I am having a string like
-------- AGG x y PORT-16385-INFO ----------------------------+
I want to extract the "AGG x y PORT-16385-INFO ". However this pattern in not same. It can have any number of spaces inbetween .
Help me with the regexp to get the string.
I am using this regexp
regexp {\s+(.*)\-\-*} $a - am
Ouput
AGG PORT-16385-INFO ---------------------------
this is not i want. Help me with regexp.
Well, I'll assume your delimiter is at least two - long and is seperated via a space from the contents. Then a trivial regex like
--\s+(.*?)\s+--
would already work. The *? quantifier does non-greedy matching, to terminate as early as possible.
If this regex works depends strongly on allowed values and the exact format of your input, which you have not sufficiently explained.
I am also suprised you tagged this as Perl — I am quite sure your code isn't valid Perl code.
If you do not want to use the . character class, then we can rewrite it to match all non-hyphen characters or a single hyphen followed by a non-hyphen:
--\s+((?:[^-]+|-[^-])*)\s+--
You might want to disallows newlines along the hyphens as well.
Using .*? can work, like amon says, however, I sometimes find that the non-greedy quantifier is somewhat unpredictable. You can use anchors to make the greedy quantifier do the same thing:
^-+ (.*) -+\+$
Here we require the string to start and end with the specified sequence of dashes (and a plus sign at the end), so the greedy match is not allowed to match too much.
In tcl, you easily handle it using string trim.
set a "-------- AGG x y PORT-16385-INFO ----------------------------+"
set b [string trim $a +-]; # to remove all + and -
set b [string trim $b]; # to remove all the white spaces
puts $b
Related
I frequently receive PDFs that contain (when converted with pdftotext) whitespaces between the letters of some arbitrary words:
This i s a n example t e x t that c o n t a i n s strange spaces.
For further automated processing (looking for specific words) I would like to remove all whitespace between "standalone" letters (single-letter words), so the result would look like this:
This isan example text that contains strange spaces.
I tried to achieve this with a simple perl regex:
s/ (\w) (\w) / $1$2 /g
Which of course does not work, as after the first and second standalone letters have been moved together, the second one no longer is a standalone, so the space to the third will not match:
This is a n example te x t that co n ta i ns strange spaces.
So I tried lockahead assertions, but failed to achieve anything (also because I did not find any example that uses them in a substitution).
As usual with PRE, my feeling is, that there must be a very simple and elegant solution for this...
Just match a continuous series of single letters separated by spaces, then delete all spaces from that using a nested substitution (the /e eval modifier).
s{\b ((\w\s)+\w) \b}{ my $s = $1; $s =~ s/ //g; $s }xge;
Excess whitespace can be removed with a regex, but Perl by itself cannot know what is correct English. With that caveat, this seems to work:
$ perl -pe's/(?<!\S)(\S) (?=\S )/$1/g' spaces.txt
This isan example text that contains strange spaces.
Note that i s a n cannot be distinguished from a normal 4 letter word, that requires human correction, or some language module.
Explanation:
(?<!\S) negative look-behind assertion checks that the character behind is not a non-whitespace.
(\S) next must follow a non-whitespace, which we capture with parens, followed by a whitespace, which we will remove (or not put back, as it were).
(?=\S ) next we check with a look-ahead assertion that what follows is a non-whitespace followed by a whitespace. We do not change the string there.
Then put back the character we captured with $1
It might be more correct to use [^ ] instead of \S. Since you only seem to have a problem with spaces being inserted, there is no need to match tabs, newlines or other whitespace. Feel free to do that change if you feel it is appropriate.
I am trying to figure out a way to determine if my matched comma(,) does not lie inside a regex. Basically, i do not want to match my character if it lies in a regex.
The regex i have come up with is ,(?<!.+\/)(?!.+\/) but its not quite working.
Any ideas?
I want to skip /some,regex/ but match any other commas.
Edit:
Live example: http://rubular.com/r/WjrwSnmzyP
Here is the regex that will work for you:
,(?!\s)(?=(?:(?:[^/]*\/){2})*[^/]*$)
Live Demo: http://rubular.com/r/37buDdg1tW
Explanation: It means match comma followed by EVEN number of forward slash /. Hence comma (,) between 2 slash (/) characters will NOT be matched and outside ones will be matched (since those are followed by even number of / characters).
A curious thing about regular expressions is that if you want to use them to ignore "something" that is within "something else", you need to match that "something else", prefer matches of it, and then either silently discard or reproduce those matches.
For example, in order to remove all commas from a string unless they are in a regular expression literal—
In Perl:
my $s = "/foo,bar/,baz";
$s =~ s{(/(?:[^/\\]|\\.)+/)|,}{\1}g;
In ECMAScript:
var s = "/foo,bar/,baz";
s = s.replace(/(\/([^\/\\]|\\.)+\/)|,/g, "$1");
or
s = s.replace(new RegExp("(/([^/\\\\]|\\\\.)+/)|,", "g"), "$1");
Note that I am capturing the match for the regular expression literal in the string value, and reproducing it (\1 or $1) if it matched. (If the other part of the alternation – the standalone comma – matched, the empty string is captured, so this simple approach suffices here.)
For further reading I recommend “Mastering Regular Expressions” by Jeffrey E. F. Friedl. Two rather enlightening example chapters, each from a different edition, are available for free online.
I need a regex script to remove double repetition for these particular words..If these character occurs replace it with single.
/[\s.'-,{2,0}]
These are character that if they comes I need to replace it with single same character.
Is this the regex you're looking for?
/([\s.'-,])\1+/
Okay, now that will match it. If you're using Perl, you can replace it using the following expression:
s/([\s.'-,])\1+/$1/g
Edit: If you're using :ahem: PHP, then you would use this syntax:
$out = preg_replace('/([\s.\'-,])\1+/', '$1', $in);
The () group matches the character and the \1 means that the same thing it just matched in the parentheses occurs at least once more. In the replacement, the $1 refers to the match in first set of parentheses.
Note: this is Perl-Compatible Regular Expression (PCRE) syntax.
From the perlretut man page:
Matching repetitions
The examples in the previous section display an annoying weakness. We were only matching 3-letter words, or chunks of words of 4 letters or less. We'd like to be able to match words or, more generally, strings of any length, without writing out tedious alternatives like \w\w\w\w|\w\w\w|\w\w|\w.
This is exactly the problem the quantifier metacharacters ?, *, +, and {} were created for. They allow us to delimit the number of repeats for a portion of a regexp we consider to be a match. Quantifiers are put immediately after the character, character class, or grouping that we want to specify. They have the following meanings:
a? means: match 'a' 1 or 0 times
a* means: match 'a' 0 or more times, i.e., any number of times
a+ means: match 'a' 1 or more times, i.e., at least once
a{n,m} means: match at least "n" times, but not more than "m" times.
a{n,} means: match at least "n" or more times
a{n} means: match exactly "n" times
As others said it depends on you regex engine but a small example how you could do this:
/([ _-,.])\1*/\1/g
With sed:
$ echo "foo , bar" | sed 's/\([ _-,.]\)\1*/\1/g'
foo , bar
$ echo "foo,. bar" | sed 's/\([ _-,.]\)\1*/\1/g'
foo,. bar
Using Javascript as mentioned in a commennt, and assuming (It's not too clear from your question) the characters you want to replace are space characters, ., ', -, and ,:
var str = 'a b....,,';
str = str.replace(/(\s){2}|(\.){2}|('){2}|(-){2}|(,){2}/g, '$1$2$3$4$5');
// Now str === 'a b..,'
If I understand correctly, you want to do the following: given a set of characters, replace any multiple occurrence of each of them with a single character. Here's how I would do it in perl:
perl -pi.bak -e "s/\.{2,}/\./g; s/\-{2,}/\-/g; s/'{2,}/'/g" text.txt
If, for example, text.txt originally contains:
Here is . and here are 2 .. that should become a single one. Here's
also a double -- that should become a single one. Finally here we have
three ''' which should be substituted with one '.
it is modified as follows:
Here is . and here are 2 . that should become a single one. Here's
also a double - that should become a single one. Finally here we have
three ' which should be substituted with one '.
I simply use the same replacement regex for each character in in the set: for example
s/\.{2,}/\./g;
replaces 2 or more occurrences of a dot character with a single dot. I concatenate several of this expressions, one for each character of your original set.
There may be more compact ways of doing this, but, I think this is simple and it works :)
I hope it helps.
Given a string of identifiers separated by :, is it possible to construct a regular expression to extract the unique identifiers into another string, also separated by :?
How is it possible to achieve this using a regular expression? I have tried s/(:[^:])(.*)\1/$1$2/g with no luck, because the (.*) is greedy and skips to the last match of $1.
Example: a:b:c:d:c:c:x:c:c:e:e:f should give a:b:c:d:x:e:f
Note: I am coding in perl, but I would very much appreciate using a regex for this.
In .NET which supports infinite repetition inside lookbehind, you could search for
(?<=\b\1:.*)\b(\w+):?
and replace all matches with the empty string.
Perl (at least Perl 5) only supports fixed-length lookbehinds, so you can try the following (using lookahead, with a subtly different result):
\b(\w+):(?=.*\b\1:?)
If you replace that with the empty string, all previous repetitions of a duplicate entry will be removed; the last one will remain. So instead of
a:b:c:d:x:e:f
you would get
a:b:d:x:c:e:f
If that is OK, you can use
$subject =~ s/\b(\w+):(?=.*\b\1:?)//g;
Explanation:
First regex:
(?<=\b\1:.*): Check if you can match the contents of backreference no. 1, followed by a colon, somewhere before in the string.
\b(\w+):?: Match an identifier (from a word boundary to the next :), optionally followed by a colon.
Second regex:
\b(\w+):: Match an identifier and a colon.
(?=.*\b\1:?): Then check whether you can match the same identifier, optionally followed by a colon, somewhere ahead in the string.
Check out: http://www.regular-expressions.info/duplicatelines.html
Always a useful site when thinking about any regular expression.
$str = q!a:b:c:d:c:c:x:c:c:e:e:f!;
1 while($str =~ s/(:[^:]+)(.*?)\1/$1$2/g);
say $str
output :
a:b:c:d:x:e:f
here's an awk version, no need regex.
$ echo "a:b:c:d:c:c:x:c:c:e:e:f" | awk -F":" '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++)if($i in a){continue}else{a[$i];printf $i}}'
abcdxef
split the fields on ":", go through the splitted fields, store the elements in an array. check for existence and if exists, skip. Else print them out. you can translate this easily into Perl code.
If the identifiers are sorted, you may be able to do it using lookahead/lookbehind. If they aren't, then this is beyond the computational power of a regex. Now, just because it's impossible with formal regex doesn't mean it's impossible if you use some perl specific regex feature, but if you want to keep your regexes portable you need to describe this string in a language that supports variables.
I have a value like this:
"Foo Bar" "Another Value" something else
What regex will return the values enclosed in the quotation marks (e.g. Foo Bar and Another Value)?
In general, the following regular expression fragment is what you are looking for:
"(.*?)"
This uses the non-greedy *? operator to capture everything up to but not including the next double quote. Then, you use a language-specific mechanism to extract the matched text.
In Python, you could do:
>>> import re
>>> string = '"Foo Bar" "Another Value"'
>>> print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"', string)
['Foo Bar', 'Another Value']
I've been using the following with great success:
(["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1
It supports nested quotes as well.
For those who want a deeper explanation of how this works, here's an explanation from user ephemient:
([""']) match a quote; ((?=(\\?))\2.) if backslash exists, gobble it, and whether or not that happens, match a character; *? match many times (non-greedily, as to not eat the closing quote); \1 match the same quote that was use for opening.
I would go for:
"([^"]*)"
The [^"] is regex for any character except '"'
The reason I use this over the non greedy many operator is that I have to keep looking that up just to make sure I get it correct.
Lets see two efficient ways that deal with escaped quotes. These patterns are not designed to be concise nor aesthetic, but to be efficient.
These ways use the first character discrimination to quickly find quotes in the string without the cost of an alternation. (The idea is to discard quickly characters that are not quotes without to test the two branches of the alternation.)
Content between quotes is described with an unrolled loop (instead of a repeated alternation) to be more efficient too: [^"\\]*(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*
Obviously to deal with strings that haven't balanced quotes, you can use possessive quantifiers instead: [^"\\]*+(?:\\.[^"\\]*)*+ or a workaround to emulate them, to prevent too much backtracking. You can choose too that a quoted part can be an opening quote until the next (non-escaped) quote or the end of the string. In this case there is no need to use possessive quantifiers, you only need to make the last quote optional.
Notice: sometimes quotes are not escaped with a backslash but by repeating the quote. In this case the content subpattern looks like this: [^"]*(?:""[^"]*)*
The patterns avoid the use of a capture group and a backreference (I mean something like (["']).....\1) and use a simple alternation but with ["'] at the beginning, in factor.
Perl like:
["'](?:(?<=")[^"\\]*(?s:\\.[^"\\]*)*"|(?<=')[^'\\]*(?s:\\.[^'\\]*)*')
(note that (?s:...) is a syntactic sugar to switch on the dotall/singleline mode inside the non-capturing group. If this syntax is not supported you can easily switch this mode on for all the pattern or replace the dot with [\s\S])
(The way this pattern is written is totally "hand-driven" and doesn't take account of eventual engine internal optimizations)
ECMA script:
(?=["'])(?:"[^"\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(?:\\[\s\S][^'\\]*)*')
POSIX extended:
"[^"\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^"\\]*)*"|'[^'\\]*(\\(.|\n)[^'\\]*)*'
or simply:
"([^"\\]|\\.|\\\n)*"|'([^'\\]|\\.|\\\n)*'
Peculiarly, none of these answers produce a regex where the returned match is the text inside the quotes, which is what is asked for. MA-Madden tries but only gets the inside match as a captured group rather than the whole match. One way to actually do it would be :
(?<=(["']\b))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)
Examples for this can be seen in this demo https://regex101.com/r/Hbj8aP/1
The key here is the the positive lookbehind at the start (the ?<= ) and the positive lookahead at the end (the ?=). The lookbehind is looking behind the current character to check for a quote, if found then start from there and then the lookahead is checking the character ahead for a quote and if found stop on that character. The lookbehind group (the ["']) is wrapped in brackets to create a group for whichever quote was found at the start, this is then used at the end lookahead (?=\1) to make sure it only stops when it finds the corresponding quote.
The only other complication is that because the lookahead doesn't actually consume the end quote, it will be found again by the starting lookbehind which causes text between ending and starting quotes on the same line to be matched. Putting a word boundary on the opening quote (["']\b) helps with this, though ideally I'd like to move past the lookahead but I don't think that is possible. The bit allowing escaped characters in the middle I've taken directly from Adam's answer.
The RegEx of accepted answer returns the values including their sourrounding quotation marks: "Foo Bar" and "Another Value" as matches.
Here are RegEx which return only the values between quotation marks (as the questioner was asking for):
Double quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
"(.*?[^\\])"
Single quotes only (use value of capture group #1):
'(.*?[^\\])'
Both (use value of capture group #2):
(["'])(.*?[^\\])\1
-
All support escaped and nested quotes.
I liked Eugen Mihailescu's solution to match the content between quotes whilst allowing to escape quotes. However, I discovered some problems with escaping and came up with the following regex to fix them:
(['"])(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*\1
It does the trick and is still pretty simple and easy to maintain.
Demo (with some more test-cases; feel free to use it and expand on it).
PS: If you just want the content between quotes in the full match ($0), and are not afraid of the performance penalty use:
(?<=(['"])\b)(?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*(?=\1)
Unfortunately, without the quotes as anchors, I had to add a boundary \b which does not play well with spaces and non-word boundary characters after the starting quote.
Alternatively, modify the initial version by simply adding a group and extract the string form $2:
(['"])((?:(?!\1|\\).|\\.)*)\1
PPS: If your focus is solely on efficiency, go with Casimir et Hippolyte's solution; it's a good one.
A very late answer, but like to answer
(\"[\w\s]+\")
http://regex101.com/r/cB0kB8/1
The pattern (["'])(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?\1 above does the job but I am concerned of its performances (it's not bad but could be better). Mine below it's ~20% faster.
The pattern "(.*?)" is just incomplete. My advice for everyone reading this is just DON'T USE IT!!!
For instance it cannot capture many strings (if needed I can provide an exhaustive test-case) like the one below:
$string = 'How are you? I\'m fine, thank you';
The rest of them are just as "good" as the one above.
If you really care both about performance and precision then start with the one below:
/(['"])((\\\1|.)*?)\1/gm
In my tests it covered every string I met but if you find something that doesn't work I would gladly update it for you.
Check my pattern in an online regex tester.
This version
accounts for escaped quotes
controls backtracking
/(["'])((?:(?!\1)[^\\]|(?:\\\\)*\\[^\\])*)\1/
MORE ANSWERS! Here is the solution i used
\"([^\"]*?icon[^\"]*?)\"
TLDR;
replace the word icon with what your looking for in said quotes and voila!
The way this works is it looks for the keyword and doesn't care what else in between the quotes.
EG:
id="fb-icon"
id="icon-close"
id="large-icon-close"
the regex looks for a quote mark "
then it looks for any possible group of letters thats not "
until it finds icon
and any possible group of letters that is not "
it then looks for a closing "
I liked Axeman's more expansive version, but had some trouble with it (it didn't match for example
foo "string \\ string" bar
or
foo "string1" bar "string2"
correctly, so I tried to fix it:
# opening quote
(["'])
(
# repeat (non-greedy, so we don't span multiple strings)
(?:
# anything, except not the opening quote, and not
# a backslash, which are handled separately.
(?!\1)[^\\]
|
# consume any double backslash (unnecessary?)
(?:\\\\)*
|
# Allow backslash to escape characters
\\.
)*?
)
# same character as opening quote
\1
string = "\" foo bar\" \"loloo\""
print re.findall(r'"(.*?)"',string)
just try this out , works like a charm !!!
\ indicates skip character
My solution to this is below
(["']).*\1(?![^\s])
Demo link : https://regex101.com/r/jlhQhV/1
Explanation:
(["'])-> Matches to either ' or " and store it in the backreference \1 once the match found
.* -> Greedy approach to continue matching everything zero or more times until it encounters ' or " at end of the string. After encountering such state, regex engine backtrack to previous matching character and here regex is over and will move to next regex.
\1 -> Matches to the character or string that have been matched earlier with the first capture group.
(?![^\s]) -> Negative lookahead to ensure there should not any non space character after the previous match
Unlike Adam's answer, I have a simple but worked one:
(["'])(?:\\\1|.)*?\1
And just add parenthesis if you want to get content in quotes like this:
(["'])((?:\\\1|.)*?)\1
Then $1 matches quote char and $2 matches content string.
All the answer above are good.... except they DOES NOT support all the unicode characters! at ECMA Script (Javascript)
If you are a Node users, you might want the the modified version of accepted answer that support all unicode characters :
/(?<=((?<=[\s,.:;"']|^)["']))(?:(?=(\\?))\2.)*?(?=\1)/gmu
Try here.
echo 'junk "Foo Bar" not empty one "" this "but this" and this neither' | sed 's/[^\"]*\"\([^\"]*\)\"[^\"]*/>\1</g'
This will result in: >Foo Bar<><>but this<
Here I showed the result string between ><'s for clarity, also using the non-greedy version with this sed command we first throw out the junk before and after that ""'s and then replace this with the part between the ""'s and surround this by ><'s.
From Greg H. I was able to create this regex to suit my needs.
I needed to match a specific value that was qualified by being inside quotes. It must be a full match, no partial matching could should trigger a hit
e.g. "test" could not match for "test2".
reg = r"""(['"])(%s)\1"""
if re.search(reg%(needle), haystack, re.IGNORECASE):
print "winning..."
Hunter
If you're trying to find strings that only have a certain suffix, such as dot syntax, you can try this:
\"([^\"]*?[^\"]*?)\".localized
Where .localized is the suffix.
Example:
print("this is something I need to return".localized + "so is this".localized + "but this is not")
It will capture "this is something I need to return".localized and "so is this".localized but not "but this is not".
A supplementary answer for the subset of Microsoft VBA coders only one uses the library Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5 and this gives the following code
Sub TestRegularExpression()
Dim oRE As VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp '* Tools->References: Microsoft VBScript Regular Expressions 5.5
Set oRE = New VBScript_RegExp_55.RegExp
oRE.Pattern = """([^""]*)"""
oRE.Global = True
Dim sTest As String
sTest = """Foo Bar"" ""Another Value"" something else"
Debug.Assert oRE.test(sTest)
Dim oMatchCol As VBScript_RegExp_55.MatchCollection
Set oMatchCol = oRE.Execute(sTest)
Debug.Assert oMatchCol.Count = 2
Dim oMatch As Match
For Each oMatch In oMatchCol
Debug.Print oMatch.SubMatches(0)
Next oMatch
End Sub