boost and c++11 thread compatibility [duplicate] - c++

Question

This question already has answers here:
Is it smart to replace boost::thread and boost::mutex with c++11 equivalents?
(7 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
have a code which used to run fine with boost thread under ubuntu. it's basic read only data sharing multithreading. I try to use C++11 instead of boost, very basic transition. the code compiles but have subtle bugs. crashes randomly with C++11 std thread. tried to use valgrind drd, but hard to read the debug info. Any thoughts?
==19608== Conflicting load by thread 3 at 0x00643be8 size 8
==19608== at 0x41CEBA: std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>::operator()() (random.tcc:601)
==19608== by 0x41CD6C: double std::generate_canonical<double, 53ul, std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul> >(std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>&) (random.tcc:3475)
==19608== by 0x41CB06: std::__detail::_Adaptor<std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>, double>::operator()() (random.h:190)
==19608== by 0x41C877: double std::normal_distribution<double>::operator()<std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul> >(std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>&, std::normal_distribution<double>::param_type const&) (random.tcc:1950)
==19608== by 0x41C688: double std::normal_distribution<double>::operator()<std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul> >(std::subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned int, 24ul, 10ul, 24ul>&) (random.h:2196)
==19608== by 0x41C379: nrand(double, double) (NRand.cpp:8)
==19608== by 0x416F78: ClassDef::set_x() (LoanDef.h:407)
==19608== by 0x4168CA: Sim(std::vector<ClassDef, std::allocator<ClassDef> >&, Assumption&, std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > >&, unsigned int, NextStepCalcML&, std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >&, unsigned int, unsigned int) (NewSim.cpp:105)
==19608== by 0x411A09: _ZNSt12_Bind_simpleIFPFvRSt6vectorI7LoanDefSaIS1_EER10AssumptionRSt13unordered_mapISsS0_IdSaIdEESt4hashISsESt8equal_toISsESaISt4pairIKSsS9_EEEjR14NextStepCalcMLRS0_IS0_IS9_SaIS9_EESaISN_EEjjESt17reference_wrapperIS3_EST_IS5_EST_ISI_EjST_ISK_EST_ISP_EjjEE9_M_invokeIILm0ELm1ELm2ELm3ELm4ELm5ELm6ELm7EEEEvSt12_Index_tupleIIXspT_EEE (functional:1732)
==19608== by 0x4116AE: std::_Bind_simple<void (*()(std::reference_wrapper<std::vector<LoanDef, std::allocator<LoanDef> > >, std::reference_wrapper<Assumption>, std::reference_wrapper<std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >, unsigned int, std::reference_wrapper<NextStepCalcML>, std::reference_wrapper<std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > > >, unsigned int, unsigned int))(std::vector<LoanDef, std::allocator<ClassDef> >&, Assumption&, std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > >&, unsigned int, NextStep&, std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >&, unsigned int, unsigned int)>::operator()() (functional:1720)
==19608== by 0x411647: std::thread::_Impl<std::_Bind_simple<void (*()(std::reference_wrapper<std::vector<ClassDef, std::allocator<ClassDef> > >, std::reference_wrapper<Assumption>, std::reference_wrapper<std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >, unsigned int, std::reference_wrapper<NextStep>, std::reference_wrapper<std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > > >, unsigned int, unsigned int))(std::vector<LoanDef, std::allocator<LoanDef> >&, Assumption&, std::unordered_map<std::string, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::hash<std::string>, std::equal_to<std::string>, std::allocator<std::pair<std::string const, std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > >&, unsigned int, NextStep&, std::vector<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > >, std::allocator<std::vector<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >, std::allocator<std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> > > > > >&, unsigned int, unsigned int)> >::_M_run() (thread:115)
thank you. btw, I tried to use this random head file I wrote, not sure if it's safe under multithread environment. it used to work fine with boost.
myrand.hpp
#ifndef NRAND_H
#define NRAND_H
#include <random>
double nrand(double mean = 0., double sd = 1.);
double urand(double a=0., double b=0.);
#endif
and myrand.cpp
#include "NRand.h"
using namespace std;
double nrand(double mean, double sd) {
static random_device rd;
static subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned,24,10,24> e(rd());
normal_distribution<> dist(mean, sd);
return dist(e);
}
double urand(double a, double b) {
static random_device rd;
static subtract_with_carry_engine<unsigned,24,10,24> e(rd());
uniform_real_distribution<> dist(a, b);
return dist(e);
}
many thanks.

Answer 1

IMHO, your code is not threadsafe and hence should not work correctly under C++11. I think the problem is that the static variables rd and e are global variables but not protected (by mutex), so concurrent calls will race.
Presumably, you can make this code threadsafe by making those variables thread_local, but I have no experience.