I have a small problem with play-framwork (1.2.4).
I want to have a tag inherit another tag, and this one be included in a html page extending another web page. The best way to explain is with a schema :
However, it did not work the way I want. In fact, the extends in the test.tag file seems to overwrite the one in Screen.html. Then, the content of all the Screen.html is included in the block.tag #{doLayout /} instead of in the one of main.html
Is there any way to do what I want ?
Thanks.
Here is the sources :
main.html
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="fr" lang="fr">
<body>
#{doLayout /}
</body>
</html>
Screen.html
#{extends 'main.html' /}
<div id="Screen.html">
#{test /}
</div>
test.tag
#{extends 'tags/block.tag' /}
test.tag
block.tag
<div id="test">
#{doLayout /}
</div>
The generated html when the page is called
<div id="test">
<div id="Screen.html">
test.tag
</div>
</div>
As you can see, the main.html is not included and the the Screen is included in the block. Any ideas ?
For information, the wanted output :
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="fr" lang="fr">
<body>
<div id="Screen.html">
<div id="test">
test.tag
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
You can try using #{extends /} in your templates but not use them in tags.
To have some more flexibility in building tags on top of another, you could do:
test.tag:
#{block }
test.tag
#{/block}
and block.tag:
<div id="test">
#{doBody /}
</div>
with this you are passing part of the body from a test.tag to a block.tag and inserting it somewhere in block.tag using #{doBody /}
I think this might due to Groovy engine does #{extends} evaluation on runtime, the screen.html call test.tag which in turn extends block.tag, which happens after screen's extends to main.html and at runtime, groovy decide the final extends win.
Probably you want to try the rythm plugin which evaluate extends semantic at parsing time. That says rythm has no issue in your case.
Related
In prestashop 1.7, the checkout template file themes/classic/templates/checkout/checkout.tpl uses its own html structure instead of extending page.tpl, like every other checkout pages (cart, order confirmation, etc).
Why is that? Is there any security flaw we should be aware of?
I've overriden checkout.tpl in my own theme {extends file='page.tpl'} and I want to make sure that everything's alright:
{extends file='page.tpl'}
{block name='content'}
<section id="content">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-8">
{block name='cart_summary'}
{render file='checkout/checkout-process.tpl' ui=$checkout_process}
{/block}
</div>
<div class="col-md-4">
{block name='cart_summary'}
{include file='checkout/_partials/cart-summary.tpl' cart = $cart}
{/block}
{hook h='displayReassurance'}
</div>
</div>
</section>
{/block}
Thanks!
Florian
Is it possible to include a template (with include django template tag) within another template and "inject" some content to the page that includes (parent) through block tag, or something similar?
Let's say I have the following file structure within my project:
App/
(...)
templates/
base.html
index.html
_include1.html
_include2.html
_include3.html
_include4.html
Code for base.html:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head lang="en">
(...)
</head>
<body>
<script type="application/javascript">
$(function () {
{% block extra_script %}
{% endblock %}
});
</script>
Code for index.html:
{% extends "base.html" %}
{% load static %}
(...)
<div class="row gutter">
<div>
{% include "_include1.html" with object=object%}
</div>
<div>
{% include "_include2.html" with object=object %}
</div>
<div>
{% include "_include3.html" with object=object %}
</div>
<div>
{% include "_include4.html" with object=object %}
</div>
</div>
And in each _include*.html I would like to call some specific JS function (for example), but I want to place it in the parents (index.html or base.html, doesn't matter in my case) extra_script block. I searched in the documentation, other questions and didn't find a way to do this with the include syntax.
I've done something similar but through extends tag. However I don't want to define a block in the index.html or base.html for each page that I need to include ({% bloc include_* %}.
So the solution that I have now (and works) is to define a script in each included page like this (_include1.html):
<div>
(...)
</div>
<script>
$(function () {
//Code that should be placed within parents script page (this is just an example)
var a = function (){
(...)
};
a();
});
</script>
However I think there's a better way to do this, by making use of django templates engine, and without having to define a block for each page that needs to be included. Also I would like to have all my js code in a single place (parents <script> tag) instead of being scattered all over the place (like it is with the presented solution).
Can anyone give some input or ideas towards this?
Thanks!
Try to use django-sekizai for that purpose.
With sekizai, you can define a JavaScript block just before the </body>:
{% render_block "js" %}
And then whenever you need to add JavaScript to that block, you write this:
{% addtoblock "js" %}
<script type="text/javascript">
// your JavaScript
</script>
{% endaddtoblock %}
If there are duplicates of the content in the {% addtoblock %} blocks, they will be used only once.
I'm trying to implement an offcanvas to a site using zurb's foundation framework, for mobile viewing, and just copied the code for it from the documentation, but it just doesn't work.
the code is the following:
<script src="/js/vendor/custom.modernizr.js"></script>
<script src="/js/vendor/jquery.js"></script>
<script src="/js/foundation.min.js"></script>
<script>
$(document).foundation();
</script>
</head>
<body>
<!--offcanvas begin-->
<div class="off-canvas-wrap">
<div class="inner-wrap">
<nav class="tab-bar show-for-small">
<a class="left-off-canvas-toggle menu-icon">
<span>Foundation</span>
</a>
</nav>
<aside class="left-off-canvas-menu">
<ul class="off-canvas-list">
<li><label>Foundation</label></li>
<li>The Psychohistorians</li>
<li>The test!</li>
</ul>
</aside>
<section class="main-section">
<!--offcanvas begin-page-content-->
<!--content-->
<!--offcanvas end-page-content-->
</section>
<a class="exit-off-canvas"></a>
</div><!--inner-wrap-->
</div><!-- off-canvas-wrap -->
<!--offcanvas end-->
</body>
Am I doing something wrong?
In some instances this can be fixed by supplying the HTML data attribute data-offcanvas
<div class="off-canvas-wrap" data-offcanvas>
See this fiddle for the working changes to your markup: http://jsfiddle.net/vooaqtxt/
I have replicated the problem, and found that moving jquery, foundation.min.js resources and the initialization call:
$(document).foundation();
to just before the closing </body> tag fixed the problem (leave modernizr.js in the head).
Edit: As #Jigar pointed out offcanvas.js does not need to be loaded externally.
p.s. In just about every case, it's best to place all your script references at the end of the page, just before </body>
Unfortunately, Ribena's answer is not working anymore, at version 5.2.3, though it was at version 5.0.3.
For it to work now, the trigger javascript needs to be put:
or at the end of the <body> tag as it said in the docs, like Daniel said
or inside the <head> this way (using JQuery):
<script>
$(window).bind("load", function () {
$(document).foundation();
});
</script>
Update to Foundation 5.0.3 and your code should work fine again.
You are missing the href="#" on your toggle button link
If the href="#" is missing, it will not work on mobile devices.
This is what your nav should look like:
<nav class="tab-bar show-for-small">
<a class="left-off-canvas-toggle menu-icon" href="#">
<span>Foundation</span>
</a>
</nav>
0 release!
I am having a weird problem rendering CSS under Ember.js. It is weird because the just works fine after manually refreshing the page, and in plain HTML without Ember. I have tried different browsers and different CSS libraries and all the same.
I just want to render tabs inside a handlebars template, I have tried both Zurb Foundation sections and jQuery-ui tabs and both work only after manual page refresh.
I have tried to reproduce the problem with JSBin but it didn't work. I am using the example code from both libraries to do this.
Here is my HTML with Zurb Foundation 4.3: (referencing js and css libraries omitted for brevity)
<html>
<body>
<script type="text/x-handlebars">
<nav class="top-bar" data-options="is_hover=false">
<ul class="title-area">
<li class="name">
<h1>Main</h1>
</li>
<li class="toggle-topbar menu-icon"><span>Menu</span></li>
</ul>
<section class="top-bar-section">
<ul class="left show-on-small">
<li>{{#linkTo 'families'}}Families{{/linkTo}}</li>
</ul>
<ul class="left">
<li>{{#linkTo 'charities'}}Charities{{/linkTo}}</li>
</ul>
</section>
</nav>
<div>
{{outlet}}
</div>
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="families">
<div class="row display">
<div class="large-3 columns">
<span>{{#linkTo 'families.details'}}list{{/linkTo}}</span>
</div>
<div class="large-9 columns">
{{outlet}}
</div>
</div>
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="families/details">
<div class="row">
<span>details</span>
</div>
<div class="row">
<section class="section-container auto" data-section data-section-small-style>
<section class="active" >
<p class="title" data-section-title>Family Info</p>
<div class="content" id="panel1" data-section-content>
<span>Family Info goes here</span>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<p class="title" data-section-title>Members</p>
<div class="content" data-slug="panel2" data-section-content>
<span>Family members list goes here</span>
</div>
</section>
</section>
</div>
</script>
</body>
</html>
My Javascript:
App = Em.Application.create();
App.Router.map(function() {
this.resource('families', function() {
this.route('details');
});
this.resource('charities');
});
Just wanted to know if there are any known issues or caveats between Ember/handlebars and CSS.
Thank you.
EDIT: Got a sample running at http://jsbin.com/iTOsof/3 but does not work after refresh like local host
I am guessing the reason it's not working is because Foundations JavaScript handler is being run when the DOM fires its ready event, at that point Ember haven't rendered its templates so there's nothing to tie the tabs to.
What you could try to do is to add $(document).foundation(); to the DetailsViews didInsertElement.
App.DetailsView = Ember.View.extend({
didInsertElement: function() {
$(document).foundation('section'); // this will only load the section component
}
});
One issue though, since Foundation's JavaScript components are not compatible with Ember you will most likely run into problems when Foundation appends their location hash for the selected section since Ember is using the same method to handle its routing.
You can change Embers location method to a modern variant by specifying:
App.Router.reopen({
location: 'history'
});
This will however not be compatible with IE 9 and below.
Another alternative is to use Bootstrap as an alternative to Foundation (personally I prefer Foundation over Bootstrap but in this case it may be worth it if you don't want to create your own components in Ember), and then use the Ember Components made available for Bootstrap, http://ember-addons.github.io/bootstrap-for-ember/dist/#/show_components/tabs-panes
I am working with Velocity templates, where I need to have multiple pages that needs to follow the same template style, say "about_me", "contact_us" and "home", all these pages will have same header, left menu and only thing different is content.
For example, HTML for all of them would be exactly the same except for one in < div id="page-content" >.
<html>
<head>
.. some common css and js
</head>
<body>
<div id="main-content">
<div id="header">
Main Menu Bar on top
</div>
<div id="left-menu">
Menus on the left
</div>
<div id="page-content">
I could be contact us, or home or about us.
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
One of the ways I have done is by having separate .vm file for header and side menu and importing them over on each of aboutus.vm, contactus.vm and home.vm, but with this i have lot of duplicate code. Is there a way to define everything as a template and just have "page-content", defined in my .vm files?
You could parse a velocity file in the middle of your page and define the template name as a variable. That way you could point to a different page-content.vm file for each
In the below example $contentTemplate could equal any of the following:
home/page-content.vm
about/page-content.vm
contact/page-content.vm
See below
<html>
<head>
.. some common css and js
</head>
<body>
<div id="main-content">
<div id="header">
Main Menu Bar on top
</div>
<div id="left-menu">
Menus on the left
</div>
<div id="page-content">
#parse($contentTemplate)
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>