I have requirement on to find the duplicate elements in the input xml and sum the quantity with single record as output.
Input xml is:
<Input>
<A1>
<NAME>A</NAME>
<QTY>1</QTY>
</A1>
<A1>
<NAME>A</NAME>
<QTY>2</QTY>
</A1>
<A2>
<NAME>B</NAME>
<QTY>3</QTY>
</A2>
<A1>
<NAME>A</NAME>
<QTY>5</QTY>
</A1>
<A2>
<NAME>b</NAME>
<QTY>8</QTY>
</A2>
</Input>
output should be as below:
<Input>
<A1>
<NAME>A</NAME>
<QTY>8</QTY>
</A1>
<A2>
<NAME>B</NAME>
<QTY>11</QTY>
</A2>
</Input>
If you want to sum several nodes of type number you can use the XPath sum() function. This adds all your QTY nodes:
sum(//QTY)
If you just want to add the nodes that are below A1 you can use:
sum(/Input/A1/QTY)
or
sum(//A1/QTY)
which will have the same result considering the source you provided.
You can select the first A1 with the same name using
//A1[1]
So, to obtain the result you want you could match A1[1] in a template and call sum(//A1/QTY) or sum(/Input/A1/QTY) inside it to obtain the sum. Then you repeat the process with A2.
You can achieve this with two recursive templates:
The sum expression here obtains the value of the node * which may be A1 or A2. The XPath expression compares its name name(current()) with the name() of each child of Input (/Input/*), which will match either A1 or A2, adding the amount in the QTY of each node.
Related
I'm trying to simulate the copy-of function in XSLT where I want everything within a node outputted in the response.
Using this template
<#ftl ns_prefixes={"D": "http://milyn.codehaus.org/Smooks"} output_format="XML">
${Order.orderitem.##markup}
Facing 2 issues here
The output i get transformed the <, > as well of the XML tags. I do need XML formatting to escape invalid characters like & etc.
How can i remove the namescapes that appears in every node
My response is
<orderitem xmlns="http://milyn.codehaus.org/Smooks"><position>1</position><quantity>1</quantity><productid>364</productid><title>The 40YearOld</title><price>29.98</price></orderitem><orderitem xmlns="http://milyn.codehaus.org/Smooks"><position>2</position><quantity>1</quantity><productid>299</productid><title>Pulp Fiction</title><price>29.99</price></orderitem>
Input being
<Order xmlns="http://milyn.codehaus.org/Smooks" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchemainstance">
<header>
<orderid>1</orderid>
<statuscode>0</statuscode>
<netamount>59.97</netamount>
<totalamount>64.92</totalamount>
<tax>4.95</tax>
<date>Wed Nov 15 13:45:28 EST 2006</date>
</header>
<customerdetails>
<username>user1</username>
<name>
<firstname>Harry</firstname>
<lastname>Fletcher</lastname>
</name>
<state>South Dakota</state>
</customerdetails>
<orderitem>
<position>1</position>
<quantity>1</quantity>
<productid>364</productid>
<title>The 40YearOld</title>
<price>29.98</price>
</orderitem>
<orderitem>
<position>2</position>
<quantity>1</quantity>
<productid>299</productid>
<title>Pulp Fiction</title>
<price>29.99</price>
</orderitem>
To prevent auto-escaping: ${Order.orderitem.##markup?no_esc}. (Unfortunately XML wrapping way predates auto-escaping, so it has remained like so...)
Prevent repeated xmlns-es... you can't. The problem is that the orderitem-s has no common ancestor as far as ##markup can know, where a common xmlns could solve this, so it does the safest thing.
Below is my source schema
<ns0:xyz xmlns:ns0="http://abc/xyz">
<main>
<zzz/></zzz>
<yyy/></yyy>
</main>
<Lines>
<Line>
<LineNum></LineNum>
<Linerate></Linerate>
</Line>
</Lines>
and Below is my input file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<xyz xmlns="http://abc/xyz">
<main>
<zzz>12</zzz>
<yyy>11</yyy>
</main>
<Lines>
<Line>
<LineNum>1</LineNum>
<Linerate>0.5</Linerate>
</Line>
<LineNum>3</LineNum>
<Linerate>0.2</Linerate>
</Line>
<Line>
<LineNum>5</LineNum>
<Linerate>0.5</Linerate>
</Line>
</Lines>
I need to compare the line records and check if the Linerate element has similar value , then irrespective of the number of records in the source file , my destination file should have only 1 record with that particular Line rate value.
And for every distinct Linerate value , there should be respective record for it.
The Linerate value should be assigned to percent node in the destination
The Cumulative sum value of the LineNum value should be assigned to Amount in destination(if Linerate value is same across the records in the source)
Linerate * cumulative sum of LineNum should be assinged to AdditionalAmount in destination
Below is the expected output file
<LineSummary>
<Percent>0.5</Percent>
<Amount>6</Amount>
<AdditionalAmount>3</AdditionalAmount>
</LineSummary>
<LineSummary>
<Percent>0.2</Percent>
<Amount>3</Amount>
<AdditionalAmount>0.6</AdditionalAmount>
</LineSummary>
Below is the XSLT code used in my BizTalk Map.
<xsl:variable name="unique-LineRate" select="//Lines/Line[not(Linerate=preceding-sibling::Line/Linerate)]/Linerate" />
<xsl:for-each select="$unique-LineRate">
<LineSummary>
<xsl:variable name="LineSum" select="sum(//Lines/Line[Linerate=current()]/LineNum)" />
<Percent><xsl:value-of select="current()"/></Percent>
<Amount><xsl:value-of select="$LineSum" /></Amount>
<AdditionalAmount><xsl:value-of select="current() * $LineSum"/></AdditionalAmount>
</LineSummary>
</xsl:for-each>
If my source schema "ElementFormDefault" value is kept as unqualified or default, the I get an error as : Input validation error: The element 'xyz' in namespace 'http://abc/xyz' has invalid child element 'main' in namespace 'http://abc/xyz'. List of possible elements expected: 'main'.
If my source schema "ElementFormDefault" is kept as Qualified,then the XSLT doesn't work. I am sure it has to do something with the namespace issue or element tagging But i am not sure exactly where i need to make the change.
Do I need to prefix with the XPath or the namespace to all the elements in the XSLT?
I need to insert the line items on my XML to a Map or a flat XML in mulesoft. Iam planning to use XSLT but Im having only single values instead of multiple Line Items. Im not sure how the for each function works for this. any help would be appreciated.
Input
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><XmlInterchange xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" Version="1" xmlns="http://www.edi.com.au/EnterpriseService/">
<InterchangeInfo>
<Date>2016-02-29T05:56:10.272+05:00</Date>
<XmlType>LightWeight</XmlType>
<Source></Source>
<Target></Target>
</InterchangeInfo>
<Payload>
<WhsDockets>
<WhsDocket>
<Identifier>
<Reference>2370519</Reference>
</Identifier>
<DocketDetail>
<WarehouseCode>ROC</WarehouseCode>
<CustomerReference>3340527</CustomerReference>
<Units>41</Units>
<Packages>0</Packages>
<Pallets>0</Pallets>
<Weight DimensionType="KG">720</Weight>
<Cubic DimensionType="M3">5.922</Cubic>
<TransportInsurance>0.0000</TransportInsurance>
<ShipperCODAmount>0.0000</ShipperCODAmount>
<CustomerOrderDetail>
<OrderType>ORD</OrderType>
<DateRequired>2015-09-02T00:00:00</DateRequired>
<Consignee AddressType="CEA">
<AddressLine1>Cnr Maroochydore and BroadmeadowRds</AddressLine1>
<CityOrSuburb>MAROOCHYDORE</CityOrSuburb>
<StateOrProvince>QLD</StateOrProvince>
<PostCode>4558</PostCode>
<CompanyName>Bunnings Maroochydore OLD Warehouse</CompanyName>
<CountryCode>AU</CountryCode>
<ContactName>The Import Manager</ContactName>
</Consignee>
</CustomerOrderDetail>
<CustomAttributes />
</DocketDetail>
<DocketLines>
<DocketLine>
<Product>E4342</Product>
<Description>R 3 5/3 6 175mm x 430mm x 1160mm</Description>
<QuantityFromClientOrder>5</QuantityFromClientOrder>
<QuantityActuallyOrdered>5</QuantityActuallyOrdered>
<ProductUQ>MST</ProductUQ>
<LineAttributes />
<LineNumber>1</LineNumber>
<Confirmation>
<Lines>
<Line>
<Quantity>25</Quantity>
<QuantityUQ>PAC</QuantityUQ>
</Line>
</Lines>
<Quantity>25</Quantity>
</Confirmation>
</DocketLine>
<DocketLine>
<Product>E2281</Product>
<Description>R 3 5 175mm x 580mm x 1160mm</Description>
<QuantityFromClientOrder>4</QuantityFromClientOrder>
<QuantityActuallyOrdered>4</QuantityActuallyOrdered>
<ProductUQ>MST</ProductUQ>
<LineAttributes />
<LineNumber>2</LineNumber>
<Confirmation>
<Lines>
<Line>
<Quantity>16</Quantity>
<QuantityUQ>PAC</QuantityUQ>
</Line>
</Lines>
<Quantity>16</Quantity>
</Confirmation>
</DocketLine>
</DocketLines>
</WhsDocket>
</WhsDockets>
</Payload></XmlInterchange>
I need to flatten the XML but use the Litem Item details together with the Reference Number per each Item.
Output
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><Items>
<LineItem>
<Date/>
<Order>2370519</Order>
<Client>Bunnings Maroochydore OLD Warehouse</Client>
<Product>E2281</Product>
<Description>R 3 5 175mm x 580mm x 1160mm</Description>
<Quantity>4</Quantity>
<UOM>MST</UOM>
<Warebouse>ROC</Warebouse>
<Carrier>Deluxe</Carrier>
</LineItem>
</Items>
Have you looked at DataWeave to transform it from current xml to new xml?
https://docs.mulesoft.com/mule-user-guide/v/3.7/dataweave-examples#xml-basic
<SMRCRLT_XML>
<AREA>
<DETAILS>
<DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<RULE_REQUIREMENT>
<DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<COURSE_ROWSET>
<COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_AREA>TESTSELECT</COURSE_AREA>
<COURSE_KEY_RULE>1200</COURSE_KEY_RULE>
<COURSE_SET>A</COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_SUBSET>1</COURSE_SUBSET>
<COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>CHEM</COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>
<COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>345A</COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>
</COURSE_SET>
</COURSE_ROWSET>
</DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<COURSE_ROWSET>
<COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_KEY_RULE>1200</COURSE_KEY_RULE>
<COURSE_SET>A</COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_SUBSET>2</COURSE_SUBSET>
<COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>CHEM</COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>
<COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>476A</COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>
</COURSE_SET>
</COURSE_ROWSET>
</DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<COURSE_ROWSET>
<COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_AREA>TESTSELECT</COURSE_AREA>
<COURSE_KEY_RULE>1200</COURSE_KEY_RULE>
<COURSE_SET>A</COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_SUBSET>3</COURSE_SUBSET>
<COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>PHIL</COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>
<COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>432</COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>
</COURSE_SET>
</COURSE_ROWSET>
</DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<COURSE_ROWSET>
<COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_AREA>TESTSELECT</COURSE_AREA>
<COURSE_KEY_RULE>1200</COURSE_KEY_RULE>
<COURSE_SET>B</COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_SUBSET>4</COURSE_SUBSET>
<COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>PHIL</COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>
<COURSE_SUBJ_DESC>Philosophy</COURSE_SUBJ_DESC>
<COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>433</COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>
</COURSE_SET>
</COURSE_ROWSET>
</DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<COURSE_ROWSET>
<COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_AREA>TESTSELECT</COURSE_AREA>
<COURSE_KEY_RULE>1200</COURSE_KEY_RULE>
<COURSE_SET>B</COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_SUBSET>5</COURSE_SUBSET>
<COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>ZOOL</COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>
<COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>321</COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>
</COURSE_SET>
</COURSE_ROWSET>
</DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
<COURSE_ROWSET>
<COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_AREA>TESTSELECT</COURSE_AREA>
<COURSE_KEY_RULE>1200</COURSE_KEY_RULE>
<COURSE_SET>B</COURSE_SET>
<COURSE_SUBSET>6</COURSE_SUBSET>
<COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>BIOC</COURSE_SUBJ_CODE>
<COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>456</COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW>
</COURSE_SET>
</COURSE_ROWSET>
</DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
</RULE_REQUIREMENT>
</DETAIL_REQUIREMENT>
</DETAILS>
</AREA>
</SMRCRLT_XML>
I am trying to get the first element from the XML for each COURSE_SET, but it returns all the values. Can someone please help. This is my template that I applied:
<xsl:apply-templates select="//SMRCRLT_XML/AREA/DETAILS/DETAIL_REQUIREMENT/RULE_REQUIREMENT/DETAIL_REQUIREMENT/COURSE_ROWSET/COURSE_SET[COURSE_AREA='TESTSELECT' and COURSE_KEY_RULE='1200'][1]"/>
The results I am getting are:
CHEM345A
PHIL432
PHIL433
ZOOL321
BIOC456
The result I am looking for is CHEM 345A and then PHIL433
You have several problems here.
First, the [1] in your XPath expression is filtering the XPath value by requiring that the COURSE_SET elements selected be the first child of their parent. Without that [1], your XPath expression reads:
//SMRCRLT_XML
/AREA
/DETAILS
/DETAIL_REQUIREMENT
/RULE_REQUIREMENT
/DETAIL_REQUIREMENT
/COURSE_ROWSET
/COURSE_SET
[COURSE_AREA='TESTSELECT' and COURSE_KEY_RULE='1200']
But every COURSE_SET that matches that path expression is the first child of its parent. (The only COURSE_SET elements which are not first children are children of COURSE_SET, not children of COURSE_ROWSET.)
The second problem is that it appears, judging by your question and your attempt at formulating the XPath expression you want, that you would like the courses to be grouped somehow (at first I thought you might want them grouped by department but now I expect you want them grouped by the value of the nested COURSE_SET element, which in your example has values A or B), so that by selecting the first COURSE_SET in some suitable context you can get the first course listed for each group. But the XML you show doesn't in fact group the courses by department or by course set; it provides a flat list of courses with no groupings at all. There are no elements here for which CHEM 345A and PHIL 433 are the first courses.
If your design calls for the courses to be grouped by department or course set, then your data source is not providing the data you want, and you will want to fix it.
If on the other hand you're stuck with this XML and want to use XPath to try to provide the structure that your data source is not capable of providing, then you don't want "the first element for each COURSE_SET", you want "each COURSE_SET which is in a department (or a COURSE_SET) different from the immediately preceding COURSE_SET". And your XPath expression can be something like
//COURSE_ROWSET/COURSE_SET
[not(COURSE_SET eq preceding::COURSE_SET[1])]
Your third problem is that your XML seems to be too fond of using the same name for different constructs (one set of COURSE_SET elements each of which contains a description of a course, with department and course number and so on, and a second set of COURSE_SET elements which contain the strings 'A' and 'B', two sets of DETAIL_REQUIREMENT with different content, and so on. It's confusing for people not familiar with the data, and it will make every single discussion of detail an opportunity for miscommunication and error.
The efficient way to handle a task like this in XSLT 1.0 is to use Muenchian grouping, like this:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes" omit-xml-declaration="yes"/>
<xsl:key name="kSet" match="COURSE_ROWSET/COURSE_SET" use="COURSE_SET" />
<xsl:template match="/">
<root>
<xsl:apply-templates
select="//COURSE_ROWSET/COURSE_SET[generate-id() =
generate-id(key('kSet', COURSE_SET)[1])]" />
</root>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="COURSE_ROWSET/COURSE_SET">
<item>
<xsl:value-of select="concat(COURSE_SUBJ_CODE, COURSE_CRSE_NUMB_LOW)"/>
</item>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
When this XSLT is applied to your sample input, the result is:
<root>
<item>CHEM345A</item>
<item>PHIL433</item>
</root>
I'm trying to write an XPath that will select certain nodes that contain a specific word.
In this case the word is, "Lockwood". The correct answer is 3. Both of these paths give me 3.
count(//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')])
count(BusinessLetter/*[contains(../*,'Lockwood')])
But when I try to output the text of each specific node
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][1]
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][2]
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][3]
Node 1 ends up containing all the text and nodes 2 and 3 are blank.
Can some one please tell me what's happening or what I'm doing wrong.
Thanks.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="XPathFunctions.xsl"?>
<BusinessLetter>
<Head>
<SendDate>November 29, 2005</SendDate>
<Recipient>
<Name Title="Mr.">
<FirstName>Joshua</FirstName>
<LastName>Lockwood</LastName>
</Name>
<Company>Lockwood & Lockwood</Company>
<Address>
<Street>291 Broadway Ave.</Street>
<City>New York</City>
<State>NY</State>
<Zip>10007</Zip>
<Country>United States</Country>
</Address>
</Recipient>
</Head>
<Body>
<List>
<Heading>Along with this letter, I have enclosed the following items:</Heading>
<ListItem>two original, execution copies of the Webucator Master Services Agreement</ListItem>
<ListItem>two original, execution copies of the Webucator Premier Support for Developers Services Description between Lockwood & Lockwood and Webucator, Inc.</ListItem>
</List>
<Para>Please sign and return all four original, execution copies to me at your earliest convenience. Upon receipt of the executed copies, we will immediately return a fully executed, original copy of both agreements to you.</Para>
<Para>Please send all four original, execution copies to my attention as follows:
<Person>
<Name>
<FirstName>Bill</FirstName>
<LastName>Smith</LastName>
</Name>
<Address>
<Company>Webucator, Inc.</Company>
<Street>4933 Jamesville Rd.</Street>
<City>Jamesville</City>
<State>NY</State>
<Zip>13078</Zip>
<Country>USA</Country>
</Address>
</Person>
</Para>
<Para>If you have any questions, feel free to call me at <Phone>800-555-1000 x123</Phone> or e-mail me at <Email>bsmith#webucator.com</Email>.</Para>
</Body>
<Foot>
<Closing>
<Name>
<FirstName>Bill</FirstName>
<LastName>Smith</LastName>
</Name>
<JobTitle>VP of Operations</JobTitle>
</Closing>
</Foot>
</BusinessLetter>
But when I try to output the text of
each specific node
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][1]
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][2]
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][3]
Node 1 ends up containing all the text
and nodes 2 and 3 are blank
This is a FAQ.
//SomeExpression[1]
is not the equivalent to
(//someExpression)[1]
The former selects all //SomeExpression nodes that are the first child of their parent.
The latter selects the first (in document order) of all //SomeExpression nodes in the whole document.
How does this apply to your problem?
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][1]
This selects all elements that have at least one child whose string value contains 'Lockwood' and that are the first such child of their parent. All three elements that have a text node containing the string 'Lockwood' are the first such child of their parents, so the result is that three elements are selected.
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][2]
There is no element that has a child with string value containing the string 'Lockwood' and is the second such child of its parent. No nodes are selected.
//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')][3]
There is no element that has a child with string value containing the string 'Lockwood' and is the third such child of its parent. No nodes are selected.
Solution:
Use:
(//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')])[1]
(//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')])[2]
(//*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')])[3]
Each of these selects exactly the Nth element (N = {1,2,3}) selected by //*[contains(./*,'Lockwood')], correspondingly: BusinesLetter, Recipient and Body.
Remember:
The [] operator has higher priority (precedence) than the // abbreviation.