I am using regex_match for validation for last names
I have this so far regex_match[/^[a-zA-Z -]{0,25}+$/] but I also want to allow ' for names like O'Neal. I tried this regex_match[/^[a-zA-Z -\']{0,25}+$/] but it didnt work
any suggestions?
Thanks,
J
-\' is an invalid range. You need to put the dash at the end of the character class:
/^[a-zA-Z '-]{0,25}$/
The + is superfluous here (in some regex flavors, it activates "possessive matching", but it's definitely not needed here), as is the backslash.
Also, I suspect that the square brackets around the regex are not syntactically correct in whatever language you're using. (Which one is that, by the way?)
But the real problem is your trying to validate a name (with a regex, no less).
You don't need the \ to escape the ', but you probably should put the dash last so it's not creating a range.
Nor do you need the + after the {0,25}, it's not a valid regex with it.
This works fine for me ^[a-zA-Z '-]{0,25}$
Related
I like the %r<…> delimiters because it makes it really easy to spot the beginning and end of the regex, and I don't have to escape any /. But it seems that they have an insurmountable limitation that other delimiters don't have?
Every other delimiter imaginable works fine:
/(?<!foo)/
%r{(?<!foo)}
%r[(?<!foo)]
%r|(?<!foo)|
%r/(?<!foo)/
But when I try to do this:
%r<(?<!foo)>
it gives this syntax error:
unterminated regexp meets end of file
Okay, it probably doesn't like that it's not a balanced pair, but how do you escape it such that it does like it?
Does something need to be escaped?
According to wikibooks.org:
Any single non-alpha-numeric character can be used as the delimiter,
%[including these], %?or these?, %~or even these things~.
By using this notation, the usual string delimiters " and ' can appear
in the string unescaped, but of course the new delimiter you've chosen
does need to be escaped.
Indeed, escaping is needed in these examples:
%r!(?<\!foo)!
%r?(\?<!foo)?
But if that were the only problem, then I should be able to escape it like this and have it work:
%r<(?\<!foo)>
But that yields this error:
undefined group option: /(?\<!foo)/
So maybe escaping is not needed/allowed? wikibooks.org does list %<pointy brackets> as one of the exceptions:
However, if you use
%(parentheses), %[square brackets], %{curly brackets} or
%<pointy brackets> as delimiters then those same delimiters
can appear unescaped in the string as long as they are in balanced
pairs
Is it a problem with balanced pairs?
Balanced pairs are no problem as long as you are doing something in the Regexp that requires them, like...
%r{(?<!foo{1})} # repetition quantifier
%r[(?<![foo])] # character class
%r<(?<name>foo)> # named capture group
But what if you need to insert a left-side delimiter ({, [, or <) inside the regex? Just escape it, right? Ruby seems to have no problem with escaped unbalanced delimiters most of the time...
%r{(?<!foo\{)}
%r[(?<!\[foo)]
%r<\<foo>
It's just when you try to do it in the middle of the "group options" (which I guess is what the <! characters are classified as here) following a (? that it doesn't like it:
%r<(?\<!foo)>
# undefined group option: /(?\<!foo)/
So how do you do that then and make Ruby happy? (without changing the delimiters)
Conclusion
The workaround is easy. I'll just change this particular regex to just use something else instead like %r{…} instead.
But the questions remain...
Is there really no way to escape the < here?
Are there really some regular expression that are simply impossible to write using certain delimiters like %r<…>?
Is %r<…> the only regular expression delimiter pair that has this problem (where some regular expressions are impossible to write when using it). If you know of a similar example with %r{…}/%r[…], do share!
Version info
Not that it probably matters since this syntax probably hasn't changed, but I'm using:
⟫ ruby -v
ruby 2.6.0p0 (2018-12-25 revision 66547) [x86_64-linux]
Reference:
https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.6.3/Regexp.html
% Notation
As others have mentioned, seems like an oversight based on how this character differs from other paired boundaries.
As far as "Is there really no way to escape the < here?" there is a way... but you're not going to like it:
%r<(?#{'<'}!foo)> == %r((?<!foo))
Using interpolation to insert the < character seems to work. But given that there are much better options, I would avoid it unless you were planning on splitting the regex into sections anyway...
I do not want to show error when adding space. While using this regular expression, when adding space, shows error. How can I solve this?
return /^[A-Za-z\‘“:(),.$#!?=-_/\{}<>%^*]+$/.test(value);
I assume you mean that you want to allow spaces within value, right?
Then simply add a space to the character class. Make sure that the dash is never between two characters in the class, unless you want to specify a range (as you probably meant to do in A-Z but not in =-_). Also, this regex contains an error because you didn't escape the /:
return /^[- A-Za-z‘“:(),.$#!?=_\/{}<>%^*]+$/.test(value);
Add spaces using \s to the regex:
/^[-\sA-Za-z\‘“:(),.$#!?=_\/\{}<>%^*]+$/
As #Tim suggested below, / should be escaped and the - should not come between two characters for which it will define a range. Answer was updated respectfully.
Second, as was noted in the comments below, it's worth mentioning that \s matches all types of spaces (tabs, newlines etc) which is even more general than what the OP asked for
I'm sure this is a simple question for someone at ease with regular expressions:
I need to match everything up until the character #
I don't want the string following the # character, just the stuff before it, and the character itself should not be matched. This is the most important part, and what I'm mainly asking. As a second question, I would also like to know how to match the rest, after the # character. But not in the same expression, because I will need that in another context.
Here's an example string:
topics/install.xml#id_install
I want only topics/install.xml. And for the second question (separate expression) I want id_install
First expression:
^([^#]*)
Second expression:
#(.*)$
[a-zA-Z0-9]*[\#]
If your string contains any other special characters you need to add them into the first square bracket escaped.
I don't use C#, but i will assume that it uses pcre... if so,
"([^#]*)#.*"
with a call to 'match'. A call to 'search' does not need the trailing ".*"
The parens define the 'keep group'; the [^#] means any character that is not a '#'
You probably tried something like
"(.*)#.*"
and found that it fails when multiple '#' signs are present (keeping the leading '#'s)?
That is because ".*" is greedy, and will match as much as it can.
Your matcher should have a method that looks something like 'group(...)'. Most matchers
return the entire matched sequence as group(0), the first paren-matched group as group(1),
and so forth.
PCRE is so important i strongly encourage you to search for it on google, learn it, and always have it in your programming toolkit.
Use look ahead and look behind:
To get all characters up to, but not including the pound (#): .*?(?=\#)
To get all characters following, but not including the pound (#): (?<=\#).*
If you don't mind using groups, you can do it all in one shot:
(.*?)\#(.*) Your answers will be in group(1) and group(2). Notice the non-greedy construct, *?, which will attempt to match as little as possible instead of as much as possible.
If you want to allow for missing # section, use ([^\#]*)(?:\#(.*))?. It uses a non-collecting group to test the second half, and if it finds it, returns everything after the pound.
Honestly though, for you situation, it is probably easier to use the Split method provided in String.
More on lookahead and lookbehind
first:
/[^\#]*(?=\#)/ edit: is faster than /.*?(?=\#)/
second:
/(?<=\#).*/
For something like this in C# I would usually skip the regular expressions stuff altogether and do something like:
string[] split = exampleString.Split('#');
string firstString = split[0];
string secondString = split[1];
Here's the input string:
loadMedia('mediacontainer1', 'http://www.something.com/videos/JohnsAwesomeVideo.flv', 'http://www.something.com/videos/JohnsAwesomeCaption.xml', '/videos/video-splash-image.gif)
With this RegExp: \'.+.xml\'
... we get this:
'mediacontainer1', 'http://www.something.com/videos/JohnsAwesomeVideo.flv', 'http://www.something.com/videos/JohnsAwesomeCaption.xml'
... but I want to extract only this:
http://www.something.com/videos/JohnsAwesomeCaption.xml
Any suggestions? I'm sure this problem has been asked before, but it's difficult to search for. I'll be happy to Accept a solution.
Thanks!
If you want to get everything within quotes that starts with http:
(?<=')http:[^']+(?=')
If you only want those ending with .xml
(?<=')http:[^']+\.xml(?=')
It doesn't select the quotation marks (as you asked)
It's fast!
Fair warning: it only works if the regex engine you're using can handle lookbehind
Knowing the language would be helpful. Basically, you are having a problem because the + quantifier is greedy, meaning it will match the largest part of the string that it can. you need to use a non-greedy quantifier, which will match as little as possible.
We will need to know the language you're in to know what the syntax for the non-greedy quantifier should be.
Here is a perl recipe. Just as a sidenote, instead of .+, you probably want to match [^.]+.xml.
\'.+?.xml\'
should work if your language supports perl-like regexes.
This should work (tested in javascript, but pretty sure it would work in most cases)
'[^']+?\.xml'
it looks for these rules
starts with '
is followed by anything but '
ends in .xml'
you can demo it at http://RegExr.com?2tp6q
in .net this regex works for me:
\'[\w:/.]+\.xml\'
breaking it down:
a ' character
followed by a word character or ':' or '/' or '.' any number of times (which matches the url bit)
followed by '.xml' (which differentiates the sought string from the other urls which it will match without this)
followed by another ' character
I tested it here
Edit
I missed that you don't want the quotes in the result, in which case as has been pointed out you need to use look behind and look ahead to include the quotes in the search, but not in the answer. again in .net:
(?<=')[\w:/.]+\.xml(?=')
but I think the best solution is a combination of those offered already:
(?<=')[^']+\.xml(?=')
which seems the simplest to read, at least to me.
I have a feed in Yahoo Pipes and want to match everything after a question mark.
So far I've figured out how to match the question mark using..
\?
Now just to match everything that is after/follows the question mark.
\?(.*)
You want the content of the first capture group.
Try this:
\?(.*)
The parentheses are a capturing group that you can use to extract the part of the string you are interested in.
If the string can contain new lines you may have to use the "dot all" modifier to allow the dot to match the new line character. Whether or not you have to do this, and how to do this, depends on the language you are using. It appears that you forgot to mention the programming language you are using in your question.
Another alternative that you can use if your language supports fixed width lookbehind assertions is:
(?<=\?).*
With the positive lookbehind technique:
(?<=\?).*
(We're searching for a text preceded by a question mark here)
Input: derpderp?mystring blahbeh
Output: mystring blahbeh
Example
Basically the ?<= is a group construct, that requires the escaped question-mark, before any match can be made.
They perform really well, but not all implementations support them.
\?(.*)$
If you want to match all chars after "?" you can use a group to match any char, and you'd better use the "$" sign to indicate the end of line.
?(.*\n)+
With this you can get everything Even a new line
Check out this site: http://rubular.com/ Basically the site allows you to enter some example text (what you would be looking for on your site) and then as you build the regular expression it will highlight what is being matched in real time.
str.replace(/^.+?\"|^.|\".+/, '');
This is sometimes bad to use when you wanna select what else to remove between "" and you cannot use it more than twice in one string. All it does is select whatever is not in between "" and replace it with nothing.
Even for me it is a bit confusing, but ill try to explain it. ^.+? (not anything OPTIONAL) till first " then | Or/stop (still researching what it really means) till/at ^. has selected nothing until before the 2nd " using (| stop/at). And select all that comes after with .+.