For the last couple of days i've been learning C++ to make a dll plug-in for a program.
My objective is to get data(the Flight Plan's to be more precise) from the program and on a first phase save them to a text file(second phase will be connect them with python but for now it's just that).
So in my header file i imported a file with many classes and many functions(which is given by the plugin development guide). The class i'm interested in is the class CAircraftFlightPlan and it has some functions inside like this:
bool IsReceived(void) const;
//-----------------------------------------------------------------
// Return :
// true - if any kind of FL is received from the servers
// false - else
//-----------------------------------------------------------------
const char * GetOrigin ( void ) const ;
//-----------------------------------------------------------------
// Return :
// The origin airport.
//-----------------------------------------------------------------
int GetFinalAltitude ( void ) const ;
//-----------------------------------------------------------------
// Return :
// The final requested altitude.
//-----------------------------------------------------------------
I have many doubts about this, hope you can help:
1-what does it mean having "nameoffuction"(void) const? It receives nothing?how do i call these functions then
2-i do not understand this function "const char * GetOrigin ( void ) const ;",what does it want, a const or a char?
3-The comments below the functions tell that they return this or that. But how do they return that if the function is empty, it's just "int GetFinalAltitude(void) const"...
4-In the source file, i try to call one of the functions to write it to a txt file,how can i do this:
int airplane;
ofstream textfile;
textfile.open("FP.txt");
textfile<<int GetTrueAirspeed("MAH545"); //i know there's an error here, how do i solve it?
textfile.close();
I'm very sorry for asking these (noob i suppose) questions but they are way to specific to search for an answer online(i tried already)
Thank you for the help
Yes, it takes no arguments so you call it like so: nameoffunction()
This also takes no arguments so it is called as GetOrigin(). It returns a pointer to a const char.
As above, the functions take no arguments but do return values.
Delete the int in front of the function call. This should get rid of at least one error.
textfile<< GetTrueAirspeed("MAH545");
Related
I'm working on a project in C++, but at some point in the application it fails and generates a core dump. The application uses a couple of classes, which for the purposes here I'm concentrating on one of the classes, which I'm calling A, and is instantiated as object a. This has a large number of member functions, of which at the moment only a few are being used, but one of these generates a log to produce diagnostics to be used for debugging. I want to use this to find out why the application is failing.
The project is to put together code that invokes the various member functions, and although I have access to the source code and some limited documentation, none of the code can be changed, with all changes being in the code that makes use of the classes and invokes the member functions. The member function in question is:
void enable_log (log_callback callback, void * user_data = nullptr)
where the 1st argument callback contains the message and 2nd argument is optional. For now it can be set to nullptr, so would be invoked as:
a.enable_log(callback, nullptr);
From this documentation it's not at all clear what exactly callback is. However, in looking at the source code this is:
using log_callback = void (*)(const std::string& message, void* user_data);
in a header file, where log_callback is an alias for const std::string& if I understand this correctly.
I already have dummy classes on a platform using Visual Studio 2019 with some test member functions to simulate invoking the member functions on a remote Linux server, but I'm unable to find a way of making use of the member function above. I added the test member function to the dummy class as follows:
void enable_log(const std::string& callback, void* user_data = nullptr) {
callback = "ABCD";
}
which is supposed to generate a test string which is returned, such that in the real application this string will have diagnostic information that will be written to a file. However, the "=" is an error.
The idea is that in the main function an empty string will be declared, then enable_log() should populate this string, which can be printed out.
I've spent some time looking at various resources, including Stackoverflow, but I cannot find a way of returning a string with the information that can be printed out. I need a simple way to simulate this, and as I said above, I must not change the source code of the real member function, so the simulated member function has to produce a string in the same way. How is this done? Some advice would be appreciated.
Callback, in simple words, is some function that will be called later at some point. Example:
void callback_fn(int a);
using callback_t = (void)(*)(int a);
void some_func(callback_t);
You can use some_func() like so:
some_func(callback_fn);
Full example here: https://godbolt.org/z/ET3GhfYrv
For your usecase the parameters of the callback are slightly different. Here's how to read the syntax:
using log_callback = // this just creates an alias for whatever is on the right handside
void // the return type of the "callable" should be void
(*) // this tells us that it is a function pointer
(const std::string& message, void* user_data) // These are the arguments the callable takes. It is a "std::string" and a "void *"
To use this, just create a free function with the same signature:
void callable(const std::string &msg, void *userData = nullptr)
{
// msg is the data sent by the function. use it in whatever way
// you want.
std::cout << msg << '\n';
}
// Pass it to the enable_log
enable_log(callable);
Similar questions have been asked before, such as String literal matches bool overload instead of std::string.
But what I want to know is what should C++ developers do to prevent this from happening? As someone who writes C++ libraries for others to consume, what should I do to ensure this doesn't happen? Here is the example I ran into today, where a library had 2 initialize() methods:
void initialize(bool someflag) { /* ... */ }
void initialize(const std::string & name) { /* ... */ }
Now the problematic code was in the application that wanted to utilize this functionality and which called it in a manner similar to this:
initialize("robert");
At first glance you'd think that this would call initialize(string) but it actually calls the first initialize(bool) with a boolean flag set to true!
Yes, I know it can be fixed with this:
initialize( std::string("robert") );
But this puts the onus on the caller.
Edit for #zdan: I didn't consider the "solutions" in the other linked question to be great solutions since 1) I was hoping not to have to add a const char * version of every method that takes a bool or string, and 2) the template solution increases the maintainability of the code significantly for affected methods, renders them almost unreadable.
what should I do to ensure this doesn't happen?
One possibility is to create an overload that accepts a char const* and make it a pass through to the overload that accepts a std::string.
void initialize(char const* name) { initialize(std::string(name)); }
This is a follow up question from here: C++ - Developing own version of std::count_if?
I have the following function:
// vector for storing the file names that contains sound
std::vector<std::string> FilesContainingSound;
void ContainsSound(const std::unique_ptr<Signal>& s)
{
// Open the Wav file
Wav waveFile = Wav("Samples/" + s->filename_);
// Copy the signal that contains the sufficient energy
std::copy_if(waveFile.Signal().begin(), waveFile.Signal().end(),
FilesContainingSound.begin(), [] (const Signal& s) {
// If the energy bin > threshold then store the
// file name inside FilesContaining
}
}
But to me, I only need to capture the string "filename" inside of the lambda expression, because I'll only be working with this. I just need access to the waveFile.Signal() in order to do the analysis.
Anyone have any suggestions?
EDIT:
std::vector<std::string> FilesContainingSound;
std::copy_if(w.Signal().begin(), w.Signal().end(),
FilesContainingSound.begin(), [&] (const std::unique_ptr<Signal>& file) {
// If the energy bin > threshold then store the
// file name inside FilesContaining
});
You seem to be getting different levels of abstraction confused here. If you're going to work with file names, then you basically want something on this order:
std::vector<std::string> input_files;
std::vector<std::string> files_that_contain_sound;
bool file_contains_sound(std::string const &filename) {
Wav waveFile = Wav("Samples/" + filename);
return binned_energy_greater(waveFile, threshold);
}
std::copy_if(input_files.begin(), input_files.end(),
std::back_inserter(files_that_contain_sound),
file_contains_sound);
For the moment I've put the file_contains_sound in a separate function simply to make its type clear -- since you're dealing with file names, it must take a file name as a string, and return a bool indicating whether that file name is one of the group you want in your result set.
In reality, you almost never really want to implement that as an actual function though--you usually want it to be an object of some class that overloads operator() (and a lambda is an easy way to generate a class like that). The type involved must remain the same though: it still needs to take a file name (string) as a parameter, and return a bool to indicate whether that file name is one you want in your result set. Everything dealing with what's inside the file will happen inside of that function (or something it calls).
I have a DLL that I need to handle in C++. I'm using WxWidgets (standard compilation, but I also tried Unicode on/off) and NetBeans. I also tried dealing with this without WxWidgets (windows.h) and had same problems.
Here is how I access the DLL functions using WxWidgets:
// -------------------- POINTERS TO FUNCTIONS
typedef bool(*TYPE_DLL_SetLicense)(char*, char*);
typedef bool(*TYPE_DLL_PingConnection)(char*);
typedef char*(*TYPE_DLL_ERR_DESCRIPTION)(void);
class DLL_Library
{
public:
// pointers to functions inside dll
TYPE_DLL_SetLicense DLL_SetLicense; //initialize - will wor fine as it returns only true/false (buffer only provide data)
TYPE_DLL_PingConnection DLL_PingConnection; //ping to serwer. Will return trahs, becouse it uses buffer to provide data ang get answear back
TYPE_DLL_ERR_DESCRIPTION DLL_ERR_DESCRIPTION; //error description. No buffer, no trouble. Returns correct string.
wxDynamicLibrary dynLib2;
int initialize(void)
{
//patch to dll
wxString path = wxStandardPaths::Get().GetExecutablePath().BeforeLast('\\') + _("\\DLL_dll\\DLLMOK.dll");
if(!wxFile::Exists(path)) return -1;
//load dll
if(!dynLib2.Load(path)) return -2;
//Assign functions in dll to variable
DLL_SetLicense=(TYPE_DLL_SetLicense) dynLib2.GetSymbol(wxT("DLL_SetLicense"));
DLL_PingConnection=(TYPE_DLL_PingConnection) dynLib2.GetSymbol(wxT("DLL_PingConnection"));
DLL_ERR_DESCRIPTION=(TYPE_DLL_ERR_DESCRIPTION) dynLib2.GetSymbol(wxT("DLL_ERROR_DESCRIPTION"));
return 0;
}
};
And here is the function I run. It should return and XML content, that I try to save to the file.
//DLL_PingConnection
//result ping to be save in file
wxFile file_ping_xml;
plik_ping_xml.Open(wxT("C:\\dll\\ping.xml"),wxFile::write);
char buffor_ping_xml[2000];
//I run the function here
bool is_ping = DLL_PingConnection(buffor_ping_xml);
if(is_ping)
{
tex_box->AppendText(wxT("DLL_PingConnection True\n"));
//we save result to file
bool is_write_ping_ok = file_ping_xml.Write(buffor_ping_xml,2000);
if (is_write_ping_ok){tex_box->AppendText(wxT("Save to file is ok ok\n"));}
else {tex_box->AppendText(wxT("Save to file failed :( \n"));}
}
else
{
tex_box->AppendText(wxT("DLL_PingConnection False\n"));
}
std::cout << "Error description: " << DLL_ERR_DESCRIPTION() << "\n"; //will work fine both in saving to file, and in streaming to screen.
The problem is that inside the file instead of good content I get rubbish like this:
NOTE that this only happens in functions that use buffers like:
char buffer[2000] //buffer will contain for example file xml
function do_sth_with_xml(buffer) //buffer containing xml will (should) be overwriten with xml results of the function - in our case DLL_PingCONNECTION should save in buffer xml with connection data
Documentation say that the DLL operates on Windows-1250. File ping.xml I have set to windows ANSI, but I don't think problem lies here.
EDIT: I have written problem without WxWidgets (I load DLL using windows.h) - same problems. Here is the code: Getting trash data in char* while using it as buffer in function . Please help :(
This
DLL_PingConnection=(TYPE_DLL_PingConnection)
shouldn't it be
DLL_PingConnection=(TYPE_DLL_PingConnection) dynLib2.GetSymbol(wxT("DLL_PingConnection"));
?
seems otherwise you will not get a valid pointer to the function in the DLL.
as a general rule you should check return values, especially from a DLL
you load dynamically since it happens that you sometimes get another version
of the DLL which may have a function with same name but other signature or
where is missing entirely.
You named a function
DLL_PingConnection=(TYPE_DLL_PingConnection) dynLib2.GetSymbol(....
and call it with
OSOZ.OSOZ_PingConnection(buffor_ping_xml);
you typedef a function
typedef bool(*TYPE_DLL_PingConnection)(char*);
you create a variable
char buffor_ping_xml[2000];
in your typedef it is char* and your buffor_ping_xml is char
how can that work ?
try
char *buffor_ping_xml = new char[2000];
/* or */
wchar_t *buffor_ping_xml = new wchar_t[2000];
/* or */
wxChar *buffor_ping_xml = new wxchar[2000];
bool is_ping = DLL_PingConnection(buffor_ping_xml);
wxString mystring = wxString::FromUTF8(buffor_ping_xml);
write mystring to file.
To Do:
look in your wxwidgets\libs folder for your libs
are there libwxmsw29ud_* with a 'u' in the name (after version number here 29)?
If not You can not use unicode
If yes next steps
for all different test char *, wchar_t *, wxChar * give the files different name.
for example file_ping_xml.Open(wxT("C:\dll\ping_w_t_FromUTF8.xml"), ...
for wchar_t * in combination with
wxString mystring = wxString::FromUTF8(buffor_ping_xml);
also in combination with
wxString mystring(buffor_ping_xml);
Then check out the look like, of the files in a browser .
To test you can go to your wxWidgets sample folder . Compile in the folder C:\wxWidgets\samples\docview\docview.cpp . Open with docview.exe a unicode file . How does it look.
Unicode download file
Unicode-related compilation settings
You should define wxUSE_UNICODE to 1 to compile your program in Unicode mode. This currently works for wxMSW, wxGTK, wxMac and wxX11. If you compile your program in ANSI mode you can still define wxUSE_WCHAR_T to get some limited support for wchar_t type.
Here is answear: Getting trash data in char* while using it as buffer in function.
Thanks everyone - expecially for patience.
I need help making an c++ program with a function that uses int Disc(int A, int B, int C) and calculates returns B*B-4*A*C and use the function Disc in the program..... i have this so far.
void main(){
cout << Disc(a,b,c);
}
What does the book you are using say about functions?
Assuming you can't get a book, take a look that this tutorial on functions (See the edit below)
You already have the function definition. The name, what parameters it takes and what it returns so if you take some time looking at the above tutorial you should be able to put something together (All you need to do is to write the body of the function).
The one thing that may cause you an issue (compiler error) is if you don't put it above the main function as either the function definition or the function itself must come before it is used. For simplicity at this point I reccomend you just put the function itself above the main function as shown in first example in the tutorial I linked to.
EDIT about linked tutorial
It suggests you use return with brackets. Example:
return (5);
Where as it should be used without them. Example:
return 5;
Ok, so you define the function Disc then:
int Disc(int A, int B, int C)
{
/* tricky part goes here... */
}