I would like to put the image (wxStaticBitmap) which is a png file with transparency above the wxGauge. The result I would like to achieve is not rectangular progress bar. Transparency should determine the shape. Unfortunately, when value of wxGauge is changed progress bar is displayed above wxStaticBitmap. Is it possible to keep it deeper, on the 2nd layer below the image?
No, overlapped child controls are not supported by wxWidgets because none of the platforms actually supports this well (or at least used not to, I'm not sure what is the state with the latest versions). If you want to have a non-rectangular progress bar, you need to implement it yourself.
Related
As an example, imagine a complex snap operation, consisting of two active snappings in a context. Here two indicators on the second image show, that we are snapping perpendicularly and that we are snapping to any point of the line. When we drag out from the snapping intersection, we are not snapping to a point anymore, but we are still snapping perpendicularly to the reference line. For such and similar situations I would like to extend the cursor with different indicators, based on the context, like on these images.
Is it possible in MFC? Or otherwise in a Windows application?
Extending the cursor is not supported, you can only load one. So the best approach is to create all the cursors as .CUR files and then load them as needed.
Cursors can be created programmatically in Win32. The CreateCursor() function creates a cursor taking its dimensions, its hot spot and its AND (black) and XOR (invert) masks as parameters. Therefore you can create or load the basic pointer cursor masks and then add the indicators (either draw them using GDI, if they are simple, or load them from resources), creating the additional cursors you may need. I think it's a quite heavy job to do all these on the fly, so it would best to create all possible indicators during initialization.
The CreateCursor() function seems to create only monochrome cursors, maybe the CreateIconIndirect() function can create color cursors. Also take a look into this Win32 documentation topic: Using Cursors.
Of course this is quite an amount of work. You decide if it's worth or not...
Is there some way to change screen "saturation" ? Make screen in warm colors \ or make it in sepia using c++ && qt on win\mac ?
As a reference modern monitors have such a menu option on changing the screen color or you can also check the app for linux f.lux as a reference ...
The first thing that comes on my mind is to create some transparent " window on top " make a screenshot and play around with rgb ... but it will be not the best solution
There's no Qt API that will help you with that. On either platform you'll have to use native APIs to change the screen color reproduction curves and shift the color temperature to warmer tones. The situation on OS X would be more uniform in that the API to do that either exists on all hardware or on none. On Windows, things might be more complicated. Some undocumented vendor APIs probably exist, used by respective vendor control panels to alter the color temperature. There are also all ways you could hook yourself into the screen compositing pipeline, but this may require writing a driver. Unfortunately, I'm not too familiar with how easy it might be. It'll be probably either very simple or very complicated. There are some simple workarounds, like adding a translucent tinted window on top of everything, but those don't look good.
Neither C++ nor Qt facilitate such functionality. It seems for windows it is possible to modify brightness and contrast for the display, but that's about it, no saturation, no colorization.
The "make a screenshot and play around with rgb" will have abysmal performance and a number of other possible complications, such as event handling.
Now, if you want to apply a color filter to your Qt application, Qt has the QGraphicsEffect class, which automatically hooks up with the rendering system, caches the target to an image and applies to desired effect. I am not sure how well will that work for the "transparent window on top" idea.
It only has a few stock effects, but you can easily roll out your own. Then you can use QWidget::setGraphicsEffect(QGraphicsEffect * effect) to apply it to the desired widget or derived.
I am haveing trouble understanding the concept of the UpdateLayaredWindow api, how it works and how to implement it. Say for example I want to override CFrameWnd and draw a custom, alpha blended frame with UpdateLayeredWindow, as I understand it, the only way to draw child controls is to either: Blend them to the frame's Bitmap buffer (Created with CreateCompatibleBitmap) and redraw the whole frame, or create another window that sits ontop of the layered frame and draws child controls regularly (which defeats the whole idea of layered windows, because the window region wouldn't update anyway).
If I use the first method, the whole frame is redrawn - surely this is inpractical for a large application..? Or is it that the frame is constantly updated anyway so modifying the bitmap buffer wouldn't cause extra redrawing.
An example of a window similar to what I would like to achieve is the Skype notification box/incoming call box. A translucent frame/window with child contorls sitting ontop, that you can move around the screen.
In a practical, commercial world, how do I do it? Please don't refer me to the documentation, I know what it says; I need someone to explain practical methods of the infrastructure I should use to implement this.
Thanks.
It is very unclear exactly what aspect of layered windows gives you a problem, I'll just noodle on about how they are implemented and explaining their limitations from that.
Layered windows are implemented by using a hardware feature of the video adapter called "layers". The adapter has the basic ability to combine the pixels from distinct chunks of video memory, mixing them before sending them to the monitor. Obvious examples of that are the mouse cursor, it gets super-imposed on the pixels of the desktop frame buffer so it doesn't take a lot of effort to animate it when you move the mouse. Or the overlay used to display a video, the video stream decoder writes the video pixels directly to a separate frame buffer. Or the shadow cast by the frame of a toplevel window on top of the windows behind it.
The video adapter allows a few simple logical operations on the two pixel values when combining their values. The first one is an obvious one, the mixing operation that lets some of the pixel value overlap the background pixel. That effect provides opacity, you can see the background partially behind the window.
The second one is color-keying, the kind of effect you see used when the weather man on TV stands in front of a weather map. He actually stands in front of a green screen, the camera mixing panel filters out the green and replaces it with the pixels from the weather map. That effect provides pure transparency.
You see this back in the arguments passed to UpdateLayeredWindow(), the function you must call in your code to setup the layered window. The dwFlags argument select the basic operations supported by the video hardware, ULW_ALPHA flag enables the opacity effect, the ULW_COLORKEY flag enables the transparency effect. The transparency effect requires the color key, that's specified with the crKey argument value. The opacity effect is controlled with the pblend argument. This one is built for future expansion, one that hasn't happened yet. The only interesting field in the BLENDFUNCTION struct is SourceConstantAlpha, it controls the amount of opacity.
So a basic effect available for a layered window is opacity, overlapping the background windows and leaving the partially visible. One restriction to that the entire window is partially opaque, including the border and the title bar. That doesn't look good, you typically want to create a borderless window and take on the burden of creating your own window frame. Requires a bunch of code btw.
And a basic effect is transparency, completely hiding parts of a window. You often want to combine the two effects and that requires two layered windows. One that provides the partial opacity, another on top and owned by the bottom one that displays the parts of the window that are opaque, like the controls. Using the color key to make its background transparent and make the the bottom window visible.
Beyond this, another important feature for custom windows is enabled by SetWindowRgn(). It lets you give the window a shape other than a rectangle. Again it is important to omit the border and title bar, they don't work on a shaped window. The programming effort is to combine these features in a tasteful way that isn't too grossly different from the look-and-feel of windows created by other applications and write the code that paints the replacement window parts and still makes the window functional like a regular window. Things like resizing and moving the window for example, you typically do so by custom handling the WM_NCHITTEST message.
I'm drawing some graphics and text with GDI in my CScrollView. I need to implement the zooming functionality. I only need the zoom out functionality, no need to zoom in more than what is normally rendered.
Here are my best ideas:
Use MM_ANISOTROPIC mapping mode with SetWindowExt/SetViewportExt... The problem with this approach is that it does not scale text. Is there any way to force MFC to scale the text as well? Only thing I can think of is to set text font size according to the selected zoom value, but I'm not sure whether this will look well after all...
Draw to memory DC, and use StretchBlt to blit to the client area of appropriate size (set with SetScrollSizes...). This will solve the text scaling issue.
Also it is desirable to have antialiasing effect in the process. I think both methods above should accomplish this per se, but I don't know which will look better. Also I will have to implement printing/print-preview functionality later (using MFC's standard implementation from doc/view architecture), so I need the method to be compatible with that.
Need your advice please. Which way to go and why. Maybe other options exist too?..
You really don't want to mess with the mapping mode when you use MFC -- MFC itself already uses it for (at least) the print preview functionality.
I'd see if SetWorldTransform will work for you. At least with vector/TrueType fonts, it will scale the text along with everything else. Note that before SetWorldTransform will work, you need to call SetGraphicsMode with GM_ADVANCED.
I ended up using the second method I proposed in the question, but used DIBs instead of DDBs (and StretchDIBits() instead of StretchBlt()) because it proved to cause less problems, especially when using big bitmaps, and when printing.
I have a QGraphicsView for a very wide QGraphicsScene. I need to draw the background in drawBackground() and the background is a bit complicated (long loop) although it doesn't need to be repainted constantly. I store it in a static QPixmap (I tried QImage too) inside the function drawBackground() and that pixmap is what I draw onto the painter of the view. Only when needed is the QPixmap painted on again.
If I didn't use a static pixmap, the complicated background would be generated every time I scroll sideways for example. The problem is that apparently there is a maximum width for pixmaps on Windows, on my computer it's 32770. I could store a list of pixmaps and draw them side by side but it would make the code uglier and I also don't know what the maximum width of a pixmap is for every Windows machine. Since this might be a well-known problem I was wondering if anyone has a better solution.
Thanks.
You can probably avoid the windows limit by using unaccelerated raster paint device, but 32770*1024 is 100MiB of pixmap; you probably don't want to do that even if Windows would let you.
You've already thought of the usual answer (tile it in more reasonably-sized chunks and load/generate them on demand). The other piece of the usual solution is to use something like QPixmapCache to keep the recently-used tiles so you don't regenerate them too often (only when the user scrolls a long way).
You didn't say how complex your complex background is, but you might also want to look at the Mandelbrot set example for how to do piecewise rendering of an (infinitely) large background pixmap on-demand, without blocking the UI.
This is the common use case for the tiling pattern. Basically you split the background into small images.
I'm not sure why you think "it would make the code uglier". It is certainly not a one-liner. Depending whether you have fixed size background image or not, the tiling code is usually pretty straightforward.