I am using GDB along with a JTAG device, an Abatron BDI2000, to debug a programs running on a Motorola M68332.
The 68332 does not have any hardware breakpoint registers. It has very primitive debugging features.
The build tools do not generate 'elf' files, so no symbols for GDB to use.
Also the program I'm debugging is running in Flash.
In fact the 68332 has only one debug instruction, ti. ti by itself steps to the next assembly instruction. ti xxx steps until the address xxx is reached. [Yes, this is caveman days, cold hammer and chisel :)]
I am able to use GDB with target remote to connect to the BDI2000 and issue the GDB commands 'nexti'. Due to the limitations of the 68332, 'stepi' is equivalent to 'nexti'.
Single stepping is only command available.
The monitor command 'monitor ti ' states change the program counter to and step.
If one uses a 'monitor' command that changes the registers, then GDB does not know about the command and its register cache become out of sync. I have created GDB functions which have the GDB command 'flushregs' at the end of each of them. This marks the register cache dirty. The GDB command will fetch a new set of registers.
I would like to create a symbol table file for debugging, but have not found any documentation on the GDB symbol file format.
Are there alternatives to what I have setup?
I do have a RAM overlay for the Flash area. Would this allow software breakpoints?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
I found I can use 'convenience' variables as a substitute for symbols, since I'm not using ever symbol in the program all at once.
set $Symbol=(unsigned int*)<address>
Each 'Symbol' is declared a pointer to an unsigned int at an address. One can put these statements in .gdbinit, and add to them over time.
One can then state
break $Symbol
I show a GDB command function that can be passed one of these 'convenience' variables in the question linked below.
How do I write a GDB function to make a comparison to the program counter
Related
I have a freescale mpc565 powerpc, I have a copy of the raw firmware I have read from the device and I have decompiled it within Ida pro.
Is it now possible to debug the assembly using trace32 and a bdm without the original elf file and none of the symbol information?
I would like to step through the assembly and view the ram contents.
I could possibly use the trace32 api to write something that will achieve this however I don't know hurdles I will need to jump due to not having the original source of symbol tables.
Any help much appreciated.
Stepping through the assembly and debugging the assembler code (so setting breakpoints etc) is no problem.
But: without the symbol information/original elf file, you are limited to only assembly. Meaning: If you for example try "Break.Set main" (so set a breakpoint onto the entry of the main function), this will not work, because the debugger does not know what address the "main" function has.
The debugger will report "symbol not found" in this example (because it does not know anything about the "main" function).
Additionally the debugger will not be able to display the source code matching to a bunch of assembler instructions.
I hope this helps.
As we know, during gdb debugging, command 'info reg' can be used to show register
status. But in some cases, if gdb start with x86 binary, which may jumped into a
memory block which contains X64-32 instructions, how can I get R9-R15 in step by
step debugging?
info register
set architecture i386:X64-32
I tried 'set architecture', but it doesn't work. Thanks in advance!
2 years later, I finally found that should set architecture i386:x64-32 BEFORE target program starting to run.
I am using GDB in remote configuration. So I have gdbserver running on a ARM HW running linux, I connect to remote gdbserver from local gdb, I am able to put breakpoints in initial part of code and ensure that basically GDB works. However when I let my SW run for a while and break to see threads, I don't get useful stack traces for threads. All stack frames are hex addressed none resolving to symbols present in my binaries. Most of them also look the same with gdb also hinting with "same stack frames, corrupted stack ??"
Since SW runs fine with or without debugger I don't doubt my SW. Anybody seen this issue or any idea what might be going on here.
Thanks
I am trying to extract the execution sequence of my program (something like a program counter) with gdb on my local computer (windows x86) and gdbserver on a remote target (arm-linux). The idea I had was to insert breakpoints at "important" lines of my source files (i.e.: at the beginning of a specific function, and more in general before and after a conditional statement) with a high ignore count for each breakpoint, and then check if a breakpoint was hit or not. I was actually able to receive the informations with this method, but there is a problem: the application behavior I am debugging depends on real-time, and this specific method slows down the program execution too much. Do you think I could use some other method with gdb? I stumbled upon tracepoints, wich seems the exact thing I am looking for, but I was not able to find some property like a "hit counter" for them. The gdb version I am currently using is 7.5.
Thanks a lot in advance.
If your program execution must not be slowed down, you will probably need some HW tool. See these:
Keil real time trace
Lauterbach PowerDebug
(probably other similar solutions)
I know the answer to this, I'm putting it up here for others to see it
If you use eclipse CDT, you probably understand that eclipse isn't a debugger, it's just an application front-end, specifically to GDB. So when debugging C++ programs, you're actually just using GDB in a more comfortable manner. If you ever have to debug a multithreaded program in eclipse CDT, you'll realize that things quickly get hectic because when you hit a breakpoint, all threads stop, and when one tries to execute a single line in a specific thread, it also runs the other threads. In order for it to work properly, the threads have to be able to be run arbitrarily and exlusively-so that when the programmer executes a single line, it only executes the specific thread.
So, by default, gdb's settings by default leave the "scheduler-locking" turned off. If you debug multithreaded applications you'll understand that this must be on in GDB in order for the desired behavior to be achieved. How does one run this command:
set scheduler-locking on
in GDB within eclipse CDT?
At least one way to do it that certainly solves the problem is knowing how to navigate the immense set of features that eclipse offers. Typically, when a program starts, eclipse CDT switches the console window (if you have it open, typically it's on the bottom) to show the input/output of the program.
But you can change this if you didn't know-see this image. That button on the second to last right-the blue one that looks like a monitor-you can select the GDB input console. It was discussed also in this thread.
From there merely type the command.
SOLVED, BUT NEED A BETTER SOLUTION
But now that this has been solved, to solve it in a better way as a matter of convience; having to type set scheduler-locking on every time a program starts is silly. But the problem with loading a gdbinit file is that the gdbinit file gets sourced before eclipse has set the program for gdb to solve. This is a problem, as it causes the debugger view to hang within eclipse, as gdb complains. To understand what is happening, try and fire up gdb, then give the command without loading a binary to execute. It fails-so how does one set this as an option that is sticky?
Maybe if you add the following gdb script which could set the variable when the program stops and turns it off if you continue:
define hook-step
set scheduler-locking on
end
define hookpost-step
set scheduler-locking off
end
define hook-run
set scheduler-locking off
end
define hook-continue
set scheduler-locking off
end
My answer is derived from the one by #user1448557 . Unfortunately, I don't currently have enough reputation to comment on it (or to upvote it by the way). The strategy seems great, but the answer might be a bit outdated because it doesn't involve "set scheduler-locking step". I have put the following in my gdb initialization file (within my Eclipse project) and it does what I want.
#inspired from [link to this thread][1]
define hookpost-run
set scheduler-locking step
end
With regards to the comment by #rbaleksandar, Eclipse CDT launch configurations allow one to specify a "GDB Command File" and the default is usually .gdbinit