I'm totally new in using Qt and I don't know a lot of stuff.
As a test I created a simple application using Visual Studio 2012 and Qt-VS-Add-in based on the newest Qt5.1
After I compiled the application it didn't work for me (gave errors), I searched all over the internet and found a lot of people saying that I have to copy those dlls mentioned below from the directory:
C:\Qt\Qt5.1.0\5.1.0\msvc2012\bin\
DLL's I had to copy to make my application work:
icudt51.dll
icuin51.dll
icuuc51.dll
libEGL.dll
libGLESv2.dll
Qt5Core.dll
Qt5Gui.dll
Qt5Widgets.dll
My problem is the size of these dlls, they're about "37 MB" and my application itself is only "30 KB"! So, those Qt libraries will add at least 37 MB to my application [ Which I don't see it happens with other Qt-based applications I download ]. Is there any solution can make me end up with a single small .exe file?!
And I heard some people saying that I have to also include a dll for Microsoft C++ Compiler, can you explain this for me?
Note: I've come across a lot of questions here on StackOverFlow but I couldn't find anything can help me, so please do not flag this as a duplication because if I found a clear answer I wouldn't post this question!
Any help would be appreciated.
UPDATE: Use windeployqt.exe! It works really well.
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/windows-deployment.html#the-windows-deployment-tool
The simplest way to use windeployqt is to add the bin directory of
your Qt installation (e.g. ) to the PATH variable and then
run:
windeployqt <path-to-app-binary>
UPDATE: Upon Further testing, windeployqt did not copy over all the MingW dlls for me. (Tested with Qt 5.4 on Windows 10 with MingW 4.9.1). So you need to manually get the last 3 dlls before deploying:
libgcc_s_dw2-1.dll
libstdc++-6.dll
libwinpthread-1.dll
From
C:\Qt\5.4\mingw491_32\bin
I think you may have a few extras in your list... I would double check the docs in the links below...
Here is the definitive documentation on it:
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/windows-deployment.html
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/windows-deployment.html#application-dependencies
Size of Qt DLLs
The amazing Qt Libraries can do a lot, but they are kind of big. Some of the older versions of Qt might be a little smaller.
For Qt 4.8 msvc QtCore4.dll is 2.5 MB, and QtGui4.dll is 8.4 MB.
How Windows Resolves Shared Libraries/Dynamic Link Libraries (DLL)
Here is how Windows tracks down a library at runtime:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682586(v=vs.85).aspx
Single Small EXE
If you statically link, then your EXE should grab the libraries it needs and gets built into a stand alone exe. It still may be dependent on msvc redistributables. See the next section for more info on it. But it now compiles down the .libs that you reference into your EXE and your exe no longer is pointing at other dynamically linked libraries. It does take more time to get your statically linked exe environment setup.
Your exe will certainly get bigger as it now includes the binary information for the libraries that you referenced before.
https://www.google.com/search?q=qt+static+linking
EDIT:
Statically building the exe, means that you aren't using the LGPL version.
means that you have to have your object files easy to access to end users if you are using LGPL.
I think #peppe described it well (see comment below):
Technically, you are allowed to statically link when using Qt under LGPL, even if your application is not using LGPL. The only tricky requirement is keeping the ability for a third party to relink your application against a different Qt version. But you can comply with that easily, f.i. by providing a huge object file (.o) of your application, that only needs to be linked against any Qt version.
http://blog.qt.io/blog/2009/11/30/qt-making-the-right-licensing-decision/
Look at the chart near the bottom. If you are doing the commercial version, then you can statically link, without worrying about the object files.
MSVC Redistributables
Redistributable dependencies have to do with the run-time library linker options.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa278396(v=vs.60).aspx
/MD, /ML, /MT, /LD (Use Run-Time Library)
To find these options in the development environment, click Settings on the Project menu. Then click the C/C++ tab, and click Code Generation in the Category box. See the Use Run-Time Library drop-down box.
These two links below talk about some older versions of visual studio, but the reasoning should still stand.
http://www.davidlenihan.com/2008/01/choosing_the_correct_cc_runtim.html
How do I make a fully statically linked .exe with Visual Studio Express 2005?
Hope that helps.
Just open your terminal execute your_qt_installpath/version/compiler/bin/windeployqt.exe YourApplication.exe. It will automatically copy all the required libs and stuff into the folder, where your exe is located and you can just distribute it.
For Windows you need to include qminimal.dll and qwindows.dll, you will have to put them in folder called platforms.
Even if you program is small you still call huge libraries to do the graphical interface. If the size is really important you should do a console project.
PS : You can check all the libraries you really need by opening your exe with the dependency walker.
I found another workaround without recompiling Qt again!
[ This solution may affect application execution time ]
First we need to use UPX to compress each one of Qt Libraries required by our application, they're often the dll's mentioned in the question. However, avoid compressing them too much because you'll notice that your application takes longer time to run.
[ Optional ]: If your application binary is large, you may find it useful to compress it using UPX.
After compressing all binaries, we want to get a single .exe file, so we can use
Enigma Virtual Box [ http://enigmaprotector.com/en/downloads.html ] to merge all .dll files with the main executable and we'll end up with a single tiny .exe file!
I'll just do it like this for now since I'm not able to recompile Qt with my own configurations on my current machine.
it looks to me that Qt5.2 requires fewer dll.
Qt5Core.dll
Qt5Gui.dll
Qt5Widgets.dll
in windows you also need "qwindows.dll" in folder "platforms".
give it a try.
A possibility for reducing the size of the DLLs is by compressing them with UPX as mentioned by Alaa Alrufaie. Another method is to wrap it into an installer (e.g. Inno Setup). The latter one is particularly useful if you want to distribute it to end users). I had a simple application requiring Qt5Core.dll, Qt5Gui.dll, Qt5Widgets.dll and qwindows.dll (in the folder "platforms") taking about 17 MB. After creating a setup file, it shrank to 5 MB.
Related
Some of our users have been complaining about a libmmd.dll not found error on our plugins loading.
Some background:
I'm talking about an issue occurring on Windows (8, for that matter).
We develop plugins for Digital Audio Workstations (for digital sound
processing purposes).
Our plugin is a DLL coded in VS2012 and compiled with Intel Compiler 2015 via Perl scripts calling icl.exe
from the cmd.
One of its dependencies is an Intel-supplied math
library provided in the 2015 flavor of its redistributables (which we
install together with our plugins) called libmmd.dll.
For a matter of convenience, let's call the plugin DLL plugin.dll (!!!).
I didn't have much time on one of the affected users' machine but from what I saw, reinstalling Intel's redistributables package didn't help, only moving libmmd.dll to the same folder as plugin.dll.
Whatever the reason for this (sudden and unexpected) behavior, we want to be able to deliver software protected against this kind of issues (DLL Hell).
What we want is for plugin.dll to look for libraries first in a specific directory (configurable would be even better), then in its usual search order.
I tried playing with manifests, registry, library names, linker options...
The only things that actually worked were switching the /MD option with /MT (but recompiling with static libs really adds to the size of plugin.dll) and copying the library to the folder plugin.dll is in.
Any ideas ?
Thanks !
The SetDllDirectory function lets you add a folder path to the DLL search order. It will be added in second place, immediately behind the program folder itself.
This only affects DLLs loaded via LoadLibrary however; if your DLLs are loaded statically it won't make any difference.
So I've finished my Qt application, and I need to implement testing using the Squish testing application (first time using). Apparently I require a working exe file, but I can't get the executable to run. I added all the .dll files to the same directory, only to get the error:
Prior to that I was getting errors saying that XXXX.dll is missing, but like I said, I've added them to the directory. I've tried using both debug and release builds of my project with the same results. I've also tried building a stand-alone executable, but that has it's own problems (one thing at a time). The program runs great in Qt Creator and VS2013...just not on its own.
Any solutions to this?
EDIT:
From Dependency Walker...
0x7B is the error code for invalid image format.
You're either trying to run a 64-bit application on a 32-bit system, or linking to a 64-bit library (ie you copied the wrong DLLs).
Or your binaries are just corrupted.
If you run the application standalone (i.e. not from Qt Creator) you also need the Qt library DLLs. which one you need, depends on the components you are using.
Dependency Walker is also a useful tool to find missing DLLs under Windows.
As for me it seems that something is missing. Qt on windows has the script windeployqt, it will provide all needed dependencies. See documentation http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/windows-deployment.html about use of this. On Windows you will be able to run cmd with loaded qt environment variables ( on Windows 7 see under windows applications menu - it will be available if qt is installed ). As Simon stated Dependency Walker is good tool.
I have made an allegro simple game . But when I open the *.exe file on another computer it says that there are many missing .dll files . How can I make my game to run on other computers without Visual Studio and Allegro 5 library installed ?
Longer version of my comment:
When you created your application, it links to certain DLL's that exist on your computer. When you distribute your game, you will either need to ZIP the DLL's along with your .exe or package them using package creators and ship it.
The best way to find which DLL's your exe depends on will be to use a tool like Dependency Walker. You don't need to copy absolutely all DLL's that your EXE depends on. Only the ones that you see are in non-standard paths like ones that are not in C:\Windows\System32. That being said, you might need to copy some from C:\Windows\System32. You will need to find that out on your own.
To package them all as a setup, you can use package creators like InnoSetup or NSIS. Otherwise, create a script that ZIPs it all up for you. AFAIK, there is no easy way to get all DLL's required that are missing from the other persons' system. You'll need to find them out by trial and error. It is a pain, unfortunately.
If you downloaded the pre-built binaries, link against the static, monolithic, mt build of Allegro. You'll need to adjust your compiler settings to match (/MT) and add ALLEGRO_STATICLINK to your list of preprocessor definitions.
If you do that, then you only need to distribute your executable file and your resources (images, sounds, etc).
Note that you should have at least two configurations: Debug & Release. When working on your application, you should use the Debug configuration (linking against the regular debug Allegro library). When distributing your application, you should use the Release configuration.
I have compiled my Qt application and now have the following question - now my built project requires QtCore4.dll and QtGui4.dll to be located at the same folder where the .exe file is. (I built my project using MSVS2008 with Qt addon)
Q:
Is there any way to combine my final application with these .dll files so that they make one large .exe-file? (I simply don't want to have another bunch of dll files with my release - app)
Thank you.
You need to build and link to Qt statically.
Edit: Here's an updated link to at least similar information.
Bundle them into a self-extracting .exe (e.g. using 7zip) which extracts all files to a temporary directory, runs the program, then deletes the files after the program exits.
This will be easier, less time consuming and less legally constraining than statically linking Qt as previously suggested.
Of course you could statically link someway. But the point of using DLL should be to make program smaller (both on disk and in memory, if other apps are using Qt libs of course)... DLL such as those should be systemwide so that other apps needing them can use them. Basically you have to say to people wanting your program to work, to install the Qt framework.
Deploying the other way is explained here, read the part related to Static Linking.
When I run the program from IDE (VS2008) it works perfectly. When I want to launch it from Windows Commander it doesn't work because it needs DLL that wasn't found.
Used both debug and release builds.
Make sure the Qt DLL's are in your PATH. Two simple solutions are:
Copy Qt's DLL's to your EXE's directory.
Copy Qt's DLL's to %WINDOWS%\System32 (e.g. C:\WINDOWS\System32) (possibly unsafe, especially if you install another versions of Qt system-wide. Also, requires administrative privilages).
You should make sure that the DLLs needed by the executable (probably QT Dlls) are in the PATH or in the same directory as the executable. You can find which dlls are needed by using depends.exe
another solution would be to place path to qt bin subdir in VS tools->options->projects and solutions->VC++ directories.
You could link it statically with all the libraries it needs. Saves messing around with DLLs and stuff. On the down side, you can't update DLLs on your installed PCs to get updated/improved/fixed functionality, and will need to rebuild and redeploy.
So whether or not this is viable depends on what your installation targets are - a few PCs controlled by you, or every man+dog who decides to download your program?
Statically compiling in a library bug (security hole for example) and shipping that to your clients would be very poor form. Doing the same on a secure corporate intranet may make it worth doing just so that you know that each install is running exactly the same.