Programmatically clicking toolbar button in parent of modal window - c++

I have an application that hooks into another application via an API. My application launches a modal window which prevents keypresses to reach the parent as one would expect.
However due to limitations in the API I need to click one of the parents toolbar buttons from time to time (yes it's a kludge).
I wonder if this is possible while still having the modal window of my application active? Is it perhaps possible to send the required command directly into the parent command queue?
Clicking the button programmatically with no modal window should not be a problem, one could go by this link for example: http://forums.codeguru.com/showthread.php?307633-How-to-run-a-very-long-SQL-statement. But I would prefer not having to close my window each time I have to click the button.
Although the fifth answer is what I find interesting as I'm thinking this could make it possible to send the command without having to close my modal window first. Also it feels an ever so small bit less ugly.

First of all, when a modal dialog is shown, it runs its own message pump. So any attempt to fake input messages will land in the modal dialog message pump. Which is no good to you. So, you'd have to send a message rather than fake input.
However, when a modal dialog is shown, its owning windows are disabled. Which means that these windows will not respond to any messages you send. So I guess that means that you could:
Enable the owning top-level window that you hosts the toolbar in question.
Send the message to the toolbar button.
Disable the owning window again.
Not the prettiest way to go about things, but you did ask!

Related

Can't focus from main window after closing dialog from other thread

I create a new CWindThread in CWinApp::InitInstance(). In that thread, I create a dialog (for displaying a progress bar in that dialog).
After finishing InitInstance(), I close the dialog by calling DestroyWindow() from the dialog, but the application is loosing focus from main window.
I used AfxGetMainWnd()->SetActiveWindow(); to set focus for main window but it is not working.
How can I return the focus to the main window after closing the dialog?
There is no real good way to do that. The focus is set per thread. So there is no "focus" over all windows.
The only chance you have is to set the new foreground window, that belongs to the other thread with SetForegorundWindow. From within the same application this should work without restrictions.
If it doesn't work you need to "synch" both message queues. This is done by AttachThreadInput. If both messages queue are already attached, than there is no problem with settings the focus directly. But the behaviour of the application will change... Please read the docs, of the functions I linked too.
When a modal popup window is displayed, the reason a user cannot interact with the owner window is that it is disabled. When the modal window is destroyed, care must be taken to re-enable the owner window BEFORE destroying the popup as windows cannot activate a disabled window. This is the usual cause of popup windows re-activating the wrong window.

Cant focus Firemonkey application when modal dialog open, unless modal dialog itself is clicked

I have an application in which users, upon logging in, are prompted with a modal dialog where they must choose the facility they wish to work out of. At this stage, the application looks like this:
The modal dialog is shown by calling this method:
bool __fastcall ShowFacChoiceForm()
{
TFacChoiceForm *Form = new TFacChoiceForm( Application );
bool Result = ( Form->ShowModal() == mrOk );
delete Form;
return Result;
}
In this case, TFacChoiceForm inherits from TForm so the ShowFacChoiceForm() function is calling the standard TForm.ShowModal method documented here.
The issue I am running into is that if my application loses focus, it cannot become the active window again unless the modal dialog itself is clicked. To better illustrate this, I will present the following scenario:
Lets say its Friday afternoon and I decide to goof off a bit and read some web comics. With my application open, I open up another window on top of it, like so:
Then, out of nowhere my boss comes in for a performance review, and I attempt to refocus my application by clicking somewhere on the main form. For example, at the position of this red X in the next image.
In the above image, I have clicked at the location of the red X. Now, both the form containing the web comic, and my application are inactive. Thus, my application does not come to the front of the screen.
However, if I am able to click somewhere on the modal dialog, like the red X in the following image...
...then my application comes to the front like one would expect.
To solve this, I have looked at using something like SetForegroundWindow from the Windows API, but I have not been able to find a way to trigger the event, since my main form does not fire events while I have a modal dialog open.
My question is, how can I make sure that if the user clicks anywhere on my application that it is brought to the front? Is there a property I can edit in my form to do this?
If you set modalresult to mrcancel in the ondeactivate of the modal dialog then the main form will get focus when its clicked. You can then check if the user is logged in the mousedown event of the main form and if not, show the modal dialog again.

C++ Modal dialog box continuing adding texts

I have dialog box and in it, it has OK and Cancel buttons then it also has a ListBox to display text in two columns. I would like to continue adding text into the ListBox after the dialog box is shown. How can I do that? Because after I call DoModal() to show the dialog box, the code does not continue to execute. Or should I create two threads (one is display dialog box while another thread continues adding text to dialog box)?
Make your dialog 'pull' the data it needs, maybe polling the data source with window messages every second, or every 100ms or so. Or, if you go the 'two threads' route (the better but more complicated option), have your data source post a window message to your dialog when there is new data, and then have the dialog fetch the data it needs. The reason for this is that it's much easier to use the existing CDialog infrastructure to get a window that behaves like an actual dialog, compared to building a modal window that acts like a dialog but isn't really.
If you do go the two threads route, your division of labor should be: one thread that does all the UI work (including showing the dialog), and one that 'generates' data and lets the UI know when there is new data. So the worker thread should not do anything related to the UI, nor call any methods on the dialog directly - you can't access windows from several threads. The only cross-thread window communication should happen through window message (i.e., use ::SendMessage()). So certainly don't do something like myDialog->m_theList.AddString("blah") from another thread, or something like it.
Showing a dialog box modally halts further execution until you close the box. Instead of showing it modal, show it normal but make it always on top so you can continue executing the code after the call to DoModal(). Alternatively, populate the box with all the info it will need before you call DoModal().
If you decide to take the "two threads" approach you will discover that the controls on MFC dialogs should not be updated or accessed from a thread other than the one that created the dialog. Even if you have pointers to these controls available in another thread it is not thread-safe to access them. This rule applies whether or not the dialog is modal.
Instead, your second thread would need to PostMessage or SendMessage to the dialog window, so the updates occur on the thread that created the dialog (most likely the main UI thread of the application).

Keyboard messages from child controls

I am currently developing a user interface DLL that uses the WIN32 API. The DLL must work for numerous platforms, XP, WIN CE, etc. I have managed to incorporate docking, anchoring and so on but appear to have a problem regarding owner-drawn buttons. I can draw the button's correct state, focus, clicked, default. However, I cannot receive key notifications. I specifically want to perform a click operation on a button that currently has focus, should the user press enter.
Note that I am using a windows message loop rather than a dialog message loop. I use windows hooks to hook into the window creation and set the user data to 'point' to my control instance. If I test for WM_KEYDOWN in the main message loop I can get a handle to my button control instance and could forward the message to the relevant control. Unfortunately, I am dealing with a lot of legacy code and this may not be an ideal solution.
So, my question is what is the best way forward. Is subclassing the button control's window procedure a viable option or is there an easier way?
Many thanks in advance.
The comments above are correct. The button with focus should be getting the key messages. But buttons don't (by themselves) respond to Enter--they respond to Space. It sounds like what you're missing is the typical dialog keyboard navigation, like Tab key moving the focus and Enter activating the "default" button.
If you've got a typical Windows message pump, and you want the keyboard behavior normally associated with dialogs, then you need to use the IsDialogMessage API in your message loop. This means your window is essentially a "modeless dialog".
Looks like standard window proc subclassing should do the trick. See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms633591(v=vs.85).aspx for details.

How to disable user interaction in a Qt application when a DialogBox shown?

I have a modeless QDialog box that popup on errors/warning in my Qt application, I want to force the user to only focus on that dialog box and not click anything in the application until they clicked Ok on the dialog box.
I need the dialog box to remain modeless. A solution like hiding the main window or covering it up is not acceptable.
At the moment I'm using setModal(true); to solve my problem. But I think this method might be stopping the main application from executing.
From the documentation:
If you use show() and setModal(true) together to perform a long
operation, you must call QApplication::processEvents() periodically
during processing to enable the user to interact with the dialog.
Instead of using a QDialog box, try using qDebug statements in your code or a log file using qInstallMsgHandler.
You could also show a QTextEdit and post your log/error messages there in real time, too.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/debug.html
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qdebug.html#details
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qtglobal.html#qInstallMsgHandler
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qtextedit.html#details
If you still really want to debug using a QDialog box for errors, in a pseudo modal dialog but not modal dialog, you could try using eventFilters to prevent mouse and keyboard events from arriving at any other window, but it would be tricky to allow the exception to end up only at QDialog, but it is do-able.
You could also go to the one or two widgets that accept mouse and keyboard input, and ignore the input if the a QDialogBox is visible. But both of these ways of showing an error, but limiting input without making it Modal is really hacky, and would probably be error prone.