am looking to use the function SHGetKnownFolderPath (documentation here) to determine the location of the "Documents" folder on a Windows 7 machine that has the documents folder redirected to another location.
Or, is there an alternative way to determine this information without resorting to checking a registry key?

You can call external shared libraries and DLLs.
http://documentation.progress.com/output/OpenEdge113/pdfs/dvpin/dvpin.pdf
Section 3 "External Interfaces" is what you are looking for.
This http://dbappraise.com/ppt/shlib.pptx might also be helpful.
C++ is often problematic due to the way it names things. You might be better off building a "shim" using plain old C to bridge between OpenEdge and C++
Callling Windows system functions is usually easy though. Something like:
procedure SHGetKnownFolderPath external "pathToLibrary":
define parameter a as someType.
define parameter b as someType.
define return parameter x as someType.
end.

Check the "Programming Interfaces" document, "External Program Interfaces" section.
Also, some versions of ABL also support direct .NET calls as an option.

I was able to get this working in 10.2B after consulting some sources:
The C# solution, for a working example: https://stackoverflow.com/a/21953690/763102
Win32 OpenEdge samples, for translation examples: http://www.oehive.org/book/export/html/385.html
The difficult part for SHGetKnownFolderPath is the rfid parameter which needs to be passed by reference. C# has the annotation [System.Runtime.InteropServices.MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPStruct)] or the ref keyword. I couldn't figure out how to pass a reference of System.Guid due to Progress OpenEdge's limitations of external procedure parameter datatypes, so I performed a bytewise copy of a .NET Guid and passed that via MEMPTR. I apologize for leaning so heavily on .NET here.
Here is a working example that gets the provided known folder GUID, plus usage to get the Documents folder:
PROCEDURE SHGetKnownFolderPath EXTERNAL "shell32.dll":
DEFINE INPUT PARAMETER rfid AS MEMPTR.
DEFINE INPUT PARAMETER dwFlags AS UNSIGNED-LONG.
DEFINE INPUT PARAMETER hToken AS LONG.
DEFINE OUTPUT PARAMETER ppszPath AS LONG.
DEFINE RETURN PARAMETER result AS LONG.
END PROCEDURE.
FUNCTION prepareGuidPointer RETURNS MEMPTR(
pGuid AS System.Guid):
DEFINE VARIABLE lGuidBytes AS INTEGER EXTENT.
ASSIGN lGuidBytes = pGuid:ToByteArray().
DEFINE VARIABLE lGuidPointer AS MEMPTR NO-UNDO.
SET-SIZE(lGuidPointer) = EXTENT(lGuidBytes).
DEFINE VARIABLE ii AS INTEGER NO-UNDO.
DO ii = 1 TO EXTENT(lGuidBytes):
PUT-BYTE(lGuidPointer, ii) = lGuidBytes[ii].
END.
RETURN lGuidPointer.
END FUNCTION.
FUNCTION deallocatePointer RETURNS INT64(
pPointer AS MEMPTR):
SET-SIZE(pPointer) = 0.
RETURN GET-SIZE(pPointer).
END FUNCTION.
FUNCTION GetKnownFolderPath RETURNS CHARACTER(
pGuidString AS CHARACTER):
DEFINE VARIABLE lDontVerifyFolderFlag AS INT64 NO-UNDO
INITIAL 16384. /* 0x4000 */
DEFINE VARIABLE lUseDefaultUser AS INTEGER NO-UNDO
INITIAL 0.
DEFINE VARIABLE lGuidPointer AS MEMPTR NO-UNDO.
ASSIGN lGuidPointer = prepareGuidPointer( NEW System.Guid(pGuidString) ).
DEFINE VARIABLE lResult AS INTEGER NO-UNDO.
DEFINE VARIABLE lPathResponse AS INTEGER NO-UNDO.
RUN SHGetKnownFolderPath(
INPUT lGuidPointer,
INPUT lDontVerifyFolderFlag,
INPUT lUseDefaultUser,
OUTPUT lPathResponse,
OUTPUT lResult).
deallocatePointer(lGuidPointer).
IF lResult GE 0 THEN
DO:
DEFINE VARIABLE lStringPath AS CHARACTER NO-UNDO.
DEFINE VARIABLE lPathPointer AS System.IntPtr NO-UNDO.
ASSIGN lPathPointer = NEW System.IntPtr(lPathResponse).
ASSIGN lStringPath =
System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal:PtrToStringUni(lPathPointer).
System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal:FreeCoTaskMem(lPathPointer).
RETURN lStringPath.
END.
ELSE
UNDO, THROW NEW System.Runtime.InteropServices.ExternalException(
"Unable to retrieve the known folder path. It may not be available on this system.",
lResult).
END FUNCTION.
DEFINE VARIABLE lDocumentsGuidString AS CHARACTER NO-UNDO
INITIAL "~{FDD39AD0-238F-46AF-ADB4-6C85480369C7}".
MESSAGE GetKnownFolderPath(lDocumentsGuidString)
VIEW-AS ALERT-BOX.

Related

Lazy evaluation of Lauterbach macro - is it possible?

I'm currently writing some kind of a "skeleton" for tests to be performed using Lauterbach scripts.
In this skeleton I want to have a part in which all test specific definitions shall be done, e.g. functions to set breaks on, variables to be altered etc. This part shall be just near the top of the script file, so that other users do not have to go through the complete script file, changing values here and there.
Some of the variables that'll be used are defined function-local within the C-code to be tested. So, these become available to the Lauterbach script only once the scope of that function has been entered - which is deeply within the skeleton script code.
Is there a way to define a macro for these variables just way before the scope has been entered?
Let's give some example structure:
LOCAL &funcToTest // the function we want to test
LOCAL &varToBeSet // a variable within the function we want to alter
LOCAL &valueToBeSet // the value we want to set &varToBeSet to
... // some more definitions here
&funcToTest=someFunc
&varToBeSet=status
&valueToBeSet=1
... // some test code following here that sets up log files, screen areas
... // start the program to be tested etc.
IF (Register(PC)==ADDRESS.OFFSET(&funcToTest))
(
// OK - we've hit the breakpoint inside the function to test
... // Run to some point where we can set the local variable
Var.Set &varToBeSet=&valueToBeSet
... // Go on with the program and see what happens - this will be logged
)
The problem is that Lauterbach complains at the line &varToBeSet=status
with Symbol not found in this context - which is correct, because it is a local variable.
Looking at the symbols via View->Symbols->SymbolsTreeView (or by giving the command Symbol.List.Tree) I can find the symbol (in this particular case found under the node some_module.some_function.status). Clicking on it gives the information in the TRACE32 status status line \\some_app\some_module\some_func\status with type (auto STATUS), scope local, location stack.
Changing my script to read &varToBeSet=\\some_app\some_module\some_func\status instead of &varToBeSet=status, however, does not help much. In this case Lauterbach complains with no access to that symbol.
Is there a way, I can delay evaluation of the macro to some point where it is actually used instead of having it evaluated when it is defined?
Use quotes:
&varToBeSet="\\some_app\some_module\some_func\status"

v8::ObjectTemplate::SetAccessor and v8::Template::Set - Difference

I'm confused by the difference between V8 ObjectTemplate's Set and SetAccessor methods. My question has a simple context and 4 concrete sub-questions.
Context
Let's say I have code snippet that wants to provide a global object global to the targeting JS context. global has a property x, whose value takes int value. global also has a property log, which is a function. All the snippets are taken from V8's source, process.cc and Embedder's Guide to be precise.
HandleScope handle_scope(GetIsolate());
// Create a template for the global object where we set the
// built-in global functions.
Local<ObjectTemplate> global = ObjectTemplate::New(GetIsolate());
global->Set(String::NewFromUtf8(GetIsolate(), "log",
NewStringType::kNormal).ToLocalChecked(),
FunctionTemplate::New(GetIsolate(), LogCallback));
So this code snippet provides function log to the global. Then from the Embedder's Guide to accessors, it says
An accessor is a C++ callback that calculates and returns a value when an object property is accessed by a JavaScript script. Accessors are configured through an object template, using the SetAccessor method.
The code snippet follows:
void XGetter(Local<String> property,
const PropertyCallbackInfo<Value>& info) {
info.GetReturnValue().Set(x);
}
void XSetter(Local<String> property, Local<Value> value,
const PropertyCallbackInfo<Value>& info) {
x = value->Int32Value();
}
// YGetter/YSetter are so similar they are omitted for brevity
Local<ObjectTemplate> global_templ = ObjectTemplate::New(isolate);
global_templ->SetAccessor(String::NewFromUtf8(isolate, "x"), XGetter, XSetter);
global_templ->SetAccessor(String::NewFromUtf8(isolate, "y"), YGetter, YSetter);
Persistent<Context> context = Context::New(isolate, NULL, global_templ);
As I understand this code snippet, it's providing some integer value x to the global as the description goes.
Now,from the source of V8, I see ObjectTemplate doesn't have a Set method, instead, it's inherited from parent class Template. From Template's source code, it says:
/**
* Adds a property to each instance created by this template.
*
* The property must be defined either as a primitive value, or a template.
*/
void Set(Local<Name> name, Local<Data> value,
propertyAttribute attributes = None);
Questions
Template's Set method says it can set a primitive value to the instance of the template, then can I use Set to set x in the second code snippet instead of using SetAccessor?
If the answer to question 1 is true, then what's the difference for setting x between using SetMethod and Set? Is the difference being that any modification in JS to the property set by Set will not be reflected in C++?
If the answer to question 1 is false, then why can't I use Set on X?
From the description of accessors, it says it computes and return value. So does it mean we don't use SetAccessor to return functions? I'm confused because I mainly write JS and Haskell. Both languages spoils me to take functions as values.
Now I know it should be easy to verify all my assumptions by actually building the samples, but I have difficulties compiling the V8 source, hence I'm asking for any help.
Thank you in advanced for any effort!
1. Yes.
2. Set is the C++ equivalent (modulo property attributes) of:
Object.defineProperty(global, "x", {value: 3})
SetAccessor is the C++ equivalent of:
Object.defineProperty(global, "x", {get: function XGetter() { return ...; },
set: function XSetter(val) { ... }});
As you suggest, a consequence is that in case of Set, the C++ side has no way of knowing whether the value was changed from the JavaScript side.
3. n/a
4. The getter can return any value you want; in particular the value can be a function.

Changing model parameters by cPar in other module

I am using this module hierarchy :
Node: {udpApp[0]<->udp<->networkLayer->wlan[0]} and wlan[0]: {CNPCBeacon<->mac<->radio}
I have given some initial parameter in the ini file for udpApp as :
**.host*.numUdpApps = 2
**.host*.udpApp[0].typename = "UDPBasicApp"
**.host*.udpApp[0].chooseDestAddrMode = "perBurst"
**.host*.udpApp[0].destAddresses = "gw1"
**.host*.udpApp[0].startTime = 1.32s
**.host*.udpApp[0].stopTime = 1.48s
But at run time I want to change the startTime and stopTime for udpAPP[0] through CNPCBeacon module. Hence I changed CNPCBeacon.cc as:-
cModule* parentmod = getParentModule();
cModule* grantParentmod = parentmod->getParentModule();
cModule* udpmod;
for (cSubModIterator iter(*grantParentmod); !iter.end(); iter++)
{
//EV<<"get the modulde "<< iter()->getFullName()<<endl;
if (strcmp(iter()->getFullName(), "udpApp[0]") == 0)
{
udpmod = iter();
break;
}
}
cPar& startTime = udpmod->par("startTime");
cPar& stopTime = udpmod->par("stopTime");
And I am successfully able to receive the values of startTime and stopTime. However I want to change these value in current module, which is resulting in an error by following code:
udpmod->par("startTime").setDoubleValue(4.2);
Can anybody please suggest me a way to change it at run time.
Declaring your parameter as volatile should solve your problem. But for future reference I'll provide further explanation below
Volatile vs. non-volatile:
Here it depends how you want to use this parameter. Mainly via the .ini file you have two types of parameters: volatile and non-volatile.
volatile parameters are read every time during your run. That woule be helpful if you want this parameter to be generated by a built-in function, for example, uniform(0,10) each time this volatile parameter will get a different value.
On the other hand non-volatile parameters are read just one, as they don't change from run to run.
Using the volatile type parameter does not give you full flexibility, in the sense that your parameter value will always fall with in a range predefined in the .ini
Dynamic Variable (parameter) Reassignment:
Instead what you could do is use a more robust approach, and re-define the variable which stores the value from that module parameter each time you have to do so.
For example in your case you could do the following:
varHoldingStartTime = par("startTime").doubleValue();
varHoldingStartTime = 4.2;
This way the actual value will change internally without reflecting to your run.
Parameter Studies:
Alternatively if you want this change of the parameter to be applied to multiple runs you could use the advanced built-in approach provided by OMNeT++ which allows you to perform Parameter Studies.
I have explained here how Parameter Studies work: https://stackoverflow.com/a/30572095/4786271 and also here how it can be achieved with constraints etc: https://stackoverflow.com/a/29622426/4786271
If none of the approaches suggested by me fit your case, answers to this question altogether might solve your problem: How to change configuration of network during simulation in OMNeT++?
EDIT: extending the answer to roughly explain handleParameterChange()
I have not used handleParameterChange() before as well, but from what can I see this function provides a watchdog functionality to the module which utilizes it.
To activate this functionality first the void handleParameterChange(const char *parameterName); has to be re-defined.
In essence what it seems to do is the following:
Assume we have two modules moduleA and moduleB and moduleB has parameter parB. moduleA changes the parB and when that happens, moduleB reacts to this change based on the behaviour defined in:
moduleB::handleParameterChange(parB);
The behaviour could be re-reading the original value for parB from the .ini etc.

How to insert C++ variable into TCL script program?

In NS2, is there any way to embed a C++ variable into the TCL script? For example, in TCL, set routing protocol like this, set opt(rt) XXX XXX could be a variable which is defined in C++ program, such as
if(CONDITION==1)
XXX = "FLOODING";
if(CONDITION==2)
XXX = "AODV";
...
The easiest way is to use Tcl_LinkVar to couple the char* variable in C++ (std::string not supported) to Tcl. Like that, all you have to do is change the C++ variable and call Tcl_UpdateLinkedVar to allow Tcl to notice that the variable has changed. You do not need to use Tcl_UpdateLinkedVar if you never have any traces set on the variable, but they're actually quite a common mechanism so doing the call is advised. Be aware that Tcl_UpdateLinkedVar is a reentrant call to the Tcl interpreter; some care should be taken to ensure that any traces you run do not trigger a loop back into your codeā€¦
// Setup (done once)...
Tcl_LinkVar(interp, "XXX", &XXX, TCL_LINK_STRING|TCL_LINK_READ_ONLY);
// Your code ...
if(CONDITION==1)
XXX = "FLOODING";
if(CONDITION==2)
XXX = "AODV";
// Notify Tcl ...
Tcl_UpdateLinkedVar(interp, "XXX");
If you want the setting of the Tcl variable XXX to change the C++ variable XXX, you need to take extra care. Drop the use of the TCL_LINK_READ_ONLY and ensure that you always use ckalloc to allocate memory for the strings in XXX (because Tcl will use the matched ckfree to dispose of the old one when setting the C++ variable).

Is there an API to get the original variable values defined in OS

In the Windows System Properties | Environment Variables, there is a variable "AppStatus=status1".
There is an exe named MyApp.exe. In the implementation it changes the variable with the code.
int ret = putenv("AppStatus=status2"); // Change the environment variable.
If use API char * pStatus = getenv("AppStatus");, the returned value is "status2".
What I want to get is the original value defined in the OS ("AppStatus=status1") not in the process block. To implement this I can query the registry key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Environment\Path.
But it should be better if there is an API that supports it. Is anybody aware of it?
Just call GetEnvironmentVariable(). It works on the process state as maintained by Windows, not the CRT state modified by putenv().