I am trying to dynamically create the shape of a number using shape definitions from Physics Editor. I have separate shape definitions for each digit from 0-9.
I create a CCLabelBMFont with a random number (e.g. 42) and add a single body for that label. Then I loop through each child sprite of the label and add the according shape definition for that digit. The shape definition for each digit is added, but centered inside of the body (i.e. stacked on top of each other). Is it somehow possible to re-position the shapes (polygon shapes) inside of that body?
I have tried to offset each shape's position by re-setting m_centroid during the creation of the fixture with no luck (inside "GB2ShapeCache.m"):
-(void) addFixturesToBody:(b2Body*)body forShapeName:(NSString*)shape withXOffset:(float32)xOff{
BodyDef *so = [shapeObjects_ objectForKey:shape];
assert(so);
FixtureDef *fix = so->fixtures;
while(fix)
{
[...]
b2PolygonShape* polygon = (b2PolygonShape*) fix->fixture.shape;
polygon->m_centroid.Set(polygon->m_centroid.x + xOff, polygon->m_centroid.y);
}
Related
I have a function that draws triangles through OpenGL
I draw two triangles by pressing a button (function on_drawMapPushButton_clicked()).
Then i draw a sphere that placed above these triangles. And now i see, that sphere is drawed correctly over first triangle, but second triangle drawed over the sphere and not vice versa.
If i press the button second time, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles.
When i press the button third time, then second triangle drawed over the sphere again.
When i press the button fourth time, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles and so on.
If i use in sphereMesh QPhongMaterial instead of QPhongAlphaMaterial, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles always. Like it must to be.
I can't understand what i do wrong to get my sphere is drawed always over the triangles.
Code, that draws transparent sphere:
selectModel_ = new Qt3DExtras::QSphereMesh(selectEntity_);
selectModel_->setRadius(75);
selectModel_->setSlices(150);
selectMaterial_ = new Qt3DExtras::QPhongAlphaMaterial(selectEntity_);
selectMaterial_->setAmbient(QColor(28, 61, 136));
selectMaterial_->setDiffuse(QColor(11, 56, 159));
selectMaterial_->setSpecular(QColor(10, 67, 199));
selectMaterial_->setShininess(0.8f);
selectEntity_->addComponent(selectModel_);
selectEntity_->addComponent(selectMaterial_);
Function drawTriangles:
void drawTriangles(QPolygonF triangles, QColor color){
int numOfVertices = triangles.size();
// Create and fill vertex buffer
QByteArray bufferBytes;
bufferBytes.resize(3 * numOfVertices * static_cast<int>(sizeof(float)));
float *positions = reinterpret_cast<float*>(bufferBytes.data());
for(auto point : triangles){
*positions++ = static_cast<float>(point.x());
*positions++ = 0.0f; //We need to drow only on the surface
*positions++ = static_cast<float>(point.y());
}
geometry_ = new Qt3DRender::QGeometry(mapEntity_);
auto *buf = new Qt3DRender::QBuffer(geometry_);
buf->setData(bufferBytes);
positionAttribute_ = new Qt3DRender::QAttribute(mapEntity_);
positionAttribute_->setName(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::defaultPositionAttributeName());
positionAttribute_->setVertexBaseType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::Float); //In our buffer we will have only floats
positionAttribute_->setVertexSize(3); // Size of a vertex
positionAttribute_->setAttributeType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::VertexAttribute); // Attribute type
positionAttribute_->setByteStride(3 * sizeof(float));
positionAttribute_->setBuffer(buf);
geometry_->addAttribute(positionAttribute_); // Add attribute to ours Qt3DRender::QGeometry
// Create and fill an index buffer
QByteArray indexBytes;
indexBytes.resize(numOfVertices * static_cast<int>(sizeof(unsigned int))); // start to end
unsigned int *indices = reinterpret_cast<unsigned int*>(indexBytes.data());
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < static_cast<unsigned int>(numOfVertices); ++i) {
*indices++ = i;
}
auto *indexBuffer = new Qt3DRender::QBuffer(geometry_);
indexBuffer->setData(indexBytes);
indexAttribute_ = new Qt3DRender::QAttribute(geometry_);
indexAttribute_->setVertexBaseType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::UnsignedInt); //In our buffer we will have only unsigned ints
indexAttribute_->setAttributeType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::IndexAttribute); // Attribute type
indexAttribute_->setBuffer(indexBuffer);
indexAttribute_->setCount(static_cast<unsigned int>(numOfVertices)); // Set count of our vertices
geometry_->addAttribute(indexAttribute_); // Add the attribute to ours Qt3DRender::QGeometry
shape_ = new Qt3DRender::QGeometryRenderer(mapEntity_);
shape_->setPrimitiveType(Qt3DRender::QGeometryRenderer::Triangles);
shape_->setGeometry(geometry_);
//Create material
material_ = new Qt3DExtras::QPhongMaterial(mapEntity_);
material_->setAmbient(color);
trianglesEntity_ = new Qt3DCore::QEntity(mapEntity_);
trianglesEntity_->addComponent(shape_);
trianglesEntity_->addComponent(material_);
}
Press button handler on_drawMapPushButton_clicked():
void on_drawMapPushButton_clicked()
{
clearMap(); //Implementation is above
QPolygonF triangle1;
triangle1 << QPointF( 0 ,-1000) << QPointF(0 ,1000) << QPointF(1000, -1000);
drawTriangles(triangle1, Qt::black);
QPolygonF triangle2;
triangle2 << QPointF(-1000,-1000) << QPointF(-100,1000) << QPointF(-100,-1000);
drawTriangles(triangle2, Qt::red);
}
Map clearing function clearMap():
void clearMap()
{
if(mapEntity_){
delete mapEntity_;
mapEntity_ = nullptr;
mapEntity_ = new Qt3DCore::QEntity(view3dRootEntity_);
}
}
Ok here comes the extend answer.
The reason why this sometimes happens and sometimes not depends on the order of your entities. If you experiment with two simple spheres, one transparent and one not, you will see that when the sphere that is transparent is added later it will be drawn above the opaque object - just like you want it to.
This happens because the opaque object will be drawn first (it comes first in the scene graph) and the transparent object later which will give you the result you want. In the other case where the transparent object gets drawn first, the opaque object is drawn above because the QPhongAlphaMaterial has a QNoDepthMask render state which tells it not to write to the depth buffer. Thus, the opaque object always passes the depth test, where the transparent object actually already drew to. You have to do some more work to properly draw transparent objects for arbitrary scene graphs and camera positions.
The Qt3D Rendering Graph
To understand what you have to do you should understand how the Qt3D rendering graph is laid out. If you know this already you can skip this part.
Italic words reference items in the graph image in the following text.
If you use a Qt3DWindow, you can't access the root node of rendering graph. It is maintained by the window. You can access the QRenderSettings and root node of your framegraph through the functions activeFramegraph() and renderSettings() which you can both call on the window. You can also set the root node of scene graph through the setRootEntity() function of Qt3DWindow. The window internally has a QAspectEngine, where it sets the root node of the whole graph, which is the root node of the rendering graph in the graph image above.
If you want to insert a framegraph node to the existing framegraph of the 3D window, you have to add it as the parent of the active framegraph which I will explain in the next section. If you have your own custom framegraph which you set on the window through setActiveFramegraph() then just append it to the end, this should suffice.
Using QSortPolicy
As you already found out according to you other questions, you can use QSortPolicy in your framegraph to sort the entities by distance to camera. You can add a sort policy as follows (assuming that view is your Qt3DWindow and scene is your root entity of the scene graph, although I don't understand why it has to be):
Qt3DRender::QFrameGraphNode *framegraph = view.activeFrameGraph();
Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy *sortPolicy = new Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy(scene);
framegraph->setParent(sortPolicy);
QVector<Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::SortType> sortTypes =
QVector<Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::SortType>() << Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::BackToFront;
sortPolicy->setSortTypes(sortTypes);
view.setActiveFrameGraph(framegraph);
The issue with this code is that this sort policy sorts the entities by the distance of their centers to the camera. If one of the opaque objects is closer to the camera than the transparent object it gets drawn later anyways and occludes the transparent object. See the images below for a graphical explanation.
The red and black sphere are further away from the camera than the torus, that's why they get drawn first and they don't occlude the torus.
No the center of the red sphere is closer to the camera than the center of the torus. It gets rendered later than the torus and occludes it.
Using Two Framegraph Branches
You can tackle the issue above if you use two framegraph branches. One which draws all opaque entities and one which draws all transparent ones. To achieve this you have to make use of QLayer and QLayerFilter. You can attach layers to entities and then add layer filters to your framegraph. This way you can exclude entities from entering a certain branch of your framegraph.
Let's say you create two layers, one for opaque objects and one for transparents ones:
Qt3DRender::QLayer *transparentLayer = new Qt3DRender::QLayer;
Qt3DRender::QLayer *opaqueLayer = new Qt3DRender::QLayer;
You have to attach the transparent layer to each transparent object and the opaque layer to each opaque object as a component (using addComponent()).
Unfortunately, you need a special framegraph tree to include the two corresponding layer filters (again, assuming that view is your Qt3DWindow):
Qt3DRender::QRenderSurfaceSelector *renderSurfaceSelector
= new Qt3DRender::QRenderSurfaceSelector();
renderSurfaceSelector->setSurface(&view);
Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers *clearBuffers
= new Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers(renderSurfaceSelector);
clearBuffers->setBuffers(Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers::AllBuffers);
clearBuffers->setClearColor(Qt::white);
This is the first branch to clear the buffers. Now you add the following code:
Qt3DRender::QViewport *viewport = new Qt3DRender::QViewport(renderSurfaceSelector);
Qt3DRender::QCameraSelector *cameraSelector = new Qt3DRender::QCameraSelector(viewport);
Qt3DRender::QCamera *camera = new Qt3DRender::QCamera(cameraSelector);
// set your camera parameters here
cameraSelector->setCamera(camera);
Since you create the QViewport as a child of the QRenderSurfaceSelector it is now a sibling in your framegraph with respect to the QClearBuffers. You can see an illustration of the example framegraphs here.
Now you have to create the two leaf nodes that contain the layer filters. The Qt3D engine always executes a whole branch when it reaches a leaf. This means that first the opaque objects are drawn and then the transparent ones.
// not entirely sure why transparent filter has to go first
// I would have expected the reversed order of the filters but this works...
Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter *transparentFilter = new Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter(camera);
transparentFilter->addLayer(transparentLayer);
Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter *opaqueFilter = new Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter(camera);
opaqueFilter->addLayer(opaqueLayer);
The two layer filters are now leaf nodes in your framegraph branch and Qt3D will first draw the opaque objects and then afterwards, since it uses the same viewport and everything, will draw the transparent objects above. It will draw them correctly (i.e. not in front of parts of opaque objects that the transparent object actually lies behind, because we did not clear the depth buffers again -> Splitting the framegraph happens only on the camera node).
Now set the new framegaph on your Qt3DWindow:
view.setActiveFrameGraph(renderSurfaceSelector);
Result:
Edit (26.03.21): As Patrick B. pointed out correctly, using the suggested solution with two layers you will have to add both layers as components to any lights in the scene. You can get around this by setting the filter mode on the QLayerFilters to QLayerFilter::FilterMode::DiscardAnyMatching and then reverse the order of the filters. This way, the transparentFilter discards any entities with the transparentLayer attached - but not the lights because they don't have the transparentLayer. Vice versa for the opaqueFilter.
My mistake was that i did wrong order of creating and deletion of Triangles and Sphere entities.
In pseudo code right order is as follows:
clearTriangles();
clearSphere();
drawTriangles();
drawSphere();
If you are using Qt3d with QML and want to control the order elements are drawn you can control it by the order of layers in your QML file.
Something like:
{
objectName: "firstLayer"
id : firstLayer
}
Layer {
objectName: "secondLayer"
id: secondLayer
}
The order you add them to layer filters will then control which is drawn first:
RenderSurfaceSelector {
CameraSelector {
id : cameraSelector
camera: mainCamera
FrustumCulling {
ClearBuffers {
buffers : ClearBuffers.AllBuffers
clearColor: "#04151c"
NoDraw {}
}
LayerFilter
{
objectName: "firstLayerFilter"
id: firstLayerFilter
layers: [firstLayer]
}
LayerFilter
{
id: secondLayerFilter
objectName: "secondLayerFilter"
layers: [secondLayer]
}
Then anything you add to the secondLayer will get drawn over-top of the first layer. I used this to make sure text always showed up in front of shapes, but it can be used similarly with transparencies.
I have a function that draws triangles through OpenGL
I draw two triangles by pressing a button (function on_drawMapPushButton_clicked()).
Then i draw a sphere that placed above these triangles. And now i see, that sphere is drawed correctly over first triangle, but second triangle drawed over the sphere and not vice versa.
If i press the button second time, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles.
When i press the button third time, then second triangle drawed over the sphere again.
When i press the button fourth time, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles and so on.
If i use in sphereMesh QPhongMaterial instead of QPhongAlphaMaterial, then spehere is drawed correctly over first and second triangles always. Like it must to be.
I can't understand what i do wrong to get my sphere is drawed always over the triangles.
Code, that draws transparent sphere:
selectModel_ = new Qt3DExtras::QSphereMesh(selectEntity_);
selectModel_->setRadius(75);
selectModel_->setSlices(150);
selectMaterial_ = new Qt3DExtras::QPhongAlphaMaterial(selectEntity_);
selectMaterial_->setAmbient(QColor(28, 61, 136));
selectMaterial_->setDiffuse(QColor(11, 56, 159));
selectMaterial_->setSpecular(QColor(10, 67, 199));
selectMaterial_->setShininess(0.8f);
selectEntity_->addComponent(selectModel_);
selectEntity_->addComponent(selectMaterial_);
Function drawTriangles:
void drawTriangles(QPolygonF triangles, QColor color){
int numOfVertices = triangles.size();
// Create and fill vertex buffer
QByteArray bufferBytes;
bufferBytes.resize(3 * numOfVertices * static_cast<int>(sizeof(float)));
float *positions = reinterpret_cast<float*>(bufferBytes.data());
for(auto point : triangles){
*positions++ = static_cast<float>(point.x());
*positions++ = 0.0f; //We need to drow only on the surface
*positions++ = static_cast<float>(point.y());
}
geometry_ = new Qt3DRender::QGeometry(mapEntity_);
auto *buf = new Qt3DRender::QBuffer(geometry_);
buf->setData(bufferBytes);
positionAttribute_ = new Qt3DRender::QAttribute(mapEntity_);
positionAttribute_->setName(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::defaultPositionAttributeName());
positionAttribute_->setVertexBaseType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::Float); //In our buffer we will have only floats
positionAttribute_->setVertexSize(3); // Size of a vertex
positionAttribute_->setAttributeType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::VertexAttribute); // Attribute type
positionAttribute_->setByteStride(3 * sizeof(float));
positionAttribute_->setBuffer(buf);
geometry_->addAttribute(positionAttribute_); // Add attribute to ours Qt3DRender::QGeometry
// Create and fill an index buffer
QByteArray indexBytes;
indexBytes.resize(numOfVertices * static_cast<int>(sizeof(unsigned int))); // start to end
unsigned int *indices = reinterpret_cast<unsigned int*>(indexBytes.data());
for(unsigned int i = 0; i < static_cast<unsigned int>(numOfVertices); ++i) {
*indices++ = i;
}
auto *indexBuffer = new Qt3DRender::QBuffer(geometry_);
indexBuffer->setData(indexBytes);
indexAttribute_ = new Qt3DRender::QAttribute(geometry_);
indexAttribute_->setVertexBaseType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::UnsignedInt); //In our buffer we will have only unsigned ints
indexAttribute_->setAttributeType(Qt3DRender::QAttribute::IndexAttribute); // Attribute type
indexAttribute_->setBuffer(indexBuffer);
indexAttribute_->setCount(static_cast<unsigned int>(numOfVertices)); // Set count of our vertices
geometry_->addAttribute(indexAttribute_); // Add the attribute to ours Qt3DRender::QGeometry
shape_ = new Qt3DRender::QGeometryRenderer(mapEntity_);
shape_->setPrimitiveType(Qt3DRender::QGeometryRenderer::Triangles);
shape_->setGeometry(geometry_);
//Create material
material_ = new Qt3DExtras::QPhongMaterial(mapEntity_);
material_->setAmbient(color);
trianglesEntity_ = new Qt3DCore::QEntity(mapEntity_);
trianglesEntity_->addComponent(shape_);
trianglesEntity_->addComponent(material_);
}
Press button handler on_drawMapPushButton_clicked():
void on_drawMapPushButton_clicked()
{
clearMap(); //Implementation is above
QPolygonF triangle1;
triangle1 << QPointF( 0 ,-1000) << QPointF(0 ,1000) << QPointF(1000, -1000);
drawTriangles(triangle1, Qt::black);
QPolygonF triangle2;
triangle2 << QPointF(-1000,-1000) << QPointF(-100,1000) << QPointF(-100,-1000);
drawTriangles(triangle2, Qt::red);
}
Map clearing function clearMap():
void clearMap()
{
if(mapEntity_){
delete mapEntity_;
mapEntity_ = nullptr;
mapEntity_ = new Qt3DCore::QEntity(view3dRootEntity_);
}
}
Ok here comes the extend answer.
The reason why this sometimes happens and sometimes not depends on the order of your entities. If you experiment with two simple spheres, one transparent and one not, you will see that when the sphere that is transparent is added later it will be drawn above the opaque object - just like you want it to.
This happens because the opaque object will be drawn first (it comes first in the scene graph) and the transparent object later which will give you the result you want. In the other case where the transparent object gets drawn first, the opaque object is drawn above because the QPhongAlphaMaterial has a QNoDepthMask render state which tells it not to write to the depth buffer. Thus, the opaque object always passes the depth test, where the transparent object actually already drew to. You have to do some more work to properly draw transparent objects for arbitrary scene graphs and camera positions.
The Qt3D Rendering Graph
To understand what you have to do you should understand how the Qt3D rendering graph is laid out. If you know this already you can skip this part.
Italic words reference items in the graph image in the following text.
If you use a Qt3DWindow, you can't access the root node of rendering graph. It is maintained by the window. You can access the QRenderSettings and root node of your framegraph through the functions activeFramegraph() and renderSettings() which you can both call on the window. You can also set the root node of scene graph through the setRootEntity() function of Qt3DWindow. The window internally has a QAspectEngine, where it sets the root node of the whole graph, which is the root node of the rendering graph in the graph image above.
If you want to insert a framegraph node to the existing framegraph of the 3D window, you have to add it as the parent of the active framegraph which I will explain in the next section. If you have your own custom framegraph which you set on the window through setActiveFramegraph() then just append it to the end, this should suffice.
Using QSortPolicy
As you already found out according to you other questions, you can use QSortPolicy in your framegraph to sort the entities by distance to camera. You can add a sort policy as follows (assuming that view is your Qt3DWindow and scene is your root entity of the scene graph, although I don't understand why it has to be):
Qt3DRender::QFrameGraphNode *framegraph = view.activeFrameGraph();
Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy *sortPolicy = new Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy(scene);
framegraph->setParent(sortPolicy);
QVector<Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::SortType> sortTypes =
QVector<Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::SortType>() << Qt3DRender::QSortPolicy::BackToFront;
sortPolicy->setSortTypes(sortTypes);
view.setActiveFrameGraph(framegraph);
The issue with this code is that this sort policy sorts the entities by the distance of their centers to the camera. If one of the opaque objects is closer to the camera than the transparent object it gets drawn later anyways and occludes the transparent object. See the images below for a graphical explanation.
The red and black sphere are further away from the camera than the torus, that's why they get drawn first and they don't occlude the torus.
No the center of the red sphere is closer to the camera than the center of the torus. It gets rendered later than the torus and occludes it.
Using Two Framegraph Branches
You can tackle the issue above if you use two framegraph branches. One which draws all opaque entities and one which draws all transparent ones. To achieve this you have to make use of QLayer and QLayerFilter. You can attach layers to entities and then add layer filters to your framegraph. This way you can exclude entities from entering a certain branch of your framegraph.
Let's say you create two layers, one for opaque objects and one for transparents ones:
Qt3DRender::QLayer *transparentLayer = new Qt3DRender::QLayer;
Qt3DRender::QLayer *opaqueLayer = new Qt3DRender::QLayer;
You have to attach the transparent layer to each transparent object and the opaque layer to each opaque object as a component (using addComponent()).
Unfortunately, you need a special framegraph tree to include the two corresponding layer filters (again, assuming that view is your Qt3DWindow):
Qt3DRender::QRenderSurfaceSelector *renderSurfaceSelector
= new Qt3DRender::QRenderSurfaceSelector();
renderSurfaceSelector->setSurface(&view);
Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers *clearBuffers
= new Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers(renderSurfaceSelector);
clearBuffers->setBuffers(Qt3DRender::QClearBuffers::AllBuffers);
clearBuffers->setClearColor(Qt::white);
This is the first branch to clear the buffers. Now you add the following code:
Qt3DRender::QViewport *viewport = new Qt3DRender::QViewport(renderSurfaceSelector);
Qt3DRender::QCameraSelector *cameraSelector = new Qt3DRender::QCameraSelector(viewport);
Qt3DRender::QCamera *camera = new Qt3DRender::QCamera(cameraSelector);
// set your camera parameters here
cameraSelector->setCamera(camera);
Since you create the QViewport as a child of the QRenderSurfaceSelector it is now a sibling in your framegraph with respect to the QClearBuffers. You can see an illustration of the example framegraphs here.
Now you have to create the two leaf nodes that contain the layer filters. The Qt3D engine always executes a whole branch when it reaches a leaf. This means that first the opaque objects are drawn and then the transparent ones.
// not entirely sure why transparent filter has to go first
// I would have expected the reversed order of the filters but this works...
Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter *transparentFilter = new Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter(camera);
transparentFilter->addLayer(transparentLayer);
Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter *opaqueFilter = new Qt3DRender::QLayerFilter(camera);
opaqueFilter->addLayer(opaqueLayer);
The two layer filters are now leaf nodes in your framegraph branch and Qt3D will first draw the opaque objects and then afterwards, since it uses the same viewport and everything, will draw the transparent objects above. It will draw them correctly (i.e. not in front of parts of opaque objects that the transparent object actually lies behind, because we did not clear the depth buffers again -> Splitting the framegraph happens only on the camera node).
Now set the new framegaph on your Qt3DWindow:
view.setActiveFrameGraph(renderSurfaceSelector);
Result:
Edit (26.03.21): As Patrick B. pointed out correctly, using the suggested solution with two layers you will have to add both layers as components to any lights in the scene. You can get around this by setting the filter mode on the QLayerFilters to QLayerFilter::FilterMode::DiscardAnyMatching and then reverse the order of the filters. This way, the transparentFilter discards any entities with the transparentLayer attached - but not the lights because they don't have the transparentLayer. Vice versa for the opaqueFilter.
My mistake was that i did wrong order of creating and deletion of Triangles and Sphere entities.
In pseudo code right order is as follows:
clearTriangles();
clearSphere();
drawTriangles();
drawSphere();
If you are using Qt3d with QML and want to control the order elements are drawn you can control it by the order of layers in your QML file.
Something like:
{
objectName: "firstLayer"
id : firstLayer
}
Layer {
objectName: "secondLayer"
id: secondLayer
}
The order you add them to layer filters will then control which is drawn first:
RenderSurfaceSelector {
CameraSelector {
id : cameraSelector
camera: mainCamera
FrustumCulling {
ClearBuffers {
buffers : ClearBuffers.AllBuffers
clearColor: "#04151c"
NoDraw {}
}
LayerFilter
{
objectName: "firstLayerFilter"
id: firstLayerFilter
layers: [firstLayer]
}
LayerFilter
{
id: secondLayerFilter
objectName: "secondLayerFilter"
layers: [secondLayer]
}
Then anything you add to the secondLayer will get drawn over-top of the first layer. I used this to make sure text always showed up in front of shapes, but it can be used similarly with transparencies.
Firstly thanks for taking the time to look at this question.
The problem I am having is with Cocos2d and the Z values which determine where the sprites are in relation to other objects.
I have a sprite ('Ball') and also a score label ('scoreLabel') using CCLabelBMFont and I want the 'Ball' sprite to appear in front of the score label. I am currently attempting this via the z values but it is not working.
I am not sure if its because one is a sprite and the other is not as the below will work when the other object is a sprite but if anyone can point me in the direction of where I am going wrong it would be greatly appreciated.
Relevant code is listed below.
// Constants.h
// TestGame
//#ifndef SpaceViking_Constants_h
//#define SpaceViking_Constants_h
#define kBallSpriteZValue 10
#define kBallSpriteTagValue 0
#define kNewScoreTagValue 0
#define kNewScoreZValue 25
// GamePlayLayer.m
// TestGame
#import "Constants.h"
-(id)init {
self = [super init];
if (self !=nil) {
Ball *ball = [[Ball alloc]
initWithSpriteFrame:[[CCSpriteFrameCache
sharedSpriteFrameCache]
spriteFrameByName:#"Ball_1.png"]];
[ball setPosition:ccp(screenSize.width * 0.19f,
screenSize.height * 0.19f)];
[sceneSpriteBatchNode
addChild:ball
z:kBallSpriteZValue
tag:kBallSpriteTagValue];
scoreLabel = [CCLabelBMFont labelWithString:#"0"
fntFile:#"Test.fnt"];
scoreLabel.position = ccp(screenSize.width * 0.5f, screenSize.height * 0.9f);
[self addChild:scoreLabel
z:kNewScoreZValue tag:kNewScoreTagValue];
}
return self;
}
Things you need to know
z ordering only matters if you nodes are siblings (they have the same parent); the z order is not global in Cocos2d
If no z order is defined than the order of adding the children is used to determine in which order they are rendered
What this means for your use case
Setting the z order for your to CCNode objects as is will make no difference, because they are not siblings.
The ball is the the child of sceneSpriteBatchNode but the label is the child of self.
This means that the ball will already show behind the text, assuming this is your hierarchy:
->sceneSpriteBatchNode->ball
->label
Bonus stuff
Instead of using defines in your code, consider using an enum like so
typedef NS_ENUM(NSUInteger, UTzOrder) {
ballsZorder = 0,
labelsZorder = 1,
otherStuffZorder = 2
};
This is better because the compiler knows that you are using the right types, it is prettier and easier to change.
Remember this is only when they are siblings.
looking at your code I see that you have given higher z value to your label. Instead of giving higher value to your sprite, you should give it to your sprite(ball) so it will be placed on the label.
Whenever you create any objects in cocos2d it will be placed at default z=0 , you can set z value to put object behind current object or above current object. you can set negative z value also to put your label behind your sprite.
ex:
define kBallSpriteZValue 0 //this value should be greater in your case
define kNewScoreZValue -1
you can also reorder your z values later
[self reorderChild:spritename z:newzvalue];
So I have a game in Windows Phone's version of cocos2dx. There is a background (CCLayerColor) and in the middle of it I place another CCLayerColor. The problem is that, when moving a layer with sprites inside that middle layer, the movement is done relative to the whole screen, not to the layer in middle.
The code for creating this CClayerColor in the middle of the screen is:
mWheelMachine = WheelMachineView::create(symbolMap, path);
mWheelMachine->setContentSize(CCSize(WHEEL_MACHINE_WIDTH , WHEEL_MACHINE_HEIGHT));//values equaling one third of screen size
mWheelMachine->setPosition(ItemManager::sharedItemManager()->getItemPosition(WHEEL_MACHINE_TAG
addChild(mWheelMachine, THEME_WHEEL_MACHINE_ORDER);//position in the middle of the screen
"WheelMachineView" is a subclass of "CCLayerColor", while create just overrides the correspondent of CCLayerColor.
Inside this class, I have another layer that moves along with its CCSprite objects drawn inside.
unsigned short o;
for (unsigned short i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_WHEELS; i++)
{
WheelView* wheelLayer = WheelView::create();
wheelLayer->setIsRelativeAnchorPoint(true);
wheelLayer->setAnchorPoint(ccp(0,0));
wheelLayer->setPosition(i * WHEEL_WIDTH, -100 );
wheelLayer->setContentSize(CCSize(WHEEL_WIDTH, WHEEL_HEIGHT)); //large height value, to have room for making an animation with moving symbols
addChild(wheelLayer);
mWheels.push_back(wheelLayer);
/* Get the wheel symbols */
list<Symbol*> wheelSymbols = mWheelModel->getWheelSymbols(i);
/* Index */
o = 0;
for (list<Symbol*>::reverse_iterator it = wheelSymbols.rbegin(); it != wheelSymbols.rend(); it++)
{
CCSprite* symbol = CCSprite::spriteWithSpriteFrameName((*it)->getName().c_str());
symbol->setPosition(ccp(WHEEL_WIDTH / 2, SYMBOL_HEIGHT/2 + (o++ * SYMBOL_HEIGHT) - SYMBOL_HEIGHT));
symbol->setAnchorPoint(ccp(0.5f, 0.5f));
symbol->setScale(SYMBOL_SCALE_FACTOR);
wheelLayer->addChild(symbol, 10, o);
}
}
So, when moving 'wheelLayer' to a position outside the content size of 'mWheelMachine', it will move over the entire screen, thus drawing the symbols outside the middle designated area (mWheelMachine) for that. As it has a larger size than its parent, it draws symbols outside the parent.
Why is this happening? How can I make it to only use mWheelMachine's content size?
You can imagine cclayer is a node, it does not have the concept of size and anchor and set its content size does not have a role on the show's content, it will only affect the control area.
I think you should just hope that some of the pictures to be displayed in a region. Using a mask will be a good solution.
I'm having a lot of trouble detecting collisions in a zero-G space game. Hopefully this image will help me explain:
http://i.stack.imgur.com/f7AHO.png
The white rectangle is a static body with a b2PolygonShape fixture attached, as such:
// Create the line physics body definition
b2BodyDef wallBodyDef;
wallBodyDef.position.Set(0.0f, 0.0f);
// Create the line physics body in the physics world
wallBodyDef.type = b2_staticBody; // Set as a static body
m_Body = world->CreateBody(&wallBodyDef);
// Create the vertex array which will be used to make the physics shape
b2Vec2 vertices[4];
vertices[0].Set(m_Point1.x, m_Point1.y); // Point 1
vertices[1].Set(m_Point1.x + (sin(angle - 90*(float)DEG_TO_RAD)*m_Thickness), m_Point1.y - (cos(angle - 90*(float)DEG_TO_RAD)*m_Thickness)); // Point 2
vertices[2].Set(m_Point2.x + (sin(angle - 90*(float)DEG_TO_RAD)*m_Thickness), m_Point2.y - (cos(angle - 90*(float)DEG_TO_RAD)*m_Thickness)); // Point 3
vertices[3].Set(m_Point2.x, m_Point2.y); // Point 3
int32 count = 4; // Vertex count
b2PolygonShape wallShape; // Create the line physics shape
wallShape.Set(vertices, count); // Set the physics shape using the vertex array above
// Define the dynamic body fixture
b2FixtureDef fixtureDef;
fixtureDef.shape = &wallShape; // Set the line shape
fixtureDef.density = 0.0f; // Set the density
fixtureDef.friction = 0.0f; // Set the friction
fixtureDef.restitution = 0.5f; // Set the restitution
// Add the shape to the body
m_Fixture = m_Body->CreateFixture(&fixtureDef);
m_Fixture->SetUserData("Wall");[/code]
You'll have to trust me that that makes the shape in the image. The physics simulation works perfectly, the player (small triangle) collides with the body with pixel perfect precision. However, I come to a problem when I try to determine when a collision takes place so I can remove health and what-not. The code I am using for this is as follows:
/*------ Check for collisions ------*/
if (m_Physics->GetWorld()->GetContactCount() > 0)
{
if (m_Physics->GetWorld()->GetContactList()->GetFixtureA()->GetUserData() == "Player" &&
m_Physics->GetWorld()->GetContactList()->GetFixtureB()->GetUserData() == "Wall")
{
m_Player->CollideWall();
}
}
I'm aware there are probably better ways to do collisions, but I'm just a beginner and haven't found anywhere that explains how to do listeners and callbacks well enough for me to understand. The problem I have is that GetContactCount() shows a contact whenever the player body enters the purple box above. Obviously there is a rectangular bounding box being created that encompasses the white rectangle.
I've tried making the fixture an EdgeShape, and the same thing happens. Does anyone have any idea what is going on here? I'd really like to get collision nailed so I can move on to other things. Thank you very much for any help.
The bounding box is an AABB (axis aligned bounding box) which means it will always be aligned with the the Cartesian axes. AABBs are normally used for broadphase collision detection because it's a relatively simple (and inexpensive) computation.
You need to make sure that you're testing against the OBB (oriented bounding box) for the objects if you want more accurate (but not pixel perfect, as Micah pointed out) results.
Also, I agree with Micah's answer that you will most likely need a more general system for handling collisions. Even if you only ever have just walls and the player, there's no guarantee that which object will be A and which will be B. And as you add other object types, this will quickly unravel.
Creating the contact listener isn't terribly difficult, from the docs (added to attempt to handle your situation):
class MyContactListener:public b2ContactListener
{
private:
PlayerClass *m_Player;
public:
MyContactListener(PlayerClass *player) : m_Player(player)
{ }
void BeginContact(b2Contact* contact)
{ /* handle begin event */ }
void EndContact(b2Contact* contact)
{
if (contact->GetFixtureA()->GetUserData() == m_Player
|| contact->GetFixtureB()->GetUserData() == m_Player)
{
m_Player->CollideWall();
}
}
/* we're not interested in these for the time being */
void PreSolve(b2Contact* contact, const b2Manifold* oldManifold)
{ /* handle pre-solve event */ }
void PostSolve(b2Contact* contact, const b2ContactImpulse* impulse)
{ /* handle post-solve event */ }
};
This requires you to assign m_Player to the player's fixture's user data field. Then you can use the contact listener like so:
m_Physics->GetWorld()->SetContactListener(new MyContactListener(m_Player));
How do you know GetFixtureA is the player and B is the wall? Could it be reversed? Could there be an FixtureC? I would think you would need a more generic solution.
I've used a similar graphics framework (Qt) and it had something so you could grab any two objects and call something like 'hasCollided' which would return a bool. You could get away with not using a callback and just call it in the drawScene() or check it periodically.
In Box2D the existence of a contact just means that the AABBs of two fixtures overlaps. It does not necessarily mean that the shapes of the fixtures themselves are touching.
You can use the IsTouching() function of a contact to check if the shapes are actually touching, but the preferred way to deal with collisions is to use the callback feature to have the engine tell you whenever two fixtures start/stop touching. Using callbacks is much more efficient and easier to manage in the long run, though it may be a little more effort to set up initially and there are a few things to be careful about - see here for an example: http://www.iforce2d.net/b2dtut/collision-callbacks