I want to extract with a regex the value after ajaxBrowserNavigationCheck('&x and before the = from the following javascript code:
if (ajaxBrowserNavigationCheck('&x909ef93d-61ac-4311-ac56-20c2ae9770f5=7ebdc2a4-df58-4c1c-9b50-96964c93e927', '', 'servletcontroller', '')){
processBrowserNavigationButton();
Basicly teh value I want to extra are &x909ef93d-61ac-4311-ac56-20c2ae9770f5 (the value before the = and we need the &x)
and 7ebdc2a4-df58-4c1c-9b50-96964c93e927 (the value after the =)
Note that the value is there twice (its after MODE=BROWSER_NAV)
Note that both value have 36 char without the &x
the &x is always there for the first string
My reg ex is a bit rusty here what I got so far:
(&x([0-9a-fA-F]|-)+) get me the first part
(&x([0-9a-fA-F]|-)+)|(=([0-9a-fA-F]|-)+) get me both but with the = we don't want it...
Edit: Sorry that I forgot the language, it's for a jmeter script which use jakarta ORO.
Edit2: I realize I can split those in two variable or even in three in jmeter that make it a bit easier.
Edit3: I removed the window location part because it was misleading since it was the same in the ajax part.
in ajaxBrowserNavigationCheck('&x909ef93d-61ac-4311-ac56-20c2ae9770f5=7ebdc2a4-df58-4c1c-9b50-96964c93e927', '', 'servletcontroller', ''))
we want &x909ef93d-61ac-4311-ac56-20c2ae9770f5 and 7ebdc2a4-df58-4c1c-9b50-96964c93e927
You haven't said what language you are using, so it's hard to give a solid answer.
This matches just your targets:
&x[a-fA-F0-9-]*(?==)
The last term is a look ahead, which asserts, but does not capture, an equals sign.
This regex matches all the input and captures each target twice as groups 1 and 2:
(?m).*?(&x[a-fA-F0-9-]*)=.*(&x[a-fA-F0-9-]*)=.*
See a live demo on rubular
Related
We can check to see if a digit is in a password, for example, by doing something like:
(?=.*\d)
Or if there's a digit and lowercase with:
(?=.*\d)(?=.*[a-z])
This will basically go on "until the end" to check whether there's a letter in the string.
However, I was wondering if it's possible in some sort of generic way to limit the scope of a lookahead. Here's a basic example which I'm hoping will demonstrate the point:
start_of_string;
middle_of_string;
end_of_string;
I want to use a single regular expression to match against start_of_string + middle_of_string + end_of_string.
Is it possible to use a lookahead/lookbehind in the middle_of_string section WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT COMES BEFORE OR AFTER IT? That is, not knowing the size or contents of the preceding/succeeding string component. And limit the scope of the lookahead to only what is contained in that portion of the string?
Let's take one example:
start_of_string = 'start'
middle_of_string = '123'
end_of_string = 'ABC'
Would it be possible to check the contents of each part but limit it's scope like this?
string = 'start123ABC'
# Check to make sure the first part has a letter, the second part has a number and the third part has a capital
((?=.*[a-z]).*) # limit scope to the first part only!!
((?=.*[0-9]).*) # limit scope to only the second part.
((?=.*[A-Z]).*) # limit scope to only the last part.
In other words, can lookaheads/lookbehinds be "chained" with other components of a regex without it screwing up the entire regex?
UPDATE:
Here would be an example, hopefully this is more helpful to the question:
START_OF_STRING = 'abc'
Does 'x' exist in it? (?=.*x) ==> False
END_OF_STRING = 'cdxoy'
Does 'y' exist in it? (?=.*y) ==> True
FULL_STRING = START_OF_STRING + END_OF_STRING
'abcdxoy'
Is it possible to chain the two regexes together in any sort of way to only wok on its 'substring' component?
For example, now (?=.*x) in the first part of the string would return True, but it should not.
`((?=.*x)(?=.*y)).*`
I think the short answer to this is "No, it's not possible.", but am looking to hear from someone who understands this to tell why it is or isn't.
In .NET and javascript you could use a positive lookahead at the start of your string component and a negative lookbehind at the end of it to "constrain" the match. Example:
.*(?=.*arrow)(?<middle>.*)(?<=.*arrow).*
helloarrowxyz
{'middle': 'arrow'}
If in pcre, python, or other you would need to either have a fixed width lookahead to constraint it from going too far forward, such as what Wiktor Stribiżew says above:
.*(?=.{0,5}arrow)(?<middle>.{0,5}).*
Otherwise, it wouldn't be possible to do without either a fixed-width lookahead or a variable width look-behind.
In many other programming languages, there is a function which takes as a parameter a regular expression and returns an array of string values. This is true of Javascript and Ruby. The .match in crystal, however, does 1) not seem to accept the global flag and 2) it does not return an array but rather a struct of type Regex::MatchData. (https://crystal-lang.org/api/0.25.1/Regex/MatchData.html)
As an example the following code:
str = "Happy days"
re = /[a-z]+/i
matches = str.match(re)
puts matches
returns Regex::MatchData("Happy")
I am unsure how to convert this result into a string or why this is not the default as it is in the inspiration language (Ruby). I understand this question probably results from my inexperience dealing with structs and compiled languages but I would appreciate an answer in hopes that it might also help someone else coming from a JS/Ruby background.
What if I want to convert to a string merely the first match?
puts "Happy days"[/[a-z]+/i]?
puts "Happy days".match(/[a-z]+/i).try &.[0]
It will try to match a string against /[a-z]+/i regex and if there is a match, Group 0, i.e. the whole match, will be output. Note that the ? after [...] will make it fail gracefully if there is no match found. If you just use puts "??!!"[/[a-z]+/i], an exception will be thrown.
See this online demo.
If you want the functionality similar to String#scan that returns all matches found in the input, you may use (shortened version only left as per #Amadan's remark):
matches = str.scan(re).map(&.string)
Output of the code above:
["Happy days", "Happy days"]
Note that:
String::scan will return an array of Regex::MatchData for each match.
You can call .string on the match to return the actual matched text.
Actually the posted example returns a #<MatchData "Happy"> in Ruby, which also has no "global" flag – thats what String#scan(Regex) is for as mentioned by others.
If you want only a single match without going through Regex::MatchData, you can use String#[](Regex):
str = "Happy days"
p str[/[a-z]+/i] # => "Happy"
I'm grab value from web page and I use this:
.Squadra = Regex.Match(Content, "<td class=""team large-link""\s*>(.+?)</td>").Groups(1).ToString
.Squadra = Remove_Tags(Regex.Match(.Squadra, ">(\w+)<\/a>").Groups(1).ToString)
you can see that .Squadra contains the grabbed link value, so in the next step i replace al link format and grab the only value inserted in the link.
All working good, but if I have value like this: Real Vicenza, the variable return me blank value, probably for the space between Real and Vicenza?
How to correct this? I'm trying to insert s* before (+w) but seems doesn't work.
Instead of using (\w+) use ([^<]+) - that matches all non-< characters, which is far less likely to fail.
I'm converting a text file to a Tab-Delimited text file, and ran into a bit of a snag. I can get everything I need to work the way I want except for one small part.
One field I'm working with has the home addresses of the subjects as a single entry ("1234 Happy Lane Somewhere, St 12345") and I need each broken down by Street(Tab)City(Tab)State(Tab)Zip. The one part I'm hung up on is the Tab between the State and the Zip.
I've been using input=input.Replace throughout, and it's worked well so far, but I can't think of how to untangle this one. The wildcards I'm used to don't seem to be working, I can't replace ("?? #####") with ("??" + ControlChars.Tab + "#####")...which I honestly didn't expect to work, but it's the only idea on the matter I had.
I've read a bit about using Regex, but have no experience with it, and it seems a bit...overwhelming.
Is Regex my best option for this? If not, are there any other suggestions on solutions I may have missed?
Thanks for your time. :)
EDIT: Here's what I'm using so far. It makes some edits to the line in question, taking care of spaces, commas, and other text I don't need, but I've got nothing for the State/Zip situation; I've a bad habit of wiping something if it doesn't work, but I'll append the last thing I used to the very end, if that'll help.
If input Like "Guar*###/###-####" Then
input = input.Replace("Guar:", "")
input = input.Replace(" ", ControlChars.Tab)
input = input.Replace(",", ControlChars.Tab)
input = "C" + ControlChars.Tab + strAccount + ControlChars.Tab + input
End If
input = System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex.Replace(" #####", ControlChars.Tab + "#####") <-- Just one example of something that doesn't work.
This is what's written to input in this example
" Guar: LASTNAME,FIRSTNAME 999 E 99TH ST CITY,ST 99999 Tel: 999/999-9999"
And this is what I can get as a result so far
C 99999/9 LASTNAME FIRSTNAME 999 E 99TH ST CITY ST 99999 999/999-9999
With everything being exactly what I need besides the "ST 99999" bit (with actual data obviously omitted for privacy and professional whatnots).
UPDATE: Just when I thought it was all squared away, I've got another snag. The raw data gives me this.
# TERMINOLOGY ######### ##/##/#### # ###.##
And the end result is giving me this, because this is a chunk of data that was just fine as-is...before I removed the Tabs. Now I need a way to replace them after they've been removed, or to omit this small group of code from a document-wide Tab genocide I initiate the code with.
#TERMINOLOGY###########/##/########.##
Would a variant on rgx.Replace work best here? Or can I copy the code to a variable, remove Tabs from the document, then insert the variable without losing the tabs?
I think what you're looking for is
Dim r As New System.Text.RegularExpressions.Regex(" (\d{5})(?!\d)")
Dim input As String = rgx.Replace(input, ControlChars.Tab + "$1")
The first line compiles the regular expression. The \d matches a digit, and the {5}, as you can guess, matches 5 repetitions of the previous atom. The parentheses surrounding the \d{5} is known as a capture group, and is responsible for putting what's captured in a pseudovariable named $1. The (?!\d) is a more advanced concept known as a negative lookahead assertion, and it basically peeks at the next character to check that it's not a digit (because then it could be a 6-or-more digit number, where the first 5 happened to get matched). Another version is
" (\d{5})\b"
where the \b is a word boundary, disallowing alphanumeric characters following the digits.
Is it possible to write a regular expression that matches all strings that does not only contain numbers? If we have these strings:
abc
a4c
4bc
ab4
123
It should match the four first, but not the last one. I have tried fiddling around in RegexBuddy with lookaheads and stuff, but I can't seem to figure it out.
(?!^\d+$)^.+$
This says lookahead for lines that do not contain all digits and match the entire line.
Unless I am missing something, I think the most concise regex is...
/\D/
...or in other words, is there a not-digit in the string?
jjnguy had it correct (if slightly redundant) in an earlier revision.
.*?[^0-9].*
#Chad, your regex,
\b.*[a-zA-Z]+.*\b
should probably allow for non letters (eg, punctuation) even though Svish's examples didn't include one. Svish's primary requirement was: not all be digits.
\b.*[^0-9]+.*\b
Then, you don't need the + in there since all you need is to guarantee 1 non-digit is in there (more might be in there as covered by the .* on the ends).
\b.*[^0-9].*\b
Next, you can do away with the \b on either end since these are unnecessary constraints (invoking reference to alphanum and _).
.*[^0-9].*
Finally, note that this last regex shows that the problem can be solved with just the basics, those basics which have existed for decades (eg, no need for the look-ahead feature). In English, the question was logically equivalent to simply asking that 1 counter-example character be found within a string.
We can test this regex in a browser by copying the following into the location bar, replacing the string "6576576i7567" with whatever you want to test.
javascript:alert(new String("6576576i7567").match(".*[^0-9].*"));
/^\d*[a-z][a-z\d]*$/
Or, case insensitive version:
/^\d*[a-z][a-z\d]*$/i
May be a digit at the beginning, then at least one letter, then letters or digits
Try this:
/^.*\D+.*$/
It returns true if there is any simbol, that is not a number. Works fine with all languages.
Since you said "match", not just validate, the following regex will match correctly
\b.*[a-zA-Z]+.*\b
Passing Tests:
abc
a4c
4bc
ab4
1b1
11b
b11
Failing Tests:
123
if you are trying to match worlds that have at least one letter but they are formed by numbers and letters (or just letters), this is what I have used:
(\d*[a-zA-Z]+\d*)+
If we want to restrict valid characters so that string can be made from a limited set of characters, try this:
(?!^\d+$)^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]{3,}$
or
(?!^\d+$)^[\w-]{3,}$
/\w+/:
Matches any letter, number or underscore. any word character
.*[^0-9]{1,}.*
Works fine for us.
We want to use the used answer, but it's not working within YANG model.
And the one I provided here is easy to understand and it's clear:
start and end could be any chars, but, but there must be at least one NON NUMERICAL characters, which is greatest.
I am using /^[0-9]*$/gm in my JavaScript code to see if string is only numbers. If yes then it should fail otherwise it will return the string.
Below is working code snippet with test cases:
function isValidURL(string) {
var res = string.match(/^[0-9]*$/gm);
if (res == null)
return string;
else
return "fail";
};
var testCase1 = "abc";
console.log(isValidURL(testCase1)); // abc
var testCase2 = "a4c";
console.log(isValidURL(testCase2)); // a4c
var testCase3 = "4bc";
console.log(isValidURL(testCase3)); // 4bc
var testCase4 = "ab4";
console.log(isValidURL(testCase4)); // ab4
var testCase5 = "123"; // fail here
console.log(isValidURL(testCase5));
I had to do something similar in MySQL and the following whilst over simplified seems to have worked for me:
where fieldname regexp ^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$
and fieldname NOT REGEXP ^[0-9]+$
This shows all fields that are alphabetical and alphanumeric but any fields that are just numeric are hidden. This seems to work.
example:
name1 - Displayed
name - Displayed
name2 - Displayed
name3 - Displayed
name4 - Displayed
n4ame - Displayed
324234234 - Not Displayed