I have a Rendering Parameter template applied to a sublayout. It has a single Droptree field on it, and I want to set the Source of that field to a Sitecore query so I can limit the options available for that field.
Source can be:
query:./*
or
query:./ancestor-or-self::*[##templatename='MyTemplate']/
The query just needs to grab items relative to the content item that we're on. This normally works with Droptree fields in the content editor.
However I'm finding that the query isn't working here because we're in the rendering parameters, so it's not using the content item as it's context.
The query fails and I just get the full Sitecore tree.
I found this can be fixed up for the Datasource field with 'Queryable Datasource Locations' at this link:-
http://www.cognifide.com/blogs/sitecore/reduce-multisite-chaos-with-sitecore-queries/
However I don't know where to start to get this working for other rendering parameter fields.
Any ideas? (I'm using Sitecore 6.6 Update 5)
Unfortunately, the pipeline mentioned in Adam Najmanowicz's answer works for some other types, like Droplink and Multilist, but the pipeline isn't run for Droptree fields.
After looking into this deeper I found that the Source of a Droptree field IS using the wrong context item, as Adam mentioned, but the code comes from the Droptree field itself:-
Sitecore.Shell.Applications.ContentEditor.Tree, Sitecore.Kernel
Utilising the query string code from Adam's answer, we can create a 'fixed' Droptree custom field, that is almost the same as the regular Droptree but will use the correct context item instead.
The code will inherit from the normal Tree control, and only change the way that the Source property is set.
public class QueryableTree : Sitecore.Shell.Applications.ContentEditor.Tree
{
// override the Source property from the base class
public new string Source
{
get
{
return StringUtil.GetString(new string[]
{
base.Source // slightly altered from the original
});
}
set
{
Assert.ArgumentNotNull(value, "value");
if (!value.StartsWith("query:", StringComparison.InvariantCulture))
{
base.Source = value; // slightly altered from the original
return;
}
Item item = Client.ContentDatabase.GetItem(this.ItemID);
// Added code that figures out if we're looking at rendering parameters,
// and if so, figures out what the context item actually is.
string url = WebUtil.GetQueryString();
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(url) && url.Contains("hdl"))
{
FieldEditorParameters parameters = FieldEditorOptions.Parse(new UrlString(url)).Parameters;
var currentItemId = parameters["contentitem"];
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentItemId))
{
Sitecore.Data.ItemUri contentItemUri = new Sitecore.Data.ItemUri(currentItemId);
item = Sitecore.Data.Database.GetItem(contentItemUri);
}
}
if (item == null)
{
return;
}
Item item2 = item.Axes.SelectSingleItem(value.Substring("query:".Length));
if (item2 == null)
{
return;
}
base.Source = item2.ID.ToString(); // slightly altered from the original
}
}
The above code is pretty much the same as the Source property on the base Tree field, except that we figure out the proper context item from the URL if we've detected that we're in the rendering parameters dialog.
To create the custom field, you just need to edit the Web.Config file as described here. Then add the custom field to the core database as described here.
This means that parameters can now have queries for their source, allowing us to limit the available items to the content editor. (Useful for multi-site solutions).
The key here would be to set the Field Editor's context to be relative to the item you are editing instead of the Rendering parameters (that I think it has by default).
So you could have processor:
public class ResolveRelativeQuerySource
{
public void Process(GetLookupSourceItemsArgs args)
{
Assert.IsNotNull(args, "args");
if (!args.Source.StartsWith("query:"))
return;
Item contextItem = null;
string url = WebUtil.GetQueryString();
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(url) && url.Contains("hdl"))
{
FieldEditorParameters parameters = FieldEditorOptions.Parse(new UrlString(url)).Parameters;
var currentItemId = parameters["contentitem"];
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(currentItemId))
{
Sitecore.Data.ItemUri contentItemUri = new Sitecore.Data.ItemUri(currentItemId);
contextItem = Sitecore.Data.Database.GetItem(contentItemUri);
}
}
else
{
contextItem = args.Item;
}
}
}
hooked as:
<sitecore>
<pipelines>
<getLookupSourceItems>
<processor patch:before="*[#type='Sitecore.Pipelines.GetLookupSourceItems.ProcessQuerySource, Sitecore.Kernel']"
type="Cognifide.SiteCore.Logic.Processors.ResolveRelativeQuerySource, Cognifide.SiteCore" />
</getLookupSourceItems>
</pipelines>
</sitecore>
Together with ResolveQueryableDatasources from Przemek's blog this should solve your problem.
Related
I have seen how we can provide default conditions and default actions to newly created bucket items. I also know that we can create a custom rule for building path based on custom date field.
But, how can we set the item path when the date field is and the is saved.
Consider an example. We have a bucket item template say "News" which has a date field say "Release Date". We have the settings where on item creation, the item path has the creation date like "/News/2015/09/16/item1". Now, we need to have some logic where we can change the path when the "release date" of "item1" is updated and the item is Saved.
How can we update the item path when item's release date is updated and item is Saved !! do i need to implement some logic in OnItemSaved() method ?
I already went through posts on GeekHive
The simplest way to do this would be to hook into the item:saved event and sync the bucket in there. The following code is untested:
public class ItemSavedEventHandler
{
public void Execute(object sender, ItemSavedEventArgs args)
{
Assert.IsNotNull(sender, "sender is null");
Assert.IsNotNull(args, "args is null");
// WARNING: using the events disabler is not recommended in this case.
// If you do this, the path of the item in question will not be updated and will cause issues when you edit the page and try to specify rendering data sources (the locations won't resolve)
using (new EventsDisabler())
{
var parameter = args.Item;
if (!BucketManager.IsItemContainedWithinBucket(paremeter))
{
return;
}
var bucketItem = parameter.GetParentBucketItemOrParent();
if (!bucketItem.IsABucket())
{
return;
}
BucketManager.Sync(bucketItem);
}
}
}
On a bucket with a lot of items, this will considerably slow down the save process tho.
If I understood you right, you want your bucket item path to be based on date updated rather than created? Am I right with that?
If yes, that it is not going to be a straightforward thing to do. I see the following approach to implement that.
Configure your bucket to be organised by update date, not created (you mentioned you already know how to configure that behavior). Every Sitecore item derived from Standard Template should have Statistics section where is __Updated field (with two underscores a the beginning) that automatically updates on each item save by corresponding event. You should use that field.
Once done, sync all existing items to apply that bucketing items paths.
Handle item:saved event
Within item:saved event handler: unbucket that particular item and re-bucket that item again (with item:unbucket and item:bucket commands)
Your that particular item will be bucketed implementing your bucketing path rule.
Hope that helps!
Building on some of the answers, here's the most readable / performant solution for most use cases:
using Sitecore.Buckets.Extensions;
using Sitecore.Buckets.Managers;
using Sitecore.Data.Events;
using Sitecore.Diagnostics;
using System;
using Sitecore.Data.Items;
using Sitecore.Events;
namespace XXXX.Project.Web.Infrastructure.Pipelines
{
public class MoveItemIntoBucketOnSave
{
public void OnItemSaved(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
Assert.IsNotNull(sender, "sender is null");
Assert.IsNotNull(args, "args is null");
var savedItem = Event.ExtractParameter(args, 0) as Item;
if (savedItem == null || savedItem.Database.Name.ToLower() != "master" || !savedItem.IsItemBucketable())
{
return;
}
// WARNING: see update below about EventDisabler
using (new EventDisabler())
{
if (!BucketManager.IsItemContainedWithinBucket(savedItem))
{
return;
}
var bucketItem = savedItem.GetParentBucketItemOrParent();
if (!bucketItem.IsABucket())
{
return;
}
// If you want to sync the entire bucket
// BucketManager.Sync(bucketItem);
BucketManager.MoveItemIntoBucket(savedItem, bucketItem);
}
}
}
}
I'm not worried about there being any empty bucket folders after this operation since they will be cleaned up during a full bucket sync, and content authors would not typically be traversing the bucket tree as they should be using search.
Here's the config:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/">
<sitecore>
<events>
<event name="item:saved">
<handler type="XXXX.Project.Web.Infrastructure.Pipelines.MoveItemIntoBucketOnSave, XXXX.Project.Web" method="OnItemSaved" />
</event>
</events>
</sitecore>
</configuration>
UPDATE: I do not recommend using the EventDisabler. If you add a new page and then try to add a rendering to the page and specify a datasource for it, the datasource locations won't resolve because Sitecore still thinks the path of newly created item is a direct child of the bucket item, rather than wherever the item was moved to within the bucket. See this question for more information.
UPDATE 2:
Note that this method will get called twice when a new bucketed item is created. You should think very carefully about what this means for you, and if you should add any other checks prior to calling any other code within this method.
You can achieve this by programmatically moving the bucketed item to the root of the bucket with the BucketManager. Doing this will force it to reevaluate the bucket rules and reorganize it:
BucketManager.MoveItemIntoBucket(bucketedItem, bucketItem);
Note that this is different from BucketManager.Sync(bucketItem) because it does not sync the whole bucket, but instead handles just the single item that was changed.
In our solutions, we typically create an item:saved event handler to do this automatically:
using Sitecore.Buckets.Managers;
using Sitecore.Buckets.Util;
using Sitecore.Data;
using Sitecore.Data.Items;
using Sitecore.Events;
using System;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
namespace Custom.Events.ItemSaved
{
public class ReorganizeBucketedItemInBucket
{
public void OnItemSaved(object sender, EventArgs args)
{
var bucketedItem = Event.ExtractParameter(args, 0) as Item;
// If we don't have an item or we're not saving in the master DB, ignore this save
if (bucketedItem == null || !"master".Equals(bucketedItem.Database?.Name, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
return;
if (!bucketedItem.TemplateID.Equals(new ID("{bucketed-item-template-id}"))) return;
var itemChanges = Event.ExtractParameter(args, 1) as ItemChanges;
// If there were no changes or the changes didn't include the date field, ignore this save
if (itemChanges == null || !itemChanges.HasFieldsChanged || !itemChanges.IsFieldModified(new ID("{field-id-of-date-field}")))
return;
Item bucketItem = bucketedItem.Axes.SelectSingleItem($"{EscapePath(bucketedItem.Paths.FullPath)}/ancestor-or-self::*[##templateid = '{{bucket-container-template-id}}']");
// If this item isn't in a bucket (or is in a bucket of another, unexpected type), ignore it
if (bucketItem == null) return;
Item parent = bucketedItem.Parent;
BucketManager.MoveItemIntoBucket(bucketedItem, bucketItem);
// Delete empty ancestor bucket folders
while (parent != null && !parent.HasChildren && parent.TemplateID == BucketConfigurationSettings.BucketTemplateId)
{
Item tempParent = parent.Parent;
parent.Delete();
parent = tempParent;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Wraps each segment of a sitecore path with "#"'s
/// </summary>
public string EscapePath(string path)
{
return Regex.Replace(path, #"([^/]+)", "#$1#").Replace("#*#", "*");
}
}
}
And don't forget your patch config, of course:
<configuration xmlns:patch="http://www.sitecore.net/xmlconfig/">
<sitecore>
<events>
<event name="item:saved">
<handler type="Custom.Events.ItemSaved.ReorganizeBucketedItemInBucket, Custom.Events" method="OnItemSaved"></handler>
</event>
</events>
</sitecore>
</configuration>
You'll need to implement a pipeline processor.
You can do this by adding the following into a .config file in your App_Code/Include folder.
<processors>
<saveUI>
<processor mode="on" type="Namespace.ClassName, Your.Assembly" patch:after="processor[last()]" />
</saveUI>
</processor
You'll also need to implement that class - there's nothing special about it except that it must have a public Process method with a Sitecore.Pipelines.Save.SaveArgs parameter.
namespace CustomFunctions
{
public class SaveAction
{
public void Process(SaveArgs args)
{
// There's a collection of items
// I'm not sure what the situation where there's more than one item is though.
var items = args.SavedItems;
var bucket = SomeFunctionToGetParent(items);
BucketManager.Sync(items);
}
}
}
I've never actually implemented this, but I think my code should give you an idea of how to get started - though this pipeline processor would be called every time an item is saved, so you need efficient checking to make sure that the item needs to have your bucket syncing processor used.
If I have an image field in a parameter template, what are the steps involved in getting the URL of the image in c#?
#mdresser makes a valid point about what should and should not be a rendering parameter. However, I don't think that Sitecore intentionally made it difficult to use image fields in parameter templates. They simply built the parameter template functionality over the existing key-value pair rendering parameter functionality.
If the name of your image field on the rendering parameters template was BackgroundImage, you could use the following code to get the URL of the selected image:
var imageId = XmlUtil.GetAttribute("mediaid", XmlUtil.LoadXml(this.Parameters["BackgroundImage"]));
MediaItem imageItem = Sitecore.Context.Database.GetItem(imageId);
backgroundImageUrl = MediaManager.GetMediaUrl(imageItem);
If you don't already have a base class for your sublayouts that provides the Parameters property, you will need to also add this:
private NameValueCollection parameters;
public virtual NameValueCollection Parameters
{
get
{
if (this.parameters == null)
{
var parameters = this.Attributes["sc_parameters"];
this.parameters = string.IsNullOrEmpty(parameters)
? new NameValueCollection()
: WebUtil.ParseUrlParameters(parameters);
}
return this.parameters;
}
}
To achieve this you would have to look at how the sitecore image field renders the raw text value into an img tag. However, there is a reason that this doesn't work out of the box with sitecore; parameters templates are designed to define info about how a rendering or sublayout should render. E.g. You could use it to tell a list control to show a certain number of items etc. I'd advise against using rendering parameters for content as this will make content editing very cumbersome. If your aim is to have the content of a particular sublayout defined somewhere other than the page itself, put it into a sub item instead.
You can have a 2 separate functions to retrieve the value of image field in the parameter template that you gave to the sub layout .
First Step : Get the value associated with the parameter of image . Please use below function to retrieve the value .
/// <summary>
/// Returns a specific parameter value
/// Use this for Single-line, multiline text fields, linkfield, Image field etc.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="parameterName"></param>
/// <returns></returns>
public MediaItem GetValueFromRenderingParameter(string parameterName)
{
var item = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(_params[parameterName]) ? _params[parameterName] : string.Empty;
if(item == null)
{
return null ;
}
return Sitecore.Context.Database.GetItem(item);
}
Second step : Create another function where you can use the above mentioned function to retrieve the value of image field and use it appropriately. Here is the code snippet of the same :
Public string RenderImage()
{
Sitecore.Data.Fields.ImageField imageField =GetValueFromRenderingParameter("Image parameter name");
return MediaManager.GetMediaUrl(imageField.MediaItem) ;
}
Hope This Helps .
Anyone knows how to generate links in sitecore with ID instead of item path?
If you use GetMediaUrl method from the API, I can get this URL:
/~/media/Images/Archive/content/News and Events/News_and_Events_Level2/20070419162739/iwhiz3.jpg
The problem with this approach is that if someone changes the media item name, removes it somewhere or deletes it, the above link will break.
I notice if I insert a media link from rich text editor, I get the link as below:
/~/media/14BDED00E4D64DFD8F74019AED4D74EB.ashx
The second link is better because it's using the item id, so if the actual media item is renamed, removed, or deleted, all related links will be updated too. On top of that, when Sitecore renders the page, it will actually convert the above link and display the item path so it's readable.
I'm using Sitecore 6.5 and currently doing content migration so I need to make sure all internal links are updated properly.
May I know if there is a method to generate the second link by using sitecore API?
Thanks!
The GetMediaItemUrl extension method seems to give you what you want.
public static class ItemExtensions
{
public static string GetMediaItemUrl(this Item item)
{
var mediaUrlOptions = new MediaUrlOptions() { UseItemPath = false, AbsolutePath = true };
return Sitecore.Resources.Media.MediaManager.GetMediaUrl(item, mediaUrlOptions);
}
}
[TestFixture]
public class when_using_items_extensions
{
[Test]
public void a_url_based_on_media_item_id_can_be_generated()
{
// Arrange
Database db = global::Sitecore.Configuration.Factory.GetDatabase("master");
Item item = db.GetItem("/sitecore/media library/Images/MyImage");
// Act
var mediaUrl = item.GetMediaItemUrl();
// Assert
Assert.That(mediaUrl, Is.EqualTo("/~/media/17A1341ABEEC46788F2159843DCEAB03.ashx"));
}
}
These are called dynamic links and you can normally generate them using the LinkManager e.g:
Sitecore.Links.LinkManager.GetDynamicUrl(item)
.. but I'm not sure of the method to do this with Media links (there probably is one but I cant seem to find it and its not on MediaManager) but the basic syntax is:
"/~/media/" + item.ID.ToShortID() + ".ashx"
If you always want to use ID's instead of paths, you can change this setting in webconfig to false (like this):
<setting name="Media.UseItemPaths" value="false"/>`
Here is what the webconfig describes about it:
MEDIA - USE ITEM PATHS FOR URLS
This setting controls if item paths are used for constructing media URLs.
If false, short ids will be used.
Default value: true
Then you can use the default implementation (without additional parameters):
Sitecore.Resources.Media.MediaManager.GetMediaUrl(item);
This is what I use:
var imgField = ((Sitecore.Data.Fields.ImageField)currentItem.Fields["Icon"]);
MediaUrlOptions opt = new MediaUrlOptions();
opt.AlwaysIncludeServerUrl = true;
// Absolute Path works as well. So either use AbsolutePath or AlwaysIncludeServerUrl
opt.AbsolutePath = true;
string mediaUrl = MediaManager.GetMediaUrl(imgField.MediaItem, opt);
I need to put a search box within a list of objects as a result of a typical indexSuccess action in Symfony. The goal is simple: filter the list according to a criteria.
I've been reading the Zend Lucene approach in Jobeet tutorial, but it seems like using a sledge-hammer to crack a nut (at least for my requirements).
I'm more interested in the auto-generated admin filter forms but I don't know how to implement it in a frontend.
I could simply pass the search box content to the action and build a custom query, but is there any better way to do this?
EDIT
I forgot to mention that I would like to have a single generic input field instead of an input field for each model attribute.
Thanks!
I'm using this solution, instead of integrating Zend Lucene I manage to use the autogenerated Symonfy's filters. This is the way i'm doing it:
//module/actions.class.php
public function executeIndex(sfWebRequest $request)
{
//set the form filter
$this->searchForm = new EmployeeFormFilter();
//bind it empty to fetch all data
$this->searchForm->bind(array());
//fetch all
$this->employees = $this->searchForm->getQuery()->execute();
...
}
I made a search action which does the search
public function executeSearch(sfWebRequest $request)
{
//create filter
$this->searchForm = new EmployeeFormFilter();
//bind parameter
$fields = $request->getParameter($this->searchForm->getName());
//bind
$this->searchForm->bind($fields);
//set paginator
$this->employees = $this->searchForm->getQuery()->execute();
...
//template
$this->setTemplate("index");
}
It's important that the search form goes to mymodule/search action.
Actually, i'm also using the sfDoctrinePager for paginate setting directly the query that the form generate to get results properly paginated.
If you want to add more fields to the search form check this :)
I finally made a custom form using the default MyModuleForm generated by Symfony
public function executeIndex {
...
// Add a form to filter results
$this->form = new MyModuleForm();
}
but displaying only a custom field:
<div id="search_box">
<input type="text" name="criteria" id="search_box_criteria" value="Search..." />
<?php echo link_to('Search', '#my_module_search?criteria=') ?>
</div>
Then I created a route named #my_module_search linked to the index action:
my_module_search:
url: my_module/search/:criteria
param: { module: my_module, action: index }
requirements: { criteria: .* } # Terms are optional, show all by default
With Javascript (jQuery in this case) I append the text entered to the criteria parameter in the href attribute of the link:
$('#search_box a').click(function(){
$(this).attr('href', $(this).attr('href') + $(this).prev().val());
});
And finally, back to the executeIndex action, I detect if text was entered and add custom filters to the DoctrineQuery object:
public function executeIndex {
...
// Deal with search criteria
if ( $text = $request->getParameter('criteria') ) {
$query = $this->pager->getQuery()
->where("MyTable.name LIKE ?", "%$text%")
->orWhere("MyTable.remarks LIKE ?", "%$text%")
...;
}
$this->pager->setQuery($query);
...
// Add a form to filter results
$this->form = new MyModuleForm();
}
Actually, the code is more complex, because I wrote some partials and some methods in parent classes to reuse code. But this is the best I can came up with.
I need to use feature stapler to add some text columns to Posts list inside OOTB blog site definition. I plan not to use site columns, but only to add those columns to list (I don't use site columns because I have multiple site collections and there will be only one Posts list per site collection, so site columns are not very reusable in this case). My question is: How do I achieve this?
Perhaps you can create a feature that uses the object model from the feature receiver to add (and remove as appropriate) the columns to just the specific list when the feature is activated.
I would use the XML Schema approach for creating the columns in order to ensure the same GUID for each column. See
The best solution is to create a hidden custom action for Posts List. I'm posting a simplified version here
Elements.xml:
<Elements xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/">
<CustomAction Id="XXXXXXXX"
RegistrationType="List"
RegistrationId="101"
Rights="Open"
Location="ViewToolbar"
Sequence="110"
Title="Hidden Settings Button"
ControlAssembly="MyLib, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=XXXXXX"
ControlClass="MyLib.MyClass"
/>
<FeatureSiteTemplateAssociation Id="XXXXXXX" TemplateName="YOUR_BLOG_SITE_TEMPLATE_NAME" />
MyClass.cs:
[DefaultProperty("Text")]
[ToolboxData("<{0}:MyClass runat=server></{0}:MyClass>")]
public class MyClass : WebControl
{
[Bindable(true)]
[Category("Appearance")]
[DefaultValue("")]
[Localizable(true)]
public string Text
{
get
{
String s = (String)ViewState["Text"];
return ((s == null) ? String.Empty : s);
}
set
{
ViewState["Text"] = value;
}
}
protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e)
{
SPList list = SPContext.Current.List;
if (list != null)
{
list.Fields.Add(XXX, XXX, XXX);
list.Update();
}
}
}
I cannot see what benefit I have from creating custom action for posts list. Both posts are helpful, but I'll probably create custom feature for that.