In mutt, I'd like to keep track of important messages which I need to answer, pretty much like I did in GMail before. The problem is that I tend to forget that I have such important messages, and so, never run the macro which makes flagged messages appear (in case they are too old to appear in the index). So, I'd like that the flagged messages always appear in the main index, no matter how old they are. This setting, along with the fact that the flagged messages appear in a different color (they already do), should be enough to prevent me to forgetting answering old - but important - messages. Is that possible ?
Thanks in advance!
The ordering of messages cannot be changed arbitrarily outside the scope of sort and sort_aux. However, you can limit the messages in your index to specific kinds of mail and bind everything neatly to macros, like so:
macro index .i "<limit>(~N|~F)<Enter>" "view new/flag"
macro index .a "<limit>~A<Enter>" "view all"
The first macro .i will limit messages in the index to only flagged (starred) and new ones, whereas the latter .a will remove any limit and show all messages, again.
You can automatically apply one of these views when entering a mail folder by utilizing a folder-hook.
folder-hook */INBOX push .i
Just alter the regular expression following the hook to whatever folder(s) you want to apply the macro to. Simply press .a at any point in the index to show all messages, again.
For further details consult the manpage, as it is fairly comprehensive.
That's a great hint and it works, I only had to change folder-hook to point to /var/mail/username (Linux INBOX).
I only wonder if the "push" (or maybe even the macro itself) could be made conditional, that is to work only if there are any new/flagged messages. As it is now, if there are no such messages, one gets empty list and has to manually execute ".a" macro.
Related
In QT I have an item named tr("&Output") (where the & indicates a short-cut).
Now I want to use the same text without the shortcut - i.e. just "Output" translated to what-ever language, and I could not find this in the documentation.
Added: The reason for doing this is to tell the user to select a menu entry in this case "Output". So if the translation gets out of sync we might have a menu entry "Ausgabe" and telling the user to press "Ausgang", which isn't good. It could be that there is a completely different way of resolving this.
Obviously I can do tr("Output") - but that creates the need for additional translation, and the risk that they are inconsistent.
I can also do tr("&Output").replace("&", "") - but it seems like a hack. (And would need additional code to handle actual "&" in the text.)
I assume Qt has some internal mechanism for this, but is there a standardized way of accessing it?
We started noticing we have two SignInMessages with the exact same id when authenticating using IdentityServer 3. Checking the code, I believe this happens because one gets created on method "CreateSignInRequest" when authenticating, and also here after identityServer3 calls "AuthenticateLocalAsync", if "IsPartialSignIn" is set to false, like in our case, then this line is executed "signInMessageCookie.Clear(signInMessageId);". This clear method, actually does a Cookie.Append, this is (I believe) why we have two SignInCookies.
Has anyone seeing something like this? If so, were you able to figure out how to make it 1. It's not a big deal, but would prefer to keep the headers smaller.
I have a form here with a nested table - where each table can dynamically grow, i.e., the inner table (w/ Transit No and Account No) and the outer table (Accounts by ID No). Here is an example:
(Behind the buttons:
Add - $.parent.tbl.Row.instanceManager.addInstance();
Remove - $.parent.instanceManager.removeInstance(this.parent.index); (In
production I make sure there is at least one row to remove...)
In the definition for each table I do not have checked 'Repeat Table for Each Data Item'. This works great. However I did try with that checked and the outcome was the same.
Now, when I email the form and open the attachment, this is what I see:
You can see that the second table didn't make it, and apparently a row was added to the inner table in the first, without any data.
Any ideas on what's going wrong here? And what I can do about it?
Unfortunately I'm not sure what's wrong with your form but I have made a similar form that works - so I can show you how I did it and list a few things that I can think of that can cause problems.
This is what my form looks like and when I e-mail it, it comes out exactly the way it is:
(It has repeatable parent- and childsubforms like yours)
I did it entirely with JS though, no FormCalc and Dollar $igns :D
When a button is pressed I call a function from a Scriptobject.
These are the main parts of my script inside my functions:
Adding a Subform:
var oNewInstance = subform.instanceManager.addInstance(1);
Deleting a Subform:
if (subform.instanceManager.count > subform.instanceManager.occur.min)
{
subform.instanceManager.removeInstance(subform.index);
}
And these are my subforms' properties (in German, but you can figure it out :P):
Your problem might also have completely other reasons though, make sure you don't have any changes in an initialize,docReady, preSubmit and similar actions that occur between sending and opening the sent PDF.
Also before sending it as an e-mail you have to save it in Acrobat as a Reader Extended PDF:
Besides that I've noticed that sometimes problems can occur due to the target version (Selectable in LCD under File > Form Properties > Defaults).
It helped me sometimes to set it to the newest one.
I'm looking for a way how to deal with a following problem:
Imagine you modify a resource and that subsequently causes update of other resources.
E.g. you issue a PUT to, say /api/orders/1234, which by definition changes state of all other Orders of given user. There may be UI clients that display the table of Orders and they should know that not only single item in the table was updated, but eventually other as well.
Now, is there any standard way how inform a clients about such a situation?
So far I can only think of sending back the 205 Reset Content HTTP status code to inform the client that he should refresh the state, as not just a single thing was changed.
There are multiple solutions.
You can define specific resources as non-cacheable, so the client does not cache them at all. (no-store)
You can try giving a max-age of 0, so the client will have to re-validate those resources always. In this case you might have to implement ETags and conditional GETs, but it will be easier on the server than option 1.
Some push method like WebSockets.
If you really want to "notify" potentially multiple clients of a change, then it sounds like you would need option 3.
However, correctly configured caching is normally good enough. For example you could mark not-yet-executed orders as not cached (max-age=0), but as soon as it is executed, you might mark it to be cached indefinitely, since it can not change anymore.
I'm trying to figure out how to disable storing sent messages in Mutt.
Is there a record value in .muttrc that would make it happen?
Just to make it a litte more clear:
in /home/user/.muttrc:
set copy=no
There's the copy option to control if copies of messages you sent are saved. It's a quadoption, so can be set to no (which would accomplish what you want), yes to save messages automatically, as well as ask-yes or ask-no to have it ask on each message with you being able to choose the default.
I managed to do this with:
set record = "/dev/null"
From what I read there a lot of options for granular control. record being one of them. When copy is set to no all storage of mail copies is disabled. Whereas the record variable can be overridden by the $force_name and $save_name variables, and the "fcc-hook" command. see the manual
Technically I am misusing it in my example since it only specifies a save path. But it does give you more control by being able to override it with other variables.
However you did ask for a specific record value that would do the job ;-)