Our application has a number of widgets that use templates that are generated on the fly via a JSP.
In the front-end code, they are included using the dojo/text plugin. This ensures that Widget lifecycle isn't kicked off until the template has been resolved and it works just fine.
Unfortunately, when we try to perform our build, we get a 311 error:
error(311) Missing dependency. module:
app/navigation/NavigationManager; dependency:
dojo/text!/author/app/templates/NavigationManager-content.html; error:
Error: text resource
(/author/app/templates/NavigationManager-content.html/x) missing
I understand what's happening here, the build process is trying to internalize the string, but when it goes to look for it, it can't locate it and so flags it as a missing dependency.
I see a number of options here:
Somehow, tell Dojo to ignore this missing dependency - this would be fine, but I'd need to be able to be specific, so that I get alerted to any other dependencies that might be missing
Somehow, tell Dojo not to try and internalize this template - this would also be fine, since there's nothing to internalize here.
Somehow, stub out the dependency so that the dependency resolution passes, but the internalization doesn't occur.
I've seen references to the
internStringsSkipList
value, but none of the following helped:
internStringsSkipList: ['/author/pepper/templates/NavigationManager-content.html']
internStringsSkipList: ['dojo/text!/author/pepper/templates/NavigationManager-content.html']
internStringsSkipList: ['/author/pepper/templates/NavigationManager-content.html/x']
Any suggestions?
I faced exactly the same problem and after reading lots of dojo documentation and source code I came to the conclusion that it's very difficult if almost impossible to do. There is, however, a very simple and elegant workaround. But before telling you how to solve the problem firstly why there is a workaround needed in the first place (so you can adjust the solution to your own circumstances):
First issue, the resource is undiscoverable
According to the Overview section of the dojo build system Reference Guide:
[The build system] “discovers” a set of resources and then applies a synchronized, ordered set of resource-dependent transforms to those resources. (…) When a resource is discovered, it is tagged with one or more flags that help identify the role of that resource. (…) After a resource is discovered and tagged, the system assigns a set of transforms that are to be applied to that resource.
So in short, any resources generated on the fly can't be discovered by the build system because they don't reside on the file system. If they can't be discovered, then they can't be tagged and no transformation can be applied to it. In particular, resourceTags is not called for such resources and you can't put them on the exclude list of a profile layer definition (compare section Layers in Creating Builds).
BTW, as far as I understand the documentation to depsScan transform, internStringsSkipList can only be used to skip resources specified using the legacy notation (dojo.something, e.g. dojo.moduleUrl).
Second issue, the plugin resolver expects a physical file
Notation dojo/text!/some/url says to use the dojo/text.js component as a plugin. I found this note in this ticket:
Every AMD plugin should have a plugin resolver in util/build/plugins and have it registered in util/build/buildControlDefault.
If you check util/build/plugins/text.js (e.g. on Github) you'll see that the error is being thrown because the dependency (that part after dojo/text! is stored in moduleInfo) is not in the resources array:
textResource = bc.resources[moduleInfo.url];
if (!textResource){
throw new Error("text resource (" + moduleInfo.url + ") missing");
}
And this is precisely because the resource couldn't be discovered during the "discovery" phase.
The difficult solution
In the difficult solution, that might or might not work, you would need to change how the transformation depsScan works. Basically, when depsScan encounters dojo/text!/some/url it calls the plugin resolver to check if the dependency exists. From the depsScan documentation:
Once all dependencies are found, the transform ensures all dependencies exist in the discovered modules. Missing dependencies result in an error being logged to the console and the build report.
That might be possible by redefining transformJobs to contain a custom transform for depsScan. See util/build/buildControlDefault.js (on Github) and this forum post for more insights.
The simple workaround
Just create your own plugin to load the resource. Your own plugin won't have the plugin resolver registered (see the second issue above) and all you'll get when compiling is the dreaded
warn(224) A plugin dependency was encountered but there was no build-time plugin resolver.
This is my example of such plugin that loads a JSON resource dynamically:
define(["dojo/text", "dojo/_base/lang", "dojo/json"],
function(text,lang,json){
return lang.delegate(text, {
load: function(id, require, load){
text.load(id, require, function(data){
load(json.parse(data));
});
}
});
});
It reuses dojo/text adding its custom load function. This is an adaptation of another example posted on this dojo-toolkit forum post. You can see their code on JSFiddle.
In my project I use the plugin like this:
define(["./json!/path/to/an/json"],
function(values){
return values;
});
Your plugin can just return the loaded template without parsing it as JSON, and as long as you don't specify your custom plugin resolver (which would expect the file to exist physically on disk) the project will compile fine.
This wasn't your issue, but the most common solution to those facing the error(311) problem is going to be this:
Don't start template paths with a slash.
Bad:
"dojo/text!/app/template/widget.html"
Good:
"dojo/text!app/template/widget.html"
Your template path isn't a normal, plain-ol' URL. It's still part of the Dojo build, so you use Dojo build pathing to get to the template.
Related
I'm deploying my app to my staging environment for the first time, but I'm running into an error...One of my routes is unable to render its template. I'm seeing this error in the console:
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'isHelperInstance' of undefined
I was not seeing this error in development.
I'm using ember-cli-rails to serve the app using Heroku.
How can I solve this issue?
I actually had this error due to improperly referencing a helper. My helper was called concatTwo() but in handlebars you have to reference it using kabob-case, which would be concat-two. We had some Handlebars referencing concatTwo which broke those pages and showed this error. Not surprisingly, refactoring it to use the kabob case version fixed the error.
Oddly enough, this didn't cause any problems on the development environment, even when running it with exactly the same data.
The cause of this error was due to referencing a component in a template that did not exist. The reason that I did not see the error in development is because I did not have the same data in my development environment as in staging. So I never saw the part of my template that would have caused the error.
Ember-2.6.3
In order to get my development environment to exhibit this behaviour I had to clear my node_modules/ and re-npm-install everything. I also cleared my bower_components and re-bower installed them too. Not sure which made the difference.
I think I agree with #vkoves about the kabob-case for your helpers. But also in addition, I think you must be wary of using dot-notation when referencing helpers or components.
We nested some of our format helpers in a folder named formatters. They look something like this from our Ember app's perspective: app/helpers/formatters/date
We were previously referencing this helper throughout our application as either: {{formatters.date ...}} or (formatters.date ...).
?After some recent changes in the Node/NPM ecosystem?, it appears that we must now refer to our nested helper using a slash-notation rather than dot-notation: {{formatters/date ...}} or (formatters/date ...)
Side Note (Dot-Notation Versus Slash-Notation)
We also just discovered that Ember-2.10 removes dot-notation for referencing components...it apparently is not in the release notes. We have to go fix that everywhere in our app (https://github.com/emberjs/ember.js/issues/14659).
I have a addon which used to work in Ember CLI 0.1.4 but now that I'm using 0.2.0 I think the likely improved ember-cli-dependency-checker is not letting my addon do it's magic.
The addon in question can be found here: ui-bs-popover.
My theory is the problem originates from a missing Bootstrap dependency that is excluded by design. Specifically, this plugin depends on Bootstrap (SASS or regular doesn't matter) but does not install it as part of the process. This is by design as it let's the user do this as an independent step (in whatever manner they choose). So while the dummy test app works just fine that is because the Bootstrap references are in the addon's Brocfile (just not in the index.js so that projects which include it would get same dependency met).
That said, the stacktrace I'm getting isn't very clear (to me anyway):
TypeError: undefined is not a function
at EmberCLIDependencyChecker.readBowerDependencies (/path/to/project/node_modules/ui-bs-popover/node_modules/ember-cli-dependency-checker/lib/dependency-checker.js:77:35)
at EmberCLIDependencyChecker.checkDependencies (/path/to/project/node_modules/ui-bs-popover/node_modules/ember-cli-dependency-checker/lib/dependency-checker.js:30:24)
at new EmberCLIDependencyChecker (/path/to/project/node_modules/ui-bs-popover/node_modules/ember-cli-dependency-checker/lib/dependency-checker.js:21:8)
at /path/to/project/node_modules/ember-cli/lib/models/addons-factory.js:44:19
at visit (/path/to/project/node_modules/ember-cli/lib/utilities/DAG.js:23:3)
at DAG.topsort (/path/to/project/node_modules/ember-cli/lib/utilities/DAG.js:82:7)
at AddonsFactory.initializeAddons (/path/to/project/node_modules/ember-cli/lib/models/addons-factory.js:40:9)
at Class.Addon.initializeAddons (/path/to/project/node_modules/ember-cli/lib/models/addon.js:189:36)
at setupRegistryForEachAddon (/path/to/project/node_modules/ember-cli/lib/preprocessors.js:18:10)
at Object.module.exports.setupRegistry (/path/to/project/node_modules/ember-cli/lib/preprocessors.js:46:3)
I am typically searching for answers here but I finlly gotten to the point where I can't find a good answer.
I am looking to build an ember app which only initially loads in the things that it needs just to start and open the main route. All other controllers, views, templates, etc. Would be loaded lazily when a specific route gets triggered.
I have found a good example of how to accomplIsh this here:
http://madhatted.com/2013/6/29/lazy-loading-with-ember
My main question is to determine what build tools out there support this theory of lazy loading application code? So far, I've seen that Brunch, Yeoman, and Ember App Kit seemed to minify and concatenate all the scripts and templates. I am very happy with minification but need those files separate. I have thought about just putting this code into the app/assets location so that it gets copied over without concat but it does not get minified.
Does anyone have a solution? Thanks!
You can do this with brunch by adding the following to your brunch config
files: {
javascripts: {
joinTo: {
'javascripts/app.js': /^app(\/|\\)(?!admin)/, // concat everything in app, except /app/admin
'javascripts/vendor.js': /^vendor/,
'javascripts/admin.js': /^app(\/|\\)admin/ // concat only /app/admin
}
}
}
Grunt (used in yeoman and ember app kit) is ridiculously flexible, so I'm sure you can set up the same thing there by diving into Gruntfile.js
The question was: "I am looking to build an ember app which only initially loads in the things that it needs just to start and open the main route. All other controllers, views, templates, etc. Would be loaded lazily when a specific route gets triggered.".
Ember expects to have anything it needs right there when the page gets loaded. I wouldn't be wrong, but lazy loading of routes doesn't seem to be a feature of Ember. Ember CLI is the same. It uses bundling and minification to reduce the overload. But everything should be there to make it work.
Instead, people like me would like to load things only when they are required.
When you try to implement lazy loading in Ember, everything should be represented by a module (file.js): a route, a module; a controller, a module; and so on.
You should follow a schema (like POD), to which apply a mechanism to find things where they are supposed to be.
Every module should know its dependencies. But some of them are very frequent (route, controller, template).
You should use a module loader for the browser. It can be requirejs or whatever you like. But ES6 is at the door. Let's think about that.
Many people use beforeModel hook to achieve a result. I did it, and it works, if you don't use link-to component. Otherwise everything crashes. Why? Because of href computed property. When a link-to has been inserted, an href is calculated for it. Because of that, Ember looks for the route where the link points to. If the route doesn't exist, one is created from route:basic.
A solution could be the preloading of all the routes represented by all link-tos inserted in the page. Too much expensive!
An integration to this answer can be found at Lazy loading route definitions in Ember.js
For an initial solution to lazy loading of routes organized in POD, have a look at https://github.com/ricottatosta/ember-wiz. It is an ES6 based approach, which relay on SystemJS as module loader.
When using sinatra-r18n to handle internationalisation, the r18n lib exposes a variable t for use within your helpers, routes and templates, as per these instructions.
I have written a simple unit test using rack-unit to confirm that some of my pluralisations work but the test throws an error claiming t is nil.
I've tried referencing it via app.t, MySillyApp.t (where MySillyApp is the name of my Sinatra app), MySillyApp.settings.t etc and none of them give me access to the t I need.
What I am trying to achieve is a confirmation that my translation files include all the keys I need corresponding to plurals of various metric units my app needs to understand. Perhaps there is a more direct way of testing this without going via the Sinatra app itself. I'd welcome any insight here.
I had similar task to check localized strings in my Cucumber scenarios.
I've made working example.
Here you can find how strings got translated.
This file halps to understand how to add R18n support to your testing framework:
require 'r18n-core'
...
class SinCucR18nWorld
...
include R18n::Helpers
end
As you can see instead of rack/unit I'm using RSpec/Cucumber, sorry.
Trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this. I have inhereted a Django project that is pretty well done.
There are a number of pre coded modules that a user can include in a page's (a page and a module are models in this app) left well in the admin (ie: side links, ads, constant contact).
A new requirement involves inserting a module of internal links in the same well. These links are not associated with a page in the same way the other modules, they are a seperate many to many join - ie one link can be reused in a set across all the pages.
the template pseudo code is:
if page has modules:
loop through modules:
write the pre coded content of module
Since the links need to be in the same well as the modules, I have created a "link placeholder module" with a slug of link-placeholder.
The new pseudo code is:
if page has modules:
loop through modules:
if module.slug is "link-placeholder":
loop through page.links and output each
else:
write pre-coded module
My question is where is the best place to write this output for the links? As I see it, my options are:
Build the out put in the template (easy, but kind of gets messy - code is nice and neat now)
Build a function in the page model that is called when the "link placeholder is encountered) page.get_internal_link_ouutput. Essentially this would query, build and print internal link module output.
Do the same thing with a custom template tag.
I am leaning towards 2 or 3, but it doesn't seem like the right place to do it. I guess I sometimes get a little confused about the best place to put code in django apps, though I do really like the framework.
Thanks in advance for any advice.
I'd recommend using a custom template tag.
Writing the code directly into the template is not the right place for that much logic, and I don't believe a model should have template-specific methods added to it. Better to have template-specific logic live in template-specific classes and functions (e.g. template tags).