I took a look at following SO question, but had no luck. I don't know, maybe I didn't understand the answers.
1) How to remove the “Currently” tag and link of a FileInput widget in Django?
2) Django ModelForm ImageField
My form:
class SettingsForm(forms.ModelForm):
company_logo = forms.ImageField(label=_('Company Logo'),required=False, error_messages = {'invalid':_("Image files only")})
class Meta:
model = Settings
fields = ("company_logo")
....
My model:
class Settings(models.Model):
strg=CustomFileSystemStorage(strict_name='images/company_logo.png',save_format='PNG')
company_logo=models.ImageField(upload_to='images',blank=True,null=True,storage=strg)
.....
After rendering:
I see from the first link, that the models.ImageField inherits the FileInput and adds the extra stuff, but I do not understand how to overcome this?
Thanks in advance.
The solution is:
class SettingsForm(forms.ModelForm):
company_logo = forms.ImageField(label=_('Company Logo'),required=False, error_messages = {'invalid':_("Image files only")}, widget=forms.FileInput)
class Meta:
model = Settings
fields = ("company_logo")
....
I added the widget forms.FileInput, in order to tell the ImageField to use the basic field, not the one inherited from FileInput.
#mtndesign, you might also want a "remove" option, which you can place wherever you like in your template.
class MyForm(forms.ModelForm):
photo = forms.ImageField(required=False, widget=forms.FileInput)
remove_photo = forms.BooleanField(required=False)
...
def save(self, commit=True):
instance = super(MyForm, self).save(commit=False)
if self.cleaned_data.get('remove_photo'):
try:
os.unlink(instance.photo.path)
except OSError:
pass
instance.photo = None
if commit:
instance.save()
return instance
You can change the widget used to render the form field by specifying it on initializing:
class SettingsForm(forms.ModelForm):
company_logo = forms.ImageField(label=_('Company Logo'),required=False, \
error_messages ={'invalid':_("Image files only")},\
widget=FileInput)
See the docs for widgets.
Related
My Content model has a many-to-many relationship to the Tag model. When I save a Content object, I want to add the relationships dynamically. I'm doing this the following way.
def tag_content(obj):
for tag in Tag.objects.all():
print tag
obj.tags.add(tag)
obj.is_tagged = True
obj.save()
class Tag(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
class Content(models.Model):
title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
is_tagged = models.BooleanField(default=False)
tags = models.ManyToManyField(Tag, blank=True)
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(Content, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
#receiver(post_save, sender = Content)
def update_m2m_relationships_on_save(sender, **kwargs):
if not kwargs['instance'].is_tagged:
tag_content(kwargs['instance'])
The tag_content function runs, however, the m2m relationships are not established. Im using Django 1.9.8 btw. This makes no sense. What am I missing? Moreover, if I do something like tag_content(content_instance) in shell, then the tags are set, so the function is ok. I guess the problem is in the receiver. Any help?
Edit
My question has nothing to do with m2m_changed, as I have said, creating a Content object in shell works perfectly. Therefore, the problem lies in the admin panel's setup.
Ok so I solved the problem. Basically, this has something to do with how Django handles its form in the admin panel. When trying to add the Contents from admin, I kept the tags field empty, thinking the tag_content function would handle it. However, that is exactly where the problem was, as creating a Content from shell tagged it just fine. In other words, changing the admin panel to something like this solved my problem :
from django.contrib import admin
from myapp.models import *
from django import forms
class ContentCreationForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Content
fields = ('title',)
class ContentChangeForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Content
fields = ('title', 'is_tagged', 'tags')
class ContentAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_form(self, request, obj=None, **kwargs):
if obj is None:
return ContentCreationForm
else:
return ContentChangeForm
admin.site.register(Tag)
admin.site.register(Content, ContentAdmin)
When trying to create a new Content, only the 'title' field is presented. This solves the problem.
I use Django Model Form:
class Fruit(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=40)
class Box(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
name = models.CharField(max_length=199)
fruit = models.ManyToManyField(Fruit)
and forms.py:
class BoxModelForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Box
I have default django ManyToMany widget in form:
http://nov.imghost.us/ly5M.png
How can I change this to input (text type) and if I type into this input:
apple,banana,lemon - comma separated
this Fruit will be created?
As stated here in the documentation :https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/forms/modelforms/#overriding-the-default-fields
You can add a widgets attribute to the Meta of your Modelform to change the default widgets used in the form.
In your case it would be something like this :
class BoxModelForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Box
widgets = {
'fruit': TheWidgetYouWantToUse(),
}
But actually for the behavior you want to achieve, you could proceed another way.
You should add an extra text field, and write the addition/removal of fruits in the save step, while checking the validity of the differents tags in the clean step.
class BoxModelForm(ModelForm):
fruit_selector = forms.TextField(
max_length=255,
tag = 'Whatever'
)
class Meta:
model = Box
fields = ['user','name']
def clean_fruit_selector(self):
data = self.cleaned_data['fruit_selector']
# Check that data are corrects ie the string is correctly formatted
# If not raise validation error
....
fruit_tags = data.split(",")
#Check that all tags are fruit or raise a validation error
...
return data #or only the list of correct tags
def save(self, commit=True):
instance = super(MyForm, self).save(commit=False)
# Compare the list of tags fruit_tags with self.instance.fruit.all()
....
# Take the right actions
if commit:
instance.save()
return instance
Look into this page for more details on how to change the field validation https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/forms/validation/
This is just a schematic.
django-taggit is a perfect app for this use case.
Define your models like this:
from taggit.managers import TaggableManager
from taggit.models import TagBase, GenericTaggedItemBase
class Fruit(TagBase):
class Meta:
verbose_name = "Fruit"
verbose_name_plural = "Fruits"
class TaggedFruit(GenericTaggedItemBase):
tag = models.ForeignKey(Fruit,
related_name="%(app_label)s_%(class)s_items")
class Box(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=199)
fruits = TaggableManager(through=TaggedFruit)
Then create basic model form:
class BoxModelForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Box
And that's it! You can now add fruit tags into your box, separated by comma. In case the fruit doesn't exist, it will be added into Fruit table. Read the docs for more details on how to use django-taggit.
You can use it together with jquery based Selectize.js.
I have a Django model with a ManyToManyField.
1) When adding a new instance of this model via admin view, I would like to not see the M2M field at all.
2) When editing an existing instance I would like to be able to select multiple options for the M2M field, but display only a subset of the M2M options, depending on another field in the model. Because of the dependence on another field's actual value, I can't just use formfield_for_manytomany
I can do both of the things using a custom ModelForm, but I can't reliably tell whether that form is being used to edit an existing model instance, or if it's being used to create a new instance. Even MyModel.objects.filter(pk=self.instance.pk).exists() in the custom ModelForm doesn't cut it. How can I accomplish this, or just tell whether the form is being displayed in an "add" or an "edit" context?
EDIT: my relevant code is as follows:
models.py
class LimitedClassForm(forms.ModelForm):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(LimitedClassForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
if not self.instance._adding:
# Edit form
clas = self.instance
sheets_in_course = Sheet.objects.filter(course__pk=clas.course.pk)
self.Meta.exclude = ['course']
widget = self.fields['active_sheets'].widget
sheet_choices = []
for sheet in sheets_in_course:
sheet_choices.append((sheet.id, sheet.name))
widget.choices = sheet_choices
else:
# Add form
self.Meta.exclude = ['active_sheets']
class Meta:
exclude = []
admin.py
class ClassAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
formfield_overrides = {models.ManyToManyField: {
'widget': CheckboxSelectMultiple}, }
form = LimitedClassForm
admin.site.register(Class, ClassAdmin)
models.py
class Course(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
class Sheet(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
course = models.ForeignKey(Course)
file = models.FileField(upload_to=getSheetLocation)
class Class(models.model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=255)
course = models.ForeignKey(Course)
active_sheets = models.ManyToManyField(Sheet)
You can see that both Sheets and Classes have course fields. You shouldn't be able to put a sheet into active_sheets if the sheet's course doesn't match the class's course.
I need to make a form, which have 1 select and 1 text input. Select must be taken from database.
model looks like this:
class Province(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
slug = models.SlugField(max_length=30)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
It's rows to this are added only by admin, but all users can see it in forms.
I want to make a ModelForm from that. I made something like this:
class ProvinceForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
CHOICES = Province.objects.all()
model = Province
fields = ('name',)
widgets = {
'name': Select(choices=CHOICES),
}
but it doesn't work. The select tag is not displayed in html. What did I wrong?
UPDATE:
This solution works as I wanto it to work:
class ProvinceForm(ModelForm):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(ProvinceForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
user_provinces = UserProvince.objects.select_related().filter(user__exact=self.instance.id).values_list('province')
self.fields['name'].queryset = Province.objects.exclude(id__in=user_provinces).only('id', 'name')
name = forms.ModelChoiceField(queryset=None, empty_label=None)
class Meta:
model = Province
fields = ('name',)
Read Maersu's answer for the method that just "works".
If you want to customize, know that choices takes a list of tuples, ie (('val','display_val'), (...), ...)
Choices doc:
An iterable (e.g., a list or tuple) of
2-tuples to use as choices for this
field.
from django.forms.widgets import Select
class ProvinceForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
CHOICES = Province.objects.all()
model = Province
fields = ('name',)
widgets = {
'name': Select(choices=( (x.id, x.name) for x in CHOICES )),
}
ModelForm covers all your needs (Also check the Conversion List)
Model:
class UserProvince(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(User)
province = models.ForeignKey(Province)
Form:
class ProvinceForm(ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = UserProvince
fields = ('province',)
View:
if request.POST:
form = ProvinceForm(request.POST)
if form.is_valid():
obj = form.save(commit=True)
obj.user = request.user
obj.save()
else:
form = ProvinceForm()
If you need to use a query for your choices then you'll need to overwrite the __init__ method of your form.
Your first guess would probably be to save it as a variable before your list of fields but you shouldn't do that since you want your queries to be updated every time the form is accessed. You see, once you run the server the choices are generated and won't change until your next server restart. This means your query will be executed only once and forever hold your peace.
# Don't do this
class MyForm(forms.Form):
# Making the query
MYQUERY = User.objects.values_list('id', 'last_name')
myfield = forms.ChoiceField(choices=(*MYQUERY,))
class Meta:
fields = ('myfield',)
The solution here is to make use of the __init__ method which is called on every form load. This way the result of your query will always be updated.
# Do this instead
class MyForm(forms.Form):
class Meta:
fields = ('myfield',)
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
# Make the query here
MYQUERY = User.objects.values_list('id', 'last_name')
self.fields['myfield'] = forms.ChoiceField(choices=(*MYQUERY,))
Querying your database can be heavy if you have a lot of users so in the future I suggest some caching might be useful.
the two solutions given by maersu and Yuji 'Tomita' Tomita perfectly works, but there are cases when one cannot use ModelForm (django3 link), ie the form needs sources from several models / is a subclass of a ModelForm class and one want to add an extra field with choices from another model, etc.
ChoiceField is to my point of view a more generic way to answer the need.
The example below provides two choice fields from two models and a blank choice for each :
class MixedForm(forms.Form):
speaker = forms.ChoiceField(choices=([['','-'*10]]+[[x.id, x.__str__()] for x in Speakers.objects.all()]))
event = forms.ChoiceField(choices=( [['','-'*10]]+[[x.id, x.__str__()] for x in Events.objects.all()]))
If one does not need a blank field, or one does not need to use a function for the choice label but the model fields or a property it can be a bit more elegant, as eugene suggested :
class MixedForm(forms.Form):
speaker = forms.ChoiceField(choices=((x.id, x.__str__()) for x in Speakers.objects.all()))
event = forms.ChoiceField(choices=(Events.objects.values_list('id', 'name')))
using values_list() and a blank field :
event = forms.ChoiceField(choices=([['','-------------']] + list(Events.objects.values_list('id', 'name'))))
as a subclass of a ModelForm, using the one of the robos85 question :
class MixedForm(ProvinceForm):
speaker = ...
Even though a field is marked as 'editable=False' in the model, I would like the admin page to display it. Currently it hides the field altogether.. How can this be achieved ?
Use Readonly Fields. Like so (for django >= 1.2):
class MyModelAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
readonly_fields=('first',)
Update
This solution is useful if you want to keep the field editable in Admin but non-editable everywhere else. If you want to keep the field non-editable throughout then #Till Backhaus' answer is the better option.
Original Answer
One way to do this would be to use a custom ModelForm in admin. This form can override the required field to make it editable. Thereby you retain editable=False everywhere else but Admin. For e.g. (tested with Django 1.2.3)
# models.py
class FooModel(models.Model):
first = models.CharField(max_length = 255, editable = False)
second = models.CharField(max_length = 255)
def __unicode__(self):
return "{0} {1}".format(self.first, self.second)
# admin.py
class CustomFooForm(forms.ModelForm):
first = forms.CharField()
class Meta:
model = FooModel
fields = ('second',)
class FooAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
form = CustomFooForm
admin.site.register(FooModel, FooAdmin)
Add the fields you want to display on your admin page.
Then add the fields you want to be read-only.
Your read-only fields must be in fields as well.
class MyModelAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
fields = ['title', 'author', 'published_date', 'updated_date', 'created_date']
readonly_fields = ('updated_date', 'created_date')
You could also set the readonly fields as editable=False in the model (django doc reference for editable here). And then in the Admin overriding the get_readonly_fields method.
# models.py
class MyModel(models.Model):
first = models.CharField(max_length=255, editable=False)
# admin.py
class MyModelAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_readonly_fields(self, request, obj=None):
return [f.name for f in obj._meta.fields if not f.editable]
With the above solution I was able to display hidden fields for several objects but got an exception when trying to add a new object.
So I enhanced it like follows:
class HiddenFieldsAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
def get_readonly_fields(self, request, obj=None):
try:
return [f.name for f in obj._meta.fields if not f.editable]
except:
# if a new object is to be created the try clause will fail due to missing _meta.fields
return ""
And in the corresponding admin.py file I just had to import the new class and add it whenever registering a new model class
from django.contrib import admin
from .models import Example, HiddenFieldsAdmin
admin.site.register(Example, HiddenFieldsAdmin)
Now I can use it on every class with non-editable fields and so far I saw no unwanted side effects.
You can try this
#admin.register(AgentLinks)
class AgentLinksAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
readonly_fields = ('link', )