Adding custom data to django model field - django

I'd like to add some info to a model field to use at form rendering time. My real model has about 15 values of varying field types (adding and removing as I dev), and it does almost everything I need, so I'd rather not create custom model fields for all of them.
I'd like to do something like this:
from django.db import models
class MyModel(models.Model):
cost = models.DecimalField(max_digits=5,
decimal_places=2,
custom_info= {'glyph': 'glyphicon glyphicon-usd' }
)
And then in my form template use that glyph much like I'd use a verbose_name or help_text.

Something I learned from a post just the other day. Will defining the custom information on the form instead of the model work?
When you define formfield_callback on a forms.ModelForm it will iterate over the form fields and you can manipulate them. This comes in handy when you need to add a css class to widgets and don't want to explicitly override the field. Now you only need to put formfield_callback = modify_form_field on any forms.ModelForm where you want the custom_info to show up.
from django.db import models
def add_glyphicons(model_field):
form_field = model_field.formfield()
if isinstance(model_field, models.IntegerField):
form_field.custom_info = {'glyph': 'glyphicon glyphicon-usd'}
elif isinstance(model_field, models.CharField):
form_field.custom_info = {'glyph': 'glyphicon glyphicon-yen'}
return form_field
class MyModel(models.Model):
formfield_callback = add_glyphicons
class Meta:
model = MyModel
class MyOtherModel(models.Model):
formfield_callback = add_glyphicons
class Meta:
model = MyOtherModel

Related

Avoid nested objects when using nested serializers

I have two models, one contains the other in a foreignKey relationship, I wanted to make an API that would return the combine of these two models, so I attempted to use nested Serializers to add the related model as well, but the data are not all on the same level, the related models is a object inside the first.
Here are the Models
class ModelOne(models.Model):
last_counter = models.IntegerField()
class ModelTwo(models.Model):
model_one = models.ForeignKey(ModelOne, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
category = models.CharField(max_length=64)
counter_type = models.CharField(max_length=32)
Here are the serializers
class ModelOneSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = ModelOne
fields = "__all__"
class ModelTwoSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
model_one= ModelOneSerializer(read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = ModelTwo
fields = "__all__"
This would return from the API in the form of
{
"category" : ...,
"counter_type" : ...,
"model_one" : {
"last_counter" : ...
}
}
But I don't want the response to be like that, I want it more like this
{
"category" : ...,
"counter_type" : ...,
"last_counter" : ...,
}
Is there a way to achieve this through serializers?
Use SerializerMethodField
from rest_framework.fields import SerializerMethodField
class ModelTwoSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
last_counter = SerializerMethodField()
class Meta:
model = ModelTwo
fields = "__all__"
def get_last_counter(self, obj):
return ModelOneSerializer(obj.model_one).data['last_counter']
When creating custom fields(field_one for example) with SerializerMethodField, you have to create a method called get_field_one, for this method to be automatically detected by the serializer.
You can achieve what you want to do using SerializerMethodField from drf fields:
SerializerMethodField is a read-only field that computes its value at request processing time, by calling a method on the serializer class it is attached to. For example for your case it will look like this. Notice that the computed last_counter is added on the serialized model fields.
from rest_framework.fields import SerializerMethodField
class ModelTwoSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
last_counter = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
class Meta:
model = ModelTwo
fields = ["category", "counter_type", "last_counter"]
def get_last_counter(self, obj):
return int(obj.model_one.last_counter)
SerializerMethodField accepts method_name, but it’s usually more convenient to use the default pattern for naming those methods, which is get_. Just make sure you‘re not overburdening your method fields with any heavy-lifting operations.
You can read more on the official documentation:enter link description here

Django inline formset multiple models

TL;DR: I need a some kind of formset for formsets.
I have two different models related to one buisness-entity, and I need to make a form to edit both models like a one form. And I need to create a lot of such forms on the one page like Django inline formset does.
Now I have the following thing:
class Parent(models.Model):
name = models.Charfield()
class FirstChild(models.Model):
name = models.Charfield()
e_id = models.IntegerField()
parent = models.ForeignKey(Parent)
class FirstChildForm(django.forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Child
fields = ('name', 'e_id', 'parent')
widgets = {'parent': forms.TextInput}
And I render a lot of them using inline formsets:
formset_class = inlineformset_factory(Parent, FirstChild,
form=FirstChildForm, extra=1)
But now I have to add second child model and a form for it, and still render it like an one inline form, but make it form actually edit two models. Like this:
class SecondChild(models.Model):
name = models.Charfield()
e_id = models.IntegerField()
parent = models.ForeignKey(Parent)
class SecondChildForm(django.forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Child
fields = ('name', 'e_id', 'parent')
widgets = {'parent': forms.TextInput}
formset_class = inlineformset_factory(models=[Parent, FirstChild],
forms=[FirstChildForm, SecondChildForm],
extra=1)
As far as I understand, Django formsets cannot work with multiple models right now.
So which way should I choose to implement this behaviour and do not broke all django conceptions?, I cannot use some extra libraries so I have to implement everything by myself and I use django 1.6 if it is important.
So, finally I used this approach as a base: https://micropyramid.com/blog/how-to-use-nested-formsets-in-django/

use `SplitArrayField` instead of `SimpleArrayField` in ModelForm

I have model with ArrayField and I want use ModelForm. Django by default use SimpleArrayField but I need SplitArrayField. I get my data from json and I use form only for validation and I don't need input widgets. (I use client side rendering)
class Profile(models.Model):
phone = ArrayField(CharField(max_length=20, validators=[some_validator]))
class ProfileForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Profile
form = ProfileForm(data={"phone":["555-5555","444-4444"]})
form.validate()
How I can use SplitArrayField in ModelForm?
I solve my problem with field_classes in Meta class:
class ProfileForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Profile
field_classes = {
'phone': SplitArrayField, # or any custom field
}
note:
SplitArrayField is not good enough for me so I create my own array form field
I think with pure django this is not possible at the moment. There is ticket which proposes the the possibility to use a SplitArrayField.
But you could use this package: django_postgres_extensions.
There you can use a SplitArrayField by defining the form_size parameter:
from django_postgres_extensions.models.fields import ArrayField
class Product(models.Model):
keywords = ArrayField(models.CharField(max_length=20), default=[], form_size=10, blank=True)

Using ModelSerializer with joined records

I am trying to make a tool for drawing diagrams on the web. I have a model like so:
class PlaneableItem(Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=NAME_LENGTH, blank=True)
class View(PlaneableItem):
# Some useful details
class Anchor(Model):
view = models.ForeignKey(View)
planeable = models.ForeignKey(PlaneableItem)
class BlockRepresentation(Anchor):
# Useful details
class LineRepresentation(Anchor):
# Useful details
I try to make a rest API that returns lists of all blocks and lines for a specific view, including the name of the planeable that they refer to.
I can get a queryset for this using:
qs = BlockRepresentation.objects.filter(view=theview).all()
qs.select_related('planeable')
qs.extra(select={'name': 'rest_api_planeableitem.name'})
However, now I can't use a ModelSerializer on it, because the field 'name' is not part of the BlockRepresentation.
I really like ModelSerializers, is there a better way of doing this?
Is there a particular reason you need that extra() call? If the sole purpose of that call is to rename a field, you can omit that from the queryset and rename the field using a SerializerMethodField from your serializer. I will assume planeable is the ForeignKey field in BlockRepresentation model to the PlaneableItem model. Sample code:
from rest_framework import serializers
class BlockRepresentationSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
# Some fields
name = serializers.SerializerMethodField()
class Meta:
model = BlockRepresentation
def get_name(self, obj):
if obj.planeable:
return obj.planeable.name
return ''

Custom labels for UserProfileForm in Django

I'm using the UserProfileForm class under django.db to take the UserProfile model class and turn it into a form. Currently, the labels for the form elements are the column names of the underlying db table. I'm wondering if there is a way that I can customize the labels?
Thanks,
Tino
I think you mean a model form using django.forms.ModelForm. You can add a verbose name to your UserProfileModel, or you can use the label arg in your ModelForm like so:
>>> class ArticleForm(ModelForm):
... pub_date = DateField(label='Publication date')
...
... class Meta:
... model = Article
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/forms/modelforms/#a-full-example
http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/forms/api/