Related
Obviously, you can use the | (pipe?) to represent OR, but is there a way to represent AND as well?
Specifically, I'd like to match paragraphs of text that contain ALL of a certain phrase, but in no particular order.
Use a non-consuming regular expression.
The typical (i.e. Perl/Java) notation is:
(?=expr)
This means "match expr but after that continue matching at the original match-point."
You can do as many of these as you want, and this will be an "and." Example:
(?=match this expression)(?=match this too)(?=oh, and this)
You can even add capture groups inside the non-consuming expressions if you need to save some of the data therein.
You need to use lookahead as some of the other responders have said, but the lookahead has to account for other characters between its target word and the current match position. For example:
(?=.*word1)(?=.*word2)(?=.*word3)
The .* in the first lookahead lets it match however many characters it needs to before it gets to "word1". Then the match position is reset and the second lookahead seeks out "word2". Reset again, and the final part matches "word3"; since it's the last word you're checking for, it isn't necessary that it be in a lookahead, but it doesn't hurt.
In order to match a whole paragraph, you need to anchor the regex at both ends and add a final .* to consume the remaining characters. Using Perl-style notation, that would be:
/^(?=.*word1)(?=.*word2)(?=.*word3).*$/m
The 'm' modifier is for multline mode; it lets the ^ and $ match at paragraph boundaries ("line boundaries" in regex-speak). It's essential in this case that you not use the 's' modifier, which lets the dot metacharacter match newlines as well as all other characters.
Finally, you want to make sure you're matching whole words and not just fragments of longer words, so you need to add word boundaries:
/^(?=.*\bword1\b)(?=.*\bword2\b)(?=.*\bword3\b).*$/m
Look at this example:
We have 2 regexps A and B and we want to match both of them, so in pseudo-code it looks like this:
pattern = "/A AND B/"
It can be written without using the AND operator like this:
pattern = "/NOT (NOT A OR NOT B)/"
in PCRE:
"/(^(^A|^B))/"
regexp_match(pattern,data)
The AND operator is implicit in the RegExp syntax.
The OR operator has instead to be specified with a pipe.
The following RegExp:
var re = /ab/;
means the letter a AND the letter b.
It also works with groups:
var re = /(co)(de)/;
it means the group co AND the group de.
Replacing the (implicit) AND with an OR would require the following lines:
var re = /a|b/;
var re = /(co)|(de)/;
You can do that with a regular expression but probably you'll want to some else. For example use several regexp and combine them in a if clause.
You can enumerate all possible permutations with a standard regexp, like this (matches a, b and c in any order):
(abc)|(bca)|(acb)|(bac)|(cab)|(cba)
However, this makes a very long and probably inefficient regexp, if you have more than couple terms.
If you are using some extended regexp version, like Perl's or Java's, they have better ways to do this. Other answers have suggested using positive lookahead operation.
Is it not possible in your case to do the AND on several matching results? in pseudocode
regexp_match(pattern1, data) && regexp_match(pattern2, data) && ...
Why not use awk?
with awk regex AND, OR matters is so simple
awk '/WORD1/ && /WORD2/ && /WORD3/' myfile
The order is always implied in the structure of the regular expression. To accomplish what you want, you'll have to match the input string multiple times against different expressions.
What you want to do is not possible with a single regexp.
If you use Perl regular expressions, you can use positive lookahead:
For example
(?=[1-9][0-9]{2})[0-9]*[05]\b
would be numbers greater than 100 and divisible by 5
In addition to the accepted answer
I will provide you with some practical examples that will get things more clear to some of You. For example lets say we have those three lines of text:
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:29 +0200] // only this + will get selected
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:x9 +0200]
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:29 +020x]
See demo here DEMO
What we want to do here is to select the + sign but only if it's after two numbers with a space and if it's before four numbers. Those are the only constraints. We would use this regular expression to achieve it:
'~(?<=\d{2} )\+(?=\d{4})~g'
Note if you separate the expression it will give you different results.
Or perhaps you want to select some text between tags... but not the tags! Then you could use:
'~(?<=<p>).*?(?=<\/p>)~g'
for this text:
<p>Hello !</p> <p>I wont select tags! Only text with in</p>
See demo here DEMO
You could pipe your output to another regex. Using grep, you could do this:
grep A | grep B
((yes).*(no))|((no).*(yes))
Will match sentence having both yes and no at the same time, regardless the order in which they appear:
Do i like cookies? **Yes**, i do. But milk - **no**, definitely no.
**No**, you may not have my phone. **Yes**, you may go f yourself.
Will both match, ignoring case.
Use AND outside the regular expression. In PHP lookahead operator did not not seem to work for me, instead I used this
if( preg_match("/^.{3,}$/",$pass1) && !preg_match("/\s{1}/",$pass1))
return true;
else
return false;
The above regex will match if the password length is 3 characters or more and there are no spaces in the password.
Here is a possible "form" for "and" operator:
Take the following regex for an example:
If we want to match words without the "e" character, we could do this:
/\b[^\We]+\b/g
\W means NOT a "word" character.
^\W means a "word" character.
[^\We] means a "word" character, but not an "e".
see it in action: word without e
"and" Operator for Regular Expressions
I think this pattern can be used as an "and" operator for regular expressions.
In general, if:
A = not a
B = not b
then:
[^AB] = not(A or B)
= not(A) and not(B)
= a and b
Difference Set
So, if we want to implement the concept of difference set in regular expressions, we could do this:
a - b = a and not(b)
= a and B
= [^Ab]
This question already has answers here:
Regular expression to match a line that doesn't contain a word
(34 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I know that I can negate group of chars as in [^bar] but I need a regular expression where negation applies to the specific word - so in my example how do I negate an actual bar, and not "any chars in bar"?
A great way to do this is to use negative lookahead:
^(?!.*bar).*$
The negative lookahead construct is the pair of parentheses, with the opening parenthesis followed by a question mark and an exclamation point. Inside the lookahead [is any regex pattern].
Unless performance is of utmost concern, it's often easier just to run your results through a second pass, skipping those that match the words you want to negate.
Regular expressions usually mean you're doing scripting or some sort of low-performance task anyway, so find a solution that is easy to read, easy to understand and easy to maintain.
Solution:
^(?!.*STRING1|.*STRING2|.*STRING3).*$
xxxxxx OK
xxxSTRING1xxx KO (is whether it is desired)
xxxSTRING2xxx KO (is whether it is desired)
xxxSTRING3xxx KO (is whether it is desired)
You could either use a negative look-ahead or look-behind:
^(?!.*?bar).*
^(.(?<!bar))*?$
Or use just basics:
^(?:[^b]+|b(?:$|[^a]|a(?:$|[^r])))*$
These all match anything that does not contain bar.
The following regex will do what you want (as long as negative lookbehinds and lookaheads are supported), matching things properly; the only problem is that it matches individual characters (i.e. each match is a single character rather than all characters between two consecutive "bar"s), possibly resulting in a potential for high overhead if you're working with very long strings.
b(?!ar)|(?<!b)a|a(?!r)|(?<!ba)r|[^bar]
I came across this forum thread while trying to identify a regex for the following English statement:
Given an input string, match everything unless this input string is exactly 'bar'; for example I want to match 'barrier' and 'disbar' as well as 'foo'.
Here's the regex I came up with
^(bar.+|(?!bar).*)$
My English translation of the regex is "match the string if it starts with 'bar' and it has at least one other character, or if the string does not start with 'bar'.
The accepted answer is nice but is really a work-around for the lack of a simple sub-expression negation operator in regexes. This is why grep --invert-match exits. So in *nixes, you can accomplish the desired result using pipes and a second regex.
grep 'something I want' | grep --invert-match 'but not these ones'
Still a workaround, but maybe easier to remember.
If it's truly a word, bar that you don't want to match, then:
^(?!.*\bbar\b).*$
The above will match any string that does not contain bar that is on a word boundary, that is to say, separated from non-word characters. However, the period/dot (.) used in the above pattern will not match newline characters unless the correct regex flag is used:
^(?s)(?!.*\bbar\b).*$
Alternatively:
^(?!.*\bbar\b)[\s\S]*$
Instead of using any special flag, we are looking for any character that is either white space or non-white space. That should cover every character.
But what if we would like to match words that might contain bar, but just not the specific word bar?
(?!\bbar\b)\b\[A-Za-z-]*bar[a-z-]*\b
(?!\bbar\b) Assert that the next input is not bar on a word boundary.
\b\[A-Za-z-]*bar[a-z-]*\b Matches any word on a word boundary that contains bar.
See Regex Demo
Extracted from this comment by bkDJ:
^(?!bar$).*
The nice property of this solution is that it's possible to clearly negate (exclude) multiple words:
^(?!bar$|foo$|banana$).*
I wish to complement the accepted answer and contribute to the discussion with my late answer.
#ChrisVanOpstal shared this regex tutorial which is a great resource for learning regex.
However, it was really time consuming to read through.
I made a cheatsheet for mnemonic convenience.
This reference is based on the braces [], (), and {} leading each class, and I find it easy to recall.
Regex = {
'single_character': ['[]', '.', {'negate':'^'}],
'capturing_group' : ['()', '|', '\\', 'backreferences and named group'],
'repetition' : ['{}', '*', '+', '?', 'greedy v.s. lazy'],
'anchor' : ['^', '\b', '$'],
'non_printable' : ['\n', '\t', '\r', '\f', '\v'],
'shorthand' : ['\d', '\w', '\s'],
}
Just thought of something else that could be done. It's very different from my first answer, as it doesn't use regular expressions, so I decided to make a second answer post.
Use your language of choice's split() method equivalent on the string with the word to negate as the argument for what to split on. An example using Python:
>>> text = 'barbarasdbarbar 1234egb ar bar32 sdfbaraadf'
>>> text.split('bar')
['', '', 'asd', '', ' 1234egb ar ', '32 sdf', 'aadf']
The nice thing about doing it this way, in Python at least (I don't remember if the functionality would be the same in, say, Visual Basic or Java), is that it lets you know indirectly when "bar" was repeated in the string due to the fact that the empty strings between "bar"s are included in the list of results (though the empty string at the beginning is due to there being a "bar" at the beginning of the string). If you don't want that, you can simply remove the empty strings from the list.
I had a list of file names, and I wanted to exclude certain ones, with this sort of behavior (Ruby):
files = [
'mydir/states.rb', # don't match these
'countries.rb',
'mydir/states_bkp.rb', # match these
'mydir/city_states.rb'
]
excluded = ['states', 'countries']
# set my_rgx here
result = WankyAPI.filter(files, my_rgx) # I didn't write WankyAPI...
assert result == ['mydir/city_states.rb', 'mydir/states_bkp.rb']
Here's my solution:
excluded_rgx = excluded.map{|e| e+'\.'}.join('|')
my_rgx = /(^|\/)((?!#{excluded_rgx})[^\.\/]*)\.rb$/
My assumptions for this application:
The string to be excluded is at the beginning of the input, or immediately following a slash.
The permitted strings end with .rb.
Permitted filenames don't have a . character before the .rb.
Obviously, you can use the | (pipe?) to represent OR, but is there a way to represent AND as well?
Specifically, I'd like to match paragraphs of text that contain ALL of a certain phrase, but in no particular order.
Use a non-consuming regular expression.
The typical (i.e. Perl/Java) notation is:
(?=expr)
This means "match expr but after that continue matching at the original match-point."
You can do as many of these as you want, and this will be an "and." Example:
(?=match this expression)(?=match this too)(?=oh, and this)
You can even add capture groups inside the non-consuming expressions if you need to save some of the data therein.
You need to use lookahead as some of the other responders have said, but the lookahead has to account for other characters between its target word and the current match position. For example:
(?=.*word1)(?=.*word2)(?=.*word3)
The .* in the first lookahead lets it match however many characters it needs to before it gets to "word1". Then the match position is reset and the second lookahead seeks out "word2". Reset again, and the final part matches "word3"; since it's the last word you're checking for, it isn't necessary that it be in a lookahead, but it doesn't hurt.
In order to match a whole paragraph, you need to anchor the regex at both ends and add a final .* to consume the remaining characters. Using Perl-style notation, that would be:
/^(?=.*word1)(?=.*word2)(?=.*word3).*$/m
The 'm' modifier is for multline mode; it lets the ^ and $ match at paragraph boundaries ("line boundaries" in regex-speak). It's essential in this case that you not use the 's' modifier, which lets the dot metacharacter match newlines as well as all other characters.
Finally, you want to make sure you're matching whole words and not just fragments of longer words, so you need to add word boundaries:
/^(?=.*\bword1\b)(?=.*\bword2\b)(?=.*\bword3\b).*$/m
Look at this example:
We have 2 regexps A and B and we want to match both of them, so in pseudo-code it looks like this:
pattern = "/A AND B/"
It can be written without using the AND operator like this:
pattern = "/NOT (NOT A OR NOT B)/"
in PCRE:
"/(^(^A|^B))/"
regexp_match(pattern,data)
The AND operator is implicit in the RegExp syntax.
The OR operator has instead to be specified with a pipe.
The following RegExp:
var re = /ab/;
means the letter a AND the letter b.
It also works with groups:
var re = /(co)(de)/;
it means the group co AND the group de.
Replacing the (implicit) AND with an OR would require the following lines:
var re = /a|b/;
var re = /(co)|(de)/;
You can do that with a regular expression but probably you'll want to some else. For example use several regexp and combine them in a if clause.
You can enumerate all possible permutations with a standard regexp, like this (matches a, b and c in any order):
(abc)|(bca)|(acb)|(bac)|(cab)|(cba)
However, this makes a very long and probably inefficient regexp, if you have more than couple terms.
If you are using some extended regexp version, like Perl's or Java's, they have better ways to do this. Other answers have suggested using positive lookahead operation.
Is it not possible in your case to do the AND on several matching results? in pseudocode
regexp_match(pattern1, data) && regexp_match(pattern2, data) && ...
Why not use awk?
with awk regex AND, OR matters is so simple
awk '/WORD1/ && /WORD2/ && /WORD3/' myfile
The order is always implied in the structure of the regular expression. To accomplish what you want, you'll have to match the input string multiple times against different expressions.
What you want to do is not possible with a single regexp.
If you use Perl regular expressions, you can use positive lookahead:
For example
(?=[1-9][0-9]{2})[0-9]*[05]\b
would be numbers greater than 100 and divisible by 5
In addition to the accepted answer
I will provide you with some practical examples that will get things more clear to some of You. For example lets say we have those three lines of text:
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:29 +0200] // only this + will get selected
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:x9 +0200]
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:29 +020x]
See demo here DEMO
What we want to do here is to select the + sign but only if it's after two numbers with a space and if it's before four numbers. Those are the only constraints. We would use this regular expression to achieve it:
'~(?<=\d{2} )\+(?=\d{4})~g'
Note if you separate the expression it will give you different results.
Or perhaps you want to select some text between tags... but not the tags! Then you could use:
'~(?<=<p>).*?(?=<\/p>)~g'
for this text:
<p>Hello !</p> <p>I wont select tags! Only text with in</p>
See demo here DEMO
You could pipe your output to another regex. Using grep, you could do this:
grep A | grep B
((yes).*(no))|((no).*(yes))
Will match sentence having both yes and no at the same time, regardless the order in which they appear:
Do i like cookies? **Yes**, i do. But milk - **no**, definitely no.
**No**, you may not have my phone. **Yes**, you may go f yourself.
Will both match, ignoring case.
Use AND outside the regular expression. In PHP lookahead operator did not not seem to work for me, instead I used this
if( preg_match("/^.{3,}$/",$pass1) && !preg_match("/\s{1}/",$pass1))
return true;
else
return false;
The above regex will match if the password length is 3 characters or more and there are no spaces in the password.
Here is a possible "form" for "and" operator:
Take the following regex for an example:
If we want to match words without the "e" character, we could do this:
/\b[^\We]+\b/g
\W means NOT a "word" character.
^\W means a "word" character.
[^\We] means a "word" character, but not an "e".
see it in action: word without e
"and" Operator for Regular Expressions
I think this pattern can be used as an "and" operator for regular expressions.
In general, if:
A = not a
B = not b
then:
[^AB] = not(A or B)
= not(A) and not(B)
= a and b
Difference Set
So, if we want to implement the concept of difference set in regular expressions, we could do this:
a - b = a and not(b)
= a and B
= [^Ab]
This question already has answers here:
Regular expression to match a line that doesn't contain a word
(34 answers)
Closed 2 years ago.
I know that I can negate group of chars as in [^bar] but I need a regular expression where negation applies to the specific word - so in my example how do I negate an actual bar, and not "any chars in bar"?
A great way to do this is to use negative lookahead:
^(?!.*bar).*$
The negative lookahead construct is the pair of parentheses, with the opening parenthesis followed by a question mark and an exclamation point. Inside the lookahead [is any regex pattern].
Unless performance is of utmost concern, it's often easier just to run your results through a second pass, skipping those that match the words you want to negate.
Regular expressions usually mean you're doing scripting or some sort of low-performance task anyway, so find a solution that is easy to read, easy to understand and easy to maintain.
Solution:
^(?!.*STRING1|.*STRING2|.*STRING3).*$
xxxxxx OK
xxxSTRING1xxx KO (is whether it is desired)
xxxSTRING2xxx KO (is whether it is desired)
xxxSTRING3xxx KO (is whether it is desired)
You could either use a negative look-ahead or look-behind:
^(?!.*?bar).*
^(.(?<!bar))*?$
Or use just basics:
^(?:[^b]+|b(?:$|[^a]|a(?:$|[^r])))*$
These all match anything that does not contain bar.
The following regex will do what you want (as long as negative lookbehinds and lookaheads are supported), matching things properly; the only problem is that it matches individual characters (i.e. each match is a single character rather than all characters between two consecutive "bar"s), possibly resulting in a potential for high overhead if you're working with very long strings.
b(?!ar)|(?<!b)a|a(?!r)|(?<!ba)r|[^bar]
I came across this forum thread while trying to identify a regex for the following English statement:
Given an input string, match everything unless this input string is exactly 'bar'; for example I want to match 'barrier' and 'disbar' as well as 'foo'.
Here's the regex I came up with
^(bar.+|(?!bar).*)$
My English translation of the regex is "match the string if it starts with 'bar' and it has at least one other character, or if the string does not start with 'bar'.
The accepted answer is nice but is really a work-around for the lack of a simple sub-expression negation operator in regexes. This is why grep --invert-match exits. So in *nixes, you can accomplish the desired result using pipes and a second regex.
grep 'something I want' | grep --invert-match 'but not these ones'
Still a workaround, but maybe easier to remember.
If it's truly a word, bar that you don't want to match, then:
^(?!.*\bbar\b).*$
The above will match any string that does not contain bar that is on a word boundary, that is to say, separated from non-word characters. However, the period/dot (.) used in the above pattern will not match newline characters unless the correct regex flag is used:
^(?s)(?!.*\bbar\b).*$
Alternatively:
^(?!.*\bbar\b)[\s\S]*$
Instead of using any special flag, we are looking for any character that is either white space or non-white space. That should cover every character.
But what if we would like to match words that might contain bar, but just not the specific word bar?
(?!\bbar\b)\b\[A-Za-z-]*bar[a-z-]*\b
(?!\bbar\b) Assert that the next input is not bar on a word boundary.
\b\[A-Za-z-]*bar[a-z-]*\b Matches any word on a word boundary that contains bar.
See Regex Demo
Extracted from this comment by bkDJ:
^(?!bar$).*
The nice property of this solution is that it's possible to clearly negate (exclude) multiple words:
^(?!bar$|foo$|banana$).*
I wish to complement the accepted answer and contribute to the discussion with my late answer.
#ChrisVanOpstal shared this regex tutorial which is a great resource for learning regex.
However, it was really time consuming to read through.
I made a cheatsheet for mnemonic convenience.
This reference is based on the braces [], (), and {} leading each class, and I find it easy to recall.
Regex = {
'single_character': ['[]', '.', {'negate':'^'}],
'capturing_group' : ['()', '|', '\\', 'backreferences and named group'],
'repetition' : ['{}', '*', '+', '?', 'greedy v.s. lazy'],
'anchor' : ['^', '\b', '$'],
'non_printable' : ['\n', '\t', '\r', '\f', '\v'],
'shorthand' : ['\d', '\w', '\s'],
}
Just thought of something else that could be done. It's very different from my first answer, as it doesn't use regular expressions, so I decided to make a second answer post.
Use your language of choice's split() method equivalent on the string with the word to negate as the argument for what to split on. An example using Python:
>>> text = 'barbarasdbarbar 1234egb ar bar32 sdfbaraadf'
>>> text.split('bar')
['', '', 'asd', '', ' 1234egb ar ', '32 sdf', 'aadf']
The nice thing about doing it this way, in Python at least (I don't remember if the functionality would be the same in, say, Visual Basic or Java), is that it lets you know indirectly when "bar" was repeated in the string due to the fact that the empty strings between "bar"s are included in the list of results (though the empty string at the beginning is due to there being a "bar" at the beginning of the string). If you don't want that, you can simply remove the empty strings from the list.
I had a list of file names, and I wanted to exclude certain ones, with this sort of behavior (Ruby):
files = [
'mydir/states.rb', # don't match these
'countries.rb',
'mydir/states_bkp.rb', # match these
'mydir/city_states.rb'
]
excluded = ['states', 'countries']
# set my_rgx here
result = WankyAPI.filter(files, my_rgx) # I didn't write WankyAPI...
assert result == ['mydir/city_states.rb', 'mydir/states_bkp.rb']
Here's my solution:
excluded_rgx = excluded.map{|e| e+'\.'}.join('|')
my_rgx = /(^|\/)((?!#{excluded_rgx})[^\.\/]*)\.rb$/
My assumptions for this application:
The string to be excluded is at the beginning of the input, or immediately following a slash.
The permitted strings end with .rb.
Permitted filenames don't have a . character before the .rb.
Obviously, you can use the | (pipe?) to represent OR, but is there a way to represent AND as well?
Specifically, I'd like to match paragraphs of text that contain ALL of a certain phrase, but in no particular order.
Use a non-consuming regular expression.
The typical (i.e. Perl/Java) notation is:
(?=expr)
This means "match expr but after that continue matching at the original match-point."
You can do as many of these as you want, and this will be an "and." Example:
(?=match this expression)(?=match this too)(?=oh, and this)
You can even add capture groups inside the non-consuming expressions if you need to save some of the data therein.
You need to use lookahead as some of the other responders have said, but the lookahead has to account for other characters between its target word and the current match position. For example:
(?=.*word1)(?=.*word2)(?=.*word3)
The .* in the first lookahead lets it match however many characters it needs to before it gets to "word1". Then the match position is reset and the second lookahead seeks out "word2". Reset again, and the final part matches "word3"; since it's the last word you're checking for, it isn't necessary that it be in a lookahead, but it doesn't hurt.
In order to match a whole paragraph, you need to anchor the regex at both ends and add a final .* to consume the remaining characters. Using Perl-style notation, that would be:
/^(?=.*word1)(?=.*word2)(?=.*word3).*$/m
The 'm' modifier is for multline mode; it lets the ^ and $ match at paragraph boundaries ("line boundaries" in regex-speak). It's essential in this case that you not use the 's' modifier, which lets the dot metacharacter match newlines as well as all other characters.
Finally, you want to make sure you're matching whole words and not just fragments of longer words, so you need to add word boundaries:
/^(?=.*\bword1\b)(?=.*\bword2\b)(?=.*\bword3\b).*$/m
Look at this example:
We have 2 regexps A and B and we want to match both of them, so in pseudo-code it looks like this:
pattern = "/A AND B/"
It can be written without using the AND operator like this:
pattern = "/NOT (NOT A OR NOT B)/"
in PCRE:
"/(^(^A|^B))/"
regexp_match(pattern,data)
The AND operator is implicit in the RegExp syntax.
The OR operator has instead to be specified with a pipe.
The following RegExp:
var re = /ab/;
means the letter a AND the letter b.
It also works with groups:
var re = /(co)(de)/;
it means the group co AND the group de.
Replacing the (implicit) AND with an OR would require the following lines:
var re = /a|b/;
var re = /(co)|(de)/;
You can do that with a regular expression but probably you'll want to some else. For example use several regexp and combine them in a if clause.
You can enumerate all possible permutations with a standard regexp, like this (matches a, b and c in any order):
(abc)|(bca)|(acb)|(bac)|(cab)|(cba)
However, this makes a very long and probably inefficient regexp, if you have more than couple terms.
If you are using some extended regexp version, like Perl's or Java's, they have better ways to do this. Other answers have suggested using positive lookahead operation.
Is it not possible in your case to do the AND on several matching results? in pseudocode
regexp_match(pattern1, data) && regexp_match(pattern2, data) && ...
Why not use awk?
with awk regex AND, OR matters is so simple
awk '/WORD1/ && /WORD2/ && /WORD3/' myfile
The order is always implied in the structure of the regular expression. To accomplish what you want, you'll have to match the input string multiple times against different expressions.
What you want to do is not possible with a single regexp.
If you use Perl regular expressions, you can use positive lookahead:
For example
(?=[1-9][0-9]{2})[0-9]*[05]\b
would be numbers greater than 100 and divisible by 5
In addition to the accepted answer
I will provide you with some practical examples that will get things more clear to some of You. For example lets say we have those three lines of text:
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:29 +0200] // only this + will get selected
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:x9 +0200]
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:29 +020x]
See demo here DEMO
What we want to do here is to select the + sign but only if it's after two numbers with a space and if it's before four numbers. Those are the only constraints. We would use this regular expression to achieve it:
'~(?<=\d{2} )\+(?=\d{4})~g'
Note if you separate the expression it will give you different results.
Or perhaps you want to select some text between tags... but not the tags! Then you could use:
'~(?<=<p>).*?(?=<\/p>)~g'
for this text:
<p>Hello !</p> <p>I wont select tags! Only text with in</p>
See demo here DEMO
You could pipe your output to another regex. Using grep, you could do this:
grep A | grep B
((yes).*(no))|((no).*(yes))
Will match sentence having both yes and no at the same time, regardless the order in which they appear:
Do i like cookies? **Yes**, i do. But milk - **no**, definitely no.
**No**, you may not have my phone. **Yes**, you may go f yourself.
Will both match, ignoring case.
Use AND outside the regular expression. In PHP lookahead operator did not not seem to work for me, instead I used this
if( preg_match("/^.{3,}$/",$pass1) && !preg_match("/\s{1}/",$pass1))
return true;
else
return false;
The above regex will match if the password length is 3 characters or more and there are no spaces in the password.
Here is a possible "form" for "and" operator:
Take the following regex for an example:
If we want to match words without the "e" character, we could do this:
/\b[^\We]+\b/g
\W means NOT a "word" character.
^\W means a "word" character.
[^\We] means a "word" character, but not an "e".
see it in action: word without e
"and" Operator for Regular Expressions
I think this pattern can be used as an "and" operator for regular expressions.
In general, if:
A = not a
B = not b
then:
[^AB] = not(A or B)
= not(A) and not(B)
= a and b
Difference Set
So, if we want to implement the concept of difference set in regular expressions, we could do this:
a - b = a and not(b)
= a and B
= [^Ab]