so I am appling a basic filter in my config object for my report, it's working but the problem is that the rest of the selections are shown in the filter section, so the user can remove the filtered data and get all the data they want, is there a way to disable this and make only the filtered option visible? Or hide the basic filter while its doing its job in the background?
here is the object i am using:
const facilityFilter = {
$schema: "http://powerbi.com/product/schema#basic",
target: {
table: "HealthFacilities",
column: "FacilityName"
},
operator: "In",
values: ["Test Facility"],
filterType: models.FilterType.BasicFilter,
requireSingleSelection: true
};
Here is a Demonstration Screenshot:
The only way to make this happen (currently) is through applying Row Level Security or similar approaches in your dataset.
If certain table column values should not be available for certain users, these values must be filtered using RLS rules and role assignments.
What would be a correct PowerQuery syntax to extract the information from this Web JSON into a table:
I'm not very familiar with PowerQuery, and this is probably the only time I'll need this, so I'd be grateful if someone would help me out without refering me to documentation. Thanks
[{"time_entry_group": {"minutes": 301,"time_entries_params": {"locked": "0","from": "2021-02-01","to": "2021-02-28","customer_id": "11223344","project_id": "223388","service_id": "435248"},"revenue": 57691.6666666667,"project_id": 223388,"project_name": "Scrb","service_id": 435248,"service_name": "Meetings","month": "202102"}}
, {"time_entry_group": {"minutes": 1175,"time_entries_params": {"locked": "1","from": "2021-01-01","to": "2021-01-31","customer_id": "11223344","project_id": "223388","service_id": "421393"},"revenue": 225208.333333333,"project_id": 223388,"project_name": "Scrb","service_id": 421393,"service_name": "Design","month": "202101"}}
, {"time_entry_group": {"minutes": 24,"time_entries_params": {"locked": "1","from": "2021-01-01","to": "2021-01-31","customer_id": "11223344","project_id": "3168911","service_id": "95033"},"revenue": 4600.0,"project_id": 3168911,"project_name": "youkn Dev","service_id": 95033,"service_name": "Reviews","month": "202101"}}]
For future reference, if you have a column that you need to expand, you can instead click this arrow icon to the right of the column name. Clicking it should display a menu that should then allow you to specify which nested columns you want to get expand or get at. To be clear, it will expand that column for all rows in that table, not just one.
The JSON you've included is basically an array of objects, so maybe use:
Json.Document to parse the JSON, which should give you a list of records
Table.FromRecords to turn the list of records into a table.
Table.ExpandRecordColumn to expand a nested record columns.
Example implementation:
let
json = "[{""time_entry_group"":{""minutes"":301,""time_entries_params"":{""locked"":""0"",""from"":""2021-02-01"",""to"":""2021-02-28"",""customer_id"":""11223344"",""project_id"":""223388"",""service_id"":""435248""},""revenue"":57691.6666666667,""project_id"":223388,""project_name"":""Scrb"",""service_id"":435248,""service_name"":""Meetings"",""month"":""202102""}},{""time_entry_group"":{""minutes"":1175,""time_entries_params"":{""locked"":""1"",""from"":""2021-01-01"",""to"":""2021-01-31"",""customer_id"":""11223344"",""project_id"":""223388"",""service_id"":""421393""},""revenue"":225208.333333333,""project_id"":223388,""project_name"":""Scrb"",""service_id"":421393,""service_name"":""Design"",""month"":""202101""}},{""time_entry_group"":{""minutes"":24,""time_entries_params"":{""locked"":""1"",""from"":""2021-01-01"",""to"":""2021-01-31"",""customer_id"":""11223344"",""project_id"":""3168911"",""service_id"":""95033""},""revenue"":4600,""project_id"":3168911,""project_name"":""youkn Dev"",""service_id"":95033,""service_name"":""Reviews"",""month"":""202101""}}]",
parsed = Json.Document(json),
initialTable = Table.FromRecords(List.Transform(parsed, each [time_entry_group])),
expanded = Table.ExpandRecordColumn(initialTable, "time_entries_params", {"locked", "from", "to", "customer_id"})
in
expanded
One thing about the code above is that it doesn't expand nested fields project_id and service_id (present within time_entries_params). This is because these columns already exist in the table (and having duplicate column names would cause an error). I've assumed this isn't a problem, as the nested values aren't different.
In flutter I'm trying to have one of the columns of a DataTable be a DropdownButton. I would like the DataTable rows to populate from getUsers initially, then be able to edit the cell cell with a the DropdownButton based on the ratingList.
So I would like to be able to change the value of the DropdownButton cell to any of the values in the ratingList: ['Ok', 'Good', 'Great', 'Amazing']; Note I want to be able to select 'Great' or 'Amazing', these aren't one of the initial populated values.
It is essential for the data to be loaded from getUsers, as this will be grabbed from Firestore eventually. Then have the ability to change a DropdownButton cell after the data is loaded, based on the ratingList of values, which is a complete list of the ratings.
See below for example code (DropdownButton doesn't change cell value), also in DartPad.
Thanks in advance!
Just put user.rating = newValue into setState block.
Like this.
onChanged: (String newValue) {
setState(() {
//help!
user.rating = newValue;
});
},
The items in my table have an attribute of type string set. I'll stick to the example from the documentation and call the set "colors". As the name indicates the set holds various strings representing colors in each item. This would look like
this.
Now I want to query the table so that I retrieve all items where a specific color is within the set. So in regards to the attached picture I would like to query for the color "Green" and want to receive the items Picture2 and Picture3.
Is there a way to do this?
Since the amount of all possible colors and items is huge plus the fact that only a very small amount of colors are associated to an item, a scan would be very inefficient. So far I tried to create a global secondary index (GSI) but it seems that its not possible in the way I want it or am I wrong?
Unless the field you are searching for is built into the primary key or secondary index, scan will be your only option.
The scan operation will allow you to use the contains keyword to search the set
let params = {
TableName : 'TABLE_NAME',
FilterExpression: "contains(#color, :color)",
ExpressionAttributeNames: {
"#color": "color",
},
ExpressionAttributeValues: {
":color": "Blue",
}
};
documentClient.scan(params, function(err, data) {
console.log(data);
});
According to the docs on secondary indexes, you cannot build an index using a set as the primary key
The key schema for the index. Every attribute in the index key schema must be a top-level attribute of type String, Number, or Binary. Other data types, including documents and sets, are not allowed.
This is a VERY basic question. Sorry for not providing any code I have NO IDEA how to even start tackling the problem
I have lets say two fields... One is a date selector field and the other a regular text field. What I want is when I select a date (or type a date), the value comes in the second field... Just that...
I'm on APEX 5.1.4
Since you have stated that the second item is a text field, you could do this with the help of a dynamic action that sets the value of the second item when there is a change in the value of the first item ( date field).
The following would be the steps, if you are using component view:
Create Dynamic Action
When
Event : Change
Selection : Item(s)
Item : First Page Item
Condition : is not null
True Action
Action : Set Value
Fire on Page Load: No
Set Type: You can choose how you want to set the value of the second item on the page.
If you have the flexibility to change the second item to be a select list and you have a list of values that goes with a date, you could do this much simpler, with a Cascading LOV
On Second Item's - Under List of Values section
Cascading LOV Parent Item(s) : First Item
Page Items to Submit: First Item
List of Values definition: Here you can define the query.
Hope this helps.
There are a few different ways to do this, probably the easiest way is as follows.
Assume your two items are P1_ITEM1 and P1_ITEM2.
Create a dynamic action which fires on change of item P1_ITEM1.
The true action of this should be action:set value, set type:PL/SQL Expression, item::P1_ITEM2, items to submit P1_ITEM1.