i using qt5 and opencv to create an application that give a user inteface using qt and does the image processing part in opencv.....
so far my design is:
i am displaying a video and some standard controls like buttons and checkboxes using qt main gui thread
for capturing image and processing it, i have created a worker class derived from QObject and moved it to a thread....
the function that is executed in the worker class(Worker::process) has a blocking while loop.....that constantly:
captures a frame from a video or a camera
does some processing on it
converts from cv::Mat to QImage
emit a signal to the main thread to display the QImage
also in order to recieve user input i was using emitting signal from the main thread to the worker slots
the problem i faced was that the signal from the main thread never got picked off by the worker because of the event loop blocking while loop.
after much searching i came up with the solution to use Qt::DirectConnection argument while connecting the signal from the main thread to the worker slots. that solved the problem at that time.
now i need to add a qtimer or qbasictimer inside the blocking while loop....and guess what, the timer slot(in the case of qtimer) and the protected timerEvent handler (in the case of the qbasictimer) never get called. my hunch is that again the blocking while loop is the culprit
after much searching and reading on forums i have come to the conclusion that somehow my over all design maybe incorrect.....and as i keep adding more functionality to my application these problems will keep showing up.
I have two options now:
somehow call the threads exec() function inside the blocking while loop. so the question to the gurus out there is:
"how do i call the thread::exec() method inside a worker QObject class, i need the reference to the thread running the worker to call exec()" (short term solution)
change the whole implementation.....and here the questions is:
"what are my options....." (long term)
please feel free to ask for details in case my wording or english has made the problem unclear in any way.....thanks...
Inside your worker's blocking loop, call qApp->processEvents(); periodically.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/qcoreapplication.html#processEvents
#include <QApplication>
// ...
void Worker::doWork()
{
while(true)
{
someLongImageProcessingFunction();
qApp->processEvents();
}
}
This should allow for the slots to get processed, and for the timers to update.
Using a direct connection may let you access and change values local to your worker, but you should be careful about thread safety. If you put a QMutexLocker right before your values that get modified by your GUI and right before your worker thread uses them, you should be good.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/qmutexlocker.html
Also if you wanted any of those slots to run on the worker thread, you need to use the QueuedConnection.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/threads.html
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/qthread.html#details
In some parts of the Qt docs it describes subclassing the QThread class. Other parts recommend the Worker/Producer model, and just use connections to setup how you use your threads. Usually there are fewer gotchas with the Worker/Producer model.
Hope that helps.
Related
My first naive at updating my progress bar was to include the following lines in my loop which is doing the processing, making something like this:
while(data.hasMoreItems())
{
doSomeProcessing(data.nextItem())
//Added these lines but they don't do anything
ui->progressBar->setValue(numberProcessed++);
ui->progressBar->repaint();
}
I thought adding the repaint() would make the execution pause while it updated the GUI, but apparently it's not that simple. After looking at the questions:
QProgressBar Error
Progress bar is not showing progress
it looks like I'm going to have to put the data processing in a different thread and then connect a signal from the data processing thread to the GUI thread to update the progressbar. I'm rather inexperienced with GUIs and threads and I was wondering if anyone could just point me in the right direction, ie what Qt classes should I be looking at using for this. I'd guess I need a QThread object but I've been looking through the QProgressBar documentation but it doesn't bring up the topic of threading.
As #rjh and #Georg have pointed out, there are essentially two different options:
Force processing of events using QApplication::processEvents(), OR
Create a thread that emits signals that can be used to update the progress bar
If you're doing any non-trivial processing, I'd recommend moving the processing to a thread.
The most important thing to know about threads is that except for the main GUI thread (which you don't start nor create), you can never update the GUI directly from within a thread.
The last parameter of QObject::connect() is a Qt::ConnectionType enum that by default takes into consideration whether threads are involved.
Thus, you should be able to create a simple subclass of QThread that does the processing:
class DataProcessingThread : public QThread
{
public:
void run();
signals:
void percentageComplete(int);
};
void MyThread::run()
{
while(data.hasMoreItems())
{
doSomeProcessing(data.nextItem())
emit percentageCompleted(computePercentageCompleted());
}
}
And then somewhere in your GUI code:
DataProcessingThread dataProcessor(/*data*/);
connect(dataProcessor, SIGNAL(percentageCompleted(int)), progressBar, SLOT(setValue(int));
dataProcessor.start();
You need to call QApplication::processEvents() periodically inside your processing loop to let it handle UI events.
As Georg says, Qt is a single-threaded co-operative multitasking environment. You get full control of your process until you relinquish it voluntarily with processEvents() - until you do that, Qt can't update the UI elements, handle async HTTP requests, handle input, or pretty much anything else. It's up to you to make sure that stuff gets a timeslice while you're in a long processing loop.
You can create a sub-class of QThread that emits a signal progressChanged, which you connect to the QProgressBar.
connect() makes the connections auto connections per default. That means that the signal-slot-mechanism already takes care of the threading issues for you, so you don't need to worry about that.
I am wondering how to tell a QObject to process all signals and call the slots associated with them. Here's the concrete problem I am having, for a better description of the question:
My program consists of three Qthreads : Main, Communication and Input.
The communication thread handles communication via the network, the Input thread handles user input, and both have several signal-slot connections to the main thread. Whenever a network event occurs, or whenever the user inputs a commandline command, a signal from the respective thread is called, which then activates the appropriate connected slot in the main thread. The main thread's role is to process these events. My code looks as follows:
QApplication a(argc, argv);
CommObj co; //inherits from QThread
co.start(); //Starts the thread
InputObj io; //inherits from QThread
io.start(); //Starts the thread
MainObj u(&co,&io);
return a.exec();
Now, what I want to achieve is for the main thread to not reach the last line.
My intentions are to call a method run() within the constructor of MainObj which is going to do something along the lines of this:
void run ()
{
forever
{
//process all signals..
}
}
However, I do not know how to implement the process all signals part. Any advice on how this could be done (including workarounds) would be very welcome.
This is completely unnecessary. a.exec() runs an event loop that will receive and process the events sent by other threads.
When a slot is invoked due to a signal being emitted in a different thread, Qt is posting a QMetaCallEvent to the receiver object. The QObject::event method is able to re-synthesize the slot call based on the data in the event.
Thus, you need to do nothing. a.exec() does what you want. Feel free to invoke it from MainObj's constructor, as qApp->exec() or as QEventLoop loop; loop.exec(), but that's rather bad design.
The real questions are:
Why do you need MainObj's constructor to spin an event loop?
What sort of "user input" are you processing in the io? You can't access any GUI objects from that thread.
Why are you deriving from QThread if you're using Qt's networking? You definitely don't want to do that - it won't work unless you spin an event loop, so you might as well just use a QThread without changes. Well, to be safe, you need just to make the thread destructible, so:
class Thread {
using QThread::run; // make it final
public:
Thread(QObject * parent = 0) : QThread(parent) {}
~Thread() { requestInterruption(); quit(); wait(); }
};
Anyway, by not using standard QThread that spins an event loop, the communication will be one way. Nothing in such threads will be able to react to signals from other threads.
You need to rearchitect as follows:
Use the Thread class as above. It's safe to be destructed at any time.
Have worker objects that run asynchronously using signals/slots/timers.
Move constructed workers to their threads.
What you need is the processEvents function. For example, if you don't want the user to be able to interact with widgets, but you want the graphics to update, use
processEvents(QEventLoop::ExcludeUserInputEvents);
See the documentation for details.
I am writing a mathematical simulator in Qt5 and when I click a button, some heavy calculation needs to be done. During it, I want to display a Please, wait window, eventually with a progress bar. Preferably without using threads.
Problem is, during calculation the application hangs, events are not handled, and what should be a please, wait window is merely a window frame without any contents (looks transparent).
PC: AMD X2 L325, 2GB RAM, Radeon E4690
OS: Debian 6 (Squeeze, Old stable)
gcc 4.4.5, Qt 5.2.0
Any help would be appreciated!
While you could call QApplication::processEvents, it's not the best approach.
If you're avoiding threads because they're new to you, then I'm sure you'll find it much easier once you've done it once. Qt makes it easy.
All you need to do is create a class derived from QObject which will do the calculations. Next, create a thread and call the object's moveToThread function. The thread is then controlled with a few signals and slots. That's all there is to it.
Rather than repeat the content here, I suggest you read this article, which explains it in detail and provides clean and concise example code.
From the new object that processes your calculations, it can then emit a signal to a slot on the main thread, which will update the progress on your "Please Wait" window.
Note that Widgets and all rendering must be done on the main thread.
I prefer use Qt Concurrent. It is not well documented, but very handy, much better then using QThread directly.
I usually do such things like that I have separate QObject for logic, in there some slot which calls heavy calculation like that (see run documentation):
void MyCalculationClass::startCalculating() {
QtConcurent::run(this, &MyCalculationClass::doHeavyCalculation);
}
Where method doHeavyCalculation emits signals with progress and calculation results.
Usually this method operates on its own data not modified by other threads/methods, so if synchronization is needed, it is trivial. Signal-Slot mechanism is handling most of the multithreading issues (note that default connections detects that signals is emitted from other threads and queues slot calls in proper thread, it is done automatically by default).
i have such problem and i solve it like this, i make calculation in another thread( i use std::thread instad of QThread) before i start my calculation i just start timer
QTimer *timer = new QTimer(this);
connect(timer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(repaint()));
timer->start(1);
and then
std::thread t(&Widget::calcBackgound, this);
t.detach();
You can put the heavy and time consuming part of your code in run() member function of another class which inherits from QThread. After that create an instance of the new class and simply call its start() function.
Your new class can have a signal which emits the current progress value. you can then connect this signal to the slot of a progress bar.
I will try to explain what my program used to do and what I am tring to change:
I had this function that ran on a button click from the the main thread in class MainWindow : public QMainWindow :
The function looks like this and is specified inside another file:
void MakeMeshStructure(MeshStructureLayers layers,
Handle_AIS_InteractiveContext theContext,
Handle_TDocStd_Document aDoc,
MyMesh &mesh,
int detail_vertex,
double insulation_thickness,
OpenMesh::VPropHandleT<MyMesh::Scalar> _max_beam_offset);
}
What it does is: it works on mesh and creates geometry for every vertex, face and edge of the mesh. This geometry gets displayed with theContext. This process takes very long (30 min) and blocks the gui.
What I would like to do is to have as many threads as QThread::idealThreadCount() and to free the gui when it computes and make it faster. (Is this the right thinking?)
I would like to divide my mesh into equal parts and pass this range of vertices to my function (above) to only work with one vertex range for a seperate tread.
I have a problem to figure out how to pass this data around and to make it thread safe.
I know its alot of code but here is my attempt at solving it:
http://pastebin.com/u/mzagar
The problem is getting all the data around in the right way and getting the threads to work. Where do I have to use mutexes. On every data that can get writen at the time of the thread work by the mainthread? Very confused. ty
edit:
I edited my code: http://pastebin.com/u/mzagar
I made a struct cadData to pass the data around. This is how I start threads:
connect(this, SIGNAL(startMake1(cadData)), cThreads.at(0), SLOT(MakeMesh(cadData)));
//...
cThreads.at(0)->moveToThread(threads.at(0));
//...
threads.at(0)->start();
//...
emit startMake1(aCadDatas.at(0));
//...
The problem is threads dont seem to work at the same time and also the gui freezes. Process goes in like this:
GUI freezes
things in thread 1 get done
things in thread 1 get done again
things in thread 2 get done
things in thread 2 get done again
...
GUI unfreezes
Any ideas why?
edit2:
I removed the multiple runs of the same thread by moving this to the class constructor:
connect(this, SIGNAL(startMake1(cadData)), cThreads.at(0), SLOT(MakeMesh(cadData)));
//...
cThreads.at(0)->moveToThread(threads.at(0));
//...
threads.at(0)->start();
Since you're using QThread, you can probably avoid explicit use of mutexes and such by using Qt's thread-safe slots-and-signals mechanism to do the work for you. You would basically package the data you need to send to the thread into an object, then emit a signal that has that object as an argument. The thread would receive a copy of that object in a slot (that you had previously connected to your signal) and start using the data then. To get data back from the worker thread to the main thread, you'd do the same thing again in reverse. Here's an article with some example code.
To add to Jeremy's answer: You can do the same by sending events between QObjects instead of using the signal-slot mechanism. Use whichever is most convenient for you.
The key is to leverage Qt's built-in event loop mutex. When you're sending signals to objects living in a thread different from the sender, the signal gets converted into a QMetaCallEvent and is posted to the event queue of the receiving QObject. This is done in a thread safe manner of course, and all one has to do is to leverage it. Sending explicit events works the same way. The event loop spinning in the thread where the receiver lives simply picks up QMetaCallEvents and executes slot calls accordingly, or dispatches your events to your implementation of customEvent() method.
When you start a raw QThread, the default implementation of the run() method spins up an event loop. You'll notice that such a thread is effectively idle and does not consume any CPU resources: the event queue is empty, and the event loop is blocked, waiting for someone to post an event to its queue. Once you move some QObjects to such a thread, the queued signal-slot deliveries will be done via the event loop of that thread. It works the same whether it's the GUI thread, or any other thread. The GUI thread is not special in any way when it comes to receiving events or queued signals.
I've checked a satisfying explanation but could not find. Usually docs mention that in order to use signals/slots between threads, we need to use event loops and start them by calling exec.
However I can see that w/o using exec(), I can still send signals and handle them across threads.
What's the exact use of it?
Use QThread::exec() when you want to run the event loop Qt provides for you in the QThread class. If you don't call exec(), you need to create your own event loop that processes Qt events (that is, if you want signals / slots to work). This is almost certainly more work than it's worth, unless you have very specific needs.
You say you can still send signals / slots? My guess is that you're not actually running anything on a different thread. This is a very common issue when using QThread. Put a breakpoint inside the code you think is running on a different thread and have a look at the stack trace - you may be in for a shock!
A rough example.
Suppose you have a text box. On each letter user types on the text box you want to perform some background task. You can setup a QThread for that. Emit something whenever the contents of text box changes. Assign a slot from your QThread that handles the background task. Emit something from QThread when the task finished. Handle this signal from main thread. Connect them. Start the thread when the text box is created (or any appropriate time). If you call exec() from your QThread::run() then you don't need to start() the thread multiple times.
If you don't use this mechanism, you may need to create (and/or start()) a QThread each time the content of text box changes, perform the background task and get result. This time you can still use signal/slot between main thread and this thread, but you need to start() the thread multiple times.