I'm beginning programming, so sorry for my lack of knowledge.
How can I set elements in vector in a specific order? I would like to swap elements in the way that there won't be same elements next to each other.
For example vector contains:
{1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4}
and I'd like it to be like:
{1, 2, 4, 3, 4, 2, 3, 2, 4}
Thanks for help.
edit:
Hello again, I found not the best solution, maybe you can take a look and correct it?
map<unsigned,unsigned> Map;
for(vector<unsigned>::iterator i=V.begin();i!=V.end();++i)
{
map<unsigned,unsigned>::iterator f=Map.find(*i);
if(f==Map.end()) Map[*i]=1;
else ++f->second;
}
for(bool more=true;more;)
{
more=false;
for(map<unsigned,unsigned>::iterator i=Map.begin();i!=Map.end();++i)
{
if(i->second)
{
--i->second;
cout<<i->first<<", ";
more=true;
}
}
}
Now, for { 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 } it gives me { 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 2, 4, 4, 4, 4 } instead of e.g { 4, 1, 4, 2, 4, 3, 4, 2, 4, 3, 4, 2 }. How can it be done? Thanks
credits: _13th_Dragon
Count the occurrences of each value.
Starting with the most-frequent value, alternate it with less-frequent values.
In order to achieve (1), one can simply use std::map<V, unsigned>. However, for the second, one needs an ordered set of std::pair<V, unsigned int>, ordered by the second value. Since we want to keep track of how many times we need to use a given value, the second value cannot be constant. Also, we don't want to change the order if we happen to decrease the count of a given value much. All in all we get
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <map>
// In the pair, first is the original value, while
// second is the number occurrences of that value.
typedef std::pair<int, unsigned> value_counter;
int main(){
std::vector<int> sequence = { 0, 1, 3, 3, 4, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2 , 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4 };
std::map<int, unsigned> count;
for( auto i : sequence){
count[i]++;
}
std::vector<value_counter> store( count.size() );
std::copy(count.begin(), count.end(), store.begin());
// Sort by the second value
std::sort(store.begin(), store.end(),
[](const value_counter& a, const value_counter& b){
return a.second > b.second;
});
std::vector<int> result;
// We need two indices, one for the current value
// and the other one for the alternative
for(unsigned i = 0, j = 1; i < store.size(); ++i){
while(store[i].second > 0){
result.push_back(store[i].first);
store[i].second--;
if(store[i].second == 0)
continue;
if( j <= i)
j = i + 1;
while(j < store.size() && store[j].second == 0)
++j;
if(j >= store.size()){
std::cerr << "Not enough elements for filling!" << std::endl;
return 1;
}
else {
result.push_back(store[j].first);
store[j].second--;
}
}
}
for( auto r : result){
std::cout << r << " ";
}
}
Instead of using a typedef you could create an alternative counter which has better names than first and second, but that makes copying from the map a little bit more verbose.
Related
This question already has answers here:
std::remove_if - lambda, not removing anything from the collection
(4 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I am trying to remove elements from a vector of ints using std::remove_if, but am not getting the required output.
Initial vector members: {0, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 5, 1, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8, 1, 9}
Required Output: {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}
Actual Output: {0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8, 1, 9}
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include <functional>
class Equal
{
public:
Equal(int a): a_(a){}
bool operator()(int b)
{
return a_ == b;
}
private:
int a_;
};
int main()
{
std::vector<int> vi{0, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 5, 1, 6, 1, 7, 1, 8, 1, 9};
std::cout << std::endl;
std::remove_if(vi.begin(), vi.end(), Equal(1));
for (const auto &i : vi) std::cout << i << " ";
return 0;
}
There are just as many elements in the vector before and after the call to
std::remove_if:
Removing is done by shifting (by means of move assignment) the elements in the range in such a way that the elements that are not to be removed appear in the beginning of the range.
... and std::remove_if returns an iterator to the start of the "removed" elements and you can use that iterator to actually erase the elements: See Erase–remove idiom
vi.erase(
std::remove_if(vi.begin(), vi.end(), Equal(1)), // returns iterator
vi.end() // erase to the end
);
Demo
Also note that std::vector got a new specialized function in C++20 that does both things, namely std::erase_if.
Example:
std::erase_if(vi, Equal(1));
I'm currently trying to find the minimum element of a 2D vector. I'm trying to practice using C++11 lambda functions and figured this might be good practice, but can't seem to get it compiling.
I'm aware that I could do the following:
vector<vector<int>> matrix = {
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5 },
{6, 7, 8, 9, 10 },
{5, 6, 8, 1, 12 },
{1, 7, 2, 4, 18 },
};
int result = std::numeric_limits<int>::max();
for(const auto& row : matrix)
{
int minElemInRow = *std::min_element(row.begin(), row.end());
result = std::min(result , minElemInRow);
}
return result;
but was wondering if the same could be done with a lambda function. Currently, this is my best attempt:
vector<vector<int>> matrix = {
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5 },
{6, 7, 8, 9, 10 },
{5, 6, 8, 1, 12 },
{1, 7, 2, 4, 18 },
};
return *std::min_element(matrix.begin(), matrix.end(),
[](const auto& row)
{
return *std::min_element(row.begin(), row.end());
});
I get the error: error C2672: 'operator __surrogate_func': no matching overloaded function found
How I feel it should be working is that the outer min_element will pass in a row at a time (which is just a reference to a vector), from which I can return the smallest, which will then be compared against other rows.
I thought that the problem might be that the lambda would be receiving an iterator to a vector of ints rather than a reference to the vector of ints, but dereferencing doesn't seem to be helping.
Is there a better way to be doing what I'm trying to do?
#assembly_wizard pointed out that min_element wants a predicate which can compare two of the item passed it. That is two rows. This leads to the following code:
vector<vector<int>> matrix = {
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5 },
{6, 7, 8, 9, 10 },
{5, 6, 8, 1, 12 },
{1, 7, 2, 4, 18 },
};
auto i = std::min_element(matrix.begin(), matrix.end(),
[](const auto& lhs, const auto& rhs)
{
return *std::min_element(lhs.begin(), lhs.end()) <
*std::min_element(rhs.begin(), rhs.end());
});
This will find the row with the smallest element. Though I can make that work by wrapping it in yet another std::min_element, that's getting way more complex than to be remotely helpful. If anyone has a better suggestion, I'd love to hear it!
I've compiled a working version that does what I've mentioned in the comments:
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::vector<std::vector<int>> matrix = {
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5 },
{6, 7, 8, 9, 10 },
{5, 6, 8, 1, 12 },
{1, 7, 2, 4, 18 },
};
std::vector<int> row_minimums(matrix.size());
std::transform(matrix.begin(), matrix.end(), row_minimums.begin(), [](const auto& row) {
return *std::min_element(row.begin(), row.end());
});
auto i = *std::min_element(row_minimums.begin(), row_minimums.end());
std::cout << "Minimum element is: " << i << std::endl;
}
See it in action on godbolt
This will take the minimum of each row separately, so we get row_minimums which is a vector of ints, and then it takes the minimum of these to get the final result between all the rows.
The only thing making this code worse than the for loop version, is that it keeps all of the row_minimums in memory at once, before running min_element on them. Unfortunately I don't know of a way to do this simultaneously, but I'm not the greatest STL expect, so maybe there is a way.
Other options you might consider is first concatenating the 2D matrix into a 1D vector and then using min_element on it, or the option you've included in your edit where you call min_element 3 times.
Also, this SO answer seems to have interesting info regarding solutions using the boost library which might be better, but I'm not sure exactly what they are.
Just a little simpler:
With std::for_each you iterate over each vector in matrix, and obtain the minimum element of them. As min is captured by reference, you get the min of all of them.
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::vector<std::vector<int>> matrix = {
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5 },
{6, 7, 8, 9, 10 },
{5, 6, 8, 1, 12 },
{1, 7, 2, 4, 18 },
};
int min = std::numeric_limits<int>::max();
std::for_each(matrix.begin(), matrix.end(),
[&min](const auto& v)
{
min = std::min(*min_element(v.begin(), v.end()), min);
}
);
std::cout << "Minimum element is: " << min << std::endl;
}
I have an array of arrays of things
typedef std::vector<thing> group;
std::vector<group> groups;
things could be compared like so
int comparison(thing a, thing b);
where the return value is 0, 1 or 2
0 means that the things are not alike
1 means that they are alike and a is more specific or equal to b
2 means that they are alike and b is more specific or equal to a
and I am looking for a function that would return me a group that contains all things that appear in every group.
std::getgroup(groups.begin(), groups.end(), myComparisonFunction);
the problem is I have no idea what this function may be called, if it does even exist, or what the closest thing to it would be.
Eventually, what you want is an intersection. Luckily, there is std::set_intersection which almost does what you need. Here's a simple example on std::vector<std::vector<int>>. You can easily change it to work with your thing:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
std::vector<int> getGroup(const std::vector<std::vector<int>>& groups) {
std::vector<int> group;
std::vector<int> temp = groups[0];
std::sort(temp.begin(), temp.end());
for ( unsigned i = 1; i < groups.size(); ++i ) {
group = std::vector<int>();
std::vector<int> temp2 = groups[i];
std::sort(temp2.begin(), temp2.end());
std::set_intersection(temp2.begin(), temp2.end(),
temp.begin(), temp.end(),
std::back_inserter(group));
temp = group;
}
return group;
}
int main() {
std::vector<std::vector<int>> groups = { {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10},
{1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10},
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10},
{1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10},
{1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10},
{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10} };
for ( auto g : getGroup(groups) )
std::cout << g << "\n";
return 0;
}
This will print:
1
6
10
I'm trying to find the maximum contiguous subarray with start and end index. The method I've adopted is divide-and-conquer, with O(nlogn) time complexity.
I have tested with several test cases, and the start and end index always work correctly. However, I found that if the array contains an odd-numbered of elements, the maximum sum is sometimes correct, sometimes incorrect(seemingly random). But for even cases, it is always correct. Here is my code:
int maxSubSeq(int A[], int n, int &s, int &e)
{
// s and e stands for start and end index respectively,
// and both are passed by reference
if(n == 1){
return A[0];
}
int sum = 0;
int midIndex = n / 2;
int maxLeftIndex = midIndex - 1;
int maxRightIndex = midIndex;
int leftMaxSubSeq = A[maxLeftIndex];
int rightMaxSubSeq = A[maxRightIndex];
int left = maxSubSeq(A, midIndex, s, e);
int right = maxSubSeq(A + midIndex, n - midIndex, s, e);
for(int i = midIndex - 1; i >= 0; i--){
sum += A[i];
if(sum > leftMaxSubSeq){
leftMaxSubSeq = sum;
s = i;
}
}
sum = 0;
for(int i = midIndex; i < n; i++){
sum += A[i];
if(sum > rightMaxSubSeq){
rightMaxSubSeq = sum;
e = i;
}
}
return max(max(leftMaxSubSeq + rightMaxSubSeq, left),right);
}
Below is two of the test cases I was working with, one has odd-numbered elements, one has even-numbered elements.
Array with 11 elements:
1, 3, -7, 9, 6, 3, -2, 4, -1, -9,
2,
Array with 20 elements:
1, 3, 2, -2, 4, 5, -9, -4, -8, 6,
5, 9, 7, -1, 5, -2, 6, 4, -3, -1,
Edit: The following are the 2 kinds of outputs:
// TEST 1
Test file : T2-Data-1.txt
Array with 11 elements:
1, 3, -7, 9, 6, 3, -2, 4, -1, -9,
2,
maxSubSeq : A[3..7] = 32769 // Index is correct, but sum should be 20
Test file : T2-Data-2.txt
Array with 20 elements:
1, 3, 2, -2, 4, 5, -9, -4, -8, 6,
5, 9, 7, -1, 5, -2, 6, 4, -3, -1,
maxSubSeq : A[9..17] = 39 // correct
// TEST 2
Test file : T2-Data-1.txt
Array with 11 elements:
1, 3, -7, 9, 6, 3, -2, 4, -1, -9,
2,
maxSubSeq : A[3..7] = 20
Test file : T2-Data-2.txt
Array with 20 elements:
1, 3, 2, -2, 4, 5, -9, -4, -8, 6,
5, 9, 7, -1, 5, -2, 6, 4, -3, -1,
maxSubSeq : A[9..17] = 39
Can anyone point out why this is occurring? Thanks in advance!
Assuming that n is the correct size of your array (we see it being passed in as a parameter and later used to initialize midIndexbut we do not see its actual invocation and so must assume you're doing it correctly), the issue lies here:
int midIndex = n / 2;
In the case that your array has an odd number of elements, which we can represented as
n = 2k + 1
we can find that your middle index will always equate to
(2k + 1) / 2 = k + (1/2)
which means that for every integer, k, you'll always have half of an integer number added to k.
C++ doesn't round integers that receive floating-point numbers; it truncates. So while you'd expect k + 0.5 to round to k+1, you actually get k after truncation.
This means that, for example, when your array size is 11, midIndex is defined to be 5. Therefore, you need to adjust your code accordingly.
Suppose I have a matrix and a vector given by. How can I perform a search algorithm like binary search to return the index?
Example:
const int V_SIZE = 10,H_SIZE = 7;
int a1[V_SIZE][H_SIZE] = {
{1,2,0,0,0,0,0},
{1,3,0,0,0,0,0},
{2,2,4,0,0,0,0},
{2,2,6,0,0,0,0},
{3,2,4,7,0,0,0},
{4,1,3,5,9,0,0},
{4,1,4,6,8,0,0},
{4,2,3,4,7,0,0},
{5,2,3,5,7,8,0},
{6,1,3,4,5,7,10}
}; // sorted
int a2 [H_SIZE] = {4,1,3,5,9,0,0};
Perform a search for the vector a2 in the matrix a1 and the return value is 6
Thank a lot
You could use a 2D std::array in combination with std::lower_bound:
const int V_SIZE = 10,H_SIZE = 7;
std::array<std::array<int, H_SIZE>, V_SIZE> a1 {
{{{1,2,0,0,0,0,0}},
{{1,3,0,0,0,0,0}},
{{2,2,4,0,0,0,0}},
{{2,2,6,0,0,0,0}},
{{3,2,4,7,0,0,0}},
{{4,1,3,5,9,0,0}},
{{4,1,4,6,8,0,0}},
{{4,2,3,4,7,0,0}},
{{5,2,3,5,7,8,0}},
{{6,1,3,4,5,7,10}}
}}; // sorted
std::array<int, H_SIZE> a2 {{4,1,3,5,9,0,0}};
int idx = std::lower_bound(std::begin(a1), std::end(a1), a2) - std::begin(a1);
LIVE DEMO
If the matrix is sorted on the first number, you could use binary search to find an approximate index. You then have to go back until you find the first row starting with the same number as in the vector, as well as forward to find the last row starting with the same number. Then you loop over the vector, searching for a match for the second, third, etc. number in the range of rows you have.
What about something like this using std::array?
template <int HSIZE>
bool operator<(const std::array<int, HSIZE> &lhs, const std::array<int, HSIZE> &rhs)
{
for (int i = 0; i < HSIZE; i++)
if (lhs[i] != rhs[i])
return lhs[i] < rhs[i];
return false;
}
std::array<int, 7> a1[] =
{
{ 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 },
{ 1, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 },
{ 2, 2, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0 },
{ 2, 2, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0 },
{ 3, 2, 4, 7, 0, 0, 0 },
{ 4, 1, 3, 5, 9, 0, 0 },
{ 4, 1, 4, 6, 8, 0, 0 },
{ 4, 2, 3, 4, 7, 0, 0 },
{ 5, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 0 },
{ 6, 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10 }
};
void search(void)
{
std::array<int, 7> a2 = { 4, 1, 3, 5, 9, 0, 0 };
std::array<int, 7> *a1_end = a1 + sizeof(a1) / sizeof(std::array<int, 7>);
std::array<int, 7> *it = std::lower_bound(a1, a1_end, a2);
}