I keep getting the wrong answer of 1179908154. At first I blamed it on my summation variable being type int, rather than long. I gave it long type but I get the same answer. Thoughts?
// Project Euler
// Problem 10
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
void main()
{
int p = 3;
long sum = 2;
bool isPrime;
for (p; p < 2000000; p++)
{
isPrime = true;
for (int i = 2; i <= sqrt(static_cast<double>(p)); i++) // cast into double for sqrt function
{
if (p % i == 0)
{
isPrime = false;
break;
}
}
if (isPrime == true)
{
cout << p << endl; // show each prime
sum += p; // add prime to sum
}
}
cout << sum << endl; // show sum
system("pause");
}
Maybe on your platform the long is not enough to hold the value too. Try a long long instead.
Do not write prime numbers generator by yourself, it's really not easy.
Just use this http://cr.yp.to/primegen.html , it's really good enough for project euler.
When putting the bounds on your for loop, you should check numbers up until sqrt(p) + 1. You can get floating point errors when calculating the square root (it might underestimate it slightly), so it's possible that some potential factors are not checked in the loop.
Related
I am new to coding and just starting with the c++ language, here I am trying to find the number given as input if it is Armstrong or not.
An Armstrong number of three digits is an integer such that the sum of the cubes of its digits is equal to the number itself. For example, 153 is an Armstrong number since 1^3 + 5^3 + 3^3 = 153.
But even if I give not an armstrong number, it still prints that number is armstrong.
Below is my code.
#include <cmath>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
bool ifarmstrong(int n, int p) {
int sum = 0;
int num = n;
while(num>0){
num=num%10;
sum=sum+pow(num,p);
}
if(sum==n){
return true;
}else{
return false;
}
}
int main() {
int n;
cin >> n;
int i, p = 0;
for (i = 0; n > 0; i++) {
n = n / 10;
}
cout << i<<endl;
if (ifarmstrong(n, i)) {
cout << "Yes it is armstorng" << endl;
} else {
cout << "No it is not" << endl;
}
return 0;
}
A solution to my problem and explantation to what's wrong
This code
for (i = 0; n > 0; i++) {
n = n / 10;
}
will set n to zero after the loop has executed. But here
if (ifarmstrong(n, i)) {
you use n as if it still had the original value.
Additionally you have a error in your ifarmstrong function, this code
while(num>0){
num=num%10;
sum=sum+pow(num,p);
}
result in num being zero from the second iteration onwards. Presumably you meant to write this
while(num>0){
sum=sum+pow(num%10,p);
num=num/10;
}
Finally using pow on integers is unreliable. Because it's a floating point function and it (presumably) uses logarithms to do it's calculations, it may not return the exact integer result that you are expecting. It's better to use integers if you are doing exact integer calculations.
All these issues (and maybe more) will very quickly be discovered by using a debugger. much better than staring at code and scratching your head.
I'm supposed to write a small code that generates a random number between 2 and 100 and then checks if its a perfect number. I don't get any bugs from the compiler but the output doesn't show my cout lines like " x is a perfect number". Can someone help me with finding the reason?
#include <iostream>
#include <ctime>
#include <cstdlib>
using namespace std;
bool PerfectCheck(int x) {
int t; // divisor
int sum; // sum of divisors
for (t = 0; t <= x; t++ ) {
if (x%t == 0) {
sum = sum + t;
}
}
if (sum == x)
return true;
else
return false;
}
int main() {
srand(time(NULL));
int x = rand()%(100-2+1)+2;
if (PerfectCheck(x) == true )
cout << x << "is a perfect number.";
else
cout << x << "is not a perfect number.";
return 0;
}
There are three problems in your PerfectCheck function. First, you don't initialize the sum variable, so it can start off with any value whatsoever; you should set it to zero explicitly in the declaration.
Second, your for loop starts with t as zero, and you check x % t. The modulo operator implicitly involves a division, so using a left-hand value of zero has the same issue as trying to divide by zero, which will cause a crash.
Third, when checking for a perfect number, don't use that number itself in the sum; so, stop your loop with t < x instead of t <= x.
Also, as mentioned in the comments, you can simplify the return statement. The code below works, in the tests I have performed:
bool PerfectCheck(int x)
{
int sum = 0; // sum of divisors - MUST BE INITIALIZED (to zero)
for (int t = 1; t < x; t++) { // DO NOT INCLUDE X ITSELF!!
if (x % t == 0) {
sum += t;
}
}
return (sum == x); // This will already give a "true" or "false" bool value.
}
You could actually make the code a tiny bit more 'efficient', by initializing sum to 1 and then starting the loop from t = 2 (all numbers divide by 1, after all).
Feel free to ask for further clarification and/or explanation.
if (x%t == 0) calculates the remainder after dividing x by t and compares the result with 0. That statement is correct, but look at the previous code for (t = 0; t <= x; t++ ) {. The first value of t is 0, so you have a division by zero. More than likely that is crashing your program which is why you see no output. Change for (t = 0; t <= x; t++ ) { to for (t = 1; t <= x; t++ ) {.
Also I believe the definition of a perfect number does not include division by the number itself. So the for loop should actually be for (t = 1; t < x; t++ ) {.
Finally you are using the sum variable to add up the divisors but you do not give it an initial value. Your code should say int sum = 0;.
Three errors in a ten line program (plus various style issues). Imagine how many errors here might be in a 5000 line program. Programming is tricky, you have to be very focused and get your code exactly right, nearly right is not good enough.
I'm trying to create a array of prime numbers done by calculation. As a project to learn coding. Ultimately to build my own math library so this is something I can add onto at a variety of levels as I learn to code c++.
The following is code that works great for printing prime numbers to the screen based on the search range, but my totalPrimes iterator is stuck at 1. So each time it places the last prime found in the PrimeNumbers[1] position.
Any advice would be awesome.
#include <iostream>
#include <array>
std::array<long, 10000000> PrimeNumbers={0};
void isPrime(long x);
int main() {
for (long i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
isPrime(i);
}
for(int h = 0; h < 10; h++) {
std::cout << "\nSecond Prime is : " << PrimeNumbers[h];
}
}
void isPrime(long x) {
int count(0), totalPrimes(0);
for (long a = 1; a < x; a++) {
if ((x % a) == 0) {
count += 1;
}
}
if (count == 1) {
++totalPrimes;
std::cout << '\n' << x << " is a Prime number";
PrimeNumbers[totalPrimes] = x;
}
}
You're initializing totalPrimes to 0 every time the function runs. You would need to have totalPrimes as a global variable, or better yet (because global variables can become problematic), set it equal to the first available member of PrimeNumbers before you do anything else in that function.
Keep track of a position along with your PrimeNumbers array.
size_t nLastPos=0;
...
for(size_t x = 0; 1000 > x; ++x)
{
if(isPrime(x))
{
PrimeNumbers[nLastPos++] = x;
}
}
for(size_t i = 0; nLastPos > n; ++n)
{/* print out number PrimeNumbers[n] */ }
It looks like you're having some trouble with variable scoping. The reason for your problem (as I noted in the comment) is that totalPrimes is local, so you're creating a new integer variable and setting it to 0 every time the function is called.
However, you've made PrimeNumbers global and are having the isPrime function modify it, which doesn't look like good practice.
All of this can be fixed with a little restructuring to make the code nicer:
#include <iostream>
#include <array>
bool isPrime(long x);
int main() {
std::array<long, 10000000> PrimeNumbers={0};
int totalPrimes = 0;
for (long i = 1; i < 10; i++) {
if (isPrime(i)) {
std::cout << '\n' << i << " is a Prime number";
PrimeNumbers[totalPrimes++] = i;
}
}
for(int h = 0; h < 10; h++) {
std::cout << h << " Prime is : " << PrimeNumbers[h] << std::endl;
}
}
bool isPrime(long x) {
int count(0);
for (long a = 1; a < x; a++) {
if ((x % a) == 0) {
count += 1;
}
}
return count == 1;
}
Your program can be re-structured little bit to make it easier to follow and debug.
Don't put things in isPrime other than the logic to decide whether a number is prime. Make sure it returns a bool. This will make the function a bit simpler and easier to debug.
Use the return value of isPrime in the calling function to perform other bookkeeping tasks.
The logic you have used to check whether a number is prime is incorrect. That needs to be fixed.
Here's an updated version of your posted code.
#include <iostream>
#include <array>
#include <cmath>
std::array<long, 10000000> PrimeNumbers={0};
bool isPrime(long x);
int main()
{
int totalPrimes = 0;
for (long i = 1; i < 10; i++)
{
if ( isPrime(i) )
{
std::cout << i << " is a Prime number" << std::endl;
PrimeNumbers[totalPrimes] = i;
++totalPrimes;
}
}
}
bool isPrime(long x) {
// 1, 2, and 3 are primes.
if ( x <= 3 )
{
return true;
}
// Even numbers are not primes.
if ( x % 2 == 0 )
{
return false;
}
// Check the rest.
long end = (long)std::sqrt(x);
for (long a = 3; a < end; a += 2) {
if ((x % a) == 0)
{
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
and its output:
1 is a Prime number
2 is a Prime number
3 is a Prime number
5 is a Prime number
7 is a Prime number
9 is a Prime number
Everybody is talking about how your totalPrimes variable is reset each time the function is called, and this is obviously true. You could return the value from the function and increment it from main, you could use global variables having the variable being defined outside of the function so that it's not reset each time inside the function or you could use
A static variable!
Take a look at this simple case. I have a function called up_two which increases the value of by two each time the function is called. The static variable int value has a memory of each time the function up_two() is called which increments value by two each time. If I were to use a just an integer it would always reset the value and have it be zero, which is what I initially defined it to be.
The advantage of using a static variable is that I can count how many times a function has been called, and I can keep my counter specific to a particular function.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void up_two();
int main()
{
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
up_two();
}
return 0;
}
void up_two()
{
static int value = 0;
cout << value << endl;
value += 2;
}
This program doesn't solve the particular problem that you want to solve, but if you figure out how the static variable is working, it should make your workflow easier.
The magic line here is this:
static int value = 0;
With it like this my program prints the following:
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Without the static declaration, you just get 10 lines of zeroes
which is troublesome.
Hope that helps you optimize your program the way you want it to be.
/*
The prime factors of 13195 are 5, 7, 13 and 29.
What is the largest prime factor of the number 600851475143 ?
*/
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <cmath>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
unsigned long num = 600851475143;
unsigned long i;
long double root = sqrt(num);
long double tempRoot = 0;
unsigned long factor = 0;
unsigned long largest = 0;
for (i=2; i<root; i++)
{
if (num%i == 0)
{
num = num/i;
factor = i;
cout << factor << endl;
if (factor > largest)
{
largest = factor;
}
}
}
cout << largest << endl;
return 0;
}
This solution works because coincidentally the factors of 600851475143 are all prime numbers. But when debugging the code I was inputting various values for the variable num (=600851475143). For example, when I input 135 it showed me all the factors, including the non-prime ones. How do I add a prime number checker for the factors? I tried using the same method that I used here within a nested if, but failed miserably. Any help would be appreciated.
Also, please indicate if I am using unnecessarily large variable types in case of some variables.
Thanks.
You don't have to do a prime-number check. As you are factoring, just make sure to continue dividing out a candidate until it no longer divides the number. This is really easy to do in code: just change the if (num%i == 0) to while (num%i == 0).
before I start I want to clarify that I am not looking for code examples to get the answer; that would defeat the object of Project Euler.
The problem can be found here http://projecteuler.net/problem=3
I think I have a way of solving the problem, but the Algorithm is VERY slow; it has been running for nearly two and a half hours now. So I am looking for general advice on optimisation.
Thanks.
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
bool primality(int);
int main(){
long long lim = 600851475143;
long long div = lim/2;
bool run = true;
while(run){
if(lim%div==0 && primality(div)){
cout << "HPF: " << div;
run = false;
}
else{
div--;
}
if(div<=1){
break;
}
}
return 0;
}
bool primality(int num){
for(int i=2; i<num; i++){
if(num%i==0 && i!=num){
return false;
}
else{
return true;
}
}
}
If you start div at 2 and count up instead of down, and divide it out from the number when the modulo is zero, you gain two big advantages that are useful here:
You don't have to check if div is prime, since it can't be composite because any prime factors smaller than it would already have been divided out.
You reduce the remaining problem size every time you find a factor, and, as it turns out, the input number has fairly small prime factors.
You could then also break once div*div is greater than the remaining number, as you know at that point that it must be a prime. This is because any divisors greater than the square root are "paired" with one less than the square root. However, since this is an "easy" problem, this optimization is not needed here (although it is useful for later problems).
# Possible solution but still its *time consuming* but answer can be guessed by the last option in console output
#include<stdio.h>
#include<string>
#include<iostream>
#include<math.h>
int prime(unsigned long long);
using namespace std;
int main(){
unsigned long long ii, ij; unsigned long long in;
cin>>in; ij = ceil(in/2);
if( (ij % 2) == 0 ) ij -= 1;
for(ii = 3 ;ii < ij;ii+= 2){
if(in % ii == 0){
if(prime(ii) == 1 ){
cout<<" ans "<<ii<<endl;
}
}
}
return 0;
}
int prime(unsigned long long ii){
unsigned long long ij;
for(ij = 3;ij < ii/2 ;ij += 2){
if( (ii % ij) ==0){
return 0;
}
}
return 1;
}