I have two models:
App.User = DS.Model.create({
comments: DS.hasMany('App.Comment')
});
App.Comment = DS.Model.create({
user: DS.belongsTo('App.User')
});
When a user is deleted, it also will delete all its comments on the backend, so I should delete them from the client-side identity map.
I'm listing all the comments on the system from another place, so after deleting a user it would just crash.
Is there any way to specify this kind of dependency on the association? Thanks!
I use a mixin when I want to implement this behaviour. My models are defined as follows:
App.Post = DS.Model.extend(App.DeletesDependentRelationships, {
dependentRelationships: ['comments'],
comments: DS.hasMany('App.Comment'),
author: DS.belongsTo('App.User')
});
App.User = DS.Model.extend();
App.Comment = DS.Model.extend({
post: DS.belongsTo('App.Post')
});
The mixin itself:
App.DeletesDependentRelationships = Ember.Mixin.create({
// an array of relationship names to delete
dependentRelationships: null,
// set to 'delete' or 'unload' depending on whether or not you want
// to actually send the deletions to the server
deleteMethod: 'unload',
deleteRecord: function() {
var transaction = this.get('store').transaction();
transaction.add(this);
this.deleteDependentRelationships(transaction);
this._super();
},
deleteDependentRelationships: function(transaction) {
var self = this;
var klass = Ember.get(this.constructor.toString());
var fields = Ember.get(klass, 'fields');
this.get('dependentRelationships').forEach(function(name) {
var relationshipType = fields.get(name);
switch(relationshipType) {
case 'belongsTo': return self.deleteBelongsToRelationship(name, transaction);
case 'hasMany': return self.deleteHasManyRelationship(name, transaction);
}
});
},
deleteBelongsToRelationship: function(name, transaction) {
var record = this.get(name);
if (record) this.deleteOrUnloadRecord(record, transaction);
},
deleteHasManyRelationship: function(key, transaction) {
var self = this;
// deleting from a RecordArray doesn't play well with forEach,
// so convert to a normal array first
this.get(key).toArray().forEach(function(record) {
self.deleteOrUnloadRecord(record, transaction);
});
},
deleteOrUnloadRecord: function(record, transaction) {
var deleteMethod = this.get('deleteMethod');
if (deleteMethod === 'delete') {
transaction.add(record);
record.deleteRecord();
}
else if (deleteMethod === 'unload') {
var store = this.get('store');
store.unloadRecord(record);
}
}
});
Note that you can specify via deleteMethod whether or not you want to send the DELETE requests to your API. If your back-end is configured to delete dependent records automatically, then you will want to use the default.
Here's a jsfiddle that shows it in action.
A quick-and-dirty way would be to add the following to your user model
destroyRecord: ->
#get('comments').invoke('unloadRecord')
#_super()
I adapted the answer of #ahmacleod to work with ember-cli 2.13.1 and ember-data 2.13.0. I had an issue with nested relationships and the fact that after deleting an entity from the database its id was reused. This lead to conflicts with remnants in the ember-data model.
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Mixin.create({
dependentRelationships: null,
destroyRecord: function() {
this.deleteDependentRelationships();
return this._super()
.then(function (model) {
model.unloadRecord();
return model;
});
},
unloadRecord: function() {
this.deleteDependentRelationships();
this._super();
},
deleteDependentRelationships: function() {
var self = this;
var fields = Ember.get(this.constructor, 'fields');
this.get('dependentRelationships').forEach(function(name) {
self.deleteRelationship(name);
});
},
deleteRelationship (name) {
var self = this;
self.get(name).then(function (records) {
if (!records) {
return;
}
var reset = [];
if (!Ember.isArray(records)) {
records = [records];
reset = null;
}
records.forEach(function(record) {
if (record) {
record.unloadRecord();
}
});
self.set(name, reset);
});
},
});
Eventually, I had to set the relationship to [] (hasMany) or null (belongsTo). Else I would have run into the following error message:
Assertion Failed: You cannot update the id index of an InternalModel once set. Attempted to update <id>.
Maybe this is helpful for somebody else.
Related
If I use a transitionTo on a route with a slow model hook, the loading.hbs state never gets triggered (I have loading.hbs files at all of the levels -- cluster, cluster.schedule and cluster.schedule.preview_grid). I tried renaming the one at cluster.schedule preview_grid-loading.hbs with no luck.
On the transitionTo, there is no model or model id passed in, just the route:
viewPreviewGrid: function() {
this.transitionTo('cluster.schedule.preview_grid');
},
I also have a loading action defined as follows:
loading(transition) {
var controller = this.controller;
if (!Ember.isNone(controller)) {
this.controller.reset();
}
transition.promise.finally(function() {
NProgress.done();
});
}
During the transitionTo call the page just stays on the previous route until the promises in the model hook resolve, and then it transitions to the other route. If I refresh the page, the loading state gets triggered just fine. Is this a known behaviour for transitionTo?
This is my model hook:
model: function (/*params*/) {
var socialProfile = this.modelFor('cluster.schedule').get('firstObject');
if (!socialProfile.get('isInstagram')){
throw new Error("Attempted to access preview with non-ig profile: " + socialProfile.get('id'));
}
var accessToken = socialProfile.get('token');
var self = this;
return Ember.RSVP.hash({
igPosts: new Ember.RSVP.Promise(function(resolve) {
self.getUsersRecentMedia(accessToken).then(function(response) {
var igPosts = Ember.A([]);
response.data.forEach(function(data) {
igPosts.pushObject(self.igPostFromResponse(data, socialProfile));
});
resolve(igPosts);
});
}),
posts: new Ember.RSVP.Promise(function(resolve) {
self.store.query('gram', { type: 'preview', social_profile_id: socialProfile.get('id'), limit: self.get('postLimit') }).then(function(grams) {
var filteredGrams = grams.filter(function(gram) {
return (gram.get('scheduledInFuture')) && (gram.belongsTo('socialProfile').id() === socialProfile.get('id')) && (gram.get('active'));
});
resolve(filteredGrams);
});
}),
igUser: new Ember.RSVP.Promise(function(resolve) {
self.getSelf(accessToken).then(function(response) {
resolve(self.igUserFromResponse(response.data, socialProfile));
});
})
});
},
You need to return true at the end of the loading() hook to tell Ember to go ahead and show the default loading route (loading.hbs).
loading(transition) {
var controller = this.controller;
if (!Ember.isNone(controller)) {
this.controller.reset();
}
transition.promise.finally(function() {
NProgress.done();
});
return true;
},
I am trying to set data from two models (that has hasMany & belongsTo relationship) and save them to firebase.
'list' data ends up being saved to firebase but not user data.
I think I'm doing something wrong at step 3. I'd appreciate your help!
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return this.store.find('list');
},
actions: {
createList: function() {
var newListTitle = this.controllerFor('lists').get('newListTitle');
var username = this.get('session.user.displayName');
alert(this.get('session.user.displayName'));
if (Ember.isBlank(newListTitle)) { return false; }
//1
var list = this.store.createRecord('list', {
title: newListTitle,
user: username,
});
//2
this.controllerFor('lists').set('newListTitle', '');
var _this = this;
//3
list.save().then(function(list) {
user.get('lists').addObject(list);
user.save();
_this.transitionTo('lists.show', list); //4
});
}
}
});
Restructured your adding logic as well as user defined models, also modified your route, which could look like this in Edit and View mode. Meaning you can have more than one item returned from "model".
// Update models
App.List = DS.Model.extend({
value: DS.attr('string')
});
App.User = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string')
});
App.UserLists = DS.Model.extend({
user: DS.belongsTo('user'),
list: DS.belongsTo('list')
});
export default Ember.Route.extend({
LIST:SHOW ROUTE
model: function(params) {
var store = this.get('store');
var userPromise = store.find('user', params.id);
return Ember.RSVP.hash({
user: userPromise,
userList : userPromise.then(function(user) {
return store.find(userList, { WhereUserIdIs : user.get('id') })
});
});
},
actions: {
createList: function() {
var self = this;
var failure = function(reason) {
// handle stuff
};
var list = this.store.createRecord('list', {
title: this.get('title'),
});
var user = this.get('user');
var usersList = store.createRecord('userList', {
'user': user,
'list': list
});
list.save().then(function(list) {
user.save().then(function() {
userList.save().then(function() {
self.transitionTo('lists.show', list.get('id'));
}, failure);
}, failure);
}, failure);
}
});
I have a custom component that expects data and not a promise, but I am unsure if they way that I am obtaining the data is the right way.
Is this the right way to do it?
component hbs
{{x-dropdown content=salutations valuePath="id" labelPath="description" action="selectSalutation"}}
Doesn't work
controller (this is the way I expect things to work
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Controller.extend({
bindSalutations: function() {
var self = this;
this.store.find('salutation').then(function(data) {
self.set('salutations', data);
});
}.on('init'),
components/x-dropdown.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Component.extend({
list: function() {
var content = this.get('content');
var valuePath = this.get('valuePath');
var labelPath = this.get('labelPath');
return content.map(function(item) {
return {
key: item[labelPath],
value: item[valuePath],
};
});
}.property('content'),
This works
controller
bindSalutations: function() {
var self = this;
this.store.find('salutation').then(function(data) {
self.set('salutations', data.get('content')); // pass the content instead of just the data
});
}.on('init'),
component
...
list: function() {
var content = this.get('content');
var valuePath = this.get('valuePath');
var labelPath = this.get('labelPath');
return content.map(function(item) {
return {
key: item._data[labelPath], // access through the _data attribute
value: item._data[valuePath],
};
});
}.property('content'),
Ember Data returns a Proxy Promise. This means you can use the promise as if it were a collection or model itself, as long as you aren't dependent on the property being completely populated when you use it. If you really want the promise resolved, you should probably be setting it up in the route.
If you want it on your controller, you can be lazy and do it like so:
Controller
salutations: function() {
this.store.find('salutation');
}.property(),
Component
...
list: function() {
var content = this.get('content'),
valuePath = this.get('valuePath'),
labelPath = this.get('labelPath');
return content.map(function(item) {
return {
key: item.get(labelPath),
value: item.get(valuePath),
};
});
}.property('content.[]'),
Template
{{x-dropdown content=salutations valuePath="id" labelPath="description" action="selectSalutation"}}
The real trick is to watch if the collection is changing. Hence you'll see I changed the property argument to content.[]
i'm working with a a router and a controller, and i need to complete some operations on the controller, this is my model code
AcornsTest.StockRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(params) {
"use strict";
var url_params = params.slug.split('|'),
url = AcornsTest.Config.quandl.URL + '/' + url_params[0] + '/' + url_params[1] + '.json',
stockInStore = this.store.getById('stock', url_params[1]),
today = new Date(),
yearAgo = new Date(),
self = this;
yearAgo.setFullYear(today.getFullYear() - 1);
today = today.getFullYear()+'-'+today.getMonth()+'-'+today.getDate();
yearAgo = yearAgo.getFullYear()+'-'+yearAgo.getMonth()+'-'+yearAgo.getDate();
if(stockInStore && stockInStore.get('data').length) {
return stockInStore;
}
return Ember.$.getJSON(url,{ trim_start: yearAgo, trim_end: today, auth_token: AcornsTest.Config.quandl.APIKEY })
.then(function(data) {
if(stockInStore) {
return stockInStore.set('data', data.data);
} else {
return self.store.createRecord('stock', {
id: data.code,
source_code: data.source_code,
code: data.code,
name: data.name,
description: data.description,
display_url: data.display_url,
source_name: data.source_name,
data: data.data,
slug: data.source_code+'|'+data.code
});
}
});
}
});
and this is my controller
AcornsTest.StockController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
init: function() {
"use strict";
this.send('generateChartInfo');
},
actions: {
generateChartInfo: function() {
"use strict";
console.log(this.model);
console.log(this.get('model'));
}
}
});
from the controller i'm trying to get access to the model to get some information and format it, and send it to the view
but this.model or this.get('model') always returns null, how can i successful get access to the model from the controller? thanks
You are overriding the init method, but its broken, do this:
AcornsTest.StockController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
init: function() {
"use strict";
this._super();
this.send('generateChartInfo');
});
You need to call the parent method.
See this test case: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/gijon/3/edit?js,console,output
The model is not ready at init time. If anyone has official docs please share.
I have a basic person object
PersonApp.Person = DS.Model.extend({
username: DS.attr('string')
});
I have a route to find all people
PersonApp.Router.map(function(match) {
this.resource("person", { path: "/" }, function() {
this.route("page", { path: "/page/:page_id" });
this.route("search", { path: "/search/:page_term" });
});
});
In my route I'm looking at the params coming in
PersonApp.PersonRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
selectedPage: 1,
filterBy: '',
model: function(params) {
if (get(params, 'page_id') !== undefined) {
this.selectedPage = get(params, 'page_id');
} else {
this.selectedPage = 1;
}
if (get(params, 'page_term') !== undefined) {
this.filterBy = get(params, 'page_term');
} else {
this.filterBy = '';
}
console.log(this.selectedPage);
console.log(this.filterBy);
return PersonApp.Person.find();
}
});
My nested routes are using a different model (not person directly) as they contain data that isn't persisted (and really only let me flip a bit on the controller)
Yet when I manually put something on the url or click a link that does a full blown transition the "params" coming into my model hook above are always empty.
Here is the basic page model I'm using (w/ search support)
PersonApp.Page = Ember.Object.extend({
term: ''
});
When a user does a search I have a view that invokes transitionTo
PersonApp.SearchField = Ember.TextField.extend({
keyUp: function(e) {
var model = PersonApp.Page.create({term: this.get('value')});
this.get('controller.target').transitionTo('person.search', model);
}
});
Any way I can pass this "page" model to a nested view and still retain the basic "person" controller context (ie- so I can manipulate the view around this array of model objects)