I am not sure how to implement this, but here is the description:
Take a number as input in between the range 0-10 (0 always returning false, 10 always returning true)
Take the argument which was received as input, and pass into a function, determining at runtime whether the boolean value required will be true or false
Say for example:
Input number 7 -> (7 has a 70% chance of generating a true boolean value) -> pass into function, get the boolean value generated from the function.
This function will be run multiple times - perhaps over 1000 times.
Thanks for the help, I appreciate it.
bool func(int v) {
float f = rand()*1.0f/RAND_MAX;
float vv= v / 10.0f;
return f < vv;
}
I would say generate a random number representing a percentage (say 1 to 100) then if the random number is less then or equal to the percentage chance mark it as true, else mark it as false.
This is an interesting question! Here's what I think you should do, in pseudo code:
boolean[] booleans = new boolean[10]; //boolean array of length 10
function generateBooleans(){
loop from i = 0 to 10:
int r = random(10); //random number between 0 and 9, inclusive
if(r < i){
booleans[i] = true;
}
}
}
You can then compare the user's input to your boolean array to get the pre-determined boolean value:
boolean isTrue = booleans[userInputNumber]
Here's an idea , I'm not sure that's it's gonna be helpful;
bool randomChoice(int number){
int result =rand() % 10;
return number>=result;
}
Hope it's helpful
Related
I am currently trying to solve a problem set on codeforce where I need to check if an positive integer number has unique digits. My solutions includes a while loop and two for loops, which is quite a lot of for such an easy task.
I found a more elegant solution but I don't fully understand how the code works. I have commented it with my remarks. Could someone explain to me the second 2) and fifth 5) part?
int unique(long long int number){
/* 1) create array/list with 10 elements, the first element seen[0]
* is equal to zero */
char seen[10] = {0};
/* 2) what is the meaning of while(some random integer number)? I thought
* that the argument must be a statement that is either true or false. */
while (number) {
int digit = number % 10; // 3) get the last digit of the number
number /= 10; // 4) removes last digit of the number
/* 5) Could someone explain to me what seen[digit]++ does. And when its
* true or false? */
if (seen[digit]++)
return 0; /* not unique */
}
return 1; /* unique */
}
Of course I tried to figure out the fifth part on my own but
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main(){
char seen[10] = {0};
cout << seen[7]++ << endl;
}
print outs nothing.
I'll go by parts:
2 ) The implicit conversion between a numeric type and bool returns false if the number is zero and true otherwise. You could read while(number) like while(number != 0)
5 ) This works the same way: seen[digit]++ is an expression with the same value as seen[digit] but that then increments its value (check how post-increment works). Therefore, the first time that digit is seen, seen[digit]++ has the value 0 (so the first time the condition is not met) and increments its value to 1 (so the second time the condition will be met, making the function return).
while(number) means the cycle will repeat until number is not zero. Non-zero number is equal to true
seen[digit]++ does following:
it return current value of seen[digit]. For the first time it will be zero - as no number met.
after returning current value - it increase value by one. So for the first call it will return 0 and the seen[digit] will become 1.
So for the second call it will return 1 - that mean this number already met, so it is not unique.
Q.1 what is the meaning of while(some random integer number)? I thought that the argument must be a statement that is either true or false.
=> Yes you are right while condition checks for true and false. In case of integer, 0 is treated as false and rest of the integers as true. So, whenever number become 0, while loop will break.
Q.2 Could someone explain to me what seen[digit]++ does. And when its true or false?
=> seen is declared as an array of size 10 and initialized all entries as 0. So initially every entry of array seen is zero i.e. seen[0] = 0, seen[1] = 0, seen[2] = 1... seen[9] = 0. Now when we find digit and perform seen[digit]++ it will increase value by 1 every time.
Ok so:
Every number not equal to 0 is true and equal to 0 is false. For example 1 2 and 3 are true, but 0 is false. So while (number) will iterate as long as number != 0
seen[digit]++ first returns the value, then increments itself by one after returning the value.
The condition if(number) is same as if(number != 0).
Point 2: After we have processed the last digit in the number, the value of number/10 will be 0 (as the last digit belongs to 0-9) and there we end our loop.
Point 5: The increment number will increment the value in the array and return the old value. If the value is incremented to 2, then it means that the digit is not unique and increment operation returns us 1 and the if condition is satisfied.
In C++ 0 evaluates to false and any other number evaluates to true. That "random number" is actually modified inside the loop with number /= 10. Division of integer numbers in C++ is special in the sense that it does not yield fractions so 51/10 = 5 and 5/10 = 0. At some point number equals 0 and the loop ends.
seen[digit]++ is a commonly used trick. You lookup the table seen at position digit return the current value and increment the value by 1. So if you would modify your example code like this:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main(){
int seen[10] = {0};
cout << seen[7]++ << endl;
cout << seen[7] << endl;
}
Your console output should be:
0
1
There is also ++seen[digit] which would first increment and then return the value so you would get:
1
1
I am really new to C++. I am following a free online course, and one thing I had to do was to create a program which could scramble the characters of a string.
So, I created a function who received the word as parameter and returned the scrambled word. ctime and cstdlib were included and srand(time(0)); declared in the main.
Basically, the function looked like this :
std::string mixingWord(std::string baseWord)
{
std::string mixWord;
int pos(0);
for (int i = baseWord.length; i >= 0; i--)
{
if (i != 0)
{
pos = rand() % i;
mixWord += baseWord[pos];
baseWord.erase(pos,1);
}
else
{
mixWord += baseWord[0];
}
}
return mixWord;
}
And it worked just fine. But the correct solution was
std::string mixingWord(std::string baseWord)
{
std::string mixWord;
int pos(0);
while (baseWord.size() != 0)
{
pos = rand() % baseWord.size();
mixWord += baseWord[pos];
baseWord.erase(pos, 1);
}
return mixWord;
}
And it works fine as well.
My question is :
Why is the solution working ?
From what I understood, this :
rand() % value
gives out a value between 0 and the value given.
SO, since baseWord.size() returns, let's say 5 in the event of a word like HELLO. rand will generate a number between 0 and 5. So it COULD be 5. and baseWord[5] is out of bound, so it should crash once in a while, but I tried it over 9000 times (sorry, dbz reference), and it never crashed.
Am I just unlucky, or am I not understanding something ?
x % y gives the remainder of x / y. The result can never be y, because if it was, then that would mean y could go into x one more time, and the remainder would actually be zero, because y divides x evenly. So to answer your question:
Am I just unlucky, or am I not understanding something ?
You're misunderstanding something. rand() % value gives a result in the range [0,value - 1] (assuming value is positive), not [0, value].
rand() % 100 returns number between 0 and 99. This is 100 NUMBERs but includes 0 and does not include 100.
A good way to think about this is a random number (1000) % 100 = 0. If I mod a random number with the number N then there is no way to get the number N back.
Along those lines
pos = rand() % baseWord.size();
will never return pos = baseWord.size() so in your case there will not be an indexing issue
I guess you just misunderstood the modulo operator. a % b, with a and b any integer, will return values between 0 and b-1 (inclusive).
As for your HELLO example, it will only return values between 0 and 4, therefore will never encounter out of bound error.
Sorry for this newbie question, but I can't find on google what I need to know.
I understand return, but don't understand this... What does it mean this?
return (tail+1)%N == head%N;
Thanks a lot for patience.
It returns true or false, depending on whether the expression is true or not.
It's the same as:
if ( (tail+1)%N == head%N )
return true;
else
return false;
this
(tail+1)%N == head%N
returns a boolean value, either true or false. This statement means that after adding 1 to trail (trail + 1) and the remainder obtained after division with N is equal to remainder of head divided with N. % is used for division with remainder
(%). Modulo is the operation that gives the remainder of a division of two values.
Check this link for c++ operators : http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/operators/
you're returning a boolean value. The value represents whether or not the remainder of (tail+1) divided by N is the same as that of head.
It evaluates the expression, and return the result. In this case it's two modulo operations that are compared, and the result is either true or false which will be returned.
Short Answer:
Because of the == operator your function will return a bool, meaning it can only be trueor false. An equivalent would be something like:
return 5 == 4;
which would return false since 5 is not equal to 4.
Long Answer:
Instead of writing this in a single line you could split it up into more lines of code. Let's just assume that tail, head and N are integer values, then you could write it like this:
int x, y;
x = (tail+1)%N;
y = head%N;
if ( x == y )
{
return true;
}
else
{
return false;
}
Now in this code there may be also that %confuses you a bit. The %is called the Modulus Operator and can give you the remainder of arithmetic operations. In a simple example this would mean:
10 % 3 = 1 because 10/3 is 3 with a remainder of 1. So to make it more clear let's just make another example with your specific problem:
Lets just assume that tail=10,head=6 and N=2. Then you would get something like this:
x = (10+1)%2
x = 11 % 2
x = 1
y = 6 % 2
y = 0
y != x
This would return false cause x and y are not equal. ( If you would run your code with the given example values )
To learn more about Modulus you can look here, or just on any other basic C++ Tutorial.
it returns true if remainder of the division for tail + 1 and head is the same
for example if tail is 2, head is 1 and N is 2
(tail + 1) % N is 1
head % N is 1 too
so whole expression returns true
The following function is claimed to evaluate whether a number is integer power of 4. I do not quite understand how it works?
bool fn(unsigned int x)
{
if ( x == 0 ) return false;
if ( x & (x - 1) ) return false;
return x & 0x55555555;
}
The first condition rules out 0, which is obviously not a power of 4 but would incorrectly pass the following two tests. (EDIT: No, it wouldn't, as pointed out. The first test is redundant.)
The next one is a nice trick: It returns true if and only if the number is a power of 2. A power of two is characterized by having only one bit set. A number with one bit set minus one results in a number with all bits previous to that bit being set (i.e. 0x1000 minus one is 0x0111). AND those two numbers, and you get 0. In any other case (i.e. not power of 2), there will be at least one bit that overlaps.
So at this point, we know it's a power of 2.
x & 0x55555555 returns non-zero (=true) if any even bit it set (bit 0, bit 2, bit 4, bit 6, etc). That means it's power of 4. (i.e. 2 doesn't pass, but 4 passes, 8 doesn't pass, 16 passes, etc).
Every power of 4 must be in the form of 1 followed by an even number of zeros (binary representation): 100...00:
100 = 4
10000 = 16
1000000 = 64
The 1st test ("if") is obvious.
When subtracting 1 from a number of the form XY100...00 you get XY011...11. So, the 2nd test checks whether there is more than one "1" bit in the number (XY in this example).
The last test checks whether this single "1" is in the correct position, i.e, bit #2,4,6 etc. If it is not, the masking (&) will return a nonzero result.
Below solution works for 2,4,16 power of checking.
public static boolean isPowerOf(int a, int b)
{
while(b!=0 && (a^b)!=0)
{
b = b << 1;
}
return (b!=0)?true:false;
}
isPowerOf(4,2) > true
isPowerOf(8,2) > true
isPowerOf(8,3) > false
isPowerOf(16,4) > true
var isPowerOfFour = function (n) {
let x = Math.log(n) / Math.log(4)
if (Number.isInteger(x)) {
return true;
}
else {
return false
}
};
isPowerOfFour(4) ->true
isPowerOfFour(1) ->true
isPowerOfFour(5) ->false
Assume the availability of a function is_prime. Assume a variable n has been associated with a positive integer. Write the statements needed to compute the sum of the first n prime numbers. The sum should be associated with the variable total.
Note: is_prime takes an integer as a parameter and returns True if and only if that integer is prime.
Well, I wrote is_prime function like this:
def is_prime(n):
n = abs(n)
i = 2
while i < n:
if n % i == 0:
return False
i += 1
return True
but it works except for n==0. How can I fix it to make it work for every integer?
I'm trying to find out answers for both how to write function to get the sum of first n prime numbers and how to modify my is_prime function, which should work for all possible input, not only positive numbers.
Your assignment is as follows.
Assume the availability of a function is_prime. Assume a variable n has been associated with a positive integer. Write the statements needed to compute the sum of the first n prime numbers. The sum should be associated with the variable total.
As NVRAM rightly points out in the comments (and nobody else appears to have picked up on), the question states "assume the availability of a function is_prime".
You don't have to write that function. What you do have to do is "write the statements needed to compute the sum of the first n prime numbers".
The pseudocode for that would be something like:
primes_left = n
curr_num = 2
curr_sum = 0
while primes_left > 0:
if is_prime(curr_num):
curr_sum = curr_sum + curr_num
primes_left = primes_left - 1
curr_num = curr_num + 1
print "Sum of first " + n + " primes is " + curr_sum
I think you'll find that, if you just implement that pseudocode in your language of choice, that'll be all you have to do.
If you are looking for an implementation of is_prime to test your assignment with, it doesn't really matter how efficient it is, since you'll only be testing a few small values anyway. You also don't have to worry about numbers less than two, given the constraints of the code that will be using it. Something like this is perfectly acceptable:
def is_prime(num):
if num < 2:
return false
if num == 2:
return true
divisor = 2
while divisor * divisor <= num:
if num % divisor == 0:
return false
divisor = divisor + 1
return true
In your problem statement it says that n is a positive integer. So assert(n>0) and ensure that your program outer-loop will never is_prime() with a negative value nor zero.
Your algorithm - trial division of every successive odd number (the 'odd' would be a major speed-up for you) - works, but is going to be very slow. Look at the prime sieve for inspiration.
Well, what happens when n is 0 or 1?
You have
i = 2
while i < n: #is 2 less than 0 (or 1?)
...
return True
If you want n of 0 or 1 to return False, then doesn't this suggest that you need to modify your conditional (or function itself) to account for these cases?
Why not just hardcode an answer for i = 0 or 1?
n = abs(n)
i = 2
if(n == 0 || n == 1)
return true //Or whatever you feel 0 or 1 should return.
while i < n:
if n % i == 0:
return False
i += 1
return True
And you could further improve the speed of your algorithm by omitting some numbers. This script only checks up to the square root of n as no composite number has factors greater than its square root if a number has one or more factors, one will be encountered before the square root of that number. When testing large numbers, this makes a pretty big difference.
n = abs(n)
i = 2
if(n == 0 || n == 1)
return true //Or whatever you feel 0 or 1 should return.
while i <= sqrt(n):
if n % i == 0:
return False
i += 1
return True
try this:
if(n==0)
return true
else
n = abs(n)
i = 2
while i < n:
if n % i == 0:
return False
i += 1
return True