Consider this code:
#include <iostream>
class Base
{
public:
void Message()
{
std::cout<<"You are calling the function of class Base ";
}
};
class Derived : public Base
{
public:
void Message()
{
std::cout<<"You are calling the function of class Derived ";
}
};
int main()
{
Derived obj1;
obj1.Base::Message();
return 0;
}
These two lines of code:
Derived obj1;
obj1.Base::Message();
Call the class Derived which is derived from Base. The second line of code calls the Base class overridden function Message.
Why does the standard introduce obj1.Base::Message() when we can directly call the function Message with this code?
Base obj1;
obj1.Message();
Base::Message is necessary if you want to call that function on an object of type Derived. In the particular example you give, it's true that an alternate way of doing this is to use static_cast<Base&>(derived).Message(). However, in the case that Message is a virtual function, this won't work--you would always get Message from the most derived class.
One place where this is often used is if you are overriding a virtual function, but want to call the base function from within the derived one. For example:
class Base
{
public:
virtual void Message()
{
std::cout<<"You are calling the function of class Base ";
}
};
class Derived : public Base
{
public:
void Message() override
{
Base::Message();
std::cout<<"(and now for the Derived-only part of the message)";
}
};
This question already has answers here:
C++ multiple inheritance function call ambiguity
(3 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
I am inheriting from two classes. Both classes contain the same function name, but one being implemented and one being pure virtual. Is there any way that I can just use the one already implement?
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class BaseA {
public:
void DoSomething() {
value += 1;
std::cout<<"DoSomething():"<< value<<endl;
}
int value;
};
class BaseB {
public:
virtual void DoSomething() =0;
};
class Derived : public BaseA, public BaseB {
public:
Derived() { value = 0; }
// Compiler complains DoSomething() is not implemented.
// Can we just use BaseA.DoSomething()?
};
int main() {
Derived* obj = new Derived();
obj->DoSomething();
}
You need to define a function because DoSomething is a pure-virtual function in BaseB class. But you can call the DoSomething from BaseA class in your implementation:
void DoSomething(){
BaseA::DoSomething();
}
In a derived class If I redefine/overload a function name from a Base class,
then those overloaded functions are not accessable/visible to derived class.
Why is this??
If we don't overload the oveloaded function from the base class in derived class
then all the overloaded versions of that function are available to derived class
objects, why is this??
what is the reason behind this. If you explain this in compiler and linker level
that will be more helpful to me. is it not possible to support this kind of scinario??
Edited
For examble:
class B
{
public:
int f() {}
int f(string s) {}
};
class D : public B
{
public:
int f(int) {}
};
int main()
{
D d;
d.f(1);
//d.f(string); //hidden for D
}
Now object 'd' can't access f() and f(string).
TTBOMK this doesn't have a real technical reason, it's just that Stroustrup, when creating the language, considered this to be the better default. (In this it's similar to the rule that rvalues do not implicitly bind to non-const references.)
You can easily work around it be explicitly bringing base class versions into the derived class' scope:
class base {
public:
void f(int);
void g(int);
};
class derived : public base {
public:
using base::f;
void f(float);
void g(float); // hides base::g
};
or by calling the explicitly:
derived d;
d.base::g(42); // explicitly call base class version
The functions are available, you just need to call them explicitly:
struct A {
void f(){}
};
struct B : public A {
void f() {}
};
int main() {
B b;
b.f(); // call derived function
b.A::f(); // call base function
}
This question already has answers here:
Why does an overridden function in the derived class hide other overloads of the base class?
(4 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
Why won't the compiler call the base class function (parameterized one) through the derived class object? The derived class inherits the function from the base class, right?
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
class Base
{
public:
int fun() { cout << "Base::fun() called"; }
int fun(int i) { cout << "Base::fun(int i) called"; }
};
class Derived: public Base
{
public:
int fun() { cout << "Derived::fun() called"; }
};
int main()
{
Derived d;
d.fun(5);
return 0;
}
However, when I used the scope resolution operator, I got the desired output. Can anyone provide me a logical explanation behind this? Can I still call the base class function (parameterized one) through derived class object? Thanks!
int main()
{
Derived d;
d.Base::fun(5);
return 0;
}
The derived function Derived::fun() hides all members with the same name from the base class. So you can only use the base class member via scope resolution. To avoid hiding, you can do:
class Derived: public Base
{
public:
int fun() { cout << "Derived::fun() called"; }
using Base::fun;
};
How can I call a base class method which is overridden by the derived class, from a derived class object?
class Base{
public:
void foo(){cout<<"base";}
};
class Derived:public Base{
public:
void foo(){cout<<"derived";}
}
int main(){
Derived bar;
//call Base::foo() from bar here?
return 0;
}
You can always(*) refer to a base class's function by using a qualified-id:
#include <iostream>
class Base{
public:
void foo(){std::cout<<"base";}
};
class Derived : public Base
{
public:
void foo(){std::cout<<"derived";}
};
int main()
{
Derived bar;
//call Base::foo() from bar here?
bar.Base::foo(); // using a qualified-id
return 0;
}
[Also fixed some typos of the OP.]
(*) Access restrictions still apply, and base classes can be ambiguous.
If Base::foo is not virtual, then Derived::foo does not override Base::foo. Rather, Derived::foo hides Base::foo. The difference can be seen in the following example:
struct Base {
void foo() { std::cout << "Base::foo\n"; }
virtual void bar() { std::cout << "Base::bar\n"; }
};
struct Derived : Base {
void foo() { std::cout << "Derived::foo\n"; }
virtual void bar() { std::cout << "Derived::bar\n"; }
};
int main() {
Derived d;
Base* b = &d;
b->foo(); // calls Base::foo
b->bar(); // calls Derived::bar
}
(Derived::bar is implicitly virtual even if you don't use the virtual keyword, as long as it's signature is compatible to Base::bar.)
A qualified-id is either of the form X :: Y or just :: Y. The part before the :: specifies where we want to look up the identifier Y. In the first form, we look up X, then we look up Y from within X's context. In the second form, we look up Y in the global namespace.
An unqualified-id does not contain a ::, and therefore does not (itself) specify a context where to look up the name.
In an expression b->foo, both b and foo are unqualified-ids. b is looked up in the current context (which in the example above is the main function). We find the local variable Base* b. Because b->foo has the form of a class member access, we look up foo from the context of the type of b (or rather *b). So we look up foo from the context of Base. We will find the member function void foo() declared inside Base, which I'll refer to as Base::foo.
For foo, we're done now, and call Base::foo.
For b->bar, we first find Base::bar, but it is declared virtual. Because it is virtual, we perform a virtual dispatch. This will call the final function overrider in the class hierarchy of the type of the object b points to. Because b points to an object of type Derived, the final overrider is Derived::bar.
When looking up the name foo from Derived's context, we will find Derived::foo. This is why Derived::foo is said to hide Base::foo. Expressions such as d.foo() or, inside a member function of Derived, using simply foo() or this->foo(), will look up from the context of Derived.
When using a qualified-id, we explicitly state the context of where to look up a name. The expression Base::foo states that we want to look up the name foo from the context of Base (it can find functions that Base inherited, for example). Additionally, it disables virtual dispatch.
Therefore, d.Base::foo() will find Base::foo and call it; d.Base::bar() will find Base::bar and call it.
Fun fact: Pure virtual functions can have an implementation. They cannot be called via virtual dispatch, because they need to be overridden. However, you can still call their implementation (if they have one) by using a qualified-id.
#include <iostream>
struct Base {
virtual void foo() = 0;
};
void Base::foo() { std::cout << "look ma, I'm pure virtual!\n"; }
struct Derived : Base {
virtual void foo() { std::cout << "Derived::foo\n"; }
};
int main() {
Derived d;
d.foo(); // calls Derived::foo
d.Base::foo(); // calls Base::foo
}
Note that access-specifiers both of class members and base classes have an influence on whether or not you can use a qualified-id to call a base class's function on an object of a derived type.
For example:
#include <iostream>
struct Base {
public:
void public_fun() { std::cout << "Base::public_fun\n"; }
private:
void private_fun() { std::cout << "Base::private_fun\n"; }
};
struct Public_derived : public Base {
public:
void public_fun() { std::cout << "Public_derived::public_fun\n"; }
void private_fun() { std::cout << "Public_derived::private_fun\n"; }
};
struct Private_derived : private Base {
public:
void public_fun() { std::cout << "Private_derived::public_fun\n"; }
void private_fun() { std::cout << "Private_derived::private_fun\n"; }
};
int main() {
Public_derived p;
p.public_fun(); // allowed, calls Public_derived::public_fun
p.private_fun(); // allowed, calls Public_derived::public_fun
p.Base::public_fun(); // allowed, calls Base::public_fun
p.Base::private_fun(); // NOT allowed, tries to name Base::public_fun
Private_derived r;
r.Base::public_fun(); // NOT allowed, tries to call Base::public_fun
r.Base::private_fun(); // NOT allowed, tries to name Base::private_fun
}
Accessibility is orthogonal to name lookup. So name hiding does not have an influence on it (you can leave out public_fun and private_fun in the derived classes and get the same behaviour and errors for the qualified-id calls).
The error in p.Base::private_fun() is different from the error in r.Base::public_fun() by the way: The first one already fails to refer to the name Base::private_fun (because it's a private name). The second one fails to convert r from Private_derived& to Base& for the this-pointer (essentially). This is why the second one works from within Private_derived or a friend of Private_derived.
First of all Derived should inherit from Base.
class Derived : public Base{
That said
First of you can just not have foo in Derived
class Base{
public:
void foo(){cout<<"base";}
};
class Derived : public Base{
}
int main(){
Derived bar;
bar.foo() // calls Base::foo()
return 0;
}
Second you can make Derived::foo call Base::foo.
class Base{
public:
void foo(){cout<<"base";}
};
class Derived : public Base{
public:
void foo(){ Base::foo(); }
^^^^^^^^^^
}
int main(){
Derived bar;
bar.foo() // calls Base::foo()
return 0;
}
Third you can use qualified id of Base::foo
int main(){
Derived bar;
bar.Base::foo(); // calls Base::foo()
return 0;
}
Consider making foo() virtual in the first place.
class Base {
public:
virtual ~Base() = default;
virtual void foo() { … }
};
class Derived : public Base {
public:
virtual void foo() override { … }
};
However, this does the job:
int main() {
Derived bar;
bar.Base::foo();
return 0;
}
An important [additional] note: you will still have compilation errors if Name Hiding occurs.
In this case, either utilize the using keyword, or use the qualifer. Additionally, see this answer as well.
#include <iostream>
class Base{
public:
void foo(bool bOne, bool bTwo){std::cout<<"base"<<bOne<<bTwo;}
};
class Derived : public Base
{
public:
void foo(bool bOne){std::cout<<"derived"<<bOne;}
};
int main()
{
Derived bar;
//bar.foo(true,true); // error: derived func attempted
bar.foo(true); // no error: derived func
bar.Base::foo(true,true); // no error: base func, qualified
return 0;
}