I have a scene that is modified when mouse left button is clicked.
My problem is: this modified scene was supposed to appear with a sound, but the scene waits the sounds to finish before it renders itself.
I'm using this function:
do {
alGetSourcei(source, AL_SOURCE_STATE, &state);
} while (state == AL_PLAYING);
Of course, this function tells the program to wait. But what alternative could I use? if I remove this function, the sound isnt played
I even tried to create a function sound(), that is called after glutPostRedisplay but it still waits the sound complete to render
I think your problem, that the sounds stop, is somewhere else. alGetSourcei is not required to keep the sound playing.
Anyway you can't do that in a while loop because it will block the update of the windows messages and OpenGL and will prevent the scene from redrawing.
To play it you just need to call alSourcePlay, after this you could check each frame if the source is still playing ( if you need to do this for some reason ).
Related
I have an application which renders a 3d object using OpenGL, allowing the user to rotate and zoom and inspect the object. Currently, this is driven directly by received mouse messages (it's a Windows MFC MDI application). When a mouse movement is received, the viewing matrix is updated, and the scene re-rendered into the back buffer, and then SwapBuffers is called. For a spinning view, I start a 20ms timer and render the scene on the timer, with small updates to the viewing matrix each frame. This is OK, but is not perfectly smooth. It sometimes pauses or skips frames, and is not linked to vsync. I would love to make it smoother and smarter with the rendering.
It's not like a game where it needs to be rendered every frame though. There are long periods where the object is not moved, and does not need to be re-rendered.
I have come across GLFW library and the glfwSwapInterval function. Is this a commonly used solution?
Should I create a separate thread for the render loop, rather than being message/timer driven?
Are there other solutions I should investigate?
Are there any good references for how to structure a suitable render loop? I'm OK with all the rendering code - just looking for a better structure around the rendering code.
So, I consider you are using GLFW for creating / operating your window.
If you don't have to update your window on each frame, suggest using glfwWaitEvents() or glfwWaitEventsTimeout(). The first one tells the system to put this process (not window) on sleep state, until any event happens (mouse press / resize event etc.). The second one is similar, but you can specify a timeout for the sleep state. The function will wait till any event happens OR till specified time runs out.
What's for the glfwSwapInterval(), this is probably not the solution you are looking for. This function sets the amount of frames that videocard has to skip (wait) when glfwSwapBuffers() is called.
If you, for example, use glfwSwapInterval(1) (assuming you have valid OpenGL context), this will sync your context to the framerate of your monitor (aka v-sync, but I'm not sure if it is valid to call it so).
If you use glfwSwapInterval(0), this will basicly unset your syncronisation with monitor, and videocard will swap buffers with glfwSwapBuffers() instanly, without waiting.
If you use glfwSwapInterval(2), this will double up the time that glfwSwapBuffers() waits after (or before?) flushing framebuffer to screen. So, if you have, for instance, 60 fps on your display, using glfwSwapInterval(2) will result in 30 fps in your program (assuming you use glfwSwapBuffers() to flush framebuffer).
The glfwSwapInterval(3) will give you 20 fps, glfwSwapInterval(4) - 15 fps and so on.
As for separate render thread, this is good if you want to divide your "thinking" and rendering processes, but it comes with its own advantages, disadvantages and difficulties. Tip: some window events can't be handled "properly" without having separate thread (See this question).
The usual render loop looks like this (as far as I've learned from learnopengl lessons):
// Setup process before...
while(!window_has_to_close) // <-- Run game loop until window is marked "has to
// close". In GLFW this is done using glfwWindowShouldClose()
// https://www.glfw.org/docs/latest/group__window.html#ga24e02fbfefbb81fc45320989f8140ab5
{
// Prepare for handling input events (e. g. callbacks in GLFW)
prepare();
// Handle events (if there are none, this is just skipped)
glfwPollEvents(); // <-- You can also use glfwWaitEvents()
// "Thinknig step" of your program
tick();
// Clear window framebuffer (better also put this in separate func)
glClearColor(0.f, 0.f, 0.f, 1.f);
glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT);
// Render everything
render();
// Swap buffers (you can also put this in separate function)
glfwSwapBuffers(window); // <-- Flush framebuffer to screen
}
// Exiting operations after...
See this ("Ready your engines" part) for additional info. Wish you luck!
Here is a part of SDL2 code
SDL main function
int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
...
...
bool quit=false;
SDL_Event e;
while(!quit) ///First while (say)
{
while(SDL_PollEvent(&e)) ///Second while (say)
{
if(e.type==SDL_QUIT)
{
quit=true;
}
handleEvent(e) ;///Function for executing certain event
}
...
SDL_RenderPresent((SDL_Renderer)renderer);
}
}
My question is,what does this SDL_PollEvent() actually do ,and suppose an event occur does the execution goes out of the second while() and call the SDL_RenderPresent() or it waits for all the events to take poll and then SDL_RenderPresent() is called , i am totally confused ?
The above is a very common single thread event loop:
Basically the application is constantly inside the outer while loop. To get the smoothest user experience we try to keep this loop under 17ms (for a 60 frames a sec rate)
Every 'frame' starts by responding to all the events that are waiting in the queue (the inner while):
while(SDL_PollEvent(&e)) ///Second while (say)
{
if(e.type==SDL_QUIT)
{
quit=true;
}
handleEvent(e) ;///Function for executing certain event
}
Events are notifications from the operating system that something happened. It might be that the window is closing SDL_QUIT or that the mouse was moved.
You must respond to these events for the application to be responsive. Usually the response is to change the state of the application.
For example we might see a left-mouse is down event we might find what is "under" the mouse button and indicate that it is now selected. This is normally just finding the object and calling a function that will change its state. All that changes is the boolean value that indicates the object is now selected.
Maybe moving the mouse needs to change the point of view of the next frame so we will update the vector that stores the direction we are looking at. So we update the vector in memory.
You may have long stretches where the event queue is empty and the application does not have any events to handle. And there might be flurries of activity (for instance the user moving the mouse) where you will get lots of events to respond to.
SDL_PollEvent will not "wait" for events. If there is an event in the queue you will get the information. If there is no event it will return false.
Handling events should be done quickly (remember we have to be finished in 17ms) don't worry it is quite a lot of time on a PC.
Once you are done with all the events and out of the inner loop you are ready to move on to updating the world and rendering.
At this point you will normally do stuff like AI. Calling physics engine. For instance you might iterate over the objects and change their position based on their velocity.
The next step is to actually do the drawing.
SDL_RenderClear(renderer);
...
SDL_RenderPresent((SDL_Renderer)renderer);
The first call will clear the screen. You then go and based on the state of different objects do the rendering. For instance maybe because we changed the object state to selected we will now draw a glowing border around it.
Your final call is for SDL_RenderPresent(renderer) to present the new screen to the user
If you are using Vsync (quite common) then this final call will hide a small wait time to synch the screen update with the graphics card capabilities. This will produce a smoother graphics. Assuming a 60Hz refresh rate (60 frames per second) and assuming you are running under 16.6 ms in your frame rendering logic the app will wait the remaining time.
Now the application is ready to go back to the start of the loop and check if there are any events in SDL_PollEvent. Since the entire loop typically only takes a few milliseconds the application will always feel responsive.
Has anyone figured out how to display smooth video (i.e. a series of bitmaps) in a FireMonkey application, HD or 3D? In VCL you could write to a canvas from a thread and this would work perfectly, but this does not work in FMX. To make things worse, the apparently only reliable way is to use TImage, and that seems to be updated from the main thread (open a menu and video freezes temporarily). All EMB examples I could find all either write to TImage from the main thread, or use Synchronize(). These limitations make FMX unusable for decent video display so I am looking for a hack or possibly bypass of FMX. I use XE5/C++ but welcome any suggestions. Target OS is both Windows 7+ & OS X. Thanks!
How about putting a TPaintbox on your form to hold the video. In the OnPaint method you simply draw the next frame to the paintbox canvas. Now put a TTimer on the form, set the interval to the frame rate required. In the OnTimer event for the timer just write paintbox1.repaint
This should give you regular frames no matter what else the program is doing.
For extra safety, you could increment a frame number in the OnTimer event. Now in the paintbox paint method you know which frame to paint. This means you won't jump frames if something else calls the paint method as well as the timer - you will just end up repainting the same frame for the extra call to OnPaint.
I use this for marching ants selections although I go one step further and use an overlaid canvas so I can draw independently to the selection and the underlying paintbox canvas to remove the need to repaint the main canvas when the selection changes. That requires calls to API but I guess you won't need it unless you are doing videos with a transparent colour.
Further research, including some talks with the Itinerant developer, has unfortunately made it clear that, due to concurrency restrictions, FM has been designed so that all GPU access goes through the main thread and therefore painting will always be limited. As a result I have decided FM is not suitable for my needs and I am re-evaluating my options.
I need to clear any mouse clicks which has happened before the end of an animation.Only mouse clicks afterwards have to be considered.
I tried enabling my mouse function after the animation,but any clicks that happened during the animation was considered.
To my understanding there is a buffer where mouseclicks are stored and during any mouse callback , it takes the co-ordinates and any other info of the first click stored in that buffer.so i need to know how to clear this.
I used fflush(stdin) but it doesnt clear keyboard or the mouse buffer.
Am using windowsxp and programming in visualsudio2008 in c language.i also use glut.h
i also use glut.h
Then you can't. If you're doing an animation, it's up to you to process (or choose not to process) any messages.
You should not be animating something by looping within your display method. Instead, you should set up a timer callback or something that will call glutPostRedisplay that will constantly call your drawing method. During this time, you should ignore any messages if you don't want to process them.
I have a main window which has both a glut UI in the top 10% of the screen, and the openGL world in the bottom 90% of the screen. Every time my cursor starts hovering over the GLUT portion, openGL rendering will freeze. It resumes only when the cursor exits the GLUT area.
This is because as long as the cursor is hovering over the GLUT area, presumably glutIdleFunc is never called because glut is not "idle", so openGL stuff is not rendered.
I already tried making a new unrelated thread that just calls the display code and/or glutPostRedisplay but I got a framerate of whopping 20 fps as opposed to the 100+ fps the normal way. I don't know exactly why. (In this test I also disabled glutIdleFunc so there is no idle func, just the separate thread calling the display)
Ways to get around this (other than "stop using glut" which I might do in the future but for now I would like a temporary solution)?
I know this is an old question, but I was having a similar issue and wanted to share how I solved it.
Basically, in your idle function, you should manually set the window to your normal window ID. Thanks to Joel Davis' HexPlanet code ( https://github.com/joeld42/hexplanet/ ) for demonstrating this:
void glut_Idle( void )
{
// According to the GLUT specification, the current window is
// undefined during an idle callback. So we need to explicitly change
// it if necessary
if ( glutGetWindow() != g_glutMainWin )
{
glutSetWindow(g_glutMainWin);
}
...
}
Create a callback for passive motion func:
void passiveMouseFunc(int,int){
glutPostRedisplay();
}
And register it using:
glutPassiveMotionFunc(passiveMouseFunc);