I'd like to create a dynamic classname on an object with a value I'm getting from my model. One of the keys is named provider which contains either "twitter" or "facebook". What I'd like to do is to prepend the string "icon-" to the provider so that the resulting class is icon-twitter or icon-facebook.
This is the code that I've got now.
<i {{bindAttr class=":avatar-icon account.provider"}}></i>
Ember offers a way to include a static string within the attribute by prepending : to it. You can see that I'm also adding a class called avatar-icon in this example. I've already tried :icon-account.provider which simply resulted in the literal string "icon-account.provider".
RESPONSE
Nice one. I'm working on a solution similar to your answer right now. Question though: this view will be used within the context of an each loop. How would I pass in the current item to be used within the view? I have this right now:
{{#each account in controller}}
{{#view "Social.AccountButtonView"}}
<i {{bindAttr class="account.provider"}}></i>
{{/view}}
{{/each}}
Is it possible to just do this:
{{#view "Social.AccountButtonView" account="account"}}
?
I have previously stated that attributeBindings would be a suitable solution for this, but I was mistaken. When binding the class attribute of a given View, as pointed out, you should use classNames or classNameBindings. Please refer to the sample below:
App.ApplicationView = Em.View.extend({
provider: 'Facebook',
classNameBindings: 'providerClass',
providerClass: function() {
return 'icon-avatar icon-%#'.fmt(this.get('provider').toLowerCase());
}.property('provider')
});
This will render the following HTML:
<div id="ember212" class="ember-view icon-avatar icon-facebook">
<h1>App</h1>
</div>
Here's a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/schawaska/HH9Sk/
(Note: The fiddle is linking to a version of Ember.js earlier than RC)
Related
<script type="text/x-handlebars">
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="sideMenu">
{{#link-to 'home'}}Home{{/link-to}}
{{#link-to 'posts'}}Posts{{/link-to}}
</div>
<div class="content">
{{outlet}}
</div>
</div>
</script>
I am new to ember js. How can I add a class on 'content' class each time when view changes.
We do something like this:
Ember.Route.reopen({
activate: function() {
var cssClass = this.toCssClass();
// you probably don't need the application class
// to be added to the body
if (cssClass !== 'application') {
Ember.$('body').addClass(cssClass);
}
},
deactivate: function() {
Ember.$('body').removeClass(this.toCssClass());
},
toCssClass: function() {
return this.routeName.replace(/\./g, '-').dasherize();
}
});
It would add a class to the body (in your case just use content), that is the same as the current route.
#torazaburo had some excellent points about #Asgaroth (accepted) answer, but I liked the idea of not having to write this same functionality over and over again. So, what I am providing below is a hybrid of the two solutions plus my own two cents and I believe it addresses #torazaburo concerns regarding the accepted answer.
Let's start with the 2nd point:
I also don't like the idea of polluting Ember.Route
Can you pollute Ember.Route without polluting Ember.Route? (Huh?) Absolutely! :) Instead of overwriting activate, we can write our own function and tell it to run .on(activate) This way, our logic is run, but we are not messing with the built-in/inherited activate hook.
The accepted answer is very procedural, imperative, jQuery-ish, and un-Ember-like.
I have to agree with this as well. In the accepted answer, we are abandoning Ember's data binding approach and instead fall back on the jQuery. Not only that, we then have to have more code in the deactivate to "clean up the mess".
So, here is my approach:
Ember.Route.reopen({
setContentClass: function(){
this.controllerFor('application').set("path", this.routeName.dasherize());
}.on('activate')
});
We add our own method to the Ember.Route class without overwriting activate hook. All the method is doing is setting a path property on the application controller.
Then, inside application template, we can bind to that property:
<div {{bind-attr class=":content path"}}>
{{outlet}}
</div>
Working solution here
Just bind the currentPath property on the application controller to the class of the element in the template:
<div {{bind-attr class=":content currentPath"}}>
{{outlet}}
</div>
In case you're not familiar with the {{bind-attr class= syntax in Ember/Handlebars:
the class name preceded with a colon (:content) is always added to the element
properties such as currentPath result in the current value of that property being inserted as a class, and are kept dynamically updated
To be able to access currentPath in a template being driven by a controller other than the application controller, first add
needs: ['application']
to the controller, which makes the application controller available under the name controllers.application, for use in the bind-attr as follows:
<div {{bind-attr class=":content controllers.application.currentPath"}}>
You may use currentRouteName instead of or in addition to currentPath if that works better for you.
The class name added will be dotted, such as uploads.index. You can refer to that in your CSS by escaping the dot, as in
.uploads\.index { }
Or, if you would prefer dasherized, add a property to give the dasherized path, such as
dasherizedCurrentPath: function() {
return this.('currentPath').replace(/\./g, '-');
}.property('currentPath')
<div {{bind-attr class=":content dasherizedCurrentPath"}}>
This has been tested in recent versions of ember-cli.
Hi i am very new to ember js. i pass action parameters(id ) on link-to action in template but i did not get the values in my controller.
My Template code as follows:
index.html:
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="search">
{{#each model.results}}
// here i pass id value along with action
{{#link-to 'profile' id action="profileinfo"}}
</script>
app.js:
App.SearchController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
id: '',
actions:{
profileinfo: function(id){
// Here i access id value like this
console.log(id);
var id = this.get('id');})
when i click on the link action goes to Searchcontroller, but i get id value is empty.I follow some solutions in stack overflow but unfortunately i did not get anything. Please provide some solution
I don't get why you're using the {{#link-to}} helper for triggering an action on your controller. Maybe you could simply use the {{action}} helper ?
If you try doing it that way, would it work ?
<button type="button" {{action "profileinfo" id}}>Click me !</button>
From there, your console.log(id); should get your value.
EDIT
Would also work for a <a> tag
<a href="#" {{action "profileinfo" id}}>Click me !</a>
I've created popular addon for doing just that:
{{#link-to 'profile' id invokeAction='profileinfo'}}
Simply install it:
ember installember-link-action
Please leave a star if you enjoy it or leave feedback if you feel anything is missing. :) It works with Ember 1.13 and 2.X (tested on Travis CI).
I have the following (ember-1.4.0):
App.DateRangeSelectorView = Ember.View.extend({
templateName: 'date-range-selector',
selectedBinding: 'controller.selected',
dateRangeSelectorItemView: Ember.View.extend({
tagName: 'li',
classNameBindings: ['isActive:active'],
isActive: function() {
return this.get('item') === this.get('parentView.selected');
}.property('item', 'parentView.selected')
})
});
And the template:
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="date-range-selector">
<ul class="nav nav-pills" style="margin-bottom: 10px;">
{{#view view.dateRangeSelectorItemView item="today"}}
<a href="#" {{action gotoToday}} >{{controller.content.today.label}}</a>
{{/view}}
....
</ul>
</script>
I have followed the guidelines specified here, specially:
When nesting a view class like this, make sure to use a lowercase
letter, as Ember will interpret a property with a capital letter as a
global property.
Thanks, but no thanks: ember is stubbornly saying:
Uncaught Error: Assertion Failed: Unable to find view at path 'view.dateRangeSelectorItemView'
I have tried with and without the view. prefix, but no luck. How can I render the nested view?
EDIT
The problem seems to be that the lookup performed by the container is failing. Maybe there are some capitalization or name coercion rules that I am not getting right. I would like to list all available views, so that I can recognize if my view is there, maybe with a slightly different name.
How can I list all available (registered?) views, including nested views? That would include dateRangeSelectorItemView, which is a view nested inside App.DateRangeSelectorView, and is not defined in the application itself.
I guess what I am looking for is a way of listing all objects (with their lookup names!) which are extensions of Ember.View: Ember.View.extend()
The problem is that I was using an outlet for this, and the outlet does not allow to specify a view: it generates the view according to the template name, so that my DateRangeSelectorView was not used. I have raised an issue about this.
The problem is as follows:
In our application we have several buttons, navigation icons etc., which we want to be 'selected' when they have been clicked. We can have multiple elements marked at the same time.
The secondary reason for me wanting to do this is that when I read the new Guides on emberjs.com I get the feeling that templates should be used more than stated before and that templates should have the responsibility of rendering the DOM, while the views should be used to handle sophisticated events (if any) or to create common/shared components to be reused in the application.
Currently the view is handling this:
app.NavView = Ember.CollectionView.extend({
...
itemViewClass: Ember.View.extend({
...
classNameBindings: ['isSelected:selected']
isSelected: function () {
return this.get('controller.selected') === this.get('content');
}.property('controller.selected')
})
});
But that is all the View basically is doing, I would like to drop the entire View and just use a template for this
I have tried with a template approach, and dropped the entire View concept.
<div id="main-menu">
{{#each content}}
<div {{bindAttr class="controller.isSelected:selected"}}>
{{{iconsvg}}}
{{name}}
</div>
{{/each}}
</div>
But my problem here of course is that bindAttr doesn't know about the context it’s in, and cannot 'send' this to the isSelected property on the controller to evaluate if it is this element that is selected or not.
Is there a good solution to do this without a view, or am I forced to use a view?
Or am I thinking the design part and responsibility of Templates/views/controllers wrong?
Any response is appreciated!
In the current documentation: http://emberjs.com/guides/templates/displaying-a-list-of-items/ there is a mention explaining how to use the {{each}} helper which doesn't override the current context.
In your case, this would be something like:
<div id="main-menu">
{{#each item in controller}}
<div {{bindAttr class="isSelected:selected"}}>
{{{item.iconsvg}}}
{{item.name}}
</div>
{{/each}}
</div>
Note I have remove the reference to 'controller' in the {{bindAttr}} since I assume it's an ember controller, then it's the current context, so basically isSelected is equivalent to controller.isSelected
I have a situation in a template where I want to use an if block on a value in the parent context while inside an each block.
The code:
App = Ember.Application.create({});
App.view = Ember.View.extend({
foo: [1, 2, 3],
bar: true
});
The template:
<script type="text/x-handlebars">
{{#view App.view}}
{{#each foo}}
{{#if bar}}
{{this}}
{{/if}}
{{/each}}
{{/view}}
</script>
This does not work because names referenced inside an each loop are scoped to the element of iteration. How do you refer to things in the parent context?
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/hekevintran/sMeyC/1/
I found a better solution.
From the Ember.js View Layer guide (http://emberjs.com/guides/understanding-ember/the-view-layer/):
Handlebars helpers in Ember may also specify variables. For example, the {{#with controller.person as tom}} form specifies a tom variable that descendent scopes can access. Even if a child context has a tom property, the tom variable will supersede it.
This form has one major benefit: it allows you to shorten long paths without losing access to the parent scope.
It is especially important in the {{#each}} helper, which provides a {{#each person in people}} form. In this form, descendent context have access to the person variable, but remain in the same scope as where the template invoked the each.
The template:
<script type="text/x-handlebars" >
{{#view App.view}}
{{#each number in view.foo}}
{{#if view.bar}}
{{number}}
{{/if}}
{{/each}}
{{/view}}
</script>
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/hekevintran/hpcJv/1/
What hekevintran's answer means is that you can rename any variable using #with. We have a similar problem in JavaScript with this. In JavaScript, sometimes you'll see code like this to work around it.
var self = this;
doSomething(function() {
// Here, `this` has changed.
if (self.bar) {
console.log(this);
}
});
In Ember flavored Handlebars, something similar is happening with view. Say you have App.MyOuterView and another view inside it. You can work around it like this.
{{#with view as myOuterView}}
{{#each foo}}
{{#if myOuterView.bar}}
{{this}}
{{/if}}
{{/each}}
{{/with}}
Similar to the JavaScript, you can essentially rename view to something else so it doesn't get shadowed by the inner view. {{#each person in people}} is just a special case of that. But renaming using {{#with view as myView}} is the more general solution/workaround to this problem that also works with nested calls to the view helper.
I was also stumped on this. This thread and this other thread (Using a container view in ember.js - how to access parent variables from child view) helped me with the solution. I used Jonathan's suggestion to do {#with} and also figured out that I should access my variable by calling the controller. Mine worked like this:
// I use the #which command to preserve access to the outer context once inside the #each
{{#with view as myOuterView}}
{{#each myInnerArray}}
//here, i get my 'name' property from the *controller* of myOuterView
{{myOuterView.controller.name}}
// stuff i did in inner array
{{/each}
{{/with}
No need to place the if inside each in the first place:
<script type="text/x-handlebars">
{{#view App.view}}
{{#if view.bar}}
{{#each view.foo}}
{{this}}
{{/each}}
{{/if}}
{{/view}}
</script>
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ppanagi/NQKvy/35/