I have a batch of files with a pattern
AB 001 CD.txt
AB 002 FG.txt
AB 003 ID.txt ...
where the first 2 chars are constant, and the last 2 are all different.
I'd like to keep the first and last 2 chars intact, and just change the digits in the middle to (xxx + 2).
AB 001 CD.txt -> AB 003 DC.txt
AB 002 FG.txt -> AB 004 FG.txt
I am new to regular expressions, so the best I can do so far is find the digits with [0-9] but I need the replacement pattern.
Note that I'm only trying to test this with an application called "RegExr" to find a replacement match. Not sure this is doable with regex.
To match filenames you can use following regex:
^AB (\d{3}) .*$
However you cannot replace number part just with regex. You have to use some funcion specified for language you're using.
From now you have to get first matched group, convert it to an integer, increase with 2, add missing zeros to the left of value and replace with this string mentioned first group.
This isn’t really a good job for regular expressions – you cannot compute with regex. Numeric manipulation is therefore severely limited. Regex is the wrong technology for this job, I’m afraid. What you can do, though, is use a callback (depending on the language you use), something akin to the following (pseudocode, depends on the language you’re using):
result = regex_replace_callback('^(\w\w) (\d+) (\w\w).txt)$',
increment_match,
your_string)
function increment_match(match):
return match[1] + " " + (int(match[2]) + 2) + " " + match[3]
Related
Given the string below,
ay bee ceefooh deefoo38 ee 37 ef gee38 aitch 38 eye19 jay38 kay 99 el88 em38 en 29 ou38 38 pee 12 q38 arr 999 esss 555
the goal is to match every word such that the suffix is a number that matches the number that appears after foo (which happens to be 38 in this case).
There is only one substring that begins with foo and ends with a number. The expected matches all exist after said substring.
Expected matches:
gee38
jay38
em38
ou38
q38
I've tried foo(\d+).*?(\w+\1)\b and foo(\d+).*(\w+\1)\b, but they fail to match all, because they either match the first one (gee38) or the last one (q38).
Is it possible to match all with just a single regex and, importantly, in just a single run?
The PCRE2 engine that I use behaves in the same way as https://regex101.com/r/uFEDOE/1. So, if the regex can match multiple substrings on regex101, then the engine that I use can too.
(?:foo|\G(?!^))(\d+).*?(?=(\w+))\w+(?=\1\b)
Demo
It could be some size or performance optimization.
#Niko Gambt, say if any optimization is important for you.
I have a filename like this:
0296005_PH3843C5_SEQ_6210_QTY_BILLING_D_DEV_0000000000000183.PS.
I needed to break down the name into groups which are separated by a underscore. Which I did like this:
(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)(\d{16})(.*)
So far so go.
Now I need to extract characters from one of the group for example in group 2 I need the first 3 and 8 decimal ( keep mind they could be characters too ).
So I had try something like this :
(.*?)_([38]{2})(.*?) _(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)(\d{16})(.*)
It didn’t work but if I do this:
(.*?)_([PH]{2})(.*?) _(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)(\d{16})(.*)
It will pull the PH into a group but not the 38 ? So I’m lost at this point.
Any help would be great
Try the below Regex to match any first 3 char/decimal and one decimal
(.?)_([A-Z0-9]{3}[0-9]{1})(.?)(.*?)(.?)_(.?)(.*?)(.?)_(.?)
Try the below Regex to match any first 3 char/decimal and one decimal/char
(.?)_([A-Z0-9]{3}[A-Z0-9]{1})(.?)(.*?)(.?)_(.?)(.*?)(.?)_(.?)
It will match any 3 letters/digits followed by 1 letter/digit.
If your first two letter is a constant like "PH" then try the below
(.?)_([PH]+[0-9A-Z]{2})(.?)(.*?)(.?)_(.?)(.*?)(.?)_(.?)
I am assuming that you are trying to match group2 starting with numbers. If that is the case then you have change the source string such as
0296005_383843C5_SEQ_6210_QTY_BILLING_D_DEV_0000000000000183.PS.
It works, check it out at https://regex101.com/r/zem3vt/1
Using [^_]* performs much better in your case than .*? since it doesn't backtrack. So changing your original regex from:
(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)_(.*?)(\d{16})(.*)
to:
([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_(.*?)(\d{16})(.*)
reduces the number of steps from 114 to 42 for your given string.
The best method might be to actually split your string on _ and then test the second element to see if it contains 38. Since you haven't specified a language, I can't help to show how in your language, but most languages employ a contains or indexOf method that can be used to determine whether or not a substring exists in a string.
Using regex alone, however, this can be accomplished using the following regular expression.
See regex in use here
Ensuring 38 exists in the second part:
([^_]*)_([^_]*38[^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_(.*?)(\d{16})(.*)
Capturing the 38 in the second part:
([^_]*)_([^_]*)(38)([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_([^_]*)_(.*?)(\d{16})(.*)
I'm trying to use regex to detect the quantity in a list of items on a receipt. The software uses OCR so the return can vary a bit. To help ive narrowed it to assume that the quantity will always be at the start of the line and is always a whole number. The use cases I'm trying to cover are:
2 Burgers $4.00
2 x Burgers $4.00
2 X Burgers $4.00
2x Burgers $4.00
2X Burgers $4.00
2- Burgers $4.00
2 - Burgers $4.00
The plan is for the regex to return 2 for each example above. The regex I have so far is \\d{1,2}(\\s[xX]|[xX]) this returns the top three examples fine but as much as I have tried I cant seem to get the rest detected, I haven't looked at adding the - yet as was stuck on detecting the x next to the Int.
Any help would be great, thanks
To help ive narrowed it to assume that the quantity will always be at the start of the line and is always a whole number.
I suggest using something like
let pattern = "(?m)^\\d+"
See the regex demo.
The pattern will match 1 or more digits at the start of any line:
(?m) - a MULTILINE modifier that makes ^ match the start of a line rather than the start of a string
^ - start of a line
\d+ - 1 or more (+) digits.
If you need to specify that some text should follow the digits, use a positive lookahead. E.g. you may require x/X/- after 0+ whitespaces, or a whitespace right after. Then, you need to use
let pattern = "(?m)\\d+(?=\\s*[xX-]|\\s)"
Here, (?=\\s*[xX-]|\\s) will make the regex match only those digits at the start of the line(s) that are immediately followed with either 0+ whitespace chars and then X, x or -, or that are immediately followed with a whitespace.
See this regex demo.
^(\\d+)\\s?[xX-]?.*?([$£](?:\\d{1,2})(?:,?\\d{3})*\.?\\d{0,2})$
See it working here (extra backslashes have been added in the code above to allow it to work in Swift, whereas the below link shows the expected result in JS, Python, Go and PHP, which means there are less backslashes there).
Will capture number of items and the price, what the item is is not captured.
I found somewhat similar questions
R - Select string text between two values, regex for n characters or at least m characters,
but I'm still having trouble
say I have a string in r
testing_String <- "AK ADAK NAS PADK ADK 70454 51 53N 176 39W 4 X T 7"
And I need to be able to pull anything between the first element in the string that contains 2 characters (AK) and PADK,ADK. PADK and ADK will change in character but will always be 4 and 3 characters in length respectively.
So I would need to pull
ADAK NAS
I came up with this but its picking up everything from AK to ADK
^[A-Za-z0_9_]{2}(.*?) +[A-Za-z0_9_]{4}|[A-Za-z0_9_]{3,}
If I understood your question correctly, this should do the trick:
\b[A-Z]{2}\s+(.+?)\s+[A-Z]{4}\s+[A-Z]{3}\b
Demo
You'll have to switch the perl = TRUE option (to use a decent regex engine).
\b means word boundary. So this pattern looks for a match starting with a 2-letter word and ending with a 4 letter word followed by a 3 letter word. Your value will be in the first group.
Alternatively, you can write the following to avoid using the capturing group:
\b[A-Z]{2}\s+\K.+?(?=\s+[A-Z]{4}\s+[A-Z]{3}\b)
But I'd prefer the first method because it's easier to read.
Lookbehind is supported for perl=TRUE, so this regex will do what you want:
(?<=\w{2}\s).*?(?=\s+[^\s]{4}\s[^\s]{2})
So, I've built a regex which follows this:
4!a2!a2!c[3!c]
which is translated to
4 alpha character followed by
2 alpha characters followed by
2 characters followed by
3 optional character
this is a standard format for SWIFT BIC code HSBCGB2LXXX
my regex to pull this out of string is:
(?<=:32[^:]:)(([a-zA-Z]{4}[a-zA-Z]{2})[0-9][a-zA-Z]{1}[X]{3})
Now this is targeting a specific tag (32) and works, however, I'm not sure if it's the cleanest, plus if there are any characters before H then it fails.
the string being matched against is:
:32B:HsBfGB4LXXXHELLO
the following returns HSBCGB4LXXX, but this:
:32B:2HsBfGB4LXXXHELLO
returns nothing.
EDIT
For clarity. I have a string which contains multiple lines all starting with :2xnumber:optional letter (eg, :58A:) i want to specify a line to start matching in and return a BIC from anywhere in the line.
EDIT
Some more example data to help:
:20:ABCDERF Z
:23B:CRED
:32A:140310AUD2120,
:33B:AUD2120,
:50K:/111222333
Mr Bank of Dad
Dads house
England
:52D:/DBEL02010987654321
address 1
address 2
:53B:/HSBCGB2LXXX
:57A://AU124040
AREFERENCE
:59:/44556677
A line which HSBCGB2LXXX contains a BIC
:70:Another line of data
:71A:Even more
Ok, so I need to pass in as a variable the tag 53 or 59 and return the BIC HSBCGB2LXXX only!
Your regex can be simplified, and corrected to allow a character before the H, to:
:32[^:]:.?([a-zA-Z]{6}\d[a-zA-Z]XXX)
The changes made were:
Lost the look behind - just make it part of the match
Inserting .? meaning "optional character"
([a-zA-Z]{4}[a-zA-Z]{2}) ==> [a-zA-Z]{6} (4+2=6)
[0-9] ==> \d (\d means "any digit")
[X]{3} ==> XXX (just easier to read and less characters)
Group 1 of the match contains your target
I'm not quite sure if I understand your question completely, as your regular expression does not completely match what you have described above it. For example, you mentioned 3 optional characters, but in the regexp you use 3 mandatory X-es.
However, the actual regular expression can be further cleaned:
instead of [a-zA-Z]{4}[a-zA-Z]{2}, you can simply use [a-zA-Z]{6}, and the grouping parentheses around this might be unnecessary;
the {1} can be left out without any change in the result;
the X does not need surrounding brackets.
All in all
(?<=:32[^:]:)([a-zA-Z]{6}[0-9][a-zA-Z]X{3})
is shorter and matches in the very same cases.
If you give a better description of the domain, probably further improvements are also possible.