I'm trying to compile my legacy-free libFoundation project, located at https://github.com/chmeeedalf/lf-foundation but running into problems using clang 3.4 and libc++. It appears something is not happy with ARC in the containers, and I see the following error excerpt:
In file included from /home/chmeee/git-lffoundation/src/Collections/NSCoreArray.mm:34:
In file included from /home/chmeee/git-lffoundation/src/../Headers/Foundation/NSArray.h:31:
In file included from /home/chmeee/git-lffoundation/src/../Headers/Foundation/NSObject.h:40:
In file included from /home/chmeee/git-lffoundation/src/../Headers/Foundation/NSRange.h:192:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/algorithm:627:
/usr/include/c++/v1/memory:913:17: error: call to 'addressof' is ambiguous
{return _VSTD::addressof(__r);}
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/v1/__config:341:15: note: expanded from macro '_VSTD'
#define _VSTD std::_LIBCPP_NAMESPACE
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/vector:1678:65: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::__1::pointer_traits<const __strong id *>::pointer_to' requested here
const_pointer __xr = pointer_traits<const_pointer>::pointer_to(__x);
^
/home/chmeee/git-lffoundation/src/Collections/NSCoreArray.mm:115:8: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::__1::vector<id, std::__1::allocator<id> >::insert' requested here
items.insert(items.begin() + index, anObject);
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/__functional_base:96:1: note: candidate function [with _Tp = const id]
addressof(__strong _Tp& __x) _NOEXCEPT
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/__functional_base:122:1: note: candidate function [with _Tp = const id]
addressof(__unsafe_unretained _Tp& __x) _NOEXCEPT
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/__functional_base:83:1: note: candidate function [with _Tp = const id]
addressof(_Tp& __x) _NOEXCEPT
^
1 error generated.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /home/chmeee/git-lffoundation/src
Exit 1
The file in this example has a std::vector declared as:
std::vector<id> items;
Can someone shed some light onto this problem? I tried adding an explicit __strong in the std::vector declaration, to no avail, however __unsafe_unretained does eliminate the error.
I'm building on FreeBSD -CURRENT, using the libc++ and clang 3.4 that is in base.
Answering my own question, in case others are interested. Clang defines __weak as a preprocessor macro for ARC. However, FreeBSD's <sys/cdefs.h> also defines __weak itself. The workaround I found for this was to add to my local <sys/cdefs.h>:
#ifndef __weak
#define __weak what_freebsd_defines_ass
#endif
Related
I defined a map like this :
std::map<std::string,LexType> lexname_s = { { "PROGRAM" , PROGRAM}}
And a LexType, like this :
typedef enum
{
ENDFILE, ERROR,
PROGRAM, PROCEDURE, TYPE, VAR, IF,
} LexType;
In Visual Studio Code, it always shows error type when I touch it.
//
I add more details for what i said.
the line
std::map<std::string,LexType> lexname_s = { { "PROGRAM" , PROGRAM}}
show error . it seems i can't initialize it in this way.
I compile it in the gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-39) (GCC) in a cloud server which is centos7.
AND the error code shows below
from parse.cpp:1:
../utils.h:52:27: error: invalid conversion from ‘int’ to ‘const LexType&’ [-fpermissive]
{"ERROR", ERROR}};
^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8.2/bits/stl_algobase.h:64:0,
from /usr/include/c++/4.8.2/bits/stl_tree.h:61,
from /usr/include/c++/4.8.2/map:60,
from ../globals.h:6,
from parse.h:4,
from parse.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/4.8.2/bits/stl_pair.h:112:26: error: initializing argument 2 of ‘constexpr std::pair<_T1, _T2>::pair(const _T1&, const _T2&) [with _T1 = const std::basic_string<char>; _T2 = LexType]’ [-fpermissive]
_GLIBCXX_CONSTEXPR pair(const _T1& __a, const _T2& __b)```
EOF(which shows in the map define) is a reserved a macro defined in stdio.h
it's the problem of it.
change the name will be ok.
I'm trying to compile the following code:
#include <boost/optional.hpp>
void foo(boost::optional<unsigned> x = boost::none);
placed in the file a.cu, with the CUDA compiler, using the following command line:
nvcc a.cu -c --std=c++11 -I/opt/boost/include
but I get a bunch of errors:
a.cu:2:53: error: conversion from ‘const boost::none_t(boost::none_t::init_tag (*)())’ to ‘boost::optional<unsigned int>’ is ambiguous
void foo(boost::optional<unsigned> x = boost::none);
^
/opt/boost/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:805:1: note: candidate: boost::optional<T>::optional(boost::optional<T>::rval_reference_type) [with T = unsigned int; boost::optional<T>::rval_reference_type = unsigned int&&] <near match>
optional ( rval_reference_type val ) : base( boost::forward<T>(val) )
^ ~~~~
/opt/boost/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:805:1: note: conversion of argument 1 would be ill-formed:
a.cu:2:53: error: invalid conversion from ‘const boost::none_t (*)(boost::none_t::init_tag (*)())’ to ‘unsigned int’ [-fpermissive]
void foo(boost::optional<unsigned> x = boost::none);
^
/opt/boost/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:800:1: note: candidate: boost::optional<T>::optional(boost::optional<T>::argument_type) [with T = unsigned int; boost::optional<T>::argument_type = const unsigned int&] <near match>
optional ( argument_type val ) : base(val) {}
^ ~~~~
/opt/boost/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:800:1: note: conversion of argument 1 would be ill-formed:
a.cu:2:53: error: invalid conversion from ‘const boost::none_t (*)(boost::none_t::init_tag (*)())’ to ‘unsigned int’ [-fpermissive]
void foo(boost::optional<unsigned> x = boost::none);
Why does this happen, and can I circumvent the problem while still actually using boost::optional in (host-side) code compiled with nvcc?
Additional information:
The code compiles fine with g++ 6.3.0 (my distribution's compiler).
This code (or rather, similar code) used to compile and work on an earlier Linux distribution I was using, where the compiler was g++ 5.4.x .
I've tried this with Boost versions 1.65.1 and 1.69.0 .
I've tried this with CUDA versions 9.2.88 and 10.0.130 .
I had the exact same error and was able to get this to work with this modification:
#define BOOST_OPTIONAL_USE_OLD_DEFINITION_OF_NONE
#include <boost/optional.hpp>
This is using CUDA 10.0.130, g++ 7.3.0, and Boost 1.68.0.
A partial answer to the second question:
You could consider using Andrzej Krzemieński's neat and self-contained implementation of an optional instead of boost::optional. It works with C++11, which is what you seem to be doing.
I have an application that requires use of both Qt 3D and the QCustomPlot library. However, when attempting to compile QCustomPlot in a project using "QT += 3dinput" in its .pro file, several errors appear referencing the QMouseEvent and QWheelEvent classes.
I believe this is related to the fact that Qt3DInput introduces classes with the same names as QMouseEvent and QWheelEvent in the QtGui module, but am not familiar enough with the inner workings of Qt to understand what the compiler errors are trying to tell me.
What exactly is causing this issue, and how can I work around it? Modifications to the .pro file or the QCustomPlot library itself are both acceptable.
To demonstrate the problem, compiling QCustomPlot with the following .pro file:
QT += widgets printsupport 3dinput
TEMPLATE = lib
SOURCES += qcustomplot.cpp
HEADERS += qcustomplot.h
Results in these errors:
In file included from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qnamespace.h:43:0,
from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qobjectdefs.h:48,
from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qobject.h:46,
from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/QObject:1,
from debug\../../QCustomPlot/qcustomplot.h:29,
from debug\moc_qcustomplot.cpp:9:
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h: In instantiation of 'constexpr int qMetaTypeId() [with T = QMouseEvent*]':
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1752:26: required from 'constexpr int qRegisterMetaType() [with T = QMouseEvent*]'
debug\moc_qcustomplot.cpp:2512:84: required from here
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qglobal.h:746:47: error: static assertion failed: Type is not registered, please use the Q_DECLARE_METATYPE macro to make it known to Qt's meta-object system
#define Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X(Condition, Message) static_assert(bool(Condition), Message)
^
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1745:5: note: in expansion of macro 'Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X'
Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X(QMetaTypeId2<T>::Defined, "Type is not registered, please use the Q_DECLARE_METATYPE macro to make it known to Qt's meta-object system");
^
In file included from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qobject.h:54:0,
from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/QObject:1,
from debug\../../QCustomPlot/qcustomplot.h:29,
from debug\moc_qcustomplot.cpp:9:
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h: In instantiation of 'static constexpr int QMetaTypeId2<T>::qt_metatype_id() [with T = QMouseEvent*]':
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1746:43: required from 'constexpr int qMetaTypeId() [with T = QMouseEvent*]'
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1752:26: required from 'constexpr int qRegisterMetaType() [with T = QMouseEvent*]'
debug\moc_qcustomplot.cpp:2512:84: required from here
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1604:96: error: 'qt_metatype_id' is not a member of 'QMetaTypeId<QMouseEvent*>'
static inline Q_DECL_CONSTEXPR int qt_metatype_id() { return QMetaTypeId<T>::qt_metatype_id(); }
^
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1604:100: error: body of constexpr function 'static constexpr int QMetaTypeId2<T>::qt_metatype_id() [with T = QMouseEvent*]' not a return-statement
static inline Q_DECL_CONSTEXPR int qt_metatype_id() { return QMetaTypeId<T>::qt_metatype_id(); }
^
In file included from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qnamespace.h:43:0,
from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qobjectdefs.h:48,
from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qobject.h:46,
from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/QObject:1,
from debug\../../QCustomPlot/qcustomplot.h:29,
from debug\moc_qcustomplot.cpp:9:
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h: In instantiation of 'constexpr int qMetaTypeId() [with T = QWheelEvent*]':
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1752:26: required from 'constexpr int qRegisterMetaType() [with T = QWheelEvent*]'
debug\moc_qcustomplot.cpp:2540:84: required from here
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qglobal.h:746:47: error: static assertion failed: Type is not registered, please use the Q_DECLARE_METATYPE macro to make it known to Qt's meta-object system
#define Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X(Condition, Message) static_assert(bool(Condition), Message)
^
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1745:5: note: in expansion of macro 'Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X'
Q_STATIC_ASSERT_X(QMetaTypeId2<T>::Defined, "Type is not registered, please use the Q_DECLARE_METATYPE macro to make it known to Qt's meta-object system");
^
In file included from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qobject.h:54:0,
from C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/QObject:1,
from debug\../../QCustomPlot/qcustomplot.h:29,
from debug\moc_qcustomplot.cpp:9:
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h: In instantiation of 'static constexpr int QMetaTypeId2<T>::qt_metatype_id() [with T = QWheelEvent*]':
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1746:43: required from 'constexpr int qMetaTypeId() [with T = QWheelEvent*]'
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1752:26: required from 'constexpr int qRegisterMetaType() [with T = QWheelEvent*]'
debug\moc_qcustomplot.cpp:2540:84: required from here
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1604:96: error: 'qt_metatype_id' is not a member of 'QMetaTypeId<QWheelEvent*>'
static inline Q_DECL_CONSTEXPR int qt_metatype_id() { return QMetaTypeId<T>::qt_metatype_id(); }
^
C:/Qt/5.7/mingw53_32/include/QtCore/qmetatype.h:1604:100: error: body of constexpr function 'static constexpr int QMetaTypeId2<T>::qt_metatype_id() [with T = QWheelEvent*]' not a return-statement
static inline Q_DECL_CONSTEXPR int qt_metatype_id() { return QMetaTypeId<T>::qt_metatype_id(); }
^
This was obviously using MinGW, but VC++ produces similar errors.
Update 3 Jan. 2016: I have answered my own question now too.
I need some help formatting my "if" statement in this C++ macro please:
#define updateEEPROMVal(address,val) if (EEPROM.get(address)!=val) \
EEPROM.put(address,val)
I'm getting pages of errors, so I'm assuming it's a simple formatting problem.
Update Apr. 2020: Jump straight to my answer. My macro was fine (surrounding it with do {} while (false) would have been better of course, but it was fine as-is). I was simply forgetting the 2nd parameter in EEPROM.get() is all. The 2nd parameter is passed by NON-const C++ reference, and at the time I didn't really know what a reference was or how it worked, so I didn't use the .get() method correctly. That's it!
Back to my original question from 2016:
Here's the full context:
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
//storeXYValsIntoEEPROM
//-store the current global variable x and y low, center, and high values into EEPROM
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#define updateEEPROMVal(address,val) if (EEPROM.get(address)!=val) \
EEPROM.put(address,val)
void storeXYValsIntoEEPROM()
{
//update EEPROM values *only* if necessary, this way you minimize writes (and wear-and-tear) on the EEPROM, since it is limited to
//100k writes per cell I believe (see datasheet)
updateEEPROMVal(0,x_low);
updateEEPROMVal(2,x_ctr);
updateEEPROMVal(4,x_high);
updateEEPROMVal(6,y_low);
updateEEPROMVal(8,y_ctr);
updateEEPROMVal(10,y_high);
}
UPDATE: HERE's my error output:
Arduino: 1.6.5 (Windows 8.1), Board: "Arduino Uno"
Using library IRremote in folder: C:\Gabe\Gabe - RC-extra\Arduino\Sketches\libraries\IRremote (legacy)
Using library eRCaGuy_ButtonReader in folder: C:\Gabe\Gabe - RC-extra\Arduino\Sketches\libraries\eRCaGuy_ButtonReader (legacy)
Using library EEPROM in folder: C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\tools\avr/bin/avr-g++ -c -g -Os -Wall -Wextra -fno-exceptions -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-threadsafe-statics -MMD -mmcu=atmega328p -DF_CPU=16000000L -DARDUINO=10605 -DARDUINO_AVR_UNO -DARDUINO_ARCH_AVR -IC:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\cores\arduino -IC:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\variants\standard -IC:\Gabe\Gabe - RC-extra\Arduino\Sketches\libraries\IRremote -IC:\Gabe\Gabe - RC-extra\Arduino\Sketches\libraries\eRCaGuy_ButtonReader -IC:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM C:\Users\Gabriel\AppData\Local\Temp\build6111239347405487460.tmp\IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.cpp -o C:\Users\Gabriel\AppData\Local\Temp\build6111239347405487460.tmp\IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.cpp.o
In file included from IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:27:0:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:43:30: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Wignored-qualifiers]
operator const uint8_t() const { return **this; }
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:92:26: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Wignored-qualifiers]
operator const int() const { return index; }
^
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino: In function 'void storeXYValsIntoEEPROM()':
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: error: no matching function for call to 'EEPROMClass::get(int)'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:436:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate is:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:436:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
In file included from IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:27:0:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template<class T> T& EEPROMClass::get(int, T&)
template< typename T > T &get( int idx, T &t ){
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:436:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: error: no matching function for call to 'EEPROMClass::get(int)'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:437:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate is:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:437:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
In file included from IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:27:0:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template<class T> T& EEPROMClass::get(int, T&)
template< typename T > T &get( int idx, T &t ){
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:437:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: error: no matching function for call to 'EEPROMClass::get(int)'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:438:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate is:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:438:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
In file included from IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:27:0:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template<class T> T& EEPROMClass::get(int, T&)
template< typename T > T &get( int idx, T &t ){
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:438:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: error: no matching function for call to 'EEPROMClass::get(int)'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:439:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate is:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:439:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
In file included from IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:27:0:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template<class T> T& EEPROMClass::get(int, T&)
template< typename T > T &get( int idx, T &t ){
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:439:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: error: no matching function for call to 'EEPROMClass::get(int)'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:440:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate is:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:440:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
In file included from IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:27:0:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template<class T> T& EEPROMClass::get(int, T&)
template< typename T > T &get( int idx, T &t ){
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:440:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: error: no matching function for call to 'EEPROMClass::get(int)'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:441:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate is:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:441:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
In file included from IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:27:0:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template<class T> T& EEPROMClass::get(int, T&)
template< typename T > T &get( int idx, T &t ){
^
C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\hardware\arduino\avr\libraries\EEPROM/EEPROM.h:130:31: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:430:61: note: candidate expects 2 arguments, 1 provided
IR_Tx_code5_w_calibration_mode.ino:441:3: note: in expansion of macro 'updateEEPROMVal'
Multiple libraries were found for "IRremote.h"
Used: C:\Gabe\Gabe - RC-extra\Arduino\Sketches\libraries\IRremote
Not used: C:\Program Files (x86)\Arduino\libraries\RobotIRremote
no matching function for call to 'EEPROMClass::get(int)'
Code with do{...}while(0) your macro (and don't forget the semicolon):
#define updateEEPROMVal(address,val) do{if (EEPROM.get(address)!=val) \
EEPROM.put(address,val);}while(0)
See also this
Better yet, make that a static inline function (to be put in some header file).
Also, use g++ -C -E source.cc > source.ii to get the preprocessed form, you can look inside it.
There is no need for this. When I wrote the library I made sure it minimizes the wear & tear.
The EEPROM function put() uses the update method on the byte level.
You are simply duplicating functionality.
If you have more questions regarding the EEPROM lib, ask on the forum.
I created a thread just for my library: https://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?topic=312645
My Answer:
Sorry for the trouble, it turns out I was misusing the EEPROM.get function, and the problem wasn't my macro at all. The EEPROM library get() method is defined: https://github.com/arduino/ArduinoCore-avr/blob/master/libraries/EEPROM/src/EEPROM.h#L130, and the documentation here: https://www.arduino.cc/en/Reference/EEPROMGet.
I was simply missing the 2nd argument, accidentally using this:
EEPROM.get(address);
...instead of this:
any_type val_in_EEPROM;
EEPROM.get(address, val_in_EEPROM);
Here are 2 solutions I came up with that work.
1) Using a separate function:
-I prefer this method. It turns out the word "inline" in this case is optional, and makes no difference.
-This method makes my program 7610 bytes, with 472 bytes used for global variables. It takes 162 bytes less memory than option 2 below.
inline void updateEEPROMVal(uint16_t address, uint16_t val)
{
uint16_t val_in_EEPROM;
EEPROM.get(address,val_in_EEPROM);
if (val_in_EEPROM!=val)
EEPROM.put(address,val);
}
void storeGlobalXYValsIntoEEPROM()
{
updateEEPROMVal(0,x_low);
updateEEPROMVal(2,x_ctr);
updateEEPROMVal(4,x_high);
updateEEPROMVal(6,y_low);
updateEEPROMVal(8,y_ctr);
updateEEPROMVal(10,y_high);
}
2) Using a macro, as follows:
-I prefer the above method.
-This method takes 7772 bytes for program space, and 472 bytes for global variables. It takes 162 bytes more than the above method.
uint16_t val_in_EEPROM;
#define updateEEPROMVal(address,val) EEPROM.get(address,val_in_EEPROM); \
if (val_in_EEPROM!=val) \
EEPROM.put(address,val)
void storeGlobalXYValsIntoEEPROM()
{
uint16_t val_in_EEPROM;
updateEEPROMVal(0,x_low);
updateEEPROMVal(2,x_ctr);
updateEEPROMVal(4,x_high);
updateEEPROMVal(6,y_low);
updateEEPROMVal(8,y_ctr);
updateEEPROMVal(10,y_high);
}
Thanks for everyone's help!
3) (Updated answer) EEPROM.put(address,val) already does the functionality I'm trying to achieve above to avoid unnecessary wear on the EEPROM, so just use the .put() function by itself, as-is!
See #Chris A's answer here.
Yet again I have failed to fully read the documentation. The EEPROM library Put function documentation here (https://github.com/arduino/Arduino/tree/master/hardware/arduino/avr/libraries/EEPROM) says, "This function uses the update method to write its data, and therefore only rewrites changed cells." Therefore, my update code is redundant. I just need to use the "put" function as-is. Refer to the EEPROM library's author's (Chris A) answer here too.
So, I've learned a lot, and here's my final answer:
Get rid of my support function and macro, and just use the put function as-is. It already minimizes EEPROM wear and only writes if the contents are different. Nevertheless, I'll leave my above answers for completeness' sake for those who are looking for what the macro or function solution otherwise would have been.
I've got lots of bugs in my old compilation machine so I decided to create a new one.
Boh project doesn't have any issue about compiling in BOOST 1.55, but in 1.5.7 or highter, only one project can compile. (Before, both are using boost 1.5.7 without problem)
Here's the bug when i'm using 1.5.8 (at char_skill.cpp)
http://i.stack.imgur.com/sh8vO.png
Text mode :
/usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/extensions.hpp:193:24: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
In file included from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/hash.hpp:558:0,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash.hpp:6,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/unordered/unordered_map.hpp:21,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/unordered_map.hpp:17,
from char.h:4,
from char_skill.cpp:7:
/usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/extensions.hpp:262:34: note: 'const VID' is not derived from 'const std::shared_ptr<_Tp1>'
return hash_value(val);
^
In file included from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/hash.hpp:558:0,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash.hpp:6,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/unordered/unordered_map.hpp:21,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/unordered_map.hpp:17,
from char.h:4,
from char_skill.cpp:7:
/usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/extensions.hpp:198:24: note: template<class T, class Deleter> std::size_t boost::hash_value(const std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>&)
inline std::size_t hash_value(std::unique_ptr<T, Deleter> const& x) {
^
/usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/extensions.hpp:198:24: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
In file included from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/hash.hpp:558:0,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash.hpp:6,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/unordered/unordered_map.hpp:21,
from /usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/unordered_map.hpp:17,
from char.h:4,
from char_skill.cpp:7:
/usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/extensions.hpp:262:34: note: 'const VID' is not derived from 'const std::unique_ptr<_Tp, _Dp>'
return hash_value(val);
^
/usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/extensions.hpp: In member function 'std::size_t boost::hash<T>::operator()(const T&) const [with T = VID; std::size_t = unsigned int]':
/usr/src/blabla/Extern/include/boost/functional/hash/extensions.hpp:263:9: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
gmake: *** [OBJDIR/char_skill.o] Error 1
I don't know why I have this problem :x
PS : If anyone know how to install boost-all (1.5.7 or +) using freebsd ^^
Have a nice day :)