I decided to do some OpenGL programming on OSX. I created a small NSOpenGLView class in order for me to get an OpenGL view in cocoa.
From there my plan was to switch to C++ and create an object model to draw shapes. Having no interest in reinventing the wheel I decided to use glutWireSphere to represent my sphere class.
Interestingly XCode throws a deprecation warning for ~90% of all the glu and glut functions. Including the sphere function.
Is there an Apple library that provides primitives similar to Glut? Am I missing something? Is there a current HowTo for OpenGL programming on OSX (OpenGL >= 3.2)? I'm currently looking through the OpenGL Programming Guide for Mac but that doesn't seem to cover it. Googling it mostly returns IOS or old results.
Note: I don't want to force the compilation to 10.8. And I don't necessarily want to link external libraries like GLFW.
You might want to check out SceneKit if you can use 10.9+. It's a native Cocoa framework specifically designed for dealing with 3D rendering.
From the docs:
'Scene Kit is a 3D-rendering Objective-C framework that combines a
high-performance rendering engine with a high-level, descriptive API.
Scene Kit supports the import, manipulation, and rendering of 3D
assets without requiring the exact steps to render a scene the way
OpenGL does.'
In particular the SCNSphere class is what you'll be looking for.
And here's a nice scene kit intro by Big Nerd Ranch:
SceneKit in Mountain Lion
However, one thing to consider is that you'll end up with code that is not portable to other platforms as SceneKit is native to OS X (and eventually iOS). Frameworks like OpenGL, Ogre, Irrlicht on the other hand support many different desktop and mobile platforms.
I am looking for the best native library that is similar to three.js in its structure and simplicity but is also extensible enough to support glsl shaders.
Requirements:
Open Source or very well documented for possible extension/enhancement
Allows commercial derivatives/use
Can either be wrapped in a physics library or easily paired with one.
Fast enough to support modern game graphics.
OpenGL or Mantle based. (I don't want to be stuck with windows.)
Windows support
Supports a system similar to three.js local/world coordinate system.
Raycasting support for doing collision detection.
Huge Bonus:
Supports Linux and OSX as well as windows.
I am looking for the closest match to Three.js as possible that is written in C++ similar to three.cpp but has completed functionality and is less beta/alpha status.
Have you tried Magnum ?
http://mosra.cz/blog/download-magnum.php
Supported platforms
Graphics APIs:
OpenGL 2.1 through 4.4, core profile functionality and modern extensions
OpenGL ES 2.0, 3.0 and extensions to match desktop OpenGL functionality
WebGL 1.0 and extensions to match desktop OpenGL functionality
Platforms:
Linux and embedded Linux (natively using GLX/EGL and Xlib or through GLUT or SDL2 toolkit)
Windows (through GLUT or SDL2 toolkit)
OS X (through SDL2 toolkit, thanks to Miguel Martin)
Google Chrome (through Native Client, both newlib and glibc toolchains are supported)
HTML5/JavaScript (through Emscripten)
Threejs actually does support glsl shaders. You can use THREE.ShaderMaterial class to create your own shader then pass your vertexShader and fragmentShader to it.
Another option is to program directly in WebGL. ThreeJS is built on top of WebGL. The only reason why I decided to use ThreeJS was to avoid writing glsl shaders since WebGL doesn't have materials and forces you to write your own glsl shaders, so if that's what you want you could go directly to WebGL. WebGL is more low level than Threejs.
If you don't like javascript, then you could use JogAmp's Ardor3D which is in Java. It's a 3D scenegraph renderer just like Threejs but in Java.
All of the above options have super fast game quality rendering performance.
I am developing a user interface for my application.... most of my application is portable as is written in c++ but today I started thinking about the UI. Which is currently written in Direct2D. I was wondering if there was an equivalent for developing a UI in IOS(Ipad), and OSX(MAC)?
Something high level enough that I could draw rectangles and circles, but also low level enough that is not as slow as GDI.
Thanks in advance.
PS. I DON'T want comparing which are better or worse, I just want to know what options I have.
CoreAnimation is a GPU-accelerated framework. Individual views are cached on the GPU. You can then apply composition arbitrary transforms to them. Such transforms are applied by the GPU to the cached image. So you can use CoreGraphics to draw a circle, rectangle or whatever, have CoreAnimation store that bitmap on the GPU and then transform that.
Also from the first-party frameworks, Sprite Kit provides a game-oriented framework that includes game-style (ie, accelerated write-once read-many 'sprites') drawing alongside physics/etc.
OpenGL ES is also fully supported. You can assume 2.0 is always available as it was introduced on the 3GS and Apple no longer accepts binaries for older devices. 3.0 is also available on the latest iPhone. That's obviously quite a bit lower level than Direct2D but Apple supplies GLKit which allows you to upload images trivially and to emulate the old fixed-functionality pipeline with just a few simple calls.
Out in the third-party world I guess the main thing people are going to suggest is Cocos2d but at this point it's already playing catch-up to Sprite Kit.
Of those, CoreAnimation, OpenGL and Cocos2D span iOS and OS X with some minor differences, Sprite Kit is already available on iOS and will turn up in the next OS X Mavericks.
Start with Cocoa (OSX) and Cocoa Touch (iOS). In apps made with those you can use Core Graphics which seems like a good fit for your needs, or OpenGL which is probably overkill. Of course there are many 3rd party libraries you can use, Cocos2d as Petesh mentioned is one of them.
I am aware that there were similar questions in past few years, but after doing some researches I still can't decide where from and what should I learn.
I would also like to see your current, actual view on modern OpenGL programming with more C++ OOP and shader approach. And get sure that my actual understanding on some things is valid.
So... currently we have OpenGL 4.2 out, which as I read somewhere requires dx11 hardware
(what does it mean?) and set of 'side' libraries, to for example create window.
There is the most common GLUT, which I extremely hate. One of main reason are function calls, which doesn't allow freedom in the way how we create main loop. As some people were telling, it was not meant for games.
There is also GLFW, which actually is quite nice and straight-forward to me. For some reason people use it with GLUT. ( which provides not only window initialisation, but also other utilities? )
And there is also SFML and SDL ( SDL < SFML imo ), whereas both of them sometimes need strange approach to work with OGL and in some cases are not really fast.
And we have also GLEW, which is extension loading utility... wait... isn't GLUT/GLFW already an extension? Is there any reason to use it, like are there any really important extensions to get interested with?
Untill now we have window creation (and some utilities), but... OGL doesn't take care of loading textures, neither 3D models. How many other libs do I need?
Let's mention education part now. There is (in)famous NeHe tutorial. Written in C with use of WinApi, with extremely unclear code and outdated solutions, yet still the most popular one. Some stuff like Red Book can be found, which are related to versions like 2.x or 3.x, however there are just few (and unfinished) tutorials mentioning 4.x.
What to go with?
So... currently we have OpenGL 4.2 out, which as I read somewhere requires dx11 hardware (what does it mean?) and set of 'side' libraries, to for example create window.
DX11 hardware is... hardware that has "supports DirectX 11" written on the side of the box. I'm not sure what it is you're asking here; are you unclear on what Direct3D is, what D3D 11 is, or what separates D3D 11 from prior versions?
FYI: D3D is a Windows-only alternative to using OpenGL to access rendering hardware. Version 11 is just the most recent version of the API. And D3D11 adds a few new things compared to D3D10, but nothing much that a beginner would need.
OpenGL is a specification that describes a certain interface for graphics operations. How this interface is created is not part of OpenGL. Therefore, every platform has its own way for creating an OpenGL context. Windows uses the Win32 API with WGL. X-Windows uses the X-Windows API with GLX functions. And so forth.
Libraries like GLUT, GLFW, etc are libraries that abstract all of these differences. They create and manage an OpenGL window for you, so that you don't have to dirty your code with platform-specific details. You do not have to use any of them.
Granted, if you're interested in learning OpenGL, it's best to avoid dealing with platform-specific minutae like how to take care of a HWND and such.
And we have also GLEW, which is extension loading utility... wait... isn't GLUT/GLFW already an extension? Is there any reason to use it, like are there any really important extensions to get interested with?
This is another misunderstanding. GLUT is a library, not an extension. An OpenGL extension is part of OpenGL. See, OpenGL is just a specification, a document. The implementation of OpenGL that you're currently using implements the OpenGL graphics system, but it may also implement a number of extensions to that graphics system.
GLUT is not part of OpenGL; it's just a library. The job of GLUT is to create and manage an OpenGL window. GLEW is also a library, which is used for loading OpenGL functions. It's not the only alternative, but it is a popular one.
Untill now we have window creation (and some utilities), but... OGL doesn't take care of loading textures, neither 3D models. How many other libs do I need?
OpenGL is not a game engine. It is a graphics system, designed for interfacing with dedicated graphics hardware. This job has nothing to do with things like loading anything from any kind of file. Yes, making a game requires this, but as previously stated, OpenGL is not a game engine.
If you need to load a file format to do something you wish to do, then you will need to either write code to do the loading (and format adjustment needed to interface with GL) or download a library that does it for you. The OpenGL Wiki maintains a pretty good list of tools for different tasks.
There is (in)famous NeHe tutorial. Written in C with use of WinApi, with extremely unclear code and outdated solutions, yet still the most popular one. Some stuff like Red Book can be found, which are related to versions like 2.x or 3.x, however there are just few (and unfinished) tutorials mentioning 4.x.
What to go with?
The OpenGL Wiki maintains a list of online materials for learning OpenGL stuff, both old-school and more modern.
WARNING: Shameless Self-Promotion Follows!
My tutorials on learning graphics are pretty good, with many sections and is still actively being worked on. It doesn't teach any OpenGL 4.x-specific functionality, but OpenGL 3.3 is completely compatible with 4.2. All of those programs will run just fine on 4.x hardware.
If you are writing a game, I would avoid things like GLUT, and write your own wrappers that will make the most sense for your game rendering architecture.
I would also avoid OpenGL 4.2 at this point, unless you only want to target specific hardware on specific platforms, because support is minimal. i.e., the latest version of Mac OSX Lion just added support for OpenGL 3.2.
For the most comprehensive coverage of machines made in the last few years, build your framework around OpenGL 2.1 and add additional support for newer OpenGL features where they make sense. The overall design should be the same. If you're only interested in targeting "current" machines, i.e. machines from late 2011 and forward, build your framework around OpenGL 3. Only the newest hardware supports 4.2, and only on Windows and some Linux. If you're interested in targeting mobile devices and consoles, use OpenGL ES 2.0.
GLEW loads and manages OpenGL Extensions, which are hardware extensions from different vendors, as opposed to GLUT which is a toolkit for building OpenGL applications, completely different things. I would highly recommend using GLEW, as it will provide a clean mechanism for determining which features are available on the hardware it is being run on, and will free you from the task of having to manually assign function pointers to the appropriate functions.
OpenGL SuperBible is a pretty good book, also check OpenGL Shading Language. Everything you do with modern OpenGL is going to involve the use of shaders - no more fixed functionality - so your biggest challenge is going to be understanding GLSL and how the shader pipelines work.
I'm currently learning modern OpenGL as well. I've also had hard time finding good resources, but here's what I've discovered so far.
I searched for a good book and ended up with OpenGL ES 2.0 Programming Guide, which I think is the best choice for learning modern OpenGL right now. Yes, the book is about OpenGL ES, but don't let that scare you. The good thing about OpenGL ES 2.0 is that all the slow parts of the API have been removed so you don't get any bad habits from learning it while it's still very close to desktop OpenGL otherwise, with only a few features missing, which I think you can learn rather easily after you've mastered OpenGL ES 2.0.
On the other hand, you don't have the mess with windowing libraries etc. that you have with desktop OpenGL and so the book on OpenGL ES won't help you there. I think it's very subjective which libraries to use, but so far I've managed fine with SDL, ImageMagick and Open Asset Import Library.
Now, the book has been a good help, but apart from that, there's also a nice collection of tutorials teaching modern OpenGL from ground up at OpenGL development on Linux. (I think it's valid on other OSes the name nevertheless.) The book, the tutorials and a glance or two every now and then to the Orange Book have been enough in getting me understand the basics of modern OpenGL. Note that I'm still not a master in the area, but it's definitely got me started.
I agree that it's king of hard to get in to OpenGL these days when all the tutorials and examples use outdated project files, boken links etc, and if you ask for help you are just directed to those same old tutorials.
I was really confused with the NeHe tutorials at first, but when I got a little better understanding of C, compiling libraries on UNIX and other basic stuff, it all fell into place.
As far as texture loading, I can recommend SOIL:
http://www.lonesock.net/soil.html
I'm not sure but I recall I had trouble compiling it correctly, but that may have been my low experience at the time. Give me a shout if you run into trouble!
Another usefull tip is to get a Linux VM running and then you can download the NeHe Linux example code and compile it out of the box. I think you just need GLUT for it to work.
I also prefer GLFW before GLUT, mainly because GLUT isn't maintained actively.
Good luck!
The major point of modern OpenGL is tesselation and new type of shader programs so i would like to recommend to start from a standalone tutorial on OpenGL 4 tesselation, i.e: http://prideout.net/blog/?p=48
After manuals and tutorials a good follow-up is to take a look at the open-source engines out there that are based on top of "new" OpenGL 3/4. As one of the developers, I would point at Linderdaum Engine.
"Modern OpenGL programming with more C++ OOP and shader approach" makes me mention Qt. It hasn't been mentioned yet but Qt is a library that is worth learning and is the easiest way to write cross platform C++ apps. I also found it the easiest way to learn OpenGL in general since it easily handles the initialization and hardware specific code for you. Qt has it's own math libraries as well so all you need to get started with OpenGL is Qt. VPlay is a library that uses Qt to help people make games easily so there are obviously some people using Qt to make games as well.
For a short introduction to Qt and OpenGL see my post here.
I will mention that since Qt abstracts some OpenGL code, if you are trying to use the Qt wrappers, the API is slightly different than just OpenGL (although arguably simpler).
As for my vote for good tutorials or book check out Anton's OpenGL tutorials and Swiftless tutorials. Anton's ebook on Amazon is also rated higher than any other OpenGL published resource I have seen so far (and far cheaper).
I'm writing an implementation for OpenVG and OpenGL|ES in Go, both of which depend on the Khronos EGL API, supposedly to ease portability I guess.
I'm writing an implementation of OpenVG on top of OpenGL ES for fun and educational reasons - I haven't done a lot of rendering work and I'd like to learn more about the open APIs and practice implementing well defined standards (easier to see if I got the right results).
As I understand it, EGL provides a standard API for retrieving a drawing context (or what ever it's rightly called,) instead of using one of the multiple OS provided APIs (GLX, WGL etc)
I have a hard time believing Khronos would go through such effort and leave the standard OpenGL out of the loop but the thing is, I haven't found how or if OpenGL (the real deal) interfaces with EGL or if it's only OpenGL ES. If OpenGL ES can use the drawing context from EGL, would standard OpenGL also work?
I'm really new to all of this which is why I'm excited but the real project I'm doing is a Go widget toolkit that utilizes OpenVG for its drawing operations and uses hardware acceleration wherever possible.
If OpenVG, OpenGL and OpenGL ES depend on EGL, I think my question can be answered with "yes" or "no". Just keep in mind that I dove into this subject head-first last night.
Does OpenGL use or depend on EGL?
Off topic, but there is no EGL tag. Should there be?
You can bind EGL_OPENGL_API as the current API for your thread, via the eglBindAPI(EGLenum api); a subsequent eglCreateContext will create an OpenGL rendering context.
From the EGL spec, p42:
Some of the functions described in this section make use of the current rendering API, which is set on a per-thread basis
by calling
EGLBoolean eglBindAPI(EGLenum api);
api must specify one of the supported client APIs , either EGL_OPENGL_API,
EGL_OPENGL_ES_API, or EGL_OPENVG_API
The caveat is that the EGL implementation is well within its rights not support EGL_OPENGL_API and instead generate an EGL_BAD_PARAMETER error if you try to bind it.
It's also hard to link to libGL without picking up the AGL/WGL/GLX cruft; the ABI on these platforms require that libGL provides those entry points. Depending on what platform you're playing with this may or may not be a problem.
Does OpenGL use or depend on EGL?
No. You can run OpenGL without EGL.
But is possible to have EGL implementation capable to create desktop OpenGL context. That's because EGL's eglBindAPI(int api) allows EGL_OPENGL_API, EGL_OPENGL_ES_API, or EGL_OPENVG_API.
But if you ask:
Does OpenGL-ES use or depend on EGL?
The answer is yes, but there are exceptions.
Currently (2015), you have several implementations of OpenGL-ES that rely on EGL to create graphics context: Google ANGLE, PowerVR, ARM MALI, Adreno, AMD, Mesa, etc.
But on recent releases of NVIDIA and Intel drivers you can also request OpenGL-ES contexts directly, where extensions WGL_EXT_create_context_es_profile and WGL_EXT_create_context_es2_profile are available (Windows). Same thing on Unix platforms where GLX_EXT_create_context_es_profile and GLX_EXT_create_context_es2_profile extensions are available.
The intent of EGL is to ease developers' lives by creating a portable and standard way to initialize and get context of supported graphics API, without worrying about platform specific issues, as WGL, GLX, etc. That is a problem of EGL implementers, not final programmer.
There is no relationship between OpenGL and EGL. EGL generally does not run on desktops, and there is no ability to create a desktop OpenGL context through EGL.
OpenGL contexts are instead created and managed by platform-specific APIs. On Windows, the WGL API is used. On X11-based platforms, GLX is used. And so forth.
There was some noise last year from Khronos about creating a version of EGL that could work on the desktop and make OpenGL contexts, but thus far, nothing came of it.