I want to replace all the string except the #[anyword]
I have string like this:
yng nnti dkasih tau :)"#mazayalinda: Yg klo ada cenel busana muslim aku mau ikutan dong "#noviwahyu10: Model ! Pasti gk blh klo k
and the #mazayalinda and #noviwahyu10 matches my regex #\w*.
However, I need to get rid all of the string, except for those 2 words above. We need to do the negation, but I am confuses about combining 2 regex, which are the regex to match the #[anyword] and the one to get rid all of the sentence except those 2 words.
Any ideas?
It's not completely clear from the context if this is a viable solution, but when you want to replace everything except a certain pattern it sounds more like you want a regex search rather than a replacement. For example, in python it might look like:
>>> import re
>>> s = 'yng nnti dkasih tau :)"#mazayalinda: Yg klo ada cenel busana muslim aku mau ikutan dong "#noviwahyu10: Model ! Pasti gk blh klo k'
>>> re.findall(r'#\w+', s)
['#mazayalinda', '#noviwahyu10']
Edit: in js, something like this would be more appropriate:
var s = 'yng nnti dkasih tau :)"#mazayalinda: Yg klo ada cenel busana muslim aku mau ikutan dong "#noviwahyu10: Model ! Pasti gk blh klo k';
// code from http://www.activestate.com/blog/2008/04/javascript-refindall-workalike
var rx = new RegExp("#\\w+", "g");
var matches = new Array();
while((match = rx.exec(s)) !== null){
matches.push(match);
}
After this, matches contains all the matched strings. You can always join it back together if needed into a single string.
It seems to me that you want to use capturing groups, not exactly negate the rest of the string, a regex like:
[^#]*(#\w+)[^#]*
Will capture those entries in capturing groups, and then, depending on your language, you can access each of the captured strings: http://rubular.com/r/qHKb35OK3g
use this regex (?<=^|#\w+\b)[^#]+ and union matches
Well, I'm not entirely sure I understand the question, but if you want to keep just the names and use the rest just "to get rid of it", why don't you simply save the names and ignore the rest ?
If you're keen on matching the "non-name pattern" - this seems to be an excerpt from some kind of conversation, where every message starts with ':'. If so, then using this should simply do the trick.
:[^#]*
You can use zero-width negative assertion, i.e., #(?!mazayalinda|noviwahyu10)\w.
This requires some sophisticated regular expression engine like Perl, Ruby, Java and so on.
If you have classic engine, the way as #pcalcao sais is best.
Related
I need split sentence to words removing redundant characters.
I prepared regexp for that:
val wordCharacters = """[^A-z'\d]""".r
right now I have rule which can be used to handle task in next way:
wordCharacters.split(words)
.filterNot(_.isEmpty)
where words any sentence I need to parse.
But issue is that in case I try to handle "car: carpet, as,,, java: javascript!!&#$%^&" I get one more word ^. Trying to change my regex and without ^ I'm getting much more issues for different cases...
Is any ideas how to solve it?
P.S.
If somebody want to play with it try link or code below please:
val wordCharacters = """[^A-z'\d]""".r
val stringToInt =
wordCharacters.split("car: carpet, as,,, java: javascript!!&#$%^&")
.filterNot(_.isEmpty)
.toList
println(stringToInt)
Expected result is:
List(car, carpet, as, java, javascript)
The part A-z is not exactly what you want. Probably you assume that lower a comes immediately after upper Z, but there are some other characters in between, and one of them is ^.
So, correcting the regex as
"""[^A-Za-z'\d]""".r
would fix the issue.
Have a look at the order of characters:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unicode_characters
I'd be tempted to start with \W and expand from there.
"\\W+".r.split("car: carpet, as,,, java: javascript!!&#$%^&")
//res0: Array[String] = Array(car, carpet, as, java, javascript)
I had this question a couple of times before, and I still couldn't find a good answer..
In my current problem, I have a console program output (string) that looks like this:
Number of assemblies processed = 1200
Number of assemblies uninstalled = 1197
Number of failures = 3
Now I want to extract those numbers and to check if there were failures. (That's a gacutil.exe output, btw.) In other words, I want to match any number [0-9]+ in the string that is preceded by 'failures = '.
How would I do that? I want to get the number only. Of course I can match the whole thing like /failures = [0-9]+/ .. and then trim the first characters with length("failures = ") or something like that. The point is, I don't want to do that, it's a lame workaround.
Because it's odd; if my pattern-to-match-but-not-into-output ("failures = ") comes after the thing i want to extract ([0-9]+), there is a way to do it:
pattern(?=expression)
To show the absurdity of this, if the whole file was processed backwards, I could use:
[0-9]+(?= = seruliaf)
... so, is there no forward-way? :T
pattern(?=expression) is a regex positive lookahead and what you are looking for is a regex positive lookbehind that goes like this (?<=expression)pattern but this feature is not supported by all flavors of regex. It depends which language you are using.
more infos at regular-expressions.info for comparison of Lookaround feature scroll down 2/3 on this page.
If your console output does actually look like that throughout, try splitting the string on "=" when the word "failure" is found, then get the last element (or the 2nd element). You did not say what your language is, but any decent language with string splitting capability would do the job. For example
gacutil.exe.... | ruby -F"=" -ane "print $F[-1] if /failure/"
I have a string
IsNull(VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,0),
I need to remove IsNull part, so the result would be
VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,
I'm absolute new to RegEx, but it wouldn't be a problem, if not one thing :
VSK1 is dynamic part, can be any combination of A-Z,0-9 and any length. How to replace strings with RegEx? I use MSSQL 2k5, i think it uses general set of RegEx rules.
EDIT : I forgot to say, that I'm doing replacement in SSMS Query window's Replace Box (^H) - not building RegEx query
br
marius
here's a regex that should work:
[^(]+\(([^,]+),[^)]\)
Then use $1 capture group to extract the part that you need.
I did a sanity check in ruby:
orig = "IsNull(VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,0),"
regex = /[^(]*\(([^,]+),[^)]\)/
result = orig.sub(regex){$1} # result => VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,
It gets trickier if you have a prefix that you want to retain. Like if you have this:
"somestuff = IsNull(VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,0),"
In this case, you need someway to identify the start of the pattern. Maybe you can use '=' to identify the start of the pattern? If so, this should work:
orig = "somestuff = IsNull(VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,0),"
regex = /=\s*\w+\(([^,]+),[^)]\)/
result = orig.sub(regex){$1} # result => somestuff = VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,
But then the case where you don't have an equals sign will fail. Maybe you can use 'IsNull' to identify the start of the pattern? If so, try this (note the '/i' representing case insensitive matching):
orig = "somestuff = isnull(VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,0),"
regex = /IsNull\(([^,]+),[^)]\)/i
result = orig.sub(regex){$1} # result => somestuff = VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,
/IsNULL\((A-Z0-9+),0\)/
Then pick group match number 1.
Here's a very useful site: http://www.regexlib.com/RETester.aspx
They have a tester and a cheatsheet that are very useful for quick testing of this sort.
I tested the solution by Dave and it works fine except it also removes the trailing comma you wanted retained. Minor thing to fix.
Try this:
IsNULL\((.*,)0\)
You say in your question
I use MSSQL 2k5, i think it uses
general set of RegEx rules.
This is not true unless you enable CLR and compile and install an assembly. You can use its native pattern matching syntax and LIKE for this as below.
WITH T(C) AS
(
SELECT 'IsNull(VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,0),' UNION ALL
SELECT 'IsNull(VSK1_DVal.RuntimeSUM,123465),' UNION ALL
SELECT 'No Match'
)
SELECT SUBSTRING(C,8,1+LEN(C)-8-CHARINDEX(',',REVERSE(C),2))
FROM T
WHERE C LIKE 'IsNull(%,_%),'
i have: \£\d+\.\d\d
should find: £6.95 £16.95 etc
+ is one or more
\. is the dot
\d is for a digit
am i wrong? :(
JavaScript for Greasemonkey
// ==UserScript==
// #name CurConvertor
// #namespace CurConvertor
// #description noam smadja
// #include http://www.zavvi.com/*
// ==/UserScript==
textNodes = document.evaluate(
"//text()",
document,
null,
XPathResult.UNORDERED_NODE_SNAPSHOT_TYPE,
null);
var searchRE = /\£[0-9]\+.[0-9][0-9];
var replace = 'pling';
for (var i=0;i<textNodes.snapshotLength;i++) {
var node = textNodes.snapshotItem(i);
node.data = node.data.replace(searchRE, replace);
}
when i change the regex to /Free for example it finds and changes. but i guess i am missing something!
Had this written up for your last question just before it was deleted.
Here are the problems you're having with your GM script.
You're checking absolutely every
text node on the page for some
reason. This isn't causing it to
break but it's unnecessary and slow.
It would be better to look for text
nodes inside .price nodes and .rrp
.strike nodes instead.
When creating new regexp objects in
this way, backslashes must be
escaped, ex:
var searchRE = new
RegExp('\\d\\d','gi');
not
var
searchRE = new RegExp('\d\d','gi');
So you can add the backslashes, or
create your regex like this:
var
searchRE = /\d\d/gi;
Your actual regular expression is
only checking for numbers like
##ANYCHARACTER##, and will ignore £5.00 and £128.24
Your replacement needs to be either
a string or a callback function, not
a regular expression object.
Putting it all together
textNodes = document.evaluate(
"//p[contains(#class,'price')]/text() | //p[contains(#class,'rrp')]/span[contains(#class,'strike')]/text()",
document,
null,
XPathResult.UNORDERED_NODE_SNAPSHOT_TYPE,
null);
var searchRE = /£(\d+\.\d\d)/gi;
var replace = function(str,p1){return "₪" + ( (p1*5.67).toFixed(2) );}
for (var i=0,l=textNodes.snapshotLength;i<l;i++) {
var node = textNodes.snapshotItem(i);
node.data = node.data.replace(searchRE, replace);
}
Changes:
Xpath now includes only p.price and p.rrp span.strke nodes
Search regular expression created with /regex/ instead of new RegExp
Search variable now includes target currency symbol
Replace variable is now a function that replaces the currency symbol with a new symbol, and multiplies the first matched substring with substring * 5.67
for loop sets a variable to the snapshot length at the beginning of the loop, instead of checking textNodes.snapshotLength at the beginning of every loop.
Hope that helps!
[edit]Some of these points don't apply, as the original question changed a few times, but the final script is relevant, and the points may still be of interest to you for why your script was failing originally.
You are not wrong, but there are a few things to watch out for:
The £ sign is not a standard ASCII character so you may have encoding issue, or you may need to enable a unicode option on your regular expression.
The use of \d is not supported in all regular expression engines. [0-9] or [[:digit:]] are other possibilities.
To get a better answer, say which language you are using, and preferably also post your source code.
£[0-9]+(,[0-9]{3})*\.[0-9]{2}$
this will match anything from £dd.dd to £d[dd]*,ddd.dd. So it can fetch millions and hundreds as well.
The above regexp is not strict in terms of syntaxes. You can have, for example: 1123213123.23
Now, if you want an even strict regexp, and you're 100% sure that the prices will follow the comma and period syntaxes accordingly, then use
£[0-9]{1,3}(,[0-9]{3})*\.[0-9]{2}$
Try your regexps here to see what works for you and what not http://tools.netshiftmedia.com/regexlibrary/
It depends on what flavour of regex you are using - what is the programming language?
some older versions of regex require the + to be escaped - sed and vi for example.
Also some older versions of regex do not recognise \d as matching a digit.
Most modern regex follow the perl syntax and £\d+\.\d\d should do the trick, but it does also depend on how the £ is encoded - if the string you are matching encodes it differently from the regex then it will not match.
Here is an example in Python - the £ character is represented differently in a regular string and a unicode string (prefixed with a u):
>>> "£"
'\xc2\xa3'
>>> u"£"
u'\xa3'
>>> import re
>>> print re.match("£", u"£")
None
>>> print re.match(u"£", "£")
None
>>> print re.match(u"£", u"£")
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x7ef34de8>
>>> print re.match("£", "£")
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x7ef34e90>
>>>
£ isn't an ascii character, so you need to work out encodings. Depending on the language, you will either need to escape the byte(s) of £ in the regex, or convert all the strings into Unicode before applying the regex.
In Ruby you could just write the following
/£\d+.\d{2}/
Using the braces to specify number of digits after the point makes it slightly clearer
Can anyone help me with a regex to turn:
filename_author
to
author_filename
I am using MS Word 2003 and am trying to do this with Word's Find-and-Replace. I've tried the use wildcards feature but haven't had any luck.
Am I only going to be able to do it programmatically?
Here is the regex:
([^_]*)_(.*)
And here is a C# example:
using System;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
String test = "filename_author";
String result = Regex.Replace(test, #"([^_]*)_(.*)", "$2_$1");
}
}
Here is a Python example:
from re import sub
test = "filename_author";
result = sub('([^_]*)_(.*)', r'\2_\1', test)
Edit: In order to do this in Microsoft Word using wildcards use this as a search string:
(<*>)_(<*>)
and replace with this:
\2_\1
Also, please see Add power to Word searches with regular expressions for an explanation of the syntax I have used above:
The asterisk (*) returns all the text in the word.
The less than and greater than symbols (< >) mark the start and end
of each word, respectively. They
ensure that the search returns a
single word.
The parentheses and the space between them divide the words into
distinct groups: (first word) (second
word). The parentheses also indicate
the order in which you want search to
evaluate each expression.
Here you go:
s/^([a-zA-Z]+)_([a-zA-Z]+)$/\2_\1/
Depending on the context, that might be a little greedy.
Search pattern:
([^_]+)_(.+)
Replacement pattern:
$2_$1
In .NET you could use ([^_]+)_([^_]+) as the regex and then $2_$1 as the substitution pattern, for this very specific type of case. If you need more than 2 parts it gets a lot more complicated.
Since you're in MS Word, you might try a non-programming approach. Highlight all of the text, select Table -> Convert -> Text to Table. Set the number of columns at 2. Choose Separate Text At, select the Other radio, and enter an _. That will give you a table. Switch the two columns. Then convert the table back to text using the _ again.
Or you could copy the whole thing to Excel, construct a formula to split and rejoin the text and then copy and paste that back to Word. Either would work.
In C# you could also do something like this.
string[] parts = "filename_author".Split('_');
return parts[1] + "_" + parts[0];
You asked about regex of course, but this might be a good alternative.