Today, When trying to build my so lib project with mongodb c++ client, I got the error:
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/../../../libmongoclient.a(connection_factory.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `_ZTVN5mongo17AScopedConnectionE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.8/../../../libmongoclient.a: error adding symbols: Bad value
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
I googled -fPIC, but got nothing. Where can I find the doc about this? What's this? I am using clang++ for building.
PIC stands for Position Independent Code. Quoting from man gcc:
If supported for the target machine, emit position-independent code,
suitable for dynamic linking and avoiding any limit on the size of the
global offset table.
You compiled shared library without having relocatable code turned on at compile time. It is strongly suggested to use position independent code (PIC or PIE) when building shared libraries.
Please refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position-independent_code for more details.
There is a bug in this system,you can not use .o or .a compiled intermediate file to generate dynamic lib(xx.so file),you may try to directly use the .cpp or .c file to generate a dynamic lib,also you may see this link to fix this bug (link site)
Related
I have started learning C++ on Ubuntu. I am only a few months into using Linux as well.
I am attempting to port over a 2D Ball Collision Script from Javascript to C++ for learning purposes.
I am using simple2D for the drawing in C++: https://github.com/simple2d/simple2d
I go to run this command:
simple2d build c-code-test.cpp
I receive this response:
cc1plus: warning: command line option ‘-std=c11’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccl07DBG.o: undefined reference to symbol '_ZNSt8ios_base4InitD1Ev##GLIBCXX_3.4'
//usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Due to how fresh I am with Linux and C++ I am unable to make the correct inferences to solve this based on previous questions on stack overflow. I have installed libstdc++6 so I would have though it would be linked correctly.
Can someone walk me through in steps 1, 2, 3 ... Please? Thank you kindly!
The errors you see look to be from trying to compile C++ as C. The command line option is selecting the C11 standard, which is for C, not C++. The missing symbol is because the C++ library isn't being linked in, which also happens when linking a program as C.
I haven't used simple2d, but my guess here is that the compile script they wrote does not support C++ or there is some option you need to use C++. If we look at docs:
The simple2d build command is a helpful shortcut for compiling a
single source file. Of course, you can also use a compiler directly,
for example on Unix-like systems:
cc triangle.c `simple2d --libs` -o triangle
Why don't you try something like their example that invokes the compiler directly. But you would need to use g++ instead of cc. Something like: g++ c-code-test.cpp `simple2d --libs` -o c-code-test
This is a bug with the simple2d script.
They're basically using the wrong build command for C++.
You could work around it by patching in the fix I've linked to, or using the manual build step shown by TrentP.
Or wait for the next version after v1.1.0.
My problem is rather specific, but bear with me.
This in the end is kinda reverse engineering, but this problem in particular seems to fit more this board.
So, I have a shared object compiled for MIPS written in C++. I don't have the source code of the lib. The lib is compiled using GCC 4.3.3. I want to use functions present in this shared object in my amd64 computer running elementary OS. To do this, I used the sourcery cross compiler to cross compile some C++ code to MIPS, that would use this object.
So far I managed this except for this one compile error, which I cannot figure out. The lib is called libdvl.so, and uses as dependency libc.so.0 (and both are in the same folder as the cpp code).
mips-linux-gnu-g++ -g -L/path/to/lib -Wl,-rpath,/path/to/lib -o verifier verifier.cpp -ldvl
which gives me
(...)/mgc/embedded/codebench/bin/../lib/gcc/mips-linux-gnu/4.9.1/../../../../mips-linux-gnu/bin/ld: warning: libc.so.0, needed by /path/to/lib/libdvl.so, may conflict with libc.so.6
(...)/mgc/embedded/codebench/bin/../lib/gcc/mips-linux-gnu/4.9.1/../../../../mips-linux-gnu/bin/ld: errno##GLIBC_PRIVATE: TLS definition in (...)/mgc/embedded/codebench/bin/../mips-linux-gnu/libc/lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS definition in /path/to/lib/libc.so.0 section .bss
/path/to/lib/libc.so.0: error adding symbols: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
So I added "-l:libc.so.0" and got this
(...)/mgc/embedded/codebench/bin/../lib/gcc/mips-linux-gnu/4.9.1/../../../../mips-linux-gnu/bin/ld: errno: TLS definition in (...)/mgc/embedded/codebench/bin/../mips-linux-gnu/libc/lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches non-TLS definition in libc.so.0 section .bss
(...)/mgc/embedded/codebench/bin/../mips-linux-gnu/libc/lib/libc.so.6: error adding symbols: Bad value
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Any idea how to solve this? I know I am using GCC 4.9.1, but I already downloaded the older code sourcery version which uses GCC 4.3.154 and got the exact same error.
EDIT 1: Exactly as Lol4t0 said, filtered using c++filt it gives an actual function name from stdc++. Using
mips-linux-gnu-g++ -g -L/path/to/lib -Wl,-rpath,/path/to/lib -I/path/to/lib -o verifier verifier.cpp -ldvl -l:libuClibc++.so.0 -l:libutil.so.0 -l:libc.so.0 -l:ld-uClibc.so.0 -nodefaultlibs
to give to libdvl its depencies (as I will not rewrite stdc++ :p), I get the following compile error:
(...)/mgc/embedded/codebench/bin/../lib/gcc/mips-linux-gnu/4.9.1/../../../../mips-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /tmp/cc66DLda.o: undefined reference to symbol '_Unwind_Resume##GCC_3.0'
(...)/mgc/embedded/codebench/bin/../mips-linux-gnu/libc/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I already confirmed lib dependencies and the order in which they appear.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks for all the help.
Using -nodefaultlibs solves the first problem though.
You are linking against GLIBC (libc.so.6) and some other libc (libc.so.0).
That could never work: you have to have everything compiled and linked against a single, consistent libc.
Since your libdvl.so uses as dependency libc.so.0, and assuming you can't rebuild libdvl.so, you have to use crosscompiler that targets libc.so.0 (which is possibly dietlibc, or uClibc), and compile and link everything else using that toolchain. Your crosscompiler on the other hand appears to target GLIBC, and will not do you any good.
After a lot of trial and error, you may be able to link the final binary using inconsistent builds, and your binary may even get to main (that is very unlikely). But chances of such binary actually working correctly are minuscule.
I have written a new LLVM optimization pass. I have added this pass by making a new directory at following location:
llvm/lib/Transform/AddSub
I am following the steps as mentioned in the llvm documentation:
http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
But while compiling I am getting linking errors. May be my build and makefile settings are not correct.
relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `_ZTVN12_GLOBAL__N_18AddSubE' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
If I have written an independent llvm pass and added it in a new directory inside llvm at:
llvm/lib/Transform/
what Makefile or build changes do I need to make while writing an independent pass?
I ran into this same error when I was trying to follow the Writing An LLVM Pass guide. For me, the fix was adding a line like this:
char MyPassName::ID = 0;
(I had skipped over that step in the directions.)
I was using flex and bison to build a simple calculator project I cloned from Github.
But after I typed make in terminal, I got the following message:
gcc -o calc calc.tab.c lex.yy.c -lfl
calc.y:48:1: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int]
main() {
^~~~
1 warning generated.
ld: library not found for -lfl
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
make: *** [calc] Error 1
How could I resolve this problem?
let me guess, trying to use flex on OS/X?
Try -ll instead of -lfl
Using Flex on OS/X
So yea, the flex library name on OS/X is just arbitrarily different for some reason. OS/X is not exactly Linux, but it's pretty close. You have some options here.
You can just simply have a separate build system and source files for OS/X. Certainly Apple might like that with their pushing XCode, objective-C and not much interoperability.
You can build vs Linux and then engage with Mac Ports and Homebrew.
You can create your project using autotools. That's not an awesome link, learning this system is rough going, but it's a standard thing for Linux for sure. This will actually work, I find if you have the patience for it, OS/X is close enough that autotools based builds will work on it.
Lately, I've been turned on to Cocoapods, which I believe to be an attempt to join the open source community and XCode. It's kind of half 1 and 3 sorta with an emphasis on modularizing the external source and getting it compiled into a .app (via Xcode).
warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'
mean that you should declare return type for main function. Place int in function difinition.
ld: library not found for -lfl
flag -l mean that compiller must use libfl.a to build programm. As #waTeim said above, for Mac OS you can use libl.a instead, but this lib can be not exist alse. There is another way is to place
%option noyywrap
at the top of flex *.l file. In this case you can compile without additional libs.
I am writing a fairly large C++ shared-object library, and have run into a small issue that makes debugging a pain:
If I define a function/method in a header file, and forget to create a stub for it (during development), since I am building as a shared object library rather than an executable, no errors appear at compile-time telling me I have forgotten to implement that function. The only way I find out something is wrong is at runtime, when eventually an application linking against this library falls over with an 'undefined symbol' error.
I am looking for an easy way to check if I have all the symbols I need at compile time, perhaps something I can add to my Makefile.
One solution I did come up with is to run the compiled library through nm -C -U to get a demangled list of all undefined references. The problem is this also comes up with the list of all references that are in other libraries, such as GLibC, which of course will be linked against along with this library when the final application is put together. It would be possible to use the output of nm to grep through all my header files and see if any of the names corresponding.. but this seems insane. Surely this is not an uncommon issue and there is a better way of solving it?
Check out the linker option -z defs / --no-undefined. When creating a shared object, it will cause the link to fail if there are unresolved symbols.
If you are using gcc to invoke the linker, you'll use the compiler -Wl option to pass the option to the linker:
gcc -shared ... -Wl,-z,defs
As an example, consider the following file:
#include <stdio.h>
void forgot_to_define(FILE *fp);
void doit(const char *filename)
{
FILE *fp = fopen(filename, "r");
if (fp != NULL)
{
forgot_to_define(fp);
fclose(fp);
}
}
Now, if you build that into a shared object, it will succeed:
> gcc -shared -fPIC -o libsilly.so silly.c && echo succeeded || echo failed
succeeded
But if you add -z defs, the link will fail and tell you about your missing symbol:
> gcc -shared -fPIC -o libsilly.so silly.c -Wl,-z,defs && echo succeeded || echo failed
/tmp/cccIwwbn.o: In function `doit':
silly.c:(.text+0x2c): undefined reference to `forgot_to_define'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
failed
On Linux (which you appear to be using) ldd -r a.out should give you exactly the answer you are looking for.
UPDATE: a trivial way to create a.out against which to check:
echo "int main() { return 0; }" | g++ -xc++ - ./libMySharedLib.so
ldd -r ./a.out
What about a testsuite ? You create mock executables that link to the symbols you need. If the linking fails, it means that your library interface is incomplete.
I had the same problem once. I was developing a component model in C++, and, of course, components should load at runtime dynamically. Three solutions come to mind, that were the ones I applied:
Take some time to define a build system that is able to compile statically. You'll lose some time engineering it, but it will save you much time catching these annoying runtime errors.
Group your functions in well-known and well-understood sections, so that you can group of functions/stubs to be sure that each corresponding function has its stub. If you take the time on documenting it well, you can write perhaps a script that checks the definitions (via, for example, its doxygen comments) and check the corresponding .cpp file for it.
Do several test executables that load the same set of libraries and specify the RTLD_NOW flag to dlopen (if you're under *NIX). They will signal the missing symbols.
Hope that helps.