So, I've been editing a website and have many JavaScript functions that utilize the Contexts that the views.py file passes to the page. Until now, these functions have been contained in the base.html file and so have been loaded onto every page directly. However, to make things cleaner, I copy and pasted all the functions to an external .js file. Now, rather than use the contexts, the functions consider them to be literal strings.
Example:
$('#title').text('{{ event.name }}');
The above line will actually set the text of the element to say "{{ event.name }}" rather than the name of the event. Any ideas on how to fix this? I really don't want to keep these functions in the base file where they can be seen by anyone who inspects the page source.
It doesn't matter if you put your javascript functions in an external file or in your base.html it would still get exposed to the user. Only a minification of the file would actually help to trick the user from seeing the actual values but with javascript all your code is public.
Why you're having this problem is because when you rendered the javascript inline (in your base.html) you had access to the template context.
This is no longer the case and the Django template engine doesn't interpolate your {{ event.name }} anymore.
The problem you're facing as well is a good one. You should never mix and match javascript with Djangos template language or any template language for that matter and the only way of fixing it is to
a) start pulling the values from the DOM ie. render a proper DOM
b) to start to fetch the values from the server, traditionally using AJAX.
And the smallest example that I can muster at the moment is below:
Your view:
def my_django_view(request):
return HttpResponse(json.dumps({'meaningoflife':42}), mimetype='application/json')
Your HTML
<input type="hidden" id="myMeaning" value="{{ meaningoflife }}" />
Your javascript
var meaning = document.querySelector('#myMeaning').value;
alert(meaning); //should alert 42.
In your view you return some form of render_to_response which takes a template argument and a context argument. What the render_to_response function does is read your template, and replace all {{ placeholders }} with the values passed via the context dictionary.
Templates are essentially a complex version of this
"""
<h1>{{ person.name }}</h1>
<p>{{ person.phone_number }}</p>
""".format(person)
The problem is the templating engine does not know files specified by a scripts src attribute is actually a Django template. To fix this don't use the script src attribute. Instead do something like this.
<!--base.html-->
<h1>Site Title</h1>
<p>Some content</p>
<script>
{% include 'jsfile.js' %}
</script>
Using the include statement should do the trick.
Related
I have a Django template file working with a passed value like the below.
{% include 'boutique/rating.html' with score=[I want to put value here] %}
When I usually put value into the template, I could easily do it by doing like the below.
{% for store in stores %}
{% include 'boutique/rating.html' with score=store.review_score %}
{% endfor %}
However, as I get into more complex templates, I need to assign the value to the score parameter in the include section through jQuery. Is there a way that I can acheive this through jQuery?
What you need to understand is this: The part of the template between {% and %} is interpreted by Django. It is processed entirely on the server. In other words, it never shows up in the browser, but gets replaced by some sort of standard HTML.
On the other hand, jQuery is a Javascript library and operates entirely in the browser -- it doesn't know anything about the server or Django.
So, to modify the included template with jQuery, you have to find out what HTML it renders to. You can probably do that by looking at the included template file. Then, treat that HTML the way you would any other part of the page for manipulation with jQuery.
I have a bunch of code that I will need to use repeatedly on a page, and on multiple pages. For example, here is a shorter version of the code:
<a href="#"
data-toggle="popover"
title="{% for terms in s_terms %}{% if terms.slug == 'neuron' %}{{terms.title}}{% endif %}{% endfor %}"
data-content="{% for terms in s_terms %}{% if terms.slug == 'neuron' %}{{terms.para_one}}{% endif %}{% endfor %}">
Toggle popover
</a>
There is a lot more code in the block. Now, for obvious reasons I do not want to keep repeating such large chunks of code. I am a fan of the DRY approach.
However, I can't figure out how to render this same piece of code repeatedly. The only thing that would change is the word = "neuron" in there. I thought of using template tags, but that didn't work.
I tried saving the code as a separate file, and inherit it within my template, but then I can't change the keyword ('neuron'). I also tried creating a separate dynamic page, and include that in my Django template, but looks like the include tag only works for templates, and not for dynamic pages.
Can anyone help, please? Thank you, in advance.
You could use Django template built-in template tag include.
From the documentation:
Loads a template and renders it with the current context. This is a
way of “including” other templates within a template.
So, you can just extract your snippet in a separate template and then use it with:
{% include "snippet_template.html" %}
Additionally, you can pass a variable to the include template using the with keyword - you would use this to pass your word parameter:
{% include "snippet_template.html" with word="neuron" %}
As #bonidjukic wrote the include statement is what you search.
But include statement inside for-loop could reach one weakness of Django template Engine (vs Jinja). You include just variables, so it will be fast.
In the case of needing tags (like trans), Django will load tags at each include. Where Jinja will have global "tags".
So just be careful, with how you DRY you templates.
Imagine the context variable {{ url }} outputs www.example.com/<uuid-string> where <uuid-string> is different every time, whereas the former part of the URL stays the same.
Can one change the output of {{ url }} to instead www.forexample.com/<uuid-string>, via solely manipulating the string in the template and without involving views.py (which I know is the better way to do it, but that's not the question).
An illustrative example would be great.
read about filters and templatetags - they are a methods that allows you to perform some actions on variables in templates.
You can also create your own tags and filters that allow you to perform action non-built into Django template language
Simple example of such filter:
#in templatetags.py
#register.filter(name='duplicate')
def duplicate(value):
return value*2
#in your template
<p> {{ url|duplicate }} </p>
You can find more examples here. Also there you will find tutorial how to use and create them
It has been 2day i am trying to figure out how to do that. I am a novice so please give as detailed explanation as possible.
I am doing this in my views.py
dict1 = simplejson.dumps(dict1)
return render_to_response('main_page.html', {
'js_testsuite':testsuite_dict,
'js_testset':js_testset,
'dict1':dict1})
In main_page.html
{% if js_testsuite %}
<select id="testsuites" name="testsuite" onchange="setOptions(document.selection.testsuite.selectedIndex);">
{% for key, value in js_testsuite.items %}
<option value={{ value }} name="testsuite">{{ key }}</option>
{% endfor %}
</select>
{% endif %}
In setoptions.js, which contains the function setOptions(value), to which i am passing selected index of the select box, and using this value i have to set the second select box and the data for this select box has to come from the views.py given above.
Also, I tried doing
var value_from_django = {{ dict1 }};
what are the other things im missing. Could you please provide a detailed explanation on this. I had been trying this for 2 days.
Is there a way in which I can pass the value from django views to the javascript directly bypassing the django template?
Can I pass the information from django views to the html template and then to the javascript?
The javascript I am referring to is a simple javascript not jquery.
Thanks for your support,
Vinay
You cannot pass values to javascript bypassing the template, unless you use an ajax call to start a separate request or unless you do something very unusual like embedding the data in a response header (don't actually do this, it is not what response headers are for!). The response, which includes the header and the body (the body being the part generated by the template) is the sum total of the information your application provides to your client, so unless you generate an additional request and fetch an additional response with ajax, you have no other options.
If you don't want to do that, then your options for passing information to the javascript via the template are basically the following:
Using an inline tag, create properly formatted javascript dynamically via the templating system. The example line you have, var value_from_django = {{ dict1 }}; is essentially what I'm talking about here, except that I'm not sure you can pass a dict through from django to javascript like that, because django's text output of a dict in the template is unlikely to be exactly the correct formatting for a javascript variable declaration. So, instead you can...
Translate your data into JSON and put that into your template, and then process that with the javascript. (This is usually done with an ajax call, but there's nothing stopping you from injecting the JSON data into the initial template directly.)
Or populate your HTML with the data you want and then use javascript to locate the HTML tag containing the data and parse the data out.
If you are trying to pass simple variables like integers, it might be easiest to do it with the first or third options. If you are trying to pass a more complex data structure like a dictionary, you will probably be better off using JSON (that's what it's for!)
I would like to give you more detailed and concrete instructions, but for that you will need to post more detail about what exactly is going wrong with your current approach and what your desired functionality is.
By the way: if it is at all feasible to include jquery on this page and use that instead of trying to use basic javascript, you should do so. It will make your life much, much easier.
I'm working on a project in Symfony2 and I have several small pieces of html that need to be included in one of my main views. According to the official Twig documentation I should be able to simply use {% include 'filename.html' %} but in Symfony unless the filename ends in ".html.twig" it throws and error saying it cannot find the file. I'd like to avoid using Twig templates for these files since they have no dynamic content and lots of double braces (they're javascript templates) and requiring the template designer to have to wrap every one of these files in {% raw %} tags seems like a really Kludgey way to do it.
I also came upon the same problem trying to find a solution to include files (mustache templates) as raw in Twig templates so Twig doesn't try to parse them.
At first I had my mustache template files named simply sometemplate.html and wrapped in {% raw %} tags. This worked for a while, but then I started using PhpStorm IDE with the Handlebars plugin (for mustache syntax). For PhpStorm to recognize the files as mustache syntax, they need to have a unique file extension (.mustache by default), so I renamed my sometemplate.html to sometemplate.mustache but I really disliked the idea that my mustache templates needed to be wrapped with Twig tags. So I ended up doing what #rdjs said in his option 3. This is the best solution imo.
Here's the working Twig extension function I made:
function twig_include_raw(Twig_Environment $env, $template) {
return $env->getLoader()->getSource($template);
}
$twig->addFunction('include_raw', new Twig_Function_Function('twig_include_raw', array('needs_environment' => true)));
With this in place you can easily include files as "raw" without Twig parsing them by doing:
{{ include_raw('sometemplate.mustache')|raw }}
I even made a Twig macro for simplifying including mustache templates to HTML head sections:
{% macro mustache_script(id, file) -%}
<script id="{{ id }}" type="text/x-mustache-template">
{{ include_raw(file)|raw }}
</script>
{%- endmacro %}
And after importing the file with the above macro to your Twig template ({% import "macros.twig" %} for example), you can easily import mustache template files in your Twig templates by simply doing {{ mustache_script('sometemplate_tpl', 'sometemplate.mustache') }} inside a HTML <head> section.
I hope this helps someone who's looking for a solution to the same problem.
A quick recap on twig file extensions (taken from the documentation):
Every template name also has two extensions that specify the format and engine for that template.
AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:index.html.twig - HTML format, Twig engine
AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:index.html.php - HTML format, PHP engine
AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:index.css.twig - CSS format, Twig engine
By default, any Symfony2 template can be written in either Twig or PHP, and the last part of the extension (e.g. .twig or .php) specifies which of these two engines should be used. The first part of the extension, (e.g. .html, .css, etc) is the final format that the template will generate.
Therefore it makes sense to me that including a file as .html would be at the least ambiguous even if it didn't throw an error.
So you have 3 choices:
If the files are purely javascript then include them as script tags in your page.
If they are mixed HTML and JS then escape the JS with {% raw %} and include the files as foo.html.twig templates. If there are lots of scripts being included like this then most likely your designers could do with a little refactoring and move the bulk of their scripts to external files (see option 1)
If you really insist you could always write a Twig extension to include raw HTML files. (EDIT: See #Haprog's answer below for more details on this option).
{{ include_html('foo/bar.html') }}
UPDATE 2015 twig has since added the source function:
{{ source('AcmeSomeBundle:Default:somefile.html.twig') }}
Kudos to #Nigel Angel in the comments below for option 4.
I came accross this post, as I had a similar question. After an hour or so searching and trying, I found out, that as from Twig Version 1.15 the "source Function" was added.
Maybe that helps someone in the future.
Follow up on Kari, if you're in an extension.. you can apply it this way.
public function getFunctions() {
return [
'include_raw' => new \Twig_Function_Method($this, 'twig_include_raw', array('needs_environment'=> true, 'is_safe'=> array('all')))
];
}
And that'd be a $this->twig_include_raw type method. You'd include within your template as:
{{ include_raw("my/file/here.html.twig") }}
No need for " | raw".