I've written for myself a small utility class containing useful methods for rendering lines, quads, cubes, etc. quickly and easily in OpenGL. Up until now, I've been using almost entirely immediate mode, so I could focus on learning other aspects of OpenGL. It seems prudent to switch over to using VBOs. However, I want to keep much of the same functionality I've been using, for instance my utility class. Is there a good method of converting these simple immediate mode calls to a versatile VBO system?
I am using LWJGL.
Having converted my own code from begin..end blocks and also taught others, this is what I recommend.
I'm assuming that your utility class is mostly static methods, draw a line from this point to that point.
First step is to have each individual drawing operation create a VBO for each attribute. Replace your glBegin..glEnd block with code that creates an array (actually a ByteBuffer) for each vertex attribute: coordinates, colors, tex coords, etc. After what used to be glEnd, copy the ByteBuffers to the VBOs with glBufferData. Then set up the attributes with chunks of glEnableClientState, glBindBuffer, glVertex|Color|whateverPointer calls. Call glDrawArrays to actually draw something, and finally restore client state and delete the VBOs.
Now, this is not good OpenGL code and is horribly inefficient and wasteful. But it should work, it's fairly straightforward to write, and you can change one method at a time.
And if you don't need to draw very much, well modern GPUs are so fast that maybe you won't care that it's inefficient.
Second step is to start re-using VBOs. Have your class create one VBO for each possible attribute at init time or first use. The drawing code still creates ByteBuffer data arrays and copies them over, but doesn't delete the VBOs.
Third step, if you want to move into OpenGL 4 and are using shaders, would be to replace glVertexPointer with glVertexAttribPointer(0, glColorPointer with glVertexAttribPointer(1, etc. You should also create a Vertex Array Object along with the VBOs at init time. (You'll still have to enable/disable attrib pointers individually depending on whether each draw operation needs colors, tex coords, etc.)
And the last step, which would require changes elsewhere to your program(s), would be to go for 3D "objects" rather than methods. Your utility class would no longer contain drawing methods. Instead you create a line, quad, or cube object and draw that. Each of these objects would (probably) have its own VBOs. This is more work, but really pays off in the common case when a lot of your 3D geometry doesn't change from frame to frame. But again, you can start with the more "wasteful" approach of replacing each method call to draw a line from P1 to P2 with something like l = new Line3D(P1, P2) ; l.draw().
Hope this helps.
Related
my goal is to pack all mesh data into a C++ class, with the possibility of using an object of such a class with more than one GLSL shader program.
I've stuck with this problem: if I understand it well the way of how in GLSL vertex data are passed from CPU to GPU is based on using Vertex Array Objects which:
are made of Vertex Buffer Objects which store raw vertex data, and
Vertex Attribute Pointers which tells what shader variable location to assign and the format of the data passed to VBO above
additionally one can make an Element Buffer Object to store indices
another extra elements necessary to draw an object are textures which are made separately
I's able to make all that data and store only a VAO in my mesh class and only pass the VAO handler to my shader program to draw it. It works, but, for my goal of using multiple shader programs, the VAP stands in my way. It is the only element in my class that rely on a specific shader program's property (namely the location of input variables).
I wonder if I'm forced to remake all VAOs every time I'm using my shaders when I want to draw something. I'm afraid that the efficiency of my drawing code will suffer drastically.
So, I'm asking if I should forget of making my universal mesh class and instead make a separate objects for each shader program I'm using in my application. I would rather not, as I want to avoid unnecessary copying of my mesh data. On the other hand if this means my drawing routine will slow down because of all that remaking VAOs every milisecond during drawing then I have to rethink the design of my code :(
EDIT: OK I've misunderstood that VAOs store bindings to other objects, not the data itself. But there is one thing still left: to make an VAP I have to provide information about the location of an input variable from a shader and also the layout of data in VBO from a mesh.
What I'm trying to avoid is to make an separate object that stores that VAP which relies both on a mesh object and a shader object. I might solve my problem if all shader programs use the same location for the same thing, but at this moment I'm not sure if this is the case.
additionally one can make an Element Buffer Object to store indices
another extra elements necessary to draw an object are textures which are made separately
Just to be clear, that's you being lazy and/or uninformed. OpenGL strongly encourages you to use a single buffer for both vertex and index data. Vulkan goes a step further by limiting the number of object names (vao, vbo, textures, shaders, everything) you can create and actively punishes you for not doing that.
As to the problem you're facing.. It would help if you used correct nomenclature, or at least full names. "VAP" is yet another sign of laziness that hides what your actual issue is.
I will mention that VAOs are separate from VBOs, and you can have multiple VAOs linked to the same VBO (VBOs are just buffers of raw data -- again, Vulkan goes a step further here and its buffers store literally everything from vertex data, element indices, textures, shader constants etc).
You can also have multiple programs use the same VAOs, you just bind whatever VAO you want active (glBindVertexArray) once, then use your programs and call your render functions as needed. Here's an example from one of my projects that uses the same terrain data to render both the shaded terrain and a grid on top of them:
chunk.VertexIndexBuffer.Bind();
// pass 1, render the terrain
terrainShader.ProgramUniform("selectedPrimitiveID", selectedPrimitiveId);
terrainShader.Use();
roadsTexture.Bind();
GL.DrawArrays(PrimitiveType.Triangles, 0, chunk.VertexIndexBuffer.VertexCount);
// pass 2, render the grid
gridShader.Use();
GL.DrawElements(BeginMode.Lines, chunk.VertexIndexBuffer.IndexCount, DrawElementsType.UnsignedShort, 0);
I'm creating a tile-based renderer where each tile has a vertex model. However, from each vertex model only a small portion is rendered in one frame. These subsets change every frame.
What would be the fastest way to render this? I can think of the following options:
Make one draw call for every model. Every model is stored in full on the gpu. For every draw call, the full vbo is switched every time. Indices are then used to pick the appropriate small portion for the actual rendering.
Make one draw call with one vbo which gets assembled every frame by copying the necessary (small) subset of all the other vbos (the data is copied within vram).
Make one draw call with one vbo, but the vbo is recreated every frame with the (small) subset from CPU data using glBufferData.
Which do you think is fastest, or can you think of something faster?
One deciding factor is obviously if switching between larger VBOs is more expensive than switching between smaller VBOs.
It is a bad idea to make a lot of drawcalls. In OpenGL,you will be CPU bound by this method, so it is better to batch a lot of models.
Actually, I would go for this method. All static geometry is inside one and only one VBO and one VAO. It does not mean that you only have "one draw call". However, you should use glMultiDraw*Indirect.
The idea burried that is you have to use compute shaders to perform culling on GPU, and use something like GL_INDIRECT_PARAMETERS extensions with your multi indirect draw call.
Indirect Drawing
For all dynamic geometry, you can use a persistent buffer.
To answer your question about changing vao/vbo. Change VAO, or use glBindVertexBuffer should not make a big overhead.
But you should profile it, it can depends on your driver / hardware :)
I'm trying to use modern OpenGL and shaders, instead of the immediate mode I have been using so far. I recently learned about VBOs and VAO, and I'm still trying to get my head round them, but I know that a VBO takes an array of floats that are vertices, which it then passes to the GPU etc
What is the best way to draw multiple objects (which are all identical) but in different positions, using VBOs. Will I have to draw one, then modify the array passed in beforehand, and then draw it again and modify and draw and modify and so on... for all blocks in the screen every frame? Or is there a better way?
I'm trying to achieve this: http://imgur.com/cBgJ0sK
Any help is appreciated - I don't want to learn bad (deprecated, old) immediate mode habits, when I could be learning a more modern way!
You should not modify the vertices in your program, that should be done in the shaders. For this, you will create a matrix that represents the transformation and will use that matrix in the vertex shader.
The main idea is:
You create a VAO holding the information of your VBO (vertices, normals, texture coordinates, tangent information, etc.)
Then, for every different object, you generate a model matrix that holds the information of the position, orientation and scale (and other homogeneous tranformations) and send that to your shader to make the transformations.
The idea is that you bind your VAO just once and then draw all the different objects just sending the information that change (model matrix, may be textures) and draw the objects.
To learn about how to use the model matrix, read tutorials like this:
http://ogldev.atspace.co.uk/www/tutorial06/tutorial06.html
There are even better ways to do this, but you can start from here.
Other information that would be good for your case is using instancing.
http://ogldev.atspace.co.uk/www/tutorial33/tutorial33.html
Later, you can move on indirect drawing for even better performance. Later...
I'm new to graphics programming, and need to add on a rendering backend for a demo we're creating. I'm hoping you guys can point me in the right direction.
Short version: Is there any way to send OpenGL an array of data for distinct elements, without having to issue a draw command for each element distinctly?
Long version: We have a CUDA program (will eventually be OpenCL) which calculates a bunch of data for a bunch of objects for us. We then need to render these objects using, e.g., OpenGL.
The CUDA kernel can generate our vertices, and using OpenGL interop, it can shove these in an OpenGL VBO and not have to transfer the data back to host device memory. But the problem is we have a bunch (upwards of a million is our goal) distinct objects. It seems like our best bet here is allocating one VBO and putting every object's vertices into it. Then we can call glDrawArrays with offsets and lengths of each element inside that VBO.
However, each object may have a variable number of vertices (though the total vertices in the scene can be bounded.) I'd like to avoid having to transfer a list of start indices and lengths from CUDA -> CPU every frame, especially given that these draw commands are going right back to the GPU.
Is there any way to pack a buffer with data such that we can issue only one call to OpenGL to render the buffer, and it can render a number of distinct elements from that buffer?
(Hopefully I've also given enough info to avoid a XY problem here.)
One way would be to get away from understanding these as individual objects and making them a single large object drawn with a single draw call. The question is, what data is it that distinguishes the objects from each other, meaning what is it you change between the individual calls to glDrawArrays/glDrawElements?
If it is something simple, like a color, it would probably be easier to supply this an additional per-vertex attribute. This way you can render all objects as one single large object using a single draw call with the indiviudal sub-objects (which really only exist conceptually now) colored correctly. The memory cost of the additional attribute may be well worth it.
If it is something a little more complex (like a texture), you may still be able to index it using an additional per-vertex attribute, being either an index into a texture array (as texture arrays should be supported on CUDA/OpenCL-able hardware) or a texture coordinate into a particular subregion of a single large texture (a so-called texture atlas).
But if the difference between those objects is something more complex, as a different shader or something, you may really need to render individual objects and make individual draw calls. But you still don't need to neccessarily make a round-trip to the CPU. With the use of the ARB_draw_indirect extension (which is core since GL 4.0, I think, but may be supported on GL 3 hardware (and thus CUDA/CL-hardware), don't know) you can source the arguments to a glDrawArrays/glDrawElements call from an additional buffer (into which you can write with CUDA/CL like any other GL buffer). So you can assemble the offset-length-information of each individual object on the GPU and store them in a single buffer. Then you do your glDrawArraysIndirect loop offsetting into this single draw-indirect-buffer (with the offset between the individual objects now being constant).
But if the only reason for issuing multiple draw calls is that you want to render the objects as single GL_TRIANGLE_STRIPs or GL_TRIANGLE_FANs (or, god beware, GL_POLYGONs), you may want to reconsider just using a bunch of GL_TRIANGLES so that you can render all objects in a single draw call. The (maybe) time and memory savings from using triangle strips are likely to be outweight by the overhead of multiple draw calls, especially when rendering many small triangle strips. If you really want to use strips or fans, you may want to introduce degenerate triangles (by repeating vertices) to seprate them from each other, even when drawn with a single draw call. Or you may look into the glPrimitiveRestartIndex function introduced with GL 3.1.
Probably not optimal, but you could make a single glDrawArray on your whole buffer...
If you use GL_TRIANGLES, you can fill your buffer with zeroes, and write only the needed vertices in your kernel. This way "empty" regions of your buffer will be drawn as 0-area polygons ( = degenerate polygons -> not drawn at all )
If you use GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP, you can do the same, but you'll have to duplicate your first vertex in order to make a fake triangle between (0,0,0) and your mesh.
This can seem overkill, but :
- You'll have to be able to handle as many vertices anyway
- degenerate triangles use no fillrate, so they are almost free (the vertex shader is still computed, though)
A probably better solution would be to use glDrawElements instead : In you kernel, you also generate an index list for your whole buffer, which will be able to completely skip regions of your buffer.
I'm trying to write a game that deals with many circles (well, Triangle Fans, but you get the idea). Each circle will have an x position, a y position, and a mass property. Every circle's mass property will be different. Also, I want to color some groups of circles different, while keeping a transparent circle center, and fading to opaque along the perimeter of the circles.
I was told to use VBOs, and have been Googling all day. I would like a full example on how I would draw these circles and an explanation as to how VBOs work, while keeping that explanation simple.
I have not implemented VBOs myself yet, but from what I understand, they work similar to texture objects. In fact, when I am reminding myself and explaining to others what VBOs are, I like to incorrectly call texture objects 'texture buffer objects', to reinforce the conceptual similarity.
(Not to be mixed with buffer textures from NVIDIA-specified extension GL_EXT_texture_buffer_object.)
So let's think: what are texture objects? They are objects you generate using glGenTextures(). glGenBuffersARB() does similar thing. An analogy applies with glBindTexture() and glBindBufferARB().
(As of OpenGL 1.5, functions glGenBuffers() and glBindBuffer() have entered core OpenGL, so you can use them in place of the extension equivalents.)
But what exactly are these 'texture objects', and what do they do? Well, consider that you can, actually, use glTexture2D() in each frame to set up a texture. Texture objects only serve to reduce traffic between GPU and main memory; instead of sending entire pixel array, you send just the "OpenGL name" (that is, an integer identifier) of the texture object which you know to be static.
VBOs serve similar purpose. Instead of sending the vertex array over and over, you upload the array once using glBufferData() and then send just the "OpenGL name" of the object. They are great for static objects, and not so great for dynamic objects. In fact, many generic 3D engines such as Ogre3D provide you with a way to specify if a mesh is dynamic or static, quite probably in order to let you decide between VBOs and vertex arrays.
For your purposes, VBOs are not the right answer. You want numerous simple objects that are continuously morphing and changing. By simple, I mean those with less than 200 vertices. Unless you intend to write a very smart and complex vertex shader, VBOs are not for you. You want to use vertex arrays, which you can easily manipulate from main CPU and update them each frame without making special calls to graphics card to reupload the entire VBO onto the graphics card (which may turn out slower than just sending vertex arrays).
Here's a quite good letscallit "man page" from nVidia about VBO API. Read it for further info!
good vbo tutorial
What you're doing looks like particles, you might want to google "particle rendering" just in case.