I'm experiencing a curious problem (very strange, let me say hehe). During a FTP download of an EXE file (24 MB), if the connection is ever interrupted, it appears that the function FtpGetFile of the WinINEt library has a bug and it never returns. This causes that future file transfers fail (the connection is already opened).
Apparently, I found a workaround by increasing the timeout of the server transfers but I do not like it. I didn't found a similar problem by googling (maybe I introduced the wrong keywords).
I read some forums on the internet and it seems that everyone does not recommend using the FtpGetFile because it is buggy.
This appears in a network scenario that has a big lag (and not always) but in good conditions it disappears (downloads take place correctly and FtpGetFile returns always).
Here is how I use the function:
if( FtpGetFile(m_hFtpSession, strSourcePath.c_str(), strTargetPath.c_str(), 0, 0, FTP_TRANSFER_TYPE_BINARY, 0)==TRUE)
Can anyone confirm that? Should I refactor my code and look for an update?
Thank you
I found a way to download files without using FtpGetFile. I hope this code can help someone:
bool RetrieveFile(const string& strSource, const string& strTarget) {
/* The handle for the transfer */
HINTERNET hTransfer = NULL;
/*
* Set default error
*/
DWORD error = ERROR_SUCCESS;
if( !isConnected ) {
debug("%s(): ERROR not connected\n", __FUNCTION__);
return false;
}
/* Initiate access to a remote FTP connection */
hTransfer = FtpOpenFile(hFtpSession, strSource.c_str(), GENERIC_READ,
FTP_TRANSFER_TYPE_BINARY, 0);
if(hTransfer) {
std::ofstream myostream(strTarget.c_str(), std::ios::binary);
if ( myostream.is_open() ) {
static const DWORD SIZE = 1024;
BYTE data[SIZE];
DWORD size = 0;
do {
BOOL result = InternetReadFile(hTransfer, data, SIZE, &size);
if ( result == FALSE ) {
error = GetLastError();
Debug("InternetReadFile(): %lu\n", error);
}
myostream.write((const char*)data, size);
}
while ((error == ERROR_SUCCESS) && (size > 0));
// Close the stream
myostream.close();
}
else {
Debug("Could not open '%s'.\n", strTarget.c_str());
error = ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND; // Not necessarily not found, but it is to describe a file error which is different from ERROR_SUCCESS
}
// Close
const BOOL result = InternetCloseHandle(hTransfer);
if ( result == FALSE ) {
const DWORD error = GetLastError();
debug("InternetClose(): %lu\n", error);
}
/* Check error status of the process */
return (error == ERROR_SUCCESS);
}
DWORD dwInetError;
DWORD dwExtLength = 1000;
TCHAR *szExtErrMsg = NULL;
TCHAR errmsg[1000];
szExtErrMsg = errmsg;
int returned = InternetGetLastResponseInfo( &dwInetError, szExtErrMsg, &dwExtLength );
debug("dwInetError: %d Returned: %d\n", dwInetError, returned);
debug("Buffer: %s\n", szExtErrMsg);
debug("%s() : ERROR to get '%s' file (errorCode=%d)\n", __FUNCTION__, strSource.c_str(), GetLastError());
return false;
}
Related
I'm trying to call DeviceIoControl(IOCTL_VOLUME_GET_VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS) API, as shown here, but I need it to first "tell me" how much memory it needs (unlike the code I linked to.)
So I call it as such:
//First determine how much data do we need?
BYTE dummyBuff[1];
DWORD bytesReturned = 0;
if(!::DeviceIoControl(hDevice, dwIoControlCode, lpInBuffer, nInBufferSize,
dummyBuff, sizeof(dummyBuff), &bytesReturned, NULL))
{
//Check last error
int nError = ::GetLastError();
if(nOSError == ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER ||
nOSError == ERROR_MORE_DATA)
{
//Alloc memory from 'bytesReturned' ...
}
}
but it always returns error code 87, or ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER and my bytesReturned is always 0.
So what am I doing wrong?
The instructions for getting all disk volume extents are documented under the VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS structure:
When the number of extents returned is greater than one (1), the error code ERROR_MORE_DATA is returned. You should call DeviceIoControl again, allocating enough buffer space based on the value of NumberOfDiskExtents after the first DeviceIoControl call.
The behavior, if you pass an output buffer, that is smaller than sizeof(VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS) is also documented at IOCTL_VOLUME_GET_VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS control code:
If the output buffer is less than sizeof(VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS), the call fails, GetLastError returns ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER, and lpBytesReturned is 0 (zero).
While this explains the returned value in lpBytesReturned, it doesn't explain the error code 87 (ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER)1).
The following code will return the disk extents for all volumes:
VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS vde = { 0 };
DWORD bytesReturned = 0;
if ( !::DeviceIoControl( hDevice, IOCTL_VOLUME_GET_VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS, NULL, 0,
(void*)&vde, sizeof(vde), &bytesReturned, NULL ) )
{
// Check last error
int nError = ::GetLastError();
if ( nError != ERROR_MORE_DATA )
{
// Unexpected error -> error out
throw std::runtime_error( "DeviceIoControl() failed." );
}
size_t size = offsetof( VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS, Extents[vde.NumberOfDiskExtents] );
std::vector<BYTE> buffer( size );
if ( !::DeviceIoControl( hDevice, IOCTL_VOLUME_GET_VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS, NULL, 0,
(void*)buffer.data(), size, &bytesReturned, NULL ) )
{
// Unexpected error -> error out
throw std::runtime_error( "DeviceIoControl() failed." );
}
// At this point we have a fully populated VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS structure
const VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS& result =
*reinterpret_cast<const VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS*>( buffer.data() );
}
else
{
// Call succeeded; vde is populated with single disk extent.
}
Additional references:
Why do some structures end with an array of size 1?
offsetof Macro
1) At a guess I would assume, that BYTE[1] begins at a memory address, that is not sufficiently aligned for the alignment requirements of VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS.
Following #IInspectable's advice, here's what I came up with for a more general case:
BYTE* DeviceIoControl_Dynamic(HANDLE hDevice, DWORD dwIoControlCode, DWORD dwszCbInitialSuggested, LPVOID lpInBuffer, DWORD nInBufferSize, DWORD* pncbOutDataSz)
{
//Calls DeviceIoControl() API by pre-allocating buffer internally
//'dwIoControlCode' = control code, see DeviceIoControl() API
//'dwszCbInitialSuggested' = suggested initial size of the buffer in BYTEs, must be set depending on the description of 'dwIoControlCode'
//'lpInBuffer' = input buffer, see DeviceIoControl() API
//'nInBufferSize' = size of 'lpInBuffer', see DeviceIoControl() API
//'pncbOutDataSz' = if not NULL, receives the size of returned data in BYTEs
//RETURN:
// = Data obtained from DeviceIoControl() API -- must be removed with delete[]!
// = NULL if error -- check GetLastError() for info
BYTE* pData = NULL;
int nOSError = NO_ERROR;
DWORD ncbSzData = 0;
if((int)dwszCbInitialSuggested > 0)
{
//Initially go with suggested memory size
DWORD dwcbMemSz = dwszCbInitialSuggested;
//Try no more than 10 times
for(int t = 0; t < 10; t++)
{
//Reserve mem
ASSERT(!pData);
pData = new (std::nothrow) BYTE[dwcbMemSz];
if(!pData)
{
//Memory fault
nOSError = ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY;
break;
}
//And try calling with that size
DWORD bytesReturned = 0;
if(::DeviceIoControl(hDevice, dwIoControlCode, lpInBuffer, nInBufferSize,
pData, dwcbMemSz, &bytesReturned, NULL))
{
//Got it
ncbSzData = bytesReturned;
nOSError = NO_ERROR;
break;
}
//Check last error
nOSError = ::GetLastError();
//Knowing how badly Windows drivers are written, don't rely on the last error code!
//Alloc more memory (we'll just "wing it" on the amount)
dwcbMemSz += 1024;
//Free old mem
delete[] pData;
pData = NULL;
}
}
else
{
//Bad initial size
nOSError = ERROR_INVALID_MINALLOCSIZE;
}
if(pncbOutDataSz)
*pncbOutDataSz = ncbSzData;
::SetLastError(nOSError);
return pData;
}
and then to call it, say for IOCTL_VOLUME_GET_VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS:
DWORD bytesReturned;
VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS* p_vde = (VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS*)DeviceIoControl_Dynamic(hDsk,
IOCTL_VOLUME_GET_VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS, sizeof(VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS), NULL, NULL, &bytesReturned);
which can be later used as such:
//Ensure that driver returned the correct data
if(p_vde &&
offsetof(VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS, Extents[p_vde->NumberOfDiskExtents]) <= bytesReturned)
{
//All good
for(int x = 0; x < p_vde->NumberOfDiskExtents; x++)
{
DWORD diskNumber = p_vde->Extents[x].DiskNumber;
//...
}
}
//Remember to free mem when not needed!
if(p_vde)
{
delete[] (BYTE*)p_vde;
p_vde = NULL;
}
You are getting error code ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER when you have invalid parameter, like its name says. In your case it should be bad handle because all others looks fine, if we expect that dwIoControlCode argument is IOCTL_VOLUME_GET_VOLUME_DISK_EXTENTS, lpInBuffer and nInBufferSize are ignored.
In insufficient buffer you will get another error code mentioned in above comments.
Lets check what is saying documentation:
DeviceIoControl can accept a handle to a specific device. For example, to open a handle to the logical drive A: with CreateFile, specify \.\a:. Alternatively, you can use the names \.\PhysicalDrive0, \.\PhysicalDrive1, and so on, to open handles to the physical drives on a system.
In other words, when you open handle with "C:\" instead of "\\.\c:" argument in CreateFile and use it in DeviceIoControl, the result is ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER.
I have several processes that try to read and write the same file. I want each of them to lock the file so that only one of them accesses it at a time.
I tried this (edit: this is a complete test code this time):
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "Windows.h"
bool test()
{
const char* path = "test.txt";
HANDLE hFile = CreateFileA(path,
GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE,
FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE,
NULL,
OPEN_ALWAYS,
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
NULL);
if (hFile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
printf("ERROR: Cannot open file %s\n", path);
return false;
}
// Lock the file
{
OVERLAPPED overlapped = {0};
BOOL res = LockFileEx(hFile, LOCKFILE_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK, 0, ~0, ~0, &overlapped);
if (!res)
{
printf("ERROR: Cannot lock file %s\n", path);
return false;
}
}
DWORD fileSize = GetFileSize(hFile, NULL);
if (fileSize > 0)
{
char* content = new char[fileSize+1];
// Read the file
BOOL res = ReadFile(hFile, content, fileSize, NULL, NULL);
if (!res)
{
printf("ERROR: Cannot read file %s\n", path);
}
delete[] content;
}
const char* newContent = "bla";
int newContentSize = 3;
// Write the file
BOOL res = WriteFile(hFile, newContent, newContentSize, NULL, NULL);
if (!res)
{
//int err = GetLastError();
printf("ERROR: Cannot write to file\n");
}
// Unlock the file
{
OVERLAPPED overlapped = {0};
UnlockFileEx(hFile, 0, ~0, ~0, &overlapped);
}
CloseHandle(hFile);
return true;
}
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
bool res = test();
return 0;
}
This works fine on my computer, which has Windows 8. But on my colleague's computer, which has Windows 7, it crashes. Specifically, the calls to ReadFile and WriteFile crash, always.
Note that it never enters the code paths with the error printfs. This code triggers no error except for a write at location 0x00000000 in ReadFile (when run on Windows 7).
We tried to also pass the overlapped struct to the ReadFile and WriteFile calls. It prevents the crash but the lock doesn't work anymore, the file is all scrambled (not with this test code, with the real code).
What am I doing wrong?
Looks like your problem is:
lpNumberOfBytesRead [out, optional] argument is null in your call.
This parameter can be NULL only when the lpOverlapped parameter is not NULL.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365467%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Heres your problem :
You are missing a necessary struct-member and:
0 and ~0 and {0} are all bad code, constant expressions like these will always produce unepected results -- WINAPI doesnt work like libc, parameters are not always compared against constants, instead they are tested against/via macros and other preprocessor-definitions themselves so passing constant values or initializing WINAPI structs with constants will often lead to errors like these.
After years of experimenting i have found that there is only one surefire way of avoiding them, i will express it in corrected code :
OVERLAPPED overlapped;
overlapped.hEvent = CreateEvent( ........... ); // put valid parameters here!
UnlockFileEx(hFile, 0 /*"reserved"*/, ULONG_MAX, ULONG_MAX, &overlapped);
please read this carefully : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365716%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
I need to send one request to server more quickly and repeatedly.
So I implemented code like this.
BOOL CTestDlg::OnInitDialog()
{
...
m_hInstance = InternetOpen(L"asynchttp", INTERNET_OPEN_TYPE_PRECONFIG,NULL,NULL,INTERNET_FLAG_ASYNC);
if(m_hInstance == NULL)
{
ErrorLog(L"InternetOpen Failed");
return TRUE;
}
if (InternetSetStatusCallback(m_hInstance,(INTERNET_STATUS_CALLBACK)&Callback) == INTERNET_INVALID_STATUS_CALLBACK)
{
ErrorLog(L"Set Callback Function Failed");
return TRUE;
}
m_hConnect = InternetConnect(m_hInstance, L"192.168.2.116", 8080,NULL,NULL,INTERNET_SERVICE_HTTP,INTERNET_FLAG_RELOAD | INTERNET_FLAG_NO_CACHE_WRITE | INTERNET_FLAG_KEEP_CONNECTION,1);
if(m_hConnect == NULL)
{
if(DWORD dwError = GetLastError() != ERROR_IO_PENDING)
{
ErrorLog(L"Fail to Connect Server");
return TRUE;
}
WaitForSingleObject(hConnectedEvent, INFINITE);
}
CreateThread(0 , 0 , (LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)SendThread , 0 , 0 , 0);
return TRUE;
}
void __stdcall Callback(HINTERNET hInternet,DWORD dwContext,DWORD dwInternetStatus,LPVOID lpStatusInfo,DWORD dwStatusInfoLen)
{
switch(dwContext)
{
case 1:
{
SetEvent(hConnectedEvent);
}
break;
}
}
DWORD SendThread(LPVOID lpParam)
{
TCHAR *szAceptType[] = {_T("*/*") , NULL};
CString szContentType = _T("Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\r\n");
char szPostData[MAX_PATH];
sprintf(szPostData , "num=1234&str=3240");
HINTERNET hRequest = HttpOpenRequest(m_hConnect, L"POST", L"/TestWeb/index.jsp", HTTP_VERSION , NULL , (LPCTSTR*)szAceptType , 0, 2);
while(1)
{
try
{
if (!HttpSendRequest(hRequest, szContentType, (DWORD)szContentType.GetLength(), szPostData,(DWORD)strlen(szPostData)))
{
if (DWORD dwError = GetLastError() != ERROR_IO_PENDING)
ErrorLog(L"SendRequest: Error = %d" , dwError);
}
}
catch (CException* e)
{
UNREFERENCED_PARAMETER(e);
}
Sleep(100);
}
return 0;
}
When execute or debug program, I saw this "SendRequest; Error = 1" log frequently.
And Server does not record anymore to database , after one or two request data recorded
It seems like HttpSendRequest API doesn't work correctly after error occured.
I aim to send one request to server more fast and more correctly, without loss.
Please teach me what is wrong problem.
Or if you got another best way, then please tell me.
Thanks.
Error code 1 is "Invalid Parameter".
You appear to be mixing ASCII (char and sprintf) and Unicode strings in your sample above. Have you tried with all Unicode strings (making szPostData a WCHAR array)? From MSDN: "There two versions of HttpSendRequest —HttpSendRequestA (used with ANSI builds) and HttpSendRequestW (used with Unicode builds)". It goes on to talk about when ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER is returned. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa384247(v=vs.85).aspx
Also, I haven't used MFC in a long time, but I remember that you should call e->Delete() in your exception handler (unless you re-throw). The CException::Delete method will delete any thrown exception created on the heap (and do nothing otherwise).
I'am using ReadDirectoryChangesW to watch a directory changes asynchronously, based on this question I implement a function that watch a given directory, but I still get the error message GetQueuedCompletionStatus(): Timeout
void Filewatcher::OpenWatchDir(QString PathToOpen)
{
QString path=QDir::fromNativeSeparators(PathToOpen);
LPCTSTR Dirname=(LPCTSTR)path.utf16();//.toStdWString().c_str();
dirinfo_t* d =(dirinfo_t*) malloc(1*sizeof(dirinfo_t));
d->CompletionKey = (ULONG_PTR)&somekey;
dirinfo_init(d);
/* set up */
runthread = TRUE;
d->hDirFH = CreateFile(Dirname,
FILE_LIST_DIRECTORY,
FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_WRITE,
NULL,
OPEN_EXISTING,
FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS | FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED,
NULL);
d->hDirOPPort = CreateIoCompletionPort(d->hDirFH, NULL,
(ULONG_PTR)d->CompletionKey, 1);
DWORD errorcode = 0; // an error code
BOOL bResultQ = FALSE; // obvios=us
BOOL bResultR = FALSE;
DWORD NumBytes = 0;
FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION* pInfo = NULL; // the data incoming is a pointer
// to this struct.
int i = 0;
while ( runthread )
{
bResultR = ReadDirectoryChangesW(d->hDirFH, (void*)d->buffer,
16777216, TRUE,
FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_FILE_NAME | FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_CREATION ,
NULL,
&d->o->overlapped,
NULL );
bResultQ = GetQueuedCompletionStatus(d->hDirOPPort,
&NumBytes, &(d->CompletionKey),
(LPOVERLAPPED*)(d->o), 1000);
if ( bResultQ && bResultR )
{
wprintf(L"\n");
pInfo = (FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION*) d->buffer;
wprintf(L"File %s", pInfo->FileName);
wprintf(L" changes %d\n", pInfo->Action);
qDebug()<<"file "<<pInfo->FileName<<" was"<<pInfo->Action;
memset(d->buffer, 0, 16777216);
}
else
{
errorcode = GetLastError();
if ( errorcode == WAIT_TIMEOUT )
{
qDebug()<<"GetQueuedCompletionStatus(): Timeout\n";
}
else
{
qDebug()<<"GetQueuedCompletionStatus(): Failed\n";
qDebug()<<"Error Code "<<errorcode;
}
Sleep(500);
}
}
}
I need to know how use ReadDirectoryChangesW asynchronously with IoCompletionPort.
Any help please.
There's no reason to use a completion port here, simple overlapped I/O with an event will work fabulously.
The key is to wait for this operation (whether event or completion port) at the same time as all other events (possibly including GUI messages), and only check the status when the event becomes signaled. For that, use (Msg)WaitForMultipleObjects(Ex).
In Qt, you can add Win32 events (used by OVERLAPPED structure for async I/O) using QWinEventNotifier as described here:
http://www.downtowndougbrown.com/2010/07/adding-windows-event-objects-to-a-qt-event-loop/
thank you guys for your answers, after a deep research and retesting code I solve my problem based on this , I really appreciate your help.
I don't have much experience with Serial I/O, but have recently been tasked with fixing some highly flawed serial code, because the original programmer has left the company.
The application is a Windows program that talks to a scientific instrument serially via a virtual COMM port running on USB. Virtual COMM port USB drivers are provided by FTDI, since they manufacture the USB chip we use on the instrument.
The serial code is in an unmanaged C++ DLL, which is shared by both our old C++ software, and our new C# / .Net (WinForms) software.
There are two main problems:
Fails on many XP systems
When the first command is sent to the instrument, there's no response. When you issue the next command, you get the response from the first one.
Here's a typical usage scenario (full source for methods called is included below):
char szBuf [256];
CloseConnection ();
if (OpenConnection ())
{
ClearBuffer ();
// try to get a firmware version number
WriteChar ((char) 'V');
BOOL versionReadStatus1 = ReadString (szBuf, 100);
...
}
On a failing system, the ReadString call will never receive any serial data, and times out. But if we issue another, different command, and call ReadString again, it will return the response from the first command, not the new one!
But this only happens on a large subset of Windows XP systems - and never on Windows 7. As luck would have it, our XP dev machines worked OK, so we did not see the problem until we started beta testing. But I can also reproduce the problem by running an XP VM (VirtualBox) on my XP dev machine. Also, the problem only occurs when using the DLL with the new C# version - works fine with the old C++ app.
This seemed to be resolved when I added a Sleep(21) to the low level BytesInQue method before calling ClearCommError, but this exacerbated the other problem - CPU usage. Sleeping for less than 21 ms would make the failure mode reappear.
High CPU usage
When doing serial I/O CPU use is excessive - often above 90%. This happens with both the new C# app and the old C++ app, but is much worse in the new app. Often makes the UI very non-responsive, but not always.
Here's the code for our Port.cpp class, in all it's terrible glory. Sorry for the length, but this is what I'm working with. Most important methods are probably OpenConnection, ReadString, ReadChar, and BytesInQue.
//
// Port.cpp: Implements the CPort class, which is
// the class that controls the serial port.
//
// Copyright (C) 1997-1998 Microsoft Corporation
// All rights reserved.
//
// This source code is only intended as a supplement to the
// Broadcast Architecture Programmer's Reference.
// For detailed information regarding Broadcast
// Architecture, see the reference.
//
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include "port.h"
// Construction code to initialize the port handle to null.
CPort::CPort()
{
m_hDevice = (HANDLE)0;
// default parameters
m_uPort = 1;
m_uBaud = 9600;
m_uDataBits = 8;
m_uParity = 0;
m_uStopBits = 0; // = 1 stop bit
m_chTerminator = '\n';
m_bCommportOpen = FALSE;
m_nTimeOut = 50;
m_nBlockSizeMax = 2048;
}
// Destruction code to close the connection if the port
// handle was valid.
CPort::~CPort()
{
if (m_hDevice)
CloseConnection();
}
// Open a serial communication port for writing short
// one-byte commands, that is, overlapped data transfer
// is not necessary.
BOOL CPort::OpenConnection()
{
char szPort[64];
m_bCommportOpen = FALSE;
// Build the COM port string as "COMx" where x is the port.
if (m_uPort > 9)
wsprintf(szPort, "\\\\.\\COM%d", m_uPort);
else
wsprintf(szPort, "COM%d", m_uPort);
// Open the serial port device.
m_hDevice = CreateFile(szPort,
GENERIC_WRITE | GENERIC_READ,
0,
NULL, // No security attributes
OPEN_EXISTING,
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
NULL);
if (m_hDevice == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
SaveLastError ();
m_hDevice = (HANDLE)0;
return FALSE;
}
return SetupConnection(); // After the port is open, set it up.
} // end of OpenConnection()
// Configure the serial port with the given settings.
// The given settings enable the port to communicate
// with the remote control.
BOOL CPort::SetupConnection(void)
{
DCB dcb; // The DCB structure differs betwwen Win16 and Win32.
dcb.DCBlength = sizeof(DCB);
// Retrieve the DCB of the serial port.
BOOL bStatus = GetCommState(m_hDevice, (LPDCB)&dcb);
if (bStatus == 0)
{
SaveLastError ();
return FALSE;
}
// Assign the values that enable the port to communicate.
dcb.BaudRate = m_uBaud; // Baud rate
dcb.ByteSize = m_uDataBits; // Data bits per byte, 4-8
dcb.Parity = m_uParity; // Parity: 0-4 = no, odd, even, mark, space
dcb.StopBits = m_uStopBits; // 0,1,2 = 1, 1.5, 2
dcb.fBinary = TRUE; // Binary mode, no EOF check : Must use binary mode in NT
dcb.fParity = dcb.Parity == 0 ? FALSE : TRUE; // Enable parity checking
dcb.fOutX = FALSE; // XON/XOFF flow control used
dcb.fInX = FALSE; // XON/XOFF flow control used
dcb.fNull = FALSE; // Disable null stripping - want nulls
dcb.fOutxCtsFlow = FALSE;
dcb.fOutxDsrFlow = FALSE;
dcb.fDsrSensitivity = FALSE;
dcb.fDtrControl = DTR_CONTROL_ENABLE;
dcb.fRtsControl = RTS_CONTROL_DISABLE ;
// Configure the serial port with the assigned settings.
// Return TRUE if the SetCommState call was not equal to zero.
bStatus = SetCommState(m_hDevice, &dcb);
if (bStatus == 0)
{
SaveLastError ();
return FALSE;
}
DWORD dwSize;
COMMPROP *commprop;
DWORD dwError;
dwSize = sizeof(COMMPROP) + sizeof(MODEMDEVCAPS) ;
commprop = (COMMPROP *)malloc(dwSize);
memset(commprop, 0, dwSize);
if (!GetCommProperties(m_hDevice, commprop))
{
dwError = GetLastError();
}
m_bCommportOpen = TRUE;
return TRUE;
}
void CPort::SaveLastError ()
{
DWORD dwLastError = GetLastError ();
LPVOID lpMsgBuf;
FormatMessage(FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER |
FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM |
FORMAT_MESSAGE_IGNORE_INSERTS,
NULL,
dwLastError,
MAKELANGID(LANG_NEUTRAL, SUBLANG_DEFAULT), // Default language
(LPTSTR) &lpMsgBuf,
0,
NULL);
strcpy (m_szLastError,(LPTSTR)lpMsgBuf);
// Free the buffer.
LocalFree( lpMsgBuf );
}
void CPort::SetTimeOut (int nTimeOut)
{
m_nTimeOut = nTimeOut;
}
// Close the opened serial communication port.
void CPort::CloseConnection(void)
{
if (m_hDevice != NULL &&
m_hDevice != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
FlushFileBuffers(m_hDevice);
CloseHandle(m_hDevice); ///that the port has been closed.
}
m_hDevice = (HANDLE)0;
// Set the device handle to NULL to confirm
m_bCommportOpen = FALSE;
}
int CPort::WriteChars(char * psz)
{
int nCharWritten = 0;
while (*psz)
{
nCharWritten +=WriteChar(*psz);
psz++;
}
return nCharWritten;
}
// Write a one-byte value (char) to the serial port.
int CPort::WriteChar(char c)
{
DWORD dwBytesInOutQue = BytesInOutQue ();
if (dwBytesInOutQue > m_dwLargestBytesInOutQue)
m_dwLargestBytesInOutQue = dwBytesInOutQue;
static char szBuf[2];
szBuf[0] = c;
szBuf[1] = '\0';
DWORD dwBytesWritten;
DWORD dwTimeOut = m_nTimeOut; // 500 milli seconds
DWORD start, now;
start = GetTickCount();
do
{
now = GetTickCount();
if ((now - start) > dwTimeOut )
{
strcpy (m_szLastError, "Timed Out");
return 0;
}
WriteFile(m_hDevice, szBuf, 1, &dwBytesWritten, NULL);
}
while (dwBytesWritten == 0);
OutputDebugString(TEXT(strcat(szBuf, "\r\n")));
return dwBytesWritten;
}
int CPort::WriteChars(char * psz, int n)
{
DWORD dwBytesWritten;
WriteFile(m_hDevice, psz, n, &dwBytesWritten, NULL);
return dwBytesWritten;
}
// Return number of bytes in RX queue
DWORD CPort::BytesInQue ()
{
COMSTAT ComStat ;
DWORD dwErrorFlags;
DWORD dwLength;
// check number of bytes in queue
ClearCommError(m_hDevice, &dwErrorFlags, &ComStat ) ;
dwLength = ComStat.cbInQue;
return dwLength;
}
DWORD CPort::BytesInOutQue ()
{
COMSTAT ComStat ;
DWORD dwErrorFlags;
DWORD dwLength;
// check number of bytes in queue
ClearCommError(m_hDevice, &dwErrorFlags, &ComStat );
dwLength = ComStat.cbOutQue ;
return dwLength;
}
int CPort::ReadChars (char* szBuf, int nMaxChars)
{
if (BytesInQue () == 0)
return 0;
DWORD dwBytesRead;
ReadFile(m_hDevice, szBuf, nMaxChars, &dwBytesRead, NULL);
return (dwBytesRead);
}
// Read a one-byte value (char) from the serial port.
int CPort::ReadChar (char& c)
{
static char szBuf[2];
szBuf[0] = '\0';
szBuf[1] = '\0';
if (BytesInQue () == 0)
return 0;
DWORD dwBytesRead;
ReadFile(m_hDevice, szBuf, 1, &dwBytesRead, NULL);
c = *szBuf;
if (dwBytesRead == 0)
return 0;
return dwBytesRead;
}
BOOL CPort::ReadString (char *szStrBuf , int nMaxLength)
{
char str [256];
char str2 [256];
DWORD dwTimeOut = m_nTimeOut;
DWORD start, now;
int nBytesRead;
int nTotalBytesRead = 0;
char c = ' ';
static char szCharBuf [2];
szCharBuf [0]= '\0';
szCharBuf [1]= '\0';
szStrBuf [0] = '\0';
start = GetTickCount();
while (c != m_chTerminator)
{
nBytesRead = ReadChar (c);
nTotalBytesRead += nBytesRead;
if (nBytesRead == 1 && c != '\r' && c != '\n')
{
*szCharBuf = c;
strncat (szStrBuf,szCharBuf,1);
if (strlen (szStrBuf) == nMaxLength)
return TRUE;
// restart timer for next char
start = GetTickCount();
}
// check for time out
now = GetTickCount();
if ((now - start) > dwTimeOut )
{
strcpy (m_szLastError, "Timed Out");
return FALSE;
}
}
return TRUE;
}
int CPort::WaitForQueToFill (int nBytesToWaitFor)
{
DWORD start = GetTickCount();
do
{
if (BytesInQue () >= nBytesToWaitFor)
break;
if (GetTickCount() - start > m_nTimeOut)
return 0;
} while (1);
return BytesInQue ();
}
int CPort::BlockRead (char * pcInputBuffer, int nBytesToRead)
{
int nBytesRead = 0;
int charactersRead;
while (nBytesToRead >= m_nBlockSizeMax)
{
if (WaitForQueToFill (m_nBlockSizeMax) < m_nBlockSizeMax)
return nBytesRead;
charactersRead = ReadChars (pcInputBuffer, m_nBlockSizeMax);
pcInputBuffer += charactersRead;
nBytesRead += charactersRead;
nBytesToRead -= charactersRead;
}
if (nBytesToRead > 0)
{
if (WaitForQueToFill (nBytesToRead) < nBytesToRead)
return nBytesRead;
charactersRead = ReadChars (pcInputBuffer, nBytesToRead);
nBytesRead += charactersRead;
nBytesToRead -= charactersRead;
}
return nBytesRead;
}
Based on my testing and reading, I see several suspicious things in this code:
COMMTIMEOUTS is never set. MS docs say "Unpredictable results can occur if you fail to set the time-out values". But I tried setting this, and it didn't help.
Many methods (e.g. ReadString) will go into a tight loop and hammer the port with repeated reads if they don't get data immediately . This seems to explain the high CPU usage.
Many methods have their own timeout handling, using GetTickCount(). Isn't that what COMMTIMEOUTS is for?
In the new C# (WinForms) program, all these serial routines are called directly from the main thread, from a MultiMediaTimer event. Maybe should be run in a different thread?
BytesInQue method seems to be a bottleneck. If I break to debugger when CPU usage is high, that's usually where the program stops. Also, adding a Sleep(21) to this method before calling ClearCommError seems to resolve the XP problem, but exacerbates the CPU usage problem.
Code just seems unnecessarily complicated.
My Questions
Can anyone explain why this only works with a C# program on a small number of XP systems?
Any suggestions on how to rewrite this? Pointers to good sample code would be most welcome.
There are some serious problems with that class and it makes things even worse that there is a Microsoft copyright on it.
There is nothing special about this class. And it makes me wonder why it even exists except as an Adapter over Create/Read/WriteFile. You wouldnt even need this class if you used the SerialPort class in the .NET Framework.
Your CPU usage is because the code goes into an infinite loop while waiting for the device to have enough available data. The code might as well say while(1); If you must stick with Win32 and C++ you can look into Completion Ports and setting the OVERLAPPED flag when invoking CreateFile. This way you can wait for data in a separate worker thread.
You need to be careful when communicating to multiple COM ports. It has been a long time since I've done C++ but I believe the static buffer szBuff in the Read and Write methods is static for ALL instances of that class. It means if you invoke Read against two different COM ports "at the same time" you will have unexpected results.
As for the problems on some of the XP machines, you will most certainly figure out the problem if you check GetLastError after each Read/Write and log the results. It should be checking GetLastError anyways as it sometimes isn't always an "error" but a request from the subsystem to do something else in order to get the result you want.
You can get rid of the the whole while loop for blocking if you set COMMTIMEOUTS correctly. If there is a specific timeout for a Read operation use SetCommTimeouts before you perform the read.
I set ReadIntervalTimeout to the max timeout to ensure that the Read won't return quicker than m_nTimeOut. This value will cause Read to return if the time elapses between any two bytes. If it was set to 2 milliseconds and the first byte came in at t, and the second came in at t+1, the third at t+4, ReadFile would of only returned the first two bytes since the interval between the bytes was surpassed. ReadTotalTimeoutConstant ensures that you will never wait longer than m_nTimeOut no matter what.
maxWait = BytesToRead * ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier + ReadTotalTimeoutConstant. Thus (BytesToRead * 0) + m_nTimeout = m_nTimeout
BOOL CPort::SetupConnection(void)
{
// Snip...
COMMTIMEOUTS comTimeOut;
comTimeOut.ReadIntervalTimeout = m_nTimeOut; // Ensure's we wait the max timeout
comTimeOut.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;
comTimeOut.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = m_nTimeOut;
comTimeOut.WriteTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;
comTimeOut.WriteTotalTimeoutConstant = m_nTimeOut;
SetCommTimeouts(m_hDevice,&comTimeOut);
}
// If return value != nBytesToRead check check GetLastError()
// Most likely Read timed out.
int CPort::BlockRead (char * pcInputBuffer, int nBytesToRead)
{
DWORD dwBytesRead;
if (FALSE == ReadFile(
m_hDevice,
pcInputBuffer,
nBytesToRead,
&dwBytesRead,
NULL))
{
// Check GetLastError
return dwBytesRead;
}
return dwBytesRead;
}
I have no idea if this is completely correct but it should give you an idea. Remove the ReadChar and ReadString methods and use this if your program relies on things being synchronous. Be careful about setting high time outs also. Communications are fast, in the milliseconds.
Here's a terminal program I wrote years ago (probably at least 15 years ago, now that I think about it). I just did a quick check, and under Windows 7 x64, it still seems to work reasonably well -- connects to my GPS, read, and displays the data coming from it.
If you look at the code, you can see that I didn't spend much time selecting the comm timeout values. I set them all to 1, intending to experiment with longer timeouts until the CPU usage was tolerable. To make a long story short, it uses so little CPU time I've never bothered. For example, on the Task Manager's CPU usage graph, I can't see any difference between it running and not. I've left it running collecting data from the GPS for a few hours at a time, and the Task Manager still says its total CPU usage is 0:00:00.
Bottom line: I'm pretty sure it could be more efficient -- but sometimes good enough is good enough. Given how heavily I don't use it any more, and the chances of ever adding anything like file transfer protocols, making it more efficient probably won't ever get to the top of the pile of things to do.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <conio.h>
#include <string.h>
#define STRICT
#define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
#include <windows.h>
void system_error(char *name) {
// Retrieve, format, and print out a message from the last error. The
// `name' that's passed should be in the form of a present tense noun
// (phrase) such as "opening file".
//
char *ptr = NULL;
FormatMessage(
FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER |
FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM,
0,
GetLastError(),
0,
(char *)&ptr,
1024,
NULL);
fprintf(stderr, "\nError %s: %s\n", name, ptr);
LocalFree(ptr);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
int ch;
char buffer[64];
HANDLE file;
COMMTIMEOUTS timeouts;
DWORD read, written;
DCB port;
HANDLE keyboard = GetStdHandle(STD_INPUT_HANDLE);
HANDLE screen = GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE);
DWORD mode;
char port_name[128] = "\\\\.\\COM3";
char init[] = "";
if ( argc > 2 )
sprintf(port_name, "\\\\.\\COM%s", argv[1]);
// open the comm port.
file = CreateFile(port_name,
GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE,
0,
NULL,
OPEN_EXISTING,
0,
NULL);
if ( INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE == file) {
system_error("opening file");
return 1;
}
// get the current DCB, and adjust a few bits to our liking.
memset(&port, 0, sizeof(port));
port.DCBlength = sizeof(port);
if (!GetCommState(file, &port))
system_error("getting comm state");
if (!BuildCommDCB("baud=19200 parity=n data=8 stop=1", &port))
system_error("building comm DCB");
if (!SetCommState(file, &port))
system_error("adjusting port settings");
// set short timeouts on the comm port.
timeouts.ReadIntervalTimeout = 1;
timeouts.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 1;
timeouts.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = 1;
timeouts.WriteTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 1;
timeouts.WriteTotalTimeoutConstant = 1;
if (!SetCommTimeouts(file, &timeouts))
system_error("setting port time-outs.");
// set keyboard to raw reading.
if (!GetConsoleMode(keyboard, &mode))
system_error("getting keyboard mode");
mode &= ~ ENABLE_PROCESSED_INPUT;
if (!SetConsoleMode(keyboard, mode))
system_error("setting keyboard mode");
if (!EscapeCommFunction(file, CLRDTR))
system_error("clearing DTR");
Sleep(200);
if (!EscapeCommFunction(file, SETDTR))
system_error("setting DTR");
if (!WriteFile(file, init, sizeof(init), &written, NULL))
system_error("writing data to port");
if (written != sizeof(init))
system_error("not all data written to port");
// basic terminal loop:
do {
// check for data on port and display it on screen.
ReadFile(file, buffer, sizeof(buffer), &read, NULL);
if (read)
WriteFile(screen, buffer, read, &written, NULL);
// check for keypress, and write any out the port.
if ( kbhit() ) {
ch = getch();
WriteFile(file, &ch, 1, &written, NULL);
}
// until user hits ctrl-backspace.
} while ( ch != 127);
// close up and go home.
CloseHandle(keyboard);
CloseHandle(file);
return 0;
}
I would add
Sleep(2);
to the while loop in CPort::WaitForQueToFill()
This will give the OS a chance to actually place some bytes in the queue.