This is my program in C++, which accepts an 2D array a[m][n]. If an element a[i][j] is zero, then set all the ith row and jth column elements to zero.
This is code sample:
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <ctime>
using namespace std;
class SetZero{
public:
static void setZero(int **, int , int);
};
void SetZero::setZero(int ** a, int m, int n){
int i, j, k;
int ** b = new int *[m]; //flags to identify whether set to zero or not.
for(i = 0; i < m; i++){
b[i] = new int[n];
for(j = 0; j < n; j++)
b[i][j] = 1;
}
for(i = 0; i < m; i++)
for(j = 0; j < n; j++)
if(a[i][j] == 0 && b[i][j]){//DUMP here. If I change it to (a+i)[j], then works.
for (k = 0; k < n; k++){
a[i][k] = 0;//but there is NO dump here. Weird!
b[i][k] = 0;
}
for(k = 0; k < m; k++){
a[k][j] = 0;
b[k][j] = 0;
}
j = n;//break. next row loop.
}
for(int i = 0; i < m; i++)
delete[] b[i];
delete[] b;
}
int main(){
int a[4][5];
srand(time(NULL));
for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++){//create an 2D array
for(int j = 0; j < 5; j++){
a[i][j] = rand() % 100;
cout << a[i][j] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}
SetZero::setZero((int **)a, 4, 5);//type cast.
cout << endl;
for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++){//print result
for(int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
cout << a[i][j] << " ";
cout << endl;
}
return 0;
}
Environment: WIN8 Visual Studio 2012.
Edit:
The program can compile but cannot execute normally. It will stop when it reaches if(a[i][j] == 0 && b[i][j]){
The error message is:
Unhandled exception at 0x012875DD in CCLC.exe: 0xC0000005: Access
violation reading location 0x0000004B.
SetZero::setZero((int **)a, 4, 5)
a is not an array of pointers, it is simply a 2 dimensional array.
notice how the access violation is reading address 0x0000004B? that's 75, a number between 0 and 99 :) because you are treating a 2 dimensional array (which is just a one dimensional array with a neat way of accessing it) as an array of arrays, it is taking one of the values in your array (75) to be the address of a sub array, then trying to read the non existent array at address 75 (or 0x0000004B)
I suggest that you 'flatten' your arrays and work with them as one dimensional arrays, which I find simpler:
void SetZero::setZero(int * a, int m, int n){
int i, j, k;
int * b = new int [m*n]; //flags to identify whether set to zero or not.
for(i = 0; i < m; i++){
b[i] = new int[n];
for(j = 0; j < n; j++)
b[i*n+j] = 1;
}
for(i = 0; i < m; i++)
for(j = 0; j < n; j++)
if(a[i*n+j] == 0 && b[i*n+j]){//DUMP here. If I change it to (a+i)[j], then works.
for (k = 0; k < n; k++){
a[i*n+k] = 0;//but there is NO dump here. Weird!
b[i*n+k] = 0;
}
for(k = 0; k < m; k++){
a[k*n+j] = 0;
b[k*n+j] = 0;
}
j = n;//break. next row loop.
}
delete[] b;
}
int main(){
int a[4*5];
srand(time(NULL));
for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++){//create an 2D array
for(int j = 0; j < 5; j++){
a[i*5+j] = rand() % 100;
cout << a[i*5+j] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}
SetZero::setZero(a, 4, 5);//type cast.
cout << endl;
for(int i = 0; i < 4; i++){//print result
for(int j = 0; j < 5; j++)
cout << a[i*5+j] << " ";
cout << endl;
}
return 0;
}
One suggestion about the SetZero(). There is a function called memset() which allows you to set all bytes to a specific value given a starting pointer and the range. This function could make your SetZero() function more cleaner:
void * memset ( void * ptr, int value, size_t num );
Fill block of memory. Sets the first num bytes of the block of memory pointed by ptr to the specified value (interpreted as an unsigned char).
Parameters
ptr: Pointer to the block of memory to fill.
value: Value to be set. The value is passed as an int, but the function fills the block of memory using the unsigned char conversion of this value.
num: Number of bytes to be set to the value, size_t is an unsigned integral type.
For example, the following code block from your program:
for (k = 0; k < n; k++){
a[i][k] = 0;//but there is NO dump here. Weird!
b[i][k] = 0;
}
can be achieved by memset in a cleaner way:
memset(a[i], 0, n * sizeof(int));
memset(b[i], 0, n * sizeof(int));
Related
I want to know the column with the maximum negative matrix element and the column with the minimum element so that I can rearrange them. More specifically, I'm interested in return values of The column with the maximum negative element: and The column with the minimum element: But about half the time, the results about which columns they are return completely wrong. The interesting thing is that the results don't always come back wrong. What am I doing wrong?
#include <iostream>
#include <time.h>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int main(void) {
// random number for rand()
srand(time(0));
int m = 5; // row count
int n = 5; // column count
// declaration of a dynamic array of pointers
double **arr = (double**) malloc(n * sizeof(double));
// filling the array with pointers
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
arr[i] = (double*) malloc(m * sizeof(double));
// array initialization with random numbers
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < m; j++)
arr[i][j] = (double) (rand() % 400 - 199) / 2.0; // (-100.0; 100.0)
// matrix output
cout << "\n\033[92mOriginal array:\033[94m" << endl;
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
printf("%5.1f ", arr[i][j]);
cout << endl;
}
// array for the sums of modules of the row elements
float *sumOfAbsolutes = (float*) malloc(m * sizeof(float));
// Initializing the array with zeros
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) sumOfAbsolutes[i] = 0;
// filling the array with the sums of element modules
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
sumOfAbsolutes[i] += abs(arr[i][j]);
// output
cout << "\n\033[92mSums of modules of array row elements:" << endl;
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
cout << "\033[92m" << i << ": \033[94m"<< sumOfAbsolutes[i] << " ";
cout << "\n\n";
// sorting
for (int i = 0; i < (m - 1); i++)
for (int j = i; j < m; j++)
if (sumOfAbsolutes[i] > sumOfAbsolutes[j]) {
double tmp = sumOfAbsolutes[i];
sumOfAbsolutes[i] = sumOfAbsolutes[j];
sumOfAbsolutes[j] = tmp;
double *tmp2 = arr[i];
arr[i] = arr[j];
arr[j] = tmp2;
}
// matrix output
cout << "\033[92mSorted array:\033[94m" << endl;
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
printf("%5.1f ", arr[i][j]);
cout << endl;
}
int columnWithMaxNegNum = 0; // the column with the maximal negative element
int minNumber = 0; // the column with the minimum element
// search for the maximal negative element
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
if (arr[i][j] < 0 && arr[i][j] > arr[i][columnWithMaxNegNum])
columnWithMaxNegNum = j;
// minimum element search
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
if (arr[i][j] < arr[i][minNumber]) minNumber = j;
cout << "\n\033[92mThe column with the maximum negative element: \033[94m" << columnWithMaxNegNum << endl;
cout << "\033[92mThe column with the minimum element: \033[94m" << minNumber << endl;
// rearrangement of columns
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) {
double temp = arr[i][columnWithMaxNegNum];
arr[i][columnWithMaxNegNum] = arr[i][minNumber];
arr[i][minNumber] = temp;
}
cout << "\n\033[92mRearrangement of columns:" << endl;
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
printf("\033[94m%5.1f ", arr[i][j]);
cout << "\n\033[0m";
}
// memory cleanup
free(sumOfAbsolutes);
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
free(arr[i]);
free(arr);
}
I assume that this is some kind of homework, since normally, we'd use vectors and algorithms to write much shorter code.
The following loop doesn't find the maximal negative:
// search for the maximal negative element
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
if (arr[i][j] < 0 && arr[i][j] > arr[i][columnWithMaxNegNum])
columnWithMaxNegNum = j;
Because the the search is dependent of the line. You'd need to go for:
double maxNegNum = -100.0; // tbd
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
if (arr[i][j] < 0 && arr[i][j] > maxNegNum) {
columnWithMaxNegNum = j;
maxNegNum = arr[i][j];
}
The same applies for the minimum :
double minN=100.0;
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++)
if (arr[i][j] < minN) {
minNumber = j;
minN = arr[i][j];
}
Not related: if you go for C++ forget malloc and free, and use new/delete and new[]/delete[] instead. Here a first attempt: Online demo
Caution/Limitations:
If by no negative number are found, the maximum negative value would be inaccurate.
If several equal maximum negative values and minimum values are found, only the first one( from left to right and to bottom) will be considered.
The problem with my code is that it is not identifying my function, I am not sure if the function is incorrect or written with the wrong syntax. What I have tried is to create a new array for the location of the largest index but it doesn't seem to work.
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;
void locateLargest(const double a[][4], int location[]);
const int ROW_SIZE = 3;
const int COLUMN_SIZE = 4;
int main(){
int location [ROW_SIZE][COLUMN_SIZE];
double matrix [ROW_SIZE][COLUMN_SIZE];
double input;
cout<<"Enter the array: "<< endl;
for (int i = 0; i < ROW_SIZE; i++){
for(int j = 0; j < COLUMN_SIZE; j++){
cin>>input;
matrix[i][j] = input;
}
}
for(int i = 0; i < ROW_SIZE; i++){
for(int j = 0; j < COLUMN_SIZE; j++){
cout<< setw(4)<<matrix[i][j]<< " ";
}
cout<< endl;
}
locateLargest(matrix, location)
}
You can keep track of the max value's indices while iterating through the matrix.
void max_idx(const double (&arr)[RS][CS]) {
double curr_max = arr[0][0];
size_t max_i = 0, max_j = 0;
for (size_t i = 0; i < RS; ++i) {
for (size_t j = 0; j < CS; ++j) {
if (curr_max < arr[i][j]) {
curr_max = arr[i][j];
max_i = i;
max_j = j;
}
}
}
cout << "Largest value is at (i=" << max_i << ", j=" << max_j << ")\n";
}
Demo
First of all, you have to make sure that your code is consistent : in the prototype of your locateLargest function, location is a one-dimensional array but in your main() function it is a two-dimensional one.
This is how I would write this :
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace std;
void locateLargest(double** a, int* location);
const int ROW_SIZE = 3;
const int COLUMN_SIZE = 4;
int main()
{
int location [2];
double* matrix [ROW_SIZE];
for(int s= 0; s< ROW_SIZE; s++)
{
matrix[s]= new double[COLUMN_SIZE];
}
double input;
cout<<"Enter the array: "<< endl;
for (int i = 0; i < ROW_SIZE; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < COLUMN_SIZE; j++)
{
cin>>input;
matrix[i][j] = input;
}
}
for(int i = 0; i < ROW_SIZE; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < COLUMN_SIZE; j++)
{
cout<< setw(4)<<matrix[i][j]<< " ";
}
cout<< endl;
}
locateLargest(matrix, location);
}
void locateLargest(double** a, int* location)
{
int i, j;
double maxVal= a[0][0]; location[0]= location[1]= 0;
for(i = 0;i < ROW_SIZE; i++)
{
for(j = 0; j < COLUMN_SIZE; j++)
{
if(maxVal < a[i][j])
{
location[0] = i;
location[1]= j;
maxVal= a[i][j];
}
}
}
cout << "The location of the largest element is at ("<< location[0] << " , "<<
location[1] <<" ) . it is : "<< maxVal<<endl;
}
max represents the maximum value of your matrix's elements, you first set it to be equal to the first element and then compare it to each element of the matrix. Each time you find an element that is larger than max, you assign his value to max and his position to location and at the end of the iterations, you have the largest value and his location.
Below is my c++ code. I am trying to implement a selection sort using pointers (start and end). The code compiles, but I am getting a segmentation fault before it will sort the random generated list (currently only prints the random numbers).
Any help as to why this is and how to fix it would be greatly appreciated.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void selectionSort(int *start, int *stop) {
for (int i = *start; i < *stop - 1; ++i) {
int min = i;
for (int j = i + 1; j < *stop; ++j) {
if ((&start[0])[j] < (&start[0])[min])
min = j;
}
swap((&start[0])[i], (&start[0])[min]);
}
}
int main()
{
int size = 10;
int* data = new int[size];
for (int i = 0; i < size; ++i)
{
data[i] = rand() % size;
}
for (int k = 0; k < size; k++)
{
cout << data[k] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
selectionSort(data, data+size);
for (int j = 0; j < size; j++)
{
cout << data[j+1] << " ";
}
return 0;
}
The general logic in your function is in the right direction. However, you seem to be confused between values of the elements of the array and the indexing used to access the elements of the array.
The line
for (int i = *start; i < *stop - 1; ++i)
shows the first signs of the confusion.
You are initializing i with the value of the first element of the array and incrementing the value in the subsequent iterations of the loop. That is not correct. Incrementing the value of the first element of the array does not make logical sense.
*stop causes undefined behavior since stop points to a place one past the last valid element.
You need to use int* i, int* j, and int* min to properly sort the elements. That also means updating almost the entire function accordingly. Here's an updated function that works for me.
void selectionSort(int *start, int *stop) {
for (int* i = start; i < (stop - 1); ++i) {
int* min = i;
for (int* j = i + 1; j < stop; ++j) {
if (*j < *min)
{
min = j;
}
}
swap(*i, *min);
}
}
Also, the following lines in main are not correct. You end up accessing the array using an out of bounds index.
for (int j = 0; j < size; j++)
{
cout << data[j+1] << " ";
}
Replace them by
for (int k = 0; k < size; k++)
{
cout << data[k] << " ";
}
I am trying to write a function in C++ that multiplies two matrices A, B which have been dynamically allocated. I am currently trying to get the multiplication code working, then I will attempt to turn it into a function. Right now I am getting an error of sorts; "segmentation fault (core dumped)". I have narrowed it down to the multiplication part of my code but I have no idea what is wrong with it. Can someone help me please? My code is shown below.
#include <iostream>
#include <cassert>
int main()
{
int rowsA = 5; // number of rows
int colsA= 3; // number of coloumns
// dynamically allocating A
double** A;
A = new double* [rowsA];
A[0] = new double [rowsA*colsA];
for (int i = 1; i < rowsA; i++)
{
A[i] = A[i-1] + colsA;
}
// Storing elements of matrix A
for(int i = 0; i < rowsA; ++i)
{
for(int j = 0; j < colsA; ++j)
{
std::cout << "Enter element A" << i + 1 << j + 1 << " : ";
std::cin >> A[i][j];
}
}
int rowsB = 3; // number of rows
int colsB = 5; // number of coloumns
// dynamically allocating B
double** B;
B = new double* [rowsB];
B[0] = new double [rowsB*colsB];
for (int i = 1; i < rowsB; i++)
{
B[i] = B[i-1] + colsB;
}
// Storing elements of matrix B
for(int i = 0; i < rowsB; ++i)
{
for(int j = 0; j < colsB; ++j)
{
std::cout << "Enter element B" << i + 1 << j + 1 << " : ";
std::cin >> B[i][j];
}
}
// checking matrix multiplication qualification
assert(colsA == rowsB);
// dynamically allocating C
double** C;
C = new double* [rowsA];
C[0] = new double [rowsA*colsB];
for (int i = 1; i < rowsA; i++)
{
C[i] = C[i-1] + colsB;
}
// Initializing elements of matrix C to 0
for(int i = 0; i < rowsA; ++i)
{
for(int j = 0; j < colsB; ++j)
{
C[i][j]=0;
}
}
// multiplication
for(int i = 0; i < rowsA; ++i)
{
for(int j = 0; j < colsB; ++j)
{
for(int k = 0; k < colsB; ++k)
{
C[i][j] += A[i][k] * B[k][j];
}
}
}
// Displaying the multiplication of matrices A, B
std::cout<< "Matrix C: " << std::endl;
for(int i = 0; i < rowsA; ++i)
{
for(int j = 0; j < colsB; ++j)
{
std::cout << " " << C[i][j];
if(j == colsB-1)
{
std::cout << std::endl;
}
}
}
// deallocation
delete[] C[0];
delete[] C;
delete[] B[0];
delete[] B;
delete[] A[0];
delete[] A;
}
First, you say you are allocating the matrix properly but I'm not seeing any proof of that. You are allocating an array of pointers and only initializing the first index.. A[0] for example. This is incorrect. You need to allocate EACH ROW.
You have:
double** A;
A = new double* [rowsA];
A[0] = new double [rowsA*colsA]; //Incorrect. You only allocated A[0].
You need to allocate A[0] through A[rowsA - 1]..
Next, your multiplication loop (the inner most loop) is incorrect. It should be:
Iterate ColsA for that inner loop.
You have:
for(int i = 0; i < rowsA; ++i)
{
for(int j = 0; j < colsB; ++j)
{
for(int k = 0; k < colsB; ++k) //ColsB is incorrect. Should be colsA..
{
C[i][j] += A[i][k] * B[k][j]; //Segfaults here due to bad iteration..
}
}
}
The following would be correct:
#include <iostream>
#include <cassert>
double** create_matrix(int rows, int cols)
{
double** mat = new double* [rows]; //Allocate rows.
for (int i = 0; i < rows; ++i)
{
mat[i] = new double[cols](); //Allocate each row and zero initialize..
}
return mat;
}
void destroy_matrix(double** &mat, int rows)
{
if (mat)
{
for (int i = 0; i < rows; ++i)
{
delete[] mat[i]; //delete each row..
}
delete[] mat; //delete the rows..
mat = nullptr;
}
}
int main()
{
int rowsA = 5; // number of rows
int colsA= 3; // number of coloumns
double** matA = create_matrix(rowsA, colsA);
int rowsB = 3; // number of rows
int colsB = 5; // number of coloumns
double** matB = create_matrix(rowsB, colsB);
//Checking matrix multiplication qualification
assert(colsA == rowsB);
double** matC = create_matrix(rowsA, colsB);
//Multiplication
for(int i = 0; i < rowsA; ++i)
{
for(int j = 0; j < colsB; ++j)
{
for(int k = 0; k < colsA; ++k) //ColsA..
{
matC[i][j] += matA[i][k] * matB[k][j];
}
}
}
//Clean up..
destroy_matrix(matA, rowsA);
destroy_matrix(matB, rowsB);
destroy_matrix(matC, rowsA);
}
I have this function meant to initialize a multidimensional 2d (6x6) array to zero. I call the function in main using cout to test it and it outputs garbage. Please help. Thanks!
int** initializeArray(void)
{
typedef int* rollArray; //this line is actually outside of the function in my
//program
int i, j;
rollArray *m = new rollArray[6];
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
m[i] = new int[6];
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++)
for (j = 0; j < 6; j++)
m[i][j] = 0;
return m;
}
If the value 6 is known at compile-time, I would suggest using std::array in a nested fashion. For example:
#include <array>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::array<std::array<int,6>,6> a = {0};
for (int i = 0; i < 6; ++i)
{
for (int j = 0; j < 6; ++j)
{
std::cout << a[i][j] << std::endl; // Prints 0.
}
}
return 0;
}
In fact, you won't even need to create a function to initialize your array. Declare your nested array and you are good to go. (If you don't know the dimension at compile-time, you could use std::vector in a similar fashion.)
The problem is with your test.
How can you mess up such a simple test? Just use:
int ** a = initializeArray();
int i,j;
for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 6; j++) {
cout << a[i][j] << " ";
}
cout << endl;
}