Related
Using only Notepad++ with regex support I would like to extract some data from a txt file, representing geographic coordinates and organize the output like that:
-123456789 becomes -123.456789
123456789 becomes 123.456789
-23456789 becomes -23.456789
56789 becomes 0.056789
-89 becomes -0.000089
Tried this: (-?)([0-9]*)([0-9]{6}) but fails when input is less than 6 digits long
You will need 2 steps in notepad++ to do this. First, let's take a look at the regex:
(?<sign>-?)(?<first>\d+(?=\d{6}))?(?<last>\d+)
captures the necessary parts in groups.
Explanation: (you can lose the named grouping if you want)
(?<sign>-?) # read the '-' sign
(?<first>\d+(?=\d{6}))? # read as many digits as possible,
# leaving 6 digits at the end.
(?<last>\d+) # read the remaining digits.
see regex101.com
How to use this in notepad++? Using a two step-search and replace:
(-?)(\d+(?=\d{6}))?(\d+)
replace with:
\1(?2\2.:0.)000000\3 # copy sign, if group 2 contains any
# values, copy them, followed by '.'.
# If not show a '0.'
# Print 6 zero's, followed by group 3.
Next, replace the superfluous zeros.
\.(0+(?=\d{6}\b))(\d{6}) # Replace the maximum number of zero's
# leaving 6 digits at the end.
replace with:
.\2
You can do it with three steps :
Step1 : replace : (-?)\b(\d{1,6})\b with \10000000\2
Step2 : replace : (-?)(\d{0,})(\d{6}) with \1\2.\3
Step3 : replace : 0{2,}\. with 0.
The idea is simple :
In the first step comple all the numbers less than 6 length with 6
zeros before to insure the length should be more than 6
In the step two put the dot before the 6th number
Step three replace all the multiple zeros before the dot with just one
In the end the output
-123.456789
123.456789
-23.456789
0.056789
-0.000089
Check the three steps :
You could use a Python Script plugin available for notepad++:
editor.rereplace('(\d+)', lambda m: ('%f' % (float(m.group(1))/1000000)))
I work with text files, and I need to be able to see when the gps (last 3 columns of csv) "hangs up" for more than a few lines.
So for example, usually, part of a text file looks like this:
5451,1667,180007,35.7397387,97.8161897,375.8
5448,1053z,180006,35.7397407,97.8161814,375.7
5444,1667,180005,35.7397445,97.8161674,375.6
5439,1668,180004,35.7397483,97.8161526,375.5
5435,1669,180003,35.7397518,97.8161379,375.5
5431,1669,180002,35.7397554,97.8161269,375.6
5426,1054z,180001,35.7397584,97.8161115,375.6
5420,1670,175959,35.7397649,97.8160931,375.9
But sometimes there is an error with the gps and it looks like this:
36859,1598,202603.00,35.8867316,99.2515545,555.700
36859,1598,202608.00,35.8867316,99.2515545,555.700
36859,1142z,202610.00,35.8867316,99.2515545,555.700
36859,1597,202612.00,35.8867316,99.2515545,555.700
36859,1597,202614.00,35.8867316,99.2515545,555.700
36859,1596,202616.00,35.8867316,99.2515545,555.700
36859,1595,202618.00,35.8867316,99.2515545,555.700
I need to be able to figure out a way to search for matching strings of 7 different numbers, (the decimal portion of the gps) but so far I've only been able to figure out how to search for repeating #s or consecutive numbers.
Any ideas?
If you were to find such repetitions in an editor (such as Notepad++), you could use the following regex to find 4 or more repeating lines:
([^,]+(?:,[^,]+){2})\v+(?:(?:[^,]+,){3}\1(?:\v+|$)){3,}
To go a bit into detail
([^,]+(?:,[^,]+){2})\v+ is a group consisting of one or more non-commas followed by comma and another one or more non-commas followed by a vertical space (linebreak), that is not part of the group (e.g. 1,1,1\n)
(?:[^,]+,){3} matches one or more non-commas followed by comma, three times (your columns that don't have to be considered)
\1 is a backreference to group 1, matching if it contains exactly the same as group 1
(?:\v+|$) matches either another vertical whitespaces or the end of the text
{3,} for 3 or more repetitions - increase it if you want more
Here you can see, how it works
However, if you are using any programming language to check this, I wouldn't walk on the path of regex, as checking for those repetitions can be done a lot easier. Here is one example in Python, I hope you can adopt it for your needs:
oldcoords = [0,0,0]
lines = [line.rstrip('\n') for line in open(r'C:\temp\gps.csv')]
for line in lines:
gpscoords = line.split(',')[3:6]
if gpscoords == oldcoords:
repetitions += 1
else:
oldcoords = gpscoords
repetitions = 0
if repetitions == 4: #or however you define more than a few
print(', '.join(gpscoords) + ' is repeated')
If you can use perl, and if I understood you:
perl -ne 'm/^[^,]*,[^,]*,[^,]*,([^,]*,[^,]*,[^,]*$)/g; $current_line=$1; ++$line_number; if ($prev_line==$current_line){$equals++} else {if ($equals>=6){ print "Last three fields in lines ".($line_number-$equals-1)." to ".($line_number-1)." are equals to:\n$prev_line" } ; $equals=0}; $prev_line=$current_line' < onlyreplacethiswithyourfilepath should do the trick.
Sample output:
Last three fields in lines 1 to 7 are equals to:
35.8867316,99.2515545,555.700
Last three fields in lines 16 to 22 are equals to:
37.8782116,99.7825545,572.810
Last three fields in lines 31 to 44 are equals to:
36.6868916,77.2594245,581.358
Last three fields in lines 57 to 63 are equals to:
35.5128764,71.2874545,575.631
I got a little problem in SAS Content Categorization. I'm working with getting out two values. Value 1 and value 2.
I use predicate_rule, so when I click on the matched string in the program I get
ARGUMENT 0 [val1]: 4
ARGUMENT 1 [val2]: 4
ARGUMENT 2 [valName]: Score
In this example 4 is just an example of a value, but my problem is that when it stand 4+4 (no space between 4, + and 4) I can't get the latest value WITHOUT the plus symbol, so I get this out
ARGUMENT 0 [val1]: 4
ARGUMENT 1 [val2]: +4
ARGUMENT 2 [valName]: Score
I only manage to get the value printet correctly if there is space between the numbers and plus symbol.
I have now crateded two regex and two predicate_rules.
This one is for the first value (val1), called: Regex1
REGEX:[1-5]
This is for the seconed value (val2), called: Regex2
REGEX:\+[1-5]
I know that I get the plus symbol printed out because of Regex2, but I can't manage to get the latest value without typing it this way.
In the main concept I have created two predicate_rules. One that should manage the score which have space between the numbers and the plus symbol, and one that should manage when there is no space between.
#With space
PREDICATE_RULE:(valName,val1,val2):(ORDDIST_4, "_valName{valName}", "_val1{Regex1}", "+", "_val2{Regex1}")
#Without space
PREDICATE_RULE:(valName,val1,val2):(ORDDIST_3, "_valName{valName}", "_val1{Regex1}", "_val2{Regex2}")
valName only contains terms that should be in distance of the arguments so it matches correctly.
Thanks in advance.
I think you can look at altering your 2nd regex in the predicate_rule. Since you mentioned that text pattern like 4+4 is an issue. You could probably look into Positive lookbehind to solve the issue. Positive lookbehind will help you to select your group before your main expression without including it in the result.
Pattern like below could easily solve by Positive lookbehind:
4+4
4 + 4
4 +4
4 4
Try the following regex for the 2nd predicate_rule :
(?<=[\+ ])[\d]
Is it possible to increment numbers using regex substitution? Not using evaluated/function-based substitution, of course.
This question was inspired by another one, where the asker wanted to increment numbers in a text editor. There are probably more text editors that support regex substitution than ones that support full-on scripting, so a regex might be convenient to float around, if one exists.
Also, often I've learned neat things from clever solutions to practically useless problems, so I'm curious.
Assume we're only talking about non-negative decimal integers, i.e. \d+.
Is it possible in a single substitution? Or, a finite number of substitutions?
If not, is it at least possible given an upper bound, e.g. numbers up to 9999?
Of course it's doable given a while-loop (substituting while matched), but we're going for a loopless solution here.
This question's topic amused me for one particular implementation I did earlier. My solution happens to be two substitutions so I'll post it.
My implementation environment is solaris, full example:
echo "0 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 19 99 109 199 909 999 1099 1909" |
perl -pe 's/\b([0-9]+)\b/0$1~01234567890/g' |
perl -pe 's/\b0(?!9*~)|([0-9])(?=9*~[0-9]*?\1([0-9]))|~[0-9]*/$2/g'
1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 20 100 110 200 910 1000 1100 1910
Pulling it apart for explanation:
s/\b([0-9]+)\b/0$1~01234567890/g
For each number (#) replace it with 0#~01234567890. The first 0 is in case rounding 9 to 10 is needed. The 01234567890 block is for incrementing. The example text for "9 10" is:
09~01234567890 010~01234567890
The individual pieces of the next regex can be described seperately, they are joined via pipes to reduce substitution count:
s/\b0(?!9*~)/$2/g
Select the "0" digit in front of all numbers that do not need rounding and discard it.
s/([0-9])(?=9*~[0-9]*?\1([0-9]))/$2/g
(?=) is positive lookahead, \1 is match group #1. So this means match all digits that are followed by 9s until the '~' mark then go to the lookup table and find the digit following this number. Replace with the next digit in the lookup table. Thus "09~" becomes "19~" then "10~" as the regex engine parses the number.
s/~[0-9]*/$2/g
This regex deletes the ~ lookup table.
Wow, turns out it is possible (albeit ugly)!
In case you do not have the time or cannot be bothered to read through the whole explanation, here is the code that does it:
$str = '0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 19 20 29 99 100 139';
$str = preg_replace("/\d+/", "$0~", $str);
$str = preg_replace("/$/", "#123456789~0", $str);
do
{
$str = preg_replace(
"/(?|0~(.*#.*(1))|1~(.*#.*(2))|2~(.*#.*(3))|3~(.*#.*(4))|4~(.*#.*(5))|5~(.*#.*(6))|6~(.*#.*(7))|7~(.*#.*(8))|8~(.*#.*(9))|9~(.*#.*(~0))|~(.*#.*(1)))/s",
"$2$1",
$str, -1, $count);
} while($count);
$str = preg_replace("/#123456789~0$/", "", $str);
echo $str;
Now let's get started.
So first of all, as the others mentioned, it is not possible in a single replacement, even if you loop it (because how would you insert the corresponding increment to a single digit). But if you prepare the string first, there is a single replacement that can be looped. Here is my demo implementation using PHP.
I used this test string:
$str = '0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 19 20 29 99 100 139';
First of all, let's mark all digits we want to increment by appending a marker character (I use ~, but you should probably use some crazy Unicode character or ASCII character sequence that definitely will not occur in your target string.
$str = preg_replace("/\d+/", "$0~", $str);
Since we will be replacing one digit per number at a time (from right to left), we will just add that marking character after every full number.
Now here comes the main hack. We add a little 'lookup' to the end of our string (also delimited with a unique character that does not occur in your string; for simplicity I used #).
$str = preg_replace("/$/", "#123456789~0", $str);
We will use this to replace digits by their corresponding successors.
Now comes the loop:
do
{
$str = preg_replace(
"/(?|0~(.*#.*(1))|1~(.*#.*(2))|2~(.*#.*(3))|3~(.*#.*(4))|4~(.*#.*(5))|5~(.*#.*(6))|6~(.*#.*(7))|7~(.*#.*(8))|8~(.*#.*(9))|9~(.*#.*(~0))|(?<!\d)~(.*#.*(1)))/s",
"$2$1",
$str, -1, $count);
} while($count);
Okay, what is going on? The matching pattern has one alternative for every possible digit. This maps digits to successors. Take the first alternative for example:
0~(.*#.*(1))
This will match any 0 followed by our increment marker ~, then it matches everything up to our cheat-delimiter and the corresponding successor (that is why we put every digit there). If you glance at the replacement, this will get replaced by $2$1 (which will then be 1 and then everything we matched after the ~ to put it back in place). Note that we drop the ~ in the process. Incrementing a digit from 0 to 1 is enough. The number was successfully incremented, there is no carry-over.
The next 8 alternatives are exactly the same for the digits 1to 8. Then we take care of two special cases.
9~(.*#.*(~0))
When we replace the 9, we do not drop the increment marker, but place it to the left of our the resulting 0 instead. This (combined with the surrounding loop) is enough to implement carry-over propagation. Now there is one special case left. For all numbers consisting solely of 9s we will end up with the ~ in front of the number. That is what the last alternative is for:
(?<!\d)~(.*#.*(1))
If we encounter a ~ that is not preceded by a digit (therefore the negative lookbehind), it must have been carried all the way through a number, and thus we simply replace it with a 1. I think we do not even need the negative lookbehind (because this is the last alternative that is checked), but it feels safer this way.
A short note on the (?|...) around the whole pattern. This makes sure that we always find the two matches of an alternative in the same references $1 and $2 (instead of ever larger numbers down the string).
Lastly, we add the DOTALL modifier (s), to make this work with strings that contain line breaks (otherwise, only numbers in the last line will be incremented).
That makes for a fairly simple replacement string. We simply first write $2 (in which we captured the successor, and possibly the carry-over marker), and then we put everything else we matched back in place with $1.
That's it! We just need to remove our hack from the end of the string, and we're done:
$str = preg_replace("/#123456789~0$/", "", $str);
echo $str;
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 20 21 30 100 101 140
So we can do this entirely in regular expressions. And the only loop we have always uses the same regex. I believe this is as close as we can get without using preg_replace_callback().
Of course, this will do horrible things if we have numbers with decimal points in our string. But that could probably be taken care of by the very first preparation-replacement.
Update: I just realised, that this approach immediately extends to arbitrary increments (not just +1). Simply change the first replacement. The number of ~ you append equals the increment you apply to all numbers. So
$str = preg_replace("/\d+/", "$0~~~", $str);
would increment every integer in the string by 3.
I managed to get it working in 3 substitutions (no loops).
tl;dr
s/$/ ~0123456789/
s/(?=\d)(?:([0-8])(?=.*\1(\d)\d*$)|(?=.*(1)))(?:(9+)(?=.*(~))|)(?!\d)/$2$3$4$5/g
s/9(?=9*~)(?=.*(0))|~| ~0123456789$/$1/g
Explanation
Let ~ be a special character not expected to appear anywhere in the text.
If a character is nowhere to be found in the text, then there's no way to make it appear magically. So first we insert the characters we care about at the very end.
s/$/ ~0123456789/
For example,
0 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 19 99 109 199 909 999 1099 1909
becomes:
0 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 19 99 109 199 909 999 1099 1909 ~0123456789
Next, for each number, we (1) increment the last non-9 (or prepend a 1 if all are 9s), and (2) "mark" each trailing group of 9s.
s/(?=\d)(?:([0-8])(?=.*\1(\d)\d*$)|(?=.*(1)))(?:(9+)(?=.*(~))|)(?!\d)/$2$3$4$5/g
For example, our example becomes:
1 2 3 4 8 9 19~ 11 29~ 199~ 119~ 299~ 919~ 1999~ 1199~ 1919~ ~0123456789
Finally, we (1) replace each "marked" group of 9s with 0s, (2) remove the ~s, and (3) remove the character set at the end.
s/9(?=9*~)(?=.*(0))|~| ~0123456789$/$1/g
For example, our example becomes:
1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 20 100 110 200 910 1000 1100 1910
PHP Example
$str = '0 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 19 99 109 199 909 999 1099 1909';
echo $str . '<br/>';
$str = preg_replace('/$/', ' ~0123456789', $str);
echo $str . '<br/>';
$str = preg_replace('/(?=\d)(?:([0-8])(?=.*\1(\d)\d*$)|(?=.*(1)))(?:(9+)(?=.*(~))|)(?!\d)/', '$2$3$4$5', $str);
echo $str . '<br/>';
$str = preg_replace('/9(?=9*~)(?=.*(0))|~| ~0123456789$/', '$1', $str);
echo $str . '<br/>';
Output:
0 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 19 99 109 199 909 999 1099 1909
0 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 19 99 109 199 909 999 1099 1909 ~0123456789
1 2 3 4 8 9 19~ 11 29~ 199~ 119~ 299~ 919~ 1999~ 1199~ 1919~ ~0123456789
1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 20 100 110 200 910 1000 1100 1910
Is it possible in a single substitution?
No.
If not, is it at least possible in a single substitution given an upper bound, e.g. numbers up to 9999?
No.
You can't even replace the numbers between 0 and 8 with their respective successor. Once you have matched, and grouped this number:
/([0-8])/
you need to replace it. However, regex doesn't operate on numbers, but on strings. So you can replace the "number" (or better: digit) with twice this digit, but the regex engine does not know it is duplicating a string that holds a numerical value.
Even if you'd do something (silly) as this:
/(0)|(1)|(2)|(3)|(4)|(5)|(6)|(7)|(8)/
so that the regex engine "knows" that if group 1 is matched, the digit '0' is matched, it still cannot do a replacement. You can't instruct the regex engine to replace group 1 with the digit '1', group '2' with the digit '2', etc. Sure, some tools like PHP will let you define a couple of different patterns with corresponding replacement strings, but I get the impression that is not what you were thinking about.
It is not possible by regular expression search and substitution alone.
You have to use use something else to help achieve that. You have to use the programming language at hand to increment the number.
Edit:
The regular expressions definition, as part of Single Unix Specification doesn't mention regular expressions supporting evaluation of aritmethic expressions or capabilities for performing aritmethic operations.
Nonetheless, I know some flavors ( TextPad, editor for Windows) allows you to use \i as a substitution term which is an incremental counter of how many times has the search string been found, but it doesn't evaluate or parse found strings into a number nor does it allow to add a number to it.
I have found a solution in two steps (Javascript) but it relies on indefinite lookaheads, which some regex engines reject:
const incrementAll = s =>
s.replaceAll(/(.+)/gm, "$1\n101234567890")
.replaceAll(/(?:([0-8]|(?<=\d)9)(?=9*[^\d])(?=.*\n\d*\1(\d)\d*$))|(?<!\d)9(?=9*[^\d])(?=(?:.|\n)*(10))|\n101234567890$/gm, "$2$3");
The key thing is to add a list of numbers in order at the end of the string in the first step, and in the second, to find the location relevant digit and capture the digit to its right via a lookahead. There are two other branches in the second step, one for dealing with initial nines, and the other for removing the number sequence.
Edit: I just tested it in safari and it throws an error, but it definately works in firefox.
I needed to increment indices of output files by one from a pipeline I can't modify. After some searches I got a hit on this page. While the readings are meaningful, they really don't give a readable solution to the problem. Yes it is possible to do it with only regex; no it is not as comprehensible.
Here I would like to give a readable solution using Python, so that others don't need to reinvent the wheels. I can imagine many of you may have ended up with a similar solution.
The idea is to partition file name into three groups, and format your match string so that the incremented index is the middle group. Then it is possible to only increment the middle group, after which we piece the three groups together again.
import re
import sys
import argparse
from os import listdir
from os.path import isfile, join
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='index shift of input')
parser.add_argument('-r', '--regex', type=str,
help='regex match string for the index to be shift')
parser.add_argument('-i', '--indir', type=str,
help='input directory')
parser.add_argument('-o', '--outdir', type=str,
help='output directory')
args = parser.parse_args()
# parse input regex string
regex_str = args.regex
regex = re.compile(regex_str)
# target directories
indir = args.indir
outdir = args.outdir
try:
for input_fname in listdir(indir):
input_fpath = join(indir, input_fname)
if not isfile(input_fpath): # not a file
continue
matched = regex.match(input_fname)
if matched is None: # not our target file
continue
# middle group is the index and we increment it
index = int(matched.group(2)) + 1
# reconstruct output
output_fname = '{prev}{index}{after}'.format(**{
'prev' : matched.group(1),
'index' : str(index),
'after' : matched.group(3)
})
output_fpath = join(outdir, output_fname)
# write the command required to stdout
print('mv {i} {o}'.format(i=input_fpath, o=output_fpath))
except BrokenPipeError:
pass
if __name__ == '__main__': main()
I have this script named index_shift.py. To give an example of the usage, my files are named k0_run0.csv, for bootstrap runs of machine learning models using parameter k. The parameter k starts from zero, and the desired index map starts at one. First we prepare input and output directories to avoid overriding files
$ ls -1 test_in/ | head -n 5
k0_run0.csv
k0_run10.csv
k0_run11.csv
k0_run12.csv
k0_run13.csv
$ ls -1 test_out/
To see how the script works, just print its output:
$ python3 -u index_shift.py -r '(^k)(\d+?)(_run.+)' -i test_in -o test_out | head -n5
mv test_in/k6_run26.csv test_out/k7_run26.csv
mv test_in/k25_run11.csv test_out/k26_run11.csv
mv test_in/k7_run14.csv test_out/k8_run14.csv
mv test_in/k4_run25.csv test_out/k5_run25.csv
mv test_in/k1_run28.csv test_out/k2_run28.csv
It generates bash mv command to rename the files. Now we pipe the lines directly into bash.
$ python3 -u index_shift.py -r '(^k)(\d+?)(_run.+)' -i test_in -o test_out | bash
Checking the output, we have successfully shifted the index by one.
$ ls test_out/k0_run0.csv
ls: cannot access 'test_out/k0_run0.csv': No such file or directory
$ ls test_out/k1_run0.csv
test_out/k1_run0.csv
You can also use cp instead of mv. My files are kinda big, so I wanted to avoid duplicating them. You can also refactor how many you shift as input argument. I didn't bother, cause shift by one is most of my use cases.
I'm trying to find an algorithm which "breaks the safe" by typing the keys 0-9. The code is 4 digits long. The safe will be open where it identifies the code as substring of the typing. meaning, if the code is "3456" so the next typing will open the safe: "123456". (It just means that the safe is not restarting every 4 keys input).
Is there an algorithm which every time it add one digit to the sequence, it creates new 4 digits number (new combinations of the last 4 digits of the sequence\string)?
thanks, km.
Editing (I post it years ago):
The question is how to make sure that every time I set an input (one digit) to the safe, I generate a new 4 digit code that was not generated before. For example, if the safe gets binary code with 3 digits long then this should be my input sequence:
0001011100
Because for every input I get a new code (3 digit long) that was not generated before:
000 -> 000
1 -> 001
0 -> 010
1 -> 101
1 -> 011
1 -> 111
0 -> 110
0 -> 100
I found a reduction to your problem:
Lets define directed graph G = (V,E) in the following way:
V = {all possible combinations of the code}.
E = {< u,v > | v can be obtained from u by adding 1 digit (at the end), and delete the first digit}.
|V| = 10^4.
Din and Dout of every vertex equal to 10 => |E| = 10^5.
You need to prove that there is Hamilton cycle in G - if you do, you can prove the existence of a solution.
EDIT1:
The algorithm:
Construct directed graph G as mentioned above.
Calculate Hamilton cycle - {v1,v2,..,vn-1,v1}.
Press every number in v1.
X <- v1.
while the safe isn't open:
5.1 X <- next vertex in the Hamilton path after X.
5.2 press the last digit in X.
We can see that because we use Hamilton cycle, we never repeat the same substring. (The last 4 presses).
EDIT2:
Of course Hamilton path is sufficient.
Here in summary is the problem I think you are trying to solve and some explanation on how i might approach solving it. http://www.cs.swan.ac.uk/~csharold/cpp/SPAEcpp.pdf
You have to do some finessing to make it fit into the chinese post man problem however...
Imagine solving this problem for the binary digits, three digits strings. Assume you have the first two digits, and ask your self what are my options to move to? (In regards to the next two digit string?)
You are left with a Directed Graph.
/-\
/ V
\- 00 ----> 01
^ / ^|
\/ ||
/\ ||
V \ |V
/-- 11 ---> 10
\ ^
\-/
Solve the Chinese Postman, you will have all combinations and will form one string
The question is now, is the Chinese postman solvable? There are algorithms which determine weather or not a DAG is solvable for the CPP, but i don't know if this particular graph is necessarily solvable based on the problem alone. That would be a good thing to determine. You do however know you could find out algorithmically weather it is solvable and if it is you could solve it using algorithms available in that paper (I think) and online.
Every vertex here has 2 incoming edges and 2 outgoing edges.
There are 4 (2^2) vertexes.
In the full sized problem there are 19683( 3 ^ 9 ) vertexs and every vertex has 512 ( 2 ^ 9 ) out going and incoming vertexes. There would be a total of
19683( 3 ^ 9 ) x 512 (2 ^ 9) = 10077696 edges in your graph.
Approach to solution:
1.) Create list of all 3 digit numbers 000 to 999.
2.) Create edges for all numbers such that last two digits of first number match first
two digits of next number.
ie 123 -> 238 (valid edge) 123 -> 128 (invalid edge)
3.) use Chinese Postman solving algorithmic approaches to discover if solvable and
solve
I would create an array of subsequences which needs to be updates upon any insertion of a new digit. So in your example, it will start as:
array = {1}
then
array = {1,2,12}
then
array = {1,2,12,3,13,23,123}
then
array = {1,2,12,3,13,23,123,4,14,24,124,34,134,234,1234}
and when you have a sequence that is already at the length=4 you don't need to continue the concatenation, just remove the 1st digit of the sequence and insert the new digit at the end, for example, use the last item 1234, when we add 5 it will become 2345 as follows:
array = {1,2,12,3,13,23,123,4,14,24,124,34,134,234,1234,5,15,25,125,35,135,235,1235,45,145,245,1245,345,1345,2345,2345}
I believe that this is not a very complicated way of going over all the sub-sequences of a given sequence.