I have the following template where I loop over a list of objects and want to have a checkbox that is bound to a field isChecked for that object. This needs to be in a view helper in order to get the for tag to work (I think). When I do this I can't seem to figure out how to keep the binding with the isChecked field.
{{#each listEntry in listEntries}}
{{#view}}
{{view Ember.Checkbox viewName="checkboxView" checkedBinding="listEntry.isChecked"}}
<label {{bindAttr for="view.checkboxView.elementId"}}>Option 1</label>
{{/view}}
{{/each}}
Your question is similar to that, but that approach not work, I think is because the each helper.
But one of the comments say about nesting your component in the label.
I have done that and works.
{{#each listEntry in listEntries}}
<label>
{{view Ember.Checkbox viewName="checkboxView" checkedBinding="listEntry.isChecked"}}
Option 1
</label>
{{/each}}
I have created a jsfiddle showing
This is what I ended up doing. The problem I kept having was the need for the binding for the "for" attribute was not working in conjunction with the checked binding. Things were out of scope. If anyone has a better way to accomplish this, please let me know.
{{#each listEntry in ListEntries}}
{{#if ../isCheckable}}
{{#with ../listEntry}}
{{#view listEntryBinding="this"}}
{{view Ember.Checkbox viewName="checkboxView" checkedBinding="listEntry.isChecked"}}
<label {{bindAttr for="checkboxView.elementId"}}></label>
{{/view}}
{{/with}}
{{/if}}
{{/each}}
Related
Is it possible to pass multiple list of items in template using {{each}}
Can someone guide me on what I am doing,
in my sales-orders.hbs below is my currenet code.
{{#each model as |detail|}}
<li>{{sales-orders-grid detail=detail}}</li>
{{else}}
Blank
{{/each}}
</ul>
Then calling the sales-orders-grid component
Shipping Method
<div class="col-xs-12 col-md-12 col-sm-12 products-item-products border-left padding10">
<ul>
{{#each shippingMethod as |sm|}}
{{sales-orders-grid-shipping-method sm=sm}}
{{/each}}
</ul>
</div>
In my sales-orders-grid-shipping-method component calling is this:
sm.shippingMethodName
What I'm trying to achieve here is to pass list of items in {{each}} in my main template. Is it possible?
To change scope you can use the "with" helper.
http://emberjs.com/api/classes/Ember.Templates.helpers.html#method_with
{{#with user.posts as |blogPosts|}}
<div class="notice">
There are {{blogPosts.length}} blog posts written by {{user.name}}.
</div>
{{#each blogPosts as |post|}}
<li>{{post.title}}</li>
{{/each}}
{{/with}}
I think you can nest multiple "with" helper.
I think the way to go is to restructure your data as:model.list1,model.list2,etc.
Then pass the model and use as necessary.And use nested each to acheive the grid.
Iam only posting this as an answer because I can't comment yet.
So, do get back to me for Clarifications.
I have an each loop that looks something like this:
{{#each controller}}
{{#link-to 'searches.show' this}}
<span>{{name}}</span>
{{/link-to}}
{{/each}}
At the moment, the this in {{#link-to 'searches.show' this}} seems to refer to the content of the controller, rather than to the controller itself. Is there a way to pass in the controller here, rather than its model?
{{#each}}
{{#link-to 'searches.show' controller}}
<span>{{name}}</span>
{{/link-to}}
{{/each}}
This will work fine.
When i use {{each}} for example:
{{#each imagepost}}
<li>{{title}}</li>
{{else}}
empty :O
{{/each}}
I get the 'empty :O' message
When i do it like this:
{{#each imagepost in controller}}
<li>{{imagepost.title}}</li>
{{else}}
empty :O
{{/each}}
It works fine!
It is weird cause the docs says to do it like this:
{{#each people}}
<li>Hello, {{name}}!</li>
{{/each}}
Which doesnt work for me =/
Does the shortened version won't apply to models? only to controller's properties?
the shortened version only applies to properties on the controller/model or the controller/model. In your case it would be:
{{#each controller}}
<li>{{title}}</li>
{{else}}
empty :O
{{/each}}
or
{{#each model}}
<li>{{title}}</li>
{{else}}
empty :O
{{/each}}
Note, if you do {{#each model}} and you have an itemController defined on the array controller it won't wrap each item with the item controller, you would need to do this: {{#each model itemController='foo'}}.
I'm having a scoping issue with Handlebars templates. I have a list of modules, each of which contains a list of services. So I have a template like this (with some markup removed):
{{#each controller}}
<a onclick='$(".{{unbound uuid}}").toggle(0);'>
{{#each service in services}}
<div class='{{unbound uuid}}'></div>
{{/each}}
{{/each}}
The problem is that the second {{unbound uuid}} doesn't get substituted. And if I try accessing any other item of the outer scope, the same thing happens. However, the Ember.js site says that using the each ... in helper should preserve outer scope. What am I doing wrong?
(FYI: Using latest version of Ember.js, Ember-data and Handlebars.)
Maybe this is the right syntax?
{{#each item in controller}}
<a onclick='$(".{{unbound item.uuid}}").toggle(0);'>
{{#each service in services}}
<div class='{{unbound item.uuid}}'></div>
{{/each}}
{{/each}}
I have a controller with data about user accounts (icon, name, provider, etc.). Within the output of the each loop I have a view that will build a CSS class dynamically based on the provider passed in via that specific model.
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="accountItem">
{{#each account in controller}}
{{#view App.AccountView}}
<h4>{{account.name}}</h3>
<img {{bindAttr src="account.icon"}} />
<i {{bindAttr class="account.provider"}}></i>
{{/view}}
{{/each}}
</script>
App.AccountView = Ember.View.extend({
tagName: 'a',
classNames: ['avatar-image'],
providerClass: function(el) {
// do something
}
});
The question I have is two-fold.
How do you pass in "account", or the currently iterated item, into the view?
After you pass it in, how do you reference it?
I'm sure this is something that happens quite often but I can't seem to find any examples. Can anyone offer some input on this please?
Views has a special content property in a view which allows a more simple approach: you just use a name of the model's property without the view.content. part.
Also, when you're iterating over controller, you can omit the name of loop variable and use this instead, like in this guide. This is not necessary but can make the code a bit cleaner.
Also, from within view's template you generally don't need to reference the outside variables although you can if you like..
{{#each controller}}
{{#view App.IndexView contentBinding="this"}}
<h4>{{name}}</h4>
<img {{bindAttr src="icon"}} />
<i {{bindAttr class="provider"}}></i>
<i> {{icon}} </i>
<i>{{provider}}</i>
{{/view}}
{{/each}}
And you can always access the content property from within the view with:
this.get('content');
The currently iterated item can be passed into the view with the help of property bindings and it can be refered as "{{view.property}}" in the template. For example:
{{#each account in controller}}
{{#view App.IndexView itemBinding="account"}}
<h4>{{view.item.name}}</h3>
<img {{bindAttr src="account.icon"}} />
<i {{bindAttr class="account.provider"}}></i>
<i> {{view.item.icon}} </i>
<i>{{view.item.provider}}</i>
{{/view}}
{{/each}}
I have created a simple jsfiddle for the above case. Do check it and let me know if you were able to resolve the issues.
Fiddle url : http://jsfiddle.net/nCyn6/3/