Is "basic" a reserved route name in Ember? - ember.js

Question

I have a route in an Ember app called "basic" corresponding to the name of an API endpoint.
This route doesn't work - links to it don't render its template.
Here's a JSBin demonstrating the failure: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/hisoxadi/1
JS:
App = Ember.Application.create();
App.Router.map(function() {
this.route('basic');
this.route('test');
});
App.IndexRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return ['red', 'yellow', 'blue'];
}
});
Templates:
<script type="text/x-handlebars">
<h2> Welcome to Ember.js</h2>
{{#link-to 'index'}}Index{{/link-to}}
{{#link-to 'basic'}}Basic Route{{/link-to}}
{{#link-to 'test'}}Test Route{{/link-to}}
{{outlet}}
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="basic">
basic route is here
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="test">
test route is here
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="index">
<ul>
{{#each item in model}}
<li>{{item}}</li>
{{/each}}
</ul>
</script>

Answer 1

To expand on your comment a bit, basic is indeed a reserved word. Specifically, it's a reserved word for the resolver. You can see the source here.
useRouterNaming: function(parsedName) {
parsedName.name = parsedName.name.replace(/\./g, '_');
if (parsedName.name === 'basic') {
parsedName.name = '';
}
},
And because of the way that Ember.js sometimes looks up routes and controllers in the container, it's a fair bet to say that there's no way around this without major code changes. There should probably be a documentation issue filed for this.
EDIT: I created an issue for this here.