I have a script :
<cfscript>
gf = createObject('component','com.general');
gf.checkIpBlocked();
</cfscript>
that I want to fire onSessionStart.
I added an onSessionStart to /siteID/includes/themes/myTheme/eventHandler.cfc. But the session start NEVER fires. I know there is something managing sessions because of I open the admin, login then close the browser, re-open it I am forced to login again.
If I set a session variable close the browser and and the session.testVar never goes away and seems to hold the initial value for a very long time.
I am not trying to manage mura users or anything I am just trying to set a session variable the first time in a "session". In a typical application.cfc this is easy.
Any insight is appreciated.
Unfortunately, that's a bug. However, one thing to keep in mind is that onSiteSessionStart is unreliable since it only fires when a siteID is defined within the request. For example, if you were to go to the admin and be asked to login your session will have started and there would have been no siteID.
For now I would try using onSiteRequestStart to param the variable instead.
function onSiteRequestStart($){
param name="session.ipChecked" default=false;
if(!session.ipChecked){
var gf = createObject('component','com.general');
gf.checkIpBlocked();
session.ipChecked=true;
}
}
In regard to our documentation we have three Mura 6 books available both printed and digital downloads from Lulu
And are also working to create a systematic way to post the contents of those books on our support site which we are hoping to complete by MuraCon on 9/30. So that the all of our documentation will stay update and in sync.
The Mura docs state that the application events are actually onGlobalSessionStart and/or onSiteSessionStart.
Application Events
onApplicationLoad onSiteSessionStart
onGlobalSessionStart onSiteSessionEnd
onSiteMissingTemplate onSiteError
onGlobalError onBeforeAutoUpdate
onAfterAutoUpdate onGlobalThreatDetect
Note that Events that begin with onGlobal are deļ¬ned on a per-Mura
instance basis.
Mura docs.
Related
The issues are when I am trying to run federated authentication with the help of amplify auth method on the browser it works fine, but when I try to run it on my mobile.
It throws error No user found when I try to use Auth.currentSession() but the same work on the browser.
tried to search about this type of issue but I found related to ionic-cordova-google-plugin not related to AWS Amplify Federated Login Issue.
Updating the question after closing the question with less debugging information without asking for any information.
This is issues raised in git hub with respect to my problem.
Issue No. 5351 amplify js it's still in open state.
https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-js/issues/5351
Another issue 3537 which is still in Open
These two issues has the same scenario like me, I hope its enough debugging information, if more required mention comment instead of closing without notification, it's bullying for a beginner not helping
I fixed the above problem by referring a comment or wrapped around fix.
Link that will take to that comment directly link to comment.
First read the above comment as it will give you overall idea of what exactly the issue is instead of directly jumping to the solution.
Once you read the comment you will be little unclear with respect to implementation as he has use capacitor and not every one are using capacitor.
In my implementation I ignore this part as I am not using capacitor.
App.addListener('appUrlOpen')
Now lets go to main step where we are fixing this issue, I am using deep links to redirect to my application
this.platform.ready().then(() => {
this.deeplinks
.route({
"/success.html": "success",
"/logout.html": "logout",
})
.subscribe(
(match: any) => {
const fragment = JSON.stringify(match).split('"fragment":"')[1];
// this link can be your any link based on your requirement,
// what I am doing it I am passing all the data which I get in my fragments.
// fragments consists of id_token, stage, code,response type.
// These need to be passed to Ionic in order for Amplify to run its magic.
document.location.href = `http://192.168.1.162:8100/#${fragment}`;
},
(nomatch) => {
console.log("Got a deeplink that didn't match", nomatch);
}
);
});
I got this idea by referring the issue in which the developer mentioned of sending code and state along with application deep linking URL.
I am currently attempting to use transactions in my C++ app, but I have a problem with the ODBC's auto commit mode.
I am using the POCO libaries to create a connection to a PostgreSQL database on the same machine. Currently, I can send data to this database as single statements, but I cannot get my head around how to use Poco's transaction libraries to be able to send this data more quickly.
As I have several thousand records to insert, and so continuing to use single insert statements is extrememly slow and inpractical - So I am trying to use Poco's transaction to speed this up a bit (a fair bit).
The error I am encountering is a theoretically a simple one - Poco is throwing the following error:
'Invalid access: Session is in auto commit mode.'
I understand, as a result of this, I should somehow set "auto commit" to false - as it only allows me to commit data to the database line by line, rather than as a single transaction.
The problem is how I set this.
Currently, I have a session created from Session.h, that looks alot like this:
session = new Poco::Data::Session(
"ODBC",
connection_data.str()
);
Where connection data is a simple stringstream with the login information, password, database, server and "Driver={PostgreSQL ANSI};" to tell ODBC to utilize PostgreSQL's driver.
I have tried just setting a property "autocommit" to false through the session's setFeature or setProperty settings, this, of course, was to no avail. (it was more of a ditch attempt at this point).
session->setFeature("AUTOCOMMIT", false);
Looking around, I saw a possible alternative method by creating a ODBC sessionImpl directly from ODBC/session/SessionImpl.h instead of using this generic method above, and then creating a new session object from this.
The benefits of this are that ODBC's sessionImpl has references to autocommit mode in the header, which would suggest it would be able to handle this:
void autoCommit(const std::string&, bool val);
/// Sets autocommit property for the session.
However, having not used sessionImpl before, I cannot garuntee if this will work or if can can get this to work with the limited documentation available.
I am using C++ 03 (Not 11), with Visual Studio 2015
Poco 1.7.5
Boost (Where needed)
Would any one know the correct way of setting this feature (above) or a alternative method to achieving this?
edit: Looking at the source of poco, at:
https://github.com/pocoproject/poco/blob/develop/Data/ODBC/src/SessionImpl.cpp#L153
The property seems be named autoCommit, and looking at
https://github.com/pocoproject/poco/blob/develop/Data/include/Poco/Data/AbstractSessionImpl.h#L120
the case of the property names seem to matter. So, does it help if you use session->setFeature("autoCommit", false);?
Cant you just call session->begin(); and session->end(); on the corresponding Session object?
What is returned by session->canTransact()?
According to the doc begin() will start a new transaction, the doc does not mention any property that needs to be set before or after.
See: https://pocoproject.org/docs/Poco.Data.Session.html
Also faced a similar issue.
First of all before begin() need:
m_ses.setFeature("autoCommit", false);
m_ses.begin();
And the second issue is that this feature stays "autoCommit" in false for all other sessions. So don't forget for the next session call
session.setFeature("autoCommit", true);
I'm new to OTRS (3.2) and also new to PERL but I have been given the task of setting up OTRS so that it will make a call to our remote webservice so a record can be created on our end when a ticket is set as "Closed".
I set up various dynamic fields so the customer service rep can fill in additional data that will be passed into the webservice call along with ticket details.
I couldn't get the webservice call to trigger when the ticket was "Closed" but I did get it to trigger when the "priority" was changed so I'm just using that now to test the webservice.
I'm just using the Test.pm and TestSimple.pm files that were included with OTRS.
When I look at the Debugger for the Webserice, I can see that the calls were being made:
$VAR1 = {
'TicketID' => '6'
};
My webservice currently just has one method "create" which just returns true for testing.
however I get the following from the Test.pm
"Got no TicketNumber (2014-09-02 09:20:42, error)"
and the following from the TestSimple.pm
"Error in SOAP call: 404 Not Found at /TARGET/SHARE/var/otrs/Kernel/GenericInterface/Transport/HTTP/SOAP.pm line 578 (2014-09-02 09:20:43, error)
I've spent countless hours on Google but couldn't find anything on this. All I could find is code for the Test.pm and TestSimple.pm but nothing really helpful to help me create a custom invoker for my needs and configure the webservice in OTRS to get it to work.
Does anyone have any sample invokers that I can look at to see how to set it up?
Basically I need to pass the ticket information along with my custom dynamic fields to my webservice. From there I can create the record on my end and do whatever processing.
I'm not sure how to setup the Invoker to pass the necessary ticket fields and dynamic fields and how to make it call a specific method in my remote webservice.
I guess getting the Test.pm and TestSimple.pm to work is the first step then I can modify those for my needs. I have not used PERL at all so any help is greatly appreciated.
I'm also struggling with similar set of requirements too. I've also never programmed in PERL, but I can tell you at least that the "Got no TicketNumber" in the Test.pm is right from the PrepareRequest method, there you can see this block of code:
# we need a TicketNumber
if ( !IsStringWithData( $Param{Data}->{TicketNumber} ) ) {
return $Self->{DebuggerObject}->Error( Summary => 'Got no TicketNumber' );
}
You should change all references to TicketNumber to TicketID, or remove the validation whatsoever (also there is mapping to ReturnedData variable).
Invoking specific methods on your WS interface is quite simple (but poorly documented). The Invoker name that you specify in the "OTRS as requester" section of web service configuration corresponds to the WS method that will be called. So if you have WS interface with a method called "create" just name the Invoker "create" too.
As far as the gathering of dynamic field goes, can't help you on that one yet, sorry.
Cheers
I am having some concurrency issues in cfwheels.
I have some code in events/onrequeststart.cfm that is being executed every time the user is requesting something.
Test case:
User A - request time: 10sec
User B - request time: 2sec
If the user B issues a request while the user A is already working on a request, user's B settings will go into user A and user A will display results based on user's B request.
I tried using cflock on the onrequeststart.cfm but it doesn't seem to work. I don't have much experience with cfwheels so I maybe trying to do something that is logically wrong.
This is part of the code that gets confused.
<cfquery name="currentUser" datasource="#application.ds#">
select * from clientadmin where clientAdminid ='#session.clientadminid#'
</cfquery>
<cfquery name="currentClient" datasource="#application.ds#">
select * from clientBrands where clientbrandID ='#currentUser.ClientBrandID#'
</cfquery>
<cfset application.clientAdminSurveys = application.generalFunctions.clientSurveys(clientAdminID=session.clientAdminID, clientBrandID = currentUser.clientBrandID)>
<cfset application.AssociatedDoctors = application.generalFunctions.AssociatedDoctors(clientAdminID=session.clientAdminID, clientBrandID = currentUser.clientBrandID)>
So, I guess my question is, how to avoid this from happening?
1) The Application scope is "application wide" (all users of site wide) - you shouldn't be setting per user settings there, ever, as as you've discovered, user B overwrites user A. Use the session scope for per user stuff. So in your last two lines you're setting application scope stuff using session scope data!
2) As a side note, in wheels you can use application.wheels.datasourcename to get the database name
I would put that code into a function inside the controller(controller.cfc) and run it using a filter.
see: http://cfwheels.org/docs/1-1/chapter/filters
This has worked for me without issues for similar tasks.
Also I would drop any reference to application. because that's likely where items are getting mixed up. The correct place to put these functions is into events/functions.cfm
of course this is without seeing more of your code...
As mentioned by Neokoenig, you are utilizing a shared scope to store user specific data, you should store that in SESSION. If you need the data in application scope you should be using a lock while setting that data, but it looks like you should be running this in onSessionStart once and not on every request. If you need to run it on every request you may want to continue using the onRequestStart but utilize the user specific session storage and not the global application layer.
Just remember:
Application variables will show the same data for all users. So if user a sets application.foo = 1 and user b sets application.foo = 2 then user one try to access application.foo, user 1 will see user 2's value of 2. If this was using session scope you would not have this same issue. If user 1 sets SESSION.foo = 1 and user 2 sets SESSION.foo = 2. When the user accesses the SESSION.foo variable it will only contain the data set by that user (ex: user 1 will output SESSION.foo and see the value, 1)
I have a shopping cart like application running on SharePoint 2007.
I'm running a very standard update procedure on a list item:
using (SPWeb web = site.OpenWeb())
{
web.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true;
SPList list = web.Lists["Quotes"];
SPListItem item = list.GetItemById(_id);
item["Title"] = _quotename;
item["RecipientName"] = _quotename;
item["RecipientEmail"] = recipientemail;
item["IsActive"] = true;
item.Update();
site.Dispose();
}
This item updates properly, however it briefly appears as modified by System Account. If I wait a second and refresh the page, it shows up again as modified by CurrentUser.
This is an issue because on Page_Load I am retrieving the item that is marked as Active AND is listed as Modified By the CurrentUser. This means as a user updates his list, when the PostBack finishes, it shows he has no active items.
Is it the web.AllowUnsafeUpdates? This is necessary because I was getting a security error before.
What am I missing?
First off, it's not AllowUnsafeUpdates. This simply allows modifying of items from your code.
It's a bit hard to tell what's going on without understanding more of the flow of your application. I would suggest though that using Modified By to associate an item to a user may not be a great idea. This means, as you have discovered, that any modification by the system or even potentially an administrator will break that link.
I would store the current user in a custom field. That should solve your problem and would be a safer design choice.
There could be some other code running in Event Receivers and updating the item. Because event recievers runs in context of system user account, and if you update item from event reciever, the modified field will show just that: the system account has modified the item.