I am currently trying to write a list of pairs. my code is :
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <list>
using namespace std;
list<pair<string,char>> listPair;
list<pair<string,char>>::iterator it;
void printStars(list<pair<string,char>> listPair)
{
for (it=listPair.begin(); it != listPair.end(); it++)
cout << it->first <<" ";
cout << endl;
}
int main()
{
pair<string,char> mypair;
listPair.push_back(make_pair("bib",'a'));
listPair.push_back(make_pair("bob",'b'));
for_each(listPair.begin(), listPair.end(), printStars);
return 0;
}
Compilation fails with:
error C2664: 'void (std::list<_Ty>)' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'std::pair<_Ty1,_Ty2>' to 'std::list<_Ty>'
Can you please help me detect where exactly is the problem?
The functor you pass to std::for_each is expected to accept an element of the range you pass into std::for_each. Your last has pair<string,char> elements, so your functor should have a signature like: void printStars(const pair<string,char>& elem).
In addition, to pass a plain function to std::for_each you need to use std::ref or (on an old compiler) std::ptr_fun.
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <list>
#include <string> // missing include
#include <utility>
#include <functional>
using namespace std;
typedef list< pair<string,char> > list_t;
list_t listPair;
void printStars(list_t::reference x) // use a reference, otherwise you create a copy
{
cout << x.first << " " << x.second << endl;
}
int main()
{
pair<string,char> mypair;
listPair.push_back(make_pair("bib",'a'));
listPair.push_back(make_pair("bob",'b'));
for_each(listPair.begin(), listPair.end(), std::ref(printStars)); // C++11
for_each(listPair.begin(), listPair.end(), std::ptr_fun(&printStars)); // C++98
return 0;
}
Your problem is, your printStars() expects a list, however for_each passes it each item, not the actual list:
Working code :
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iterator>
#include <list>
#include <string>
#include <utility>
list<pair<string,char> > listPair;
list<pair<string,char> >::iterator it;
void printStars(const pair<string,char> & listPair){ //notice the &, so it would pass by reference and not make a new copy of the pair.
cout << listPair.first << ' ';
}
int main() {
pair<string,char> mypair;
listPair.push_back(make_pair("bib",'a'));
listPair.push_back(make_pair("bob",'b'));
for_each(listPair.begin(), listPair.end(), printStars);
cout << endl;
return 0;
}
Related
I am trying to pass an array of strings off to a function so that it will sort it along with a Class Template array object of strings which I don't even know what that would look like. But as it is right now. When I use size() inside of main it works just fine but when I use size() inside a function I am typing up it throws out this error.
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <array>
#include <string>
#include <algorithm> // contains sort and binary_search
using namespace std;
void sortArrays(string arr[]);
int main()
{
array<string, 5> hello = {"Hello", "world", "How", "Are", "You"};
sortArrays(&hello[0]);
}
void sortArrays(string array[])
{
string *arrPtr = array;
sort(*arrPtr.begin(), *arrPtr.end());
cout << endl << endl;
}
Like this, std::array it's easy to pass by reference.
#include <algorithm>
#include <array>
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
void sortArray(std::array<std::string,5>& arr)
{
std::sort(arr.begin(),arr.end());
}
int main()
{
std::array<std::string, 5> hello = { "Hello", "world", "How", "Are", "You" };
sortArray(hello);
for (const auto& str : hello)
{
std::cout << str << " ";
}
std::cout << std::endl;
}
I have a number of strings and their bitset equivalents. I need to be able to look up equivalents in both directions, i.e. "str to bitset" and "bitset to str". I believe boost-bimap would be the right container for this job.
I managed to get this to work with strings and integers but my string / bitset bimap does not compile. I am using VS2019 with the latest boost release.
Integer example works:
#include <boost/bimap.hpp>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
typedef boost::bimap<std::string, int> bimap_str_int_t;
bimap_str_int_t bimap1;
bimap1.insert(bimap_str_int_t::value_type("A", 1));
std::cout << bimap1.left.at("A") << '\n'; //prints 1
std::cout << bimap1.right.at(1) << '\n'; // prints A
}
Bitset example fails to compile:
#include <boost/bimap.hpp>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <bitset>
int main()
{
typedef std::bitset<3> bitset_t;
typedef boost::bimap<std::string, bitset_t> bimap_str_bitset_t;
bimap_str_bitset_t bimap2;
bitset_t bits{ "010" };
bimap2.insert(bimap_str_bitset_t::value_type("A", bits));
std::cout << bimap2.left.at("A") << '\n';
std::cout << bimap2.right.at(bits) << '\n';
}
The bitset example creates the following compiler error:
boost_test.cpp(20): message : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::bimaps::bimap' being compiled
I am not sure how to fix this and would greatly appreciate any hints.
The issue is that std::bitset has no operator< - one of the requirements of any STL-like ordered collection.
To fix this, you need to supply a comparison function - here's one way you might try:
#include <boost/bimap.hpp>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <bitset>
typedef std::bitset<3> bitset_t;
struct compare_bitset {
bool operator()(const bitset_t& x, const bitset_t& y) const {
return x.to_ulong() < y.to_ulong();
}
};
int main()
{
using bitset_set = boost::bimaps::set_of<bitset_t, compare_bitset>;
typedef boost::bimap < std::string, bitset_set> bimap_str_bitset_t;
bimap_str_bitset_t bimap2;
bitset_t bits{ "010" };
bimap2.insert(bimap_str_bitset_t::value_type("A", bits));
std::cout << bimap2.left.at("A") << '\n';
std::cout << bimap2.right.at(bits) << '\n';
}
I'm trying to use an unordered map to hold rolling accumulators in a class.
First let me show what works. Here is an accumulator within a class that works as expected without the map. Note that the accumulator needs to be initialized in the initialization list.
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/accumulators/accumulators.hpp>
#include <boost/accumulators/statistics/stats.hpp>
#include <boost/accumulators/statistics/rolling_mean.hpp>
namespace nmbstacc = boost::accumulators;
typedef nmbstacc::accumulator_set<double, nmbstacc::stats<nmbstacc::tag::rolling_mean >> MACC;
class RollMean {
public:
MACC m_acc;
RollMean(void) : m_acc(nmbstacc::tag::rolling_window::window_size = 3) {}
};
int main()
{
RollMean obj;
obj.m_acc(0.5);
obj.m_acc(1.5);
obj.m_acc(2.5);
obj.m_acc(3.5);
std::cout << "roll_mean: " << nmbstacc::rolling_mean(obj.m_acc) << std::endl;
std::getchar();
return 0;
}
However, what I need is an unordered map to hold these accumulators in a class but can't seems to figure out how to get the following program to compile. I'm not sure how to declare the mainmap container without first initializing the rolling accumulator.
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/accumulators/accumulators.hpp>
#include <boost/accumulators/statistics/stats.hpp>
#include <boost/accumulators/statistics/rolling_mean.hpp>
#include <unordered_map>
namespace nmbstacc = boost::accumulators;
typedef nmbstacc::accumulator_set<double, nmbstacc::stats<nmbstacc::tag::rolling_mean >> MACC;
class RollMean {
public:
MACC m_acc;
std::unordered_map<std::string, MACC> mainmap;
RollMean(std::string name) : m_acc(nmbstacc::tag::rolling_window::window_size = 3) {
mainmap.emplace(name, m_acc);
}
};
int main()
{
RollMean obj("a");
obj.mainmap["a"](1.0);
std::cout << "roll_mean: " << nmbstacc::rolling_mean(obj.mainmap["a"]) << std::endl;
std::getchar();
return 0;
}
I get the following error:
Error C2679 binary '[': no operator found which takes a right-hand operand of type 'boost::parameter::keyword' (or there is no acceptable conversion)
Thanks.
Like #jv_ hinted, map[key] is a mutating operation, which inserts a default constructed element if none exists.
However, there's no default constructor for your element type. Therefore, you can't use that operator.
If you use obj.mainmap.at("a") instead of obj.mainmap["a"], you'll get an exception on missing keys instead.
Live On Coliru
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/accumulators/accumulators.hpp>
#include <boost/accumulators/statistics/stats.hpp>
#include <boost/accumulators/statistics/rolling_mean.hpp>
#include <unordered_map>
namespace nmbstacc = boost::accumulators;
typedef nmbstacc::accumulator_set<double, nmbstacc::stats<nmbstacc::tag::rolling_mean> > MACC;
class RollMean {
public:
MACC m_acc;
std::unordered_map<std::string, MACC> mainmap;
RollMean(std::string name) : m_acc(nmbstacc::tag::rolling_window::window_size = 3) { mainmap.emplace(name, m_acc); }
};
int main() {
RollMean obj("a");
obj.mainmap.at("a")(1.0);
std::cout << "roll_mean: " << nmbstacc::rolling_mean(obj.mainmap.at("a")) << std::endl;
}
Prints:
roll_mean: 1
why the iteration in the code below doesn't work ? I mean the iterator is incremented but evaluating this expression o!=RateCurve.end() always give true.
i need such a function because i'm using it in a wrapper of a map to contruct an interest rate curve.
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <math.h>
#include <string>
#include <map>
#include <exception>
#include <vector>
#include <stdio.h>
using namespace std;
map<double, double>::iterator getIt(map<double, double> o){
return o.begin();
}
int main ()
{
map<double, double> RateCurve;
RateCurve[3.3 ]=0.034 ;
RateCurve[1.2 ]=0.03 ;
RateCurve[0.2 ]=.001 ;
RateCurve[6.1 ]=.023 ;
map<double, double>::iterator o=getIt(RateCurve);
while (o!=RateCurve.end()){
cout << "RateCurve[" << o->first << "] = " << o->second << endl;
++o;
}
}
getIt(map<double, double> o)
You copy the map, so the iterator returned points into an entirely unrelated map to the one you wanted. Worse, the copy gets destroyed at the end of the function call, and the iterator you try to use is no longer valid, so you have Undefined Behaviour.
Make getIt take a reference, and since you don't actually change the elements, you can make it const too. Then you need to change the return type:
std::map<double, double>::const_iterator
getIt(map<double, double> const& o)
{
return o.begin();
}
Also, please reconsider your use of bad practices using namespace std; and endl.
This question already has an answer here:
invalid operator < while sorting std::list
(1 answer)
Closed 7 years ago.
#include <algorithm>
#include <bitset>
#include <climits>
#include <cmath>
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstring>
#include <ctime>
#include <deque>
#include <functional>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <list>
#include <map>
#include <queue>
#include <set>
#include <sstream>
#include <stack>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
bool fun(int i, int j){
return abs(i - j) != -1;
}
int main(){
vector <int> v = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
sort(v.begin(), v.end(), fun);
for (int i = 0; i < v.size(); i++)
cout << v[i] << " ";
cout << endl;
return 0;
}
When I use the comparator 'fun' the programs throws the exception 'invalid operator <'. How can I modify this function to make the program run normally?
Your fun function does not provide strict weak ordering. If i and j are equal, it will return true. So you are not following the rules. Your implementation of the standard library responds by throwing an exception.
How can I modify this function to make the program run normally?
Assuming you want to sort in ascending order. Just use operator <.
bool fun(int i, int j)
{
return i < j;
}
Alternatively you could just use the comparator provided by the standard.
sort(v.begin(), v.end(), std::less<int>());
See the link in the comments or the answer provided by #DanielDaranas to understand why your original function doesn't work.