I think I'm doing something wrong but I don't know what.
When my application loads it needs to retrieve all companies and when those arrive it needs to set a property activeCompany on my ApplicationController. But when I bind an observer on content.isLoaded on my CompaniesController is fires before the data is loaded.
Application
App = Ember.Application.create({
ApplicationController : Ember.Controller.extend({
needs: ['companies'],
activeCompany: null,
activateCompany: function(company) {
this.set('activeCompany',company);
}
})
});
Router
App.ApplicationRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
enableLogging : true,
setupController: function(controller, model) {
this.controllerFor('companies').set('content', App.Company.find());
}
});
CompaniesController
App.CompaniesController = Em.ArrayController.extend({
needs: ['application'],
activateCompany: function() {
console.log(this.get('content.length')); // 0
console.log(this.get('content.isLoaded')); // true
console.log(this.get('content.firstObject')); // undefined
this.get('controllers.application').activateCompany(this.get('content.firstObject'));
}.observes('content.isLoaded')
});
Why does content.isLoaded fire when my data is not loaded?
Maybe my concept is wrong but the rest of my application depends on the activeCompany to retrieve other data. I also have a 'company-switcher' which also sets the activeCompany property.
When I change my observer to content.#each it fires for all the items that are in the Array.
EDIT
I could work around it like this:
App.CompaniesController = Em.ArrayController.extend({
needs: ['application'],
activateCompany: function() {
if (this.get('content.length') > 0)
this.get('controllers.application').activateCompany(this.get('content.firstObject'));
}.observes('content.firstObject.isLoaded')
});
This only fires when my firstObject changes.
It turns out I should use findQuery. I tried it before like this: App.Store.findQuery(App.Company) but that didn't work. The right way of doing is like this:
this.controllerFor('companies').set('model', this.get('store').findQuery(App.Company));
I needed to get the store via this.get('store')
Related
I am trying to implement a controller needing another (CampaignsNew needing AppsIndex), which looks like
App.CampaignsNewController = Ember.Controller.extend({
needs: ['appsIndex']
});
And in my CampaignsNew template I am showing it via
{{#if controllers.appsIndex.content.isUpdating}}
{{view App.SpinnerView}}
{{else}}
{{#each controllers.appsIndex.content}}
{{name}}
{{/each}}
{{/if}}
However controllers.appsIndex.content.isUpdating is never true. I.e. it attempts to show the data before it has been loaded.
My AppsIndex route has the model overridden:
App.AppsIndexRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(controller) {
var store = this.get('store').findAll('app');
}
...
});
I can get it to work if I put the same code within my CampaignsNew route and modify the template to each through controller.content. Which says to me that needs is not using the route? It also works if I go to the /apps page and it loads the data, and then navigate to the /campaigns/new page.
How do I get this to work? Thanks!
Edit:
As requested, the relevant parts of my router:
App.Router.map(function() {
this.resource('apps', function() {
...
});
this.resource('campaigns', function() {
this.route('new');
});
});
And the AppsIndex is accessed at /apps and CampaignsNew is at /campaigns/new
Edit2:
After implementing the suggestion by #kingpin2k, I've found that Ember is throwing an error. Below are the updated files and the error received.
App.CampaignsNewController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
pageTitle: 'New Campaign'
});
App.CampaignsNewRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(controller) {
return Ember.RSVP.hash({
campaign: this.store.createRecord('campaign'),
apps: this.store.find('app')
});
// return this.store.createRecord('campaign');
},
setupController: function(controller, model){
controller.set('apps', model.apps);
this._super(controller, model.campaign);
}
});
Ember throws this error:
Error while loading route: Error: Assertion Failed: Cannot delegate set('apps', <DS.RecordArray:ember689>) to the 'content' property of object proxy <App.CampaignsNewController:ember756>: its 'content' is undefined.
I read online that this is because the content object doesn't exist. If I set it like so:
App.CampaignsNewController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
content: Ember.Object.create(),
...
});
Then the page loads without error, and when inspecting the Ember Chrome extension, I can see the data has loaded. But it doesn't show on the page. Which I suppose happened because the content object existed and so Ember didn't wait for the model's promise to fulfill before rendering the template. Seems odd that you should have to define content in such a way though. Any insight on how to handle this?
Edit3: Question answered for me in another thread
Based on your router, apps isn't a parent of campaigns/new.
This means someone could hit #/campaigns/new and Ember would hit ApplicationRoute, CampaignsRoute, and CampaignsNewRoute to populate the necessary information for the url requested. Using needs as a way of communicating between controllers really only makes sense in an ancestral pattern (aka communicating with your parents, grandparents etc).
Just as another quick note, AppsIndex is a route of Apps, it won't be hit when your url includes a child. e.g.
Router
this.resource('apps', function() {
this.resource('chocolate', function(){
.....
});
});
Url being hit
#/apps/chocolate
Routes that will be hit
ApplicationRoute
AppsRoute
ChocolateRoute
ChocolateIndexRoute
The index route is only hit when you don't specify a route of a resource, and you are hitting that exact resource (aka nothing past that resource).
Update
You can return multiple models from a particular hook:
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return Em.RSVP.hash({
cows: this.store.find('cows'),
dogs: this.store.find('dogs')
});
}
});
If you want the main model to still be cows, you could switch this up at the setupController level.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return Em.RSVP.hash({
cows: this.store.find('cows'),
dogs: this.store.find('dogs')
});
},
setupController: function(controller, model){
controller.set('dogs', model.dogs); // there is a property on the controller called dogs with the dogs
this._super(controller, model.cows); // the model backing the controller is cows
}
});
Check out the second answer here, EmberJS: How to load multiple models on the same route? (the first is correct as well, just doesn't mention the gotchas of returning multiple models from the model hook).
You can also just set the property during the setupController, though this means it won't be available when the page has loaded, but asynchronously later.
Which controller?
Use Controller if you aren't going to back your controller with a model.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return undefined;
}
});
Use ObjectController, if you are going to set the model of the controller as something, that isn't a collection.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return Em.RSVP.hash({
cows: this.store.find('cows'),
dogs: this.store.find('dogs')
});
}
});
Use ArrayController if that something is going to be a collection of some sort.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return ['asdf','fdsasfd'];
}
});
Note
If you override the setupController, it won't set the model of the controller unless you explicitly tell it to, or use this._super.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return Em.RSVP.hash({
cows: this.store.find('cows'),
dogs: this.store.find('dogs')
});
},
setupController: function(controller, model){
controller.set('cows', model.cows);
controller.set('dogs', model.dogs);
// uh oh, model isn't set on the controller, it should just be Controller
// or you should define one of them as the model
// controller.set('model', model.cows); or
// this._super(controller, model.cows); this does the default setupController method
// in this particular case, ArrayController
}
});
Say I have two controllers, a CompaniesController and an IndexController. It turns out that all the data my Index route needs comes from the CompaniesController. So, I've specified my IndexController like this:
App.IndexController = Ember.ArrayController.extend({
needs: 'companies',
});
This works well if the CompaniesController is already initialized, but what about the first time I visit the site? CompaniesController is empty.
So, I need to initialize the data for CompaniesController from within the IndexController. How do I do this?
Use setupController and controllerFor within the IndexRoute:
App.IndexRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return this.store.find('company');
},
setupController: function(controller, model) {
this.controllerFor('companies').set('model', model);
}
});
It sounds to me like you may want to reverse the dependency and have your CompaniesController depend on Application, like so:
App.CompaniesController = Ember.ArrayController.extend({
needs: 'application',
contentBinding: 'controllers.application.companies'
});
Then, just initialize your application as needed when it first loads the base route.
My routing structure:
App.ready = function() {
App.Router.map(function() {
this.resource('contacts', function() {
this.resource('contact', function() {
});
});
});
}
Now in my contactsController I respond to and add action that transitions to the contact route. I would then like to call the add method on my contactController.
I have placed the needs: ['contact'] on my ContactController but then I get this message:
<App.ContactsController:ember197> needs controller:contact but it does not exist
When I use controllerFor (which is deprecated) I also get an error:
this.controllerFor('contact').add();
So Ember.js RC1 appears to only create the controllers (and other related instances) once one actually transitions to the appropriate route.
Is there a way around this.
So Ember.js RC1 appears to only create the controllers (and other related instances) once one actually transitions to the appropriate route.
Interesting - I had thought ember generated controllers earlier but guess not.
Is there a way around this?
Workaround is to define App.ContactController manually. Something like this will work:
App = Ember.Application.create({});
App.Router.map(function() {
this.resource('contacts', function() {
this.resource('contact', function() {
});
});
});
App.ContactController = Ember.Controller.extend({
add: function() {
alert('App.ContactController.add() was called!');
}
});
App.ContactsController = Ember.Controller.extend({
needs: ['contact'],
add: function() {
this.get('controllers.contact').add();
}
});
http://jsbin.com/osapal/1/edit
I have two controllers which both load to the same outlet, so only one can be active at one time. Both observe a property on a third controller like this:
App.SearchController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
needs: ['navigation'],
updateResults: function () {
console.log('load search data');
}.observes('controllers.navigation.search')
});
Full sample
http://jsfiddle.net/FMk7R/1/
When the property changes some data is fetched. If I click on both links so that both are loaded, then when the property changes, both controllers receive the observes event and load the data. I'd like to load the data only in the one which is visible.
How can I figure out which controller is currently active and load the data only in the active one?
Ideally your controllers should not know that they are active. One alternative is to invert the relationship, so that NavController is responsible for changing a query property of the "active" controller.
** UPDATE - Adding example based on comment **
App.SearchRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
setupController: function(controller) {
this.controllerFor('navigation').set('active', controller);
}
});
App.ImagesRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
setupController: function(controller) {
this.controllerFor('navigation').set('active', controller);
}
});
App.SearchController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
loadResults: function (query) {
console.log('loading web search data for: ', query);
}
});
App.ImagesController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
loadResults: function (query) {
console.log('loading image search data for: ', query);
}
});
App.NavigationController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
search: '',
active: null,
searchDidChange: function() {
this.get('active').loadResults(this.get('search'));
}.observes('search', 'active')
});
See http://jsfiddle.net/F3uFp/1/
Another alternative is to use computed properties instead. Ember will only refresh computed properties that are actually required to render the active view. For example:
App.SearchController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
needs: ['navigation'],
results: function () {
console.log('loading web search data');
return("web search results");
}.property('controllers.navigation.search')
});
See updated fiddle here: http://jsfiddle.net/ZTnmp/
http://jsfiddle.net/FMk7R/1/
hi i have the following route:
MB3.PlaylistRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(params) {
return MB3.Playlist.find(params.playlist_id);
}
});
The playlist has a hasMany realtion with tracks. in the playlist view i want do do some logic with an attribute of the first track of the playlist.
so i added this code:
MB3.PlaylistView = Ember.View.extend({
didInsertElement: function() {
console.log(this.get("controller.tracks").objectAt(0).get("title"));
}
});
The problem is title is undefined (i think because it is not yet loaded. the second thing i tried is waiting for the didLoad event:
MB3.PlaylistView = Ember.View.extend({
didInsertElement: function() {
var self=this;
this.get("controller.tracks").on("didLoad", function() {
console.log(self.get("controller.tracks").objectAt(0).get("title"));
});
}
});
but this logges null as well. How do i accomplish that?
Like Adrien said in the comments, it seems you are running into issue 587. That said, I don't think you actually need the "didLoad" callback in this case. Instead, try using a computed property to get the video_id or track title. For example:
MB3.PlaylistView = Ember.View.extend({
firstTrackTitle: function() {
return this.get('controller.tracks.firstObject.title');
}.property('controller.tracks.firstObject.title')
});
Then in your template, embed the player if this property is defined:
{{#if view.firstTrackTitle}}
embed code here
{{/if}}
FWIW I would put this logic in controller instead of view, but same idea.