I am looking to store the activity of an user, but I am not sure where to store it. I dont think database is a option as it will be very big than. I am looking to know as to how sites like facebook, dropbox remember all the activity of an particular user. And it can't be stored in sessions as this is not session specific rather user specific.
Please help me with your suggestion.
Normally you can use Django Admin Logs for such an activity, if you want.
Normally Django keeps track of admin actions such as creating, updating or deleting existing records. It has the following structure:
from django.contrib.admin.models import LogEntry
LogEntry.objects.log_action(
user_id = ...,
content_type_id = ...,
object_id = ...,
object_repr = ....,
change_message = ...,
action_flag = ...
)
I am using that in my system as a logger, and keeping track of every action. Normally, Django logs insert, update or delete operations done over admin forms and I log my hand written view and form actions. Also, you can catch user operations such as login/logout using signals.
I defined new action flags. Django uses 3 flags: 1 for insert, 2 for update and 3 for delete. I expanded that list with my action flags.
The advantage of using this is, as I said, you do not need to handle default Django Admin forms and any action you did using these forms.
You might want to look at django-activity-stream which is an implementation of the activity streams spec. This stores a list of actions in the database and allows the following of users/entities to give something similar to Facebook if this is what you are interested in.
However, as you mention, this can end up with enormous sets of data which might be a bit much for a conventional single database approach. I'm not sure how sites like Twitter deal with it but unless you plan to scale up very quickly the standard database approach would probably last you a while.
Related
I am having some struggles how does exactly django.admin.LogEntry objects are created.
Consider the following scenario:
I have a bunch of functions which take a csv file with data that allow me to create multiple objects at one call (just iterate through the file, use the data and if data in given row is correct: create a Model instance). I want to make sure that that each of that creation will be logged.
The question is: django docs are not very descriptive on how does LogEntry works and I am not sure if such actions (not taken in the admin panel itself) will be logged there. Also: will the LogEntries be created for the related objects or I have to trigger them manually?
Does anybody got any experience with such scenarios and can share thoughts about it?
The LogEntry model is in the Admin package and only used by Django admin by default. It is used in the admin layer and not model layer when saving objects. if you want to use it outside the admin, then you will have to manually create the entries yourself. That also means the admin will likely display entries of changes made by normal users so you have to think about how you want the entries displayed
We are using LogEntry/django_admin_log and recording additions, changes and deletions made from Django Admin. However we have two issues we need to address:
1.) Changes record only the field that changed. Not the old and new values. We would like to add the specific details of all changes.
2.) We would like to record an action in this log every time a page is viewed on the Django Admin panel.
How would it be best to proceed?
We are happy to do some work to extend the existing functionality of this, or we are happy to move to a completely new 3rd part module if necessary, or write our own. But would like some guidance from some experts?
We had similar requirements in terms of keeping history and track of actions done by users with a higher level of detail in terms of values changes. What we ended up doing was creating a new model called "History" which we populated with the user, the name of the model being changed, the instance id and a dictionary called changes showing the name of each field changed and values from - to.
In order to populate the new model, we overrode the save_model function in the admin file for the model we want to track. Regarding the page views, you can overrride the get_fields if "obj" is not None and create an instance of History accordingly.
I have written one Django cloud based app. This app will have multiple user and for them multiple database, so that their data should be separate and they can save only to same database.
1) How can we implement it
2) How to automatically one user from login page to assign the database to write on it.
I don't have a complete answer, since you do not give a lot of detail. But here are a couple ots that f hinDjango supports custom database router implementations. A database router is a class that helps django decide which database to use for a particular model. Unfortunately I don't think this mechanism is granular enough for your needs. You can also specify the database to use in your code by using using(name) queryset method and save(using=name) form of save() method for instances. Of course this also means that some features of Django are going to be unvailable to you, since you cannot always expect to have a user. Look at the docs here for more info
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/db/multi-db/
I have two models: Domain and Record. Many records link to a domain. The domains and records have their owners. I want to disallow users to create records in domains that they don't own. However they should be able to edit records if someone else (a superuser e.g.) created them and set owner to that specific user (even if they don't own a domain). This should work both for admin site and for API (rest_framework)
My question is - what is the simplest way to achieve this goal? Is there some django plugin that handles permissions for linking? Can I use model validators here (if so - how to distinguish if a new object is created)?
The problem here is that the Django Rest Framework and Django itself (via admin) are interacting only at the level of the models. In order to achieve your goal I would implement the following design:
Make the models aware of their owners and users. For that I would use django-audit-log.
Overwrite the default model Manager and build your logic in the create method, where I will query the user's attributes and throw appropriate exceptions.
Such a design shifts some of the business logic from the controller to the data model - there are some debates out there about the benefits and pitfalls of such an approach. But with the underlined constraints (Django admin and API) is the only common place where you could put it.
Is this what you are aiming for ?
Say I have an app with ModelA, ModelB, and ModelC
For my app's admin page (/admin/app), how do I hook into the display of the "App administration" page so I may hide Model types that are empty (have no instances)?
That's a big ask, because you'd have to dynamically register/unregister apps according to the results of a database/ORM query (a count(), at least) for each of the models that each of the INSTALLED_APPS contains.
Every single time you viewed the admin.
While that in itself is unpleasant enough, bear in mind that admin.py for each app is processed at server restart/reload time (IIRC), so you could't hope to hook up something cute like those DB lookups there, as it'd only get run once and not reflect the actual state of models currently have objects stored in your database.
Better move: leave it be. If there are no objects to view for a given model, then there are no objects to view for a given model.
If you're concerned about your client/user making new models in there when they shouldn't, then that's a combination of user education and admin user permissions that you can sort out.
As said in a few places: "The Admin is not your app." If the customization goes beyond the trivial, it's time to write your own views. You can still hook them in to the admin site by overriding the base admin template and even serving them from the same root path as the rest of your admin.