I am trying to build gcc 4.7.2 using a custom prefix $PREFIX
I have built and installed all the prerequisites into my prefix location, and then successfully configured, built and installed gcc.
The problem that I now have is that $PREFIX is not in the library search path, and therefore the shared libraries cannot be found.
$PREFIX/bin $ ./g++ ~/main.cpp
$PREFIX/libexec/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.7.2/cc1plus: \
error while loading shared libraries: \
libcloog-isl.so.1: \
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
What works, but isn't ideal
If I export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PREFIX/lib then it works, but I'm looking for something which works without having to set environment variables.
If I use patchelf to set the RPATH on all the gcc binaries then it also works; however this involves searching out all elf binaries and iterating over them calling patchelf, I would rather have something more permanent.
What I think would be ideal for my purposes
So I'm hoping there is a way to have -Wl,-rpath,$PREFIX/lib passed to make during the build process.
Since I know the paths won't need to be changed this seems like the most robust solution, and can be also be used for when we build the next gcc version.
Is configuring the build process to hard code the RPATH possible?
What I have tried, but doesn't work
Setting LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET prior to calling configure:
All of these fail:
export LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-L$PREFIX/lib -R$PREFIX/lib"
export LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-L$PREFIX/lib"
export LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-L$PREFIX/lib -Wl,-rpath,$PREFIX/lib"
Setting LDFLAGS prior to calling configure:
export LDFLAGS="-L$PREFIX/lib -Wl,-rpath,$PREFIX/lib"
In any event I worry that these will override any of the LDFLAGS gcc would have had, so I'm not sure these are a viable option even if they could be made to work?
My configure line
For completeness here is the line I pass to configure:
./configure \
--prefix=$PREFIX \
--build=x86_64-suse-linux \
--with-pkgversion='SIG build 12/10/2012' \
--disable-multilib \
--enable-cloog-backend=isl \
--with-mpc=$PREFIX \
--with-mpfr=$PREFIX \
--with-gmp=$PREFIX \
--with-cloog=$PREFIX \
--with-ppl=$PREFIX \
--with-gxx-include-dir=$PREFIX/include/c++/4.7.2
I've found that copying the source directories for gmp, mpfr, mpc, isl, cloog, etc. into the top level gcc source directory (or using symbolic links with the same name) works everywhere. This is in fact the preferred way.
You need to copy (or link) to those source directory names without the version numbers for this to work.
The compilers do not need LD_LIBRARY_PATH (although running applications built with the compilers will need an LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the $PREFIX/lib64 or something like that - but that's different)
Start in a source directory where you'll keep all your sources.
In this source directory you have your gcc directory either by unpacking a tarball or svn...
I use subversion.
Also in this top level directory you have, say, the following source tarballs:
gmp-5.1.0.tar.bz2
mpfr-3.1.1.tar.bz2
mpc-1.0.1.tar.gz
isl-0.11.1.tar.bz2
cloog-0.18.0.tar.gz
I just download these and update to the latest tarballs periodically.
In script form:
# Either:
svn checkout svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc_work
# Or:
bunzip -c gcc-4.8.0.tar.bz2 | tar -xvf -
mv gcc-4.8.0 gcc_work
# Uncompress sources.. (This will produce version numbered directories).
bunzip -c gmp-5.1.0.tar.bz2 | tar -xvf -
bunzip -c mpfr-3.1.1.tar.bz2 | tar -xvf -
gunzip -c mpc-1.0.1.tar.gz | tar -xvf -
bunzip -c isl-0.11.1.tar.bz2 | tar -xvf -
gunzip -c cloog-0.18.0.tar.gz | tar -xvf -
# Link outside source directories into the top level gcc directory.
cd gcc_work
ln -s ../gmp-5.1.0 gmp
ln -s ../mpfr-3.1.1 mpfr
ln -s ../mpc-1.0.1 mpc
ln -s ../isl-0.11.1 isl
ln -s ../cloog-0.18.0 cloog
# Get out of the gcc working directory and create a build directory. I call mine obj_work.
# I configure the gcc binary and other outputs to be bin_work in the top level directory. Your choice. But I have this:
# home/ed/projects
# home/ed/projects/gcc_work
# home/ed/projects/obj_work
# home/ed/projects/bin_work
# home/ed/projects/gmp-5.1.0
# home/ed/projects/mpfr-3.1.1
# home/ed/projects/mpc-1.0.1
# home/ed/projects/isl-0.11.1
# home/ed/projects/cloog-0.18.0
mkdir obj_work
cd obj_work
../gcc_work/configure --prefix=../bin_work <other options>
# Your <other options> shouldn't need to involve anything about gmp, mpfr, mpc, isl, cloog.
# The gcc build system will find the directories you linked,
# then configure and compile the needed libraries with the necessary flags and such.
# Good luck.
I've been using this configure option with gcc-4.8.0, on FreeBSD, after building and installing gmp, isl and cloog:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/isl/lib ./configure (lots of other options) \
--with-stage1-ldflags="-rpath /path/to/isl/lib -rpath /path/to/cloog/lib -rpath /path/to/gmp/lib"
and the resulting gcc binary does not need any LD_LIBRARY_PATH. The LD_LIBRARY_PATH for configure is needed because it compiles a test program to check for the ISL version, which would fail if it didn't find the ISL shared lib.
I tried it on Linux (Ubuntu) where it failed during configuring because the -rpath args were passed to gcc instead of ld. I could fix this by using
--with-stage1-ldflags="-Wl,-rpath,/path/to/isl/lib,-rpath,/path/to/cloog/lib,-rpath,/path/to/gmp/lib"
instead.
Just using configure --with-stage1-ldflags="-Wl,-rpath,/path/to/lib" was not enough for me to build gcc 4.9.2, bootstrap failed in stage 2. What works is to pass he flags directly to make via
make BOOT_LDFLAGS="-Wl,-rpath,/path/to/lib"
I got this from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-09/msg00214.html
While it still involves setting environment variables, what I do is that I define LD_RUN_PATH, which sets the rpath. That way the rest of the system can keep using the system provided libraries instead of using the ones that your gcc build generates.
I am going to make a suggestion that I believe solves your problem, although it definitely does not answer your question. Let's see how many downvotes I get.
Writing a generic wrapper script to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH and then to run the executable is easy; see https://stackoverflow.com/a/7101577/768469.
The idea is to pass something like --prefix=$PREFIX/install to configure, building an install tree that looks like this:
$PREFIX/
install/
lib/
libcloogXX.so
libgmpYY.so
...
bin/
gcc
emacs
...
bin/
.wrapper
gcc -> .wrapper
emacs -> .wrapper
.wrapper is a simple shell script:
#!/bin/sh
here="${0%/*}" # or use $(dirname "$0")
base="${0##*/}" # or use $(basename "$0")
libdir="$here"/../install/lib
if [ "$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"x = x ] ; then
LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$libdir"
else
LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$libdir":"$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"
fi
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
exec "$here"/../install/bin/"$base" "$#"
This will forward all arguments correctly, handle spaces in arguments or directory names, and so forth. For practical purposes, it is indistinguishable from setting the rpath like you want.
Also, you can use this approach not only for gcc, but for your entire my-personal-$PREFIX tree. I do this all the time in environments where I want an up-to-date suite of GNU tools, but I do not have (or want to admit to have) root access.
Try to add your $PREFIX to /etc/ld.so.conf and then run ldconfig:
# echo $PREFIX >> /etc/ld.so.conf
# ldconfig
This will recreate cache that is used by runtime linker and it will pick up your libraries.
WARNING: This operation will cause ALL applications to use your newly compiled libraries in $PREFIX instead of default location
Related
Is there any solution to make compilation with g++-8.2 for the project using Hazelcast C++ client library ?
If I compile it with g++-8.2, it shows a lot of errors "undefined reference ...".
While using g++-4.9, it works well.
The issue is a bit like the discussion in this google group forum, which indicated the compilation errors are because of the wrong version of a compiler.
However, the compiler g++-4.9 is too old for me to build my big project.
The sample code can be found in the official org website, if someone needs to give it a try.
I finally solved it by upgrading the library from 3.10 to 3.11.
The 3.11 library is built manually using g++-8.2 from Hazelcast source code in Github.
Because there is no make install after building hazelcast-cpp-clienet package, so I use some scripts to arrange header files together in one directory (hazelcast-cpp-client/include) so that a program can easily link the library and headers.
Build script:
#!/bin/bash
# Package Requirements:
# - asio
mkdir hazelcast-cpp-client ; cd hazelcast-cpp-client
# Build
git clone https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast-cpp-client.git
mv hazelcast-cpp-client tmp
cd tmp
git checkout v3.11
mkdir release ; cd release
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ..
make
# Back to 'hazelcast-cpp-client' directory
cd ../..
# Copy .a library out from tmp/
cp tmp/release/*.a .
# Arrange all header files in an one directory
cp -r tmp/hazelcast/include .
cp -r tmp/hazelcast/generated-sources/include/hazelcast/client/protocol ./include/hazelcast/client
rm tmp/external/include/*.md # We don't need readme file
cp -r tmp/external/include/* ./include
# Delete tmp directory
rm -rf tmp
Compilation command is like:
g++ -std=c++11 \
-I/path/to/hazelcast-cpp-client/include \
hz_test.cpp \
/path/to/hazelcast-cpp-client/libHazelcastClient3.11_64.a \
-lpthread
Thanks for reporting this problem. We did not test with the g++-8.2 compiler. I opened an issue to solve the problems: https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast-cpp-client/issues/494
Can you tell me also your OS environment? What distribution and version is it?
I'm trying to build gcc-5.3 and binutils-2.26. I've done it like this:
mkdir gcc; cd gcc
wget http://path/to/gcc-5.3.0.tar.bz2
wget http://path/to/binutils-2.26.tar.bz2
tar xf gcc-5.3.0.tar.bz2
tar xf binutils-2.26.tar.bz2
cd gcc-5.3.0
contrib/download_prerequisites
for file in ../binutils-2.26/*; do ln -s "${file}"; done
cd ..
mkdir build
mkdir dist
cd build
../gcc-5.3.0/configure --prefix=/home/teamcity/gcc/dist --disable-multilib --with-system-zlib --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --program-suffix=-mine
make
This appears to build the first stage executables okay; prev-gas, prev-gcc, prev-ld are all present with plausible-looking executables in them. But the next stage fails:
Configuring stage 2 in ./intl
configure: loading cache ./config.cache
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether NLS is requested... yes
checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
checking for msgmerge... /usr/bin/msgmerge
checking for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc... /home/teamcity/gcc/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/teamcity/gcc/build/./prev-gcc/ -B/home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/home/teamcity/gcc/build/./ld
checking for C compiler default output file name...
configure: error: in `/home/teamcity/gcc/build/intl':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
The relevant bit of config.log appears to be this:
configure:2978: checking for C compiler default output file name
configure:3000: /home/teamcity/gcc/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/teamcity/gcc/build/./prev-gcc/ -B/home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unkn
own-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /home/teamcity/gcc/dist/x86_64-unknown-l
inux-gnu/sys-include -L/home/teamcity/gcc/build/./ld -g -O2 -gtoggle -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc conftest.c >&5
/home/teamcity/gcc/build/./prev-gcc/as: 106: exec: /home/teamcity/gcc/build/./gas/as-new: not found
This looks like prev-gcc's as is expecting to find gas/as-new, when actually it's prev-gas/as-new.
Is there some workaround for this? Is it safe to just ln -s prev-gas gas? I'd sort of expect that to cause problems later on. Is it not possible to build these two versions of gcc and binutils together?
This is my edited answer after trying it on my own on an Ubuntu 14.04 Azure VM.
The following approach worked for me:
Build and install binutils 2.26; for the purposes of this discussion,
let's say it's installed in /opt/gcc-5.3.0.
Configure gcc-5.3.0 in a build directory using /root/objdir/../gcc-5.3.0/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-5.3.0
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib --with-ld=/opt/gcc-5.3.0/bin/ld --with-as=/opt/gcc-5.3.0/bin/as assuming gcc-5.3.0 and the build directory, objdir, are at the same
level.
Do make followed by make install in the objdir build directory.
To verify that the ld used by the newly-built gcc is the one from the new binutils:
/opt/gcc-5.3.0/bin/gcc -print-prog-name=ld
The output should be, in this example:
/opt/gcc-5.3.0/bin/ld
Another test: rename the system ld, in my case /usr/bin/ld; the newly-built gcc should still work.
Of course, this applies to both ld and as.
Setting AS and LD environment variables to point to the newly-built binaries from the binutils package did not work: the -print-prog-name=... still showed default tools, and removing/renaming the default tools caused gcc to fail.
Thus the best way of accomplishing this is to build binutils first and then use the --with-ld and --with-as options to configure. If you also want to ensure that the newly-built binutils are used to build GCC, you may want to put them in the PATH before the system-provided tools, or you can even rename the system-provided tools to keep them out of the picture.
Thank you for checking with another mailing list to verify that building GCC and binutils together doesn't work unless they are pulled from the source control, I guess that option is not applicable when using downloaded tarballs. Overall this was an interesting exercise.
I need a definitive answer because this is still unclear to me and I can't find an explicit answer anywhere in the docs.
Assuming that I have a working gcc toolchain where
host x86_64-linux-gnu
target x86_64-linux-gnu
, the question is can I possibly configure and build gcc from sources with ?
host x86_64-linux-gnu
build x86_64-linux-gnu
target arm-gnu-eabi
The reason why I would like an answer on this is about whether or not I should spend time trying different configurations for my libraries and whether or whether or not the scripts used to build gcc are capable of some implicit stage 1 build that can potentially bootstrap an ARM compiler for me temporarily on this x64, so I can generate the toolchain that I need for the target that I want .
"Can I build gcc for ARM with an X64 one?"
Yes, you can. I have described this process for a suse linux host development system in a blog post of mine.
==================================================================================
I'm going to replicate the steps here:
1. Ensure to have the necessary headers & libraries installed
I have used YAST's 'Install Software' feature, to install the following packages that will be necessary to complete all the build steps (just search for the package names, select and accept):
gmp-devel
mpfr-devel
mpc-devel
texinfo
ncurses-devel
termcap
2. Create a directory skeleton
cd ~
mkdir arm-none-eabi arm-none-eabi-src
cd arm-none-eabi
mkdir src build
cd ~/arm-none-eabi-src
mkdir src build
3. Download the the source packages and extract them
I'm using gcc-4.7.1 here, but the same process will of course apply for newer versions of GCC.
cd ~/arm-none-eabi-src/src
wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.7.1/gcc-4.7.1.tar.bz2
wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.22.tar.bz2
wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gdb/gdb-7.4.tar.bz2
wget ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/newlib/newlib-1.20.0.tar.gz
tar -xf gcc-4.7.1.tar.bz2
tar -xf binutils-2.22.tar.bz2
tar -xf gdb-7.4.tar.bz2
tar -xf newlib-1.20.0.tar.gz
4. Build the binutils
cd ~/arm-none-eabi-src/build
mkdir binutils-2.22
cd binutils-2.22
../../src/binutils-2.22/configure \
--target=arm-none-eabi \
--prefix=$HOME/arm-none-eabi \
--with-cpu=cortex-m3 \
--with-no-thumb-interwork \
--with-mode=thumb
make all install
export PATH="$PATH:$HOME/arm-none-eabi/bin"
5. Build GCC (Part1)
cd ~/arm-none-eabi-src/build
mkdir gcc-4.7.1
cd gcc-4.7.1
../../src/gcc-4.7.1/configure --target=arm-none-eabi \
--prefix=$HOME/arm-none-eabi --with-cpu=cortex-m3 \
--with-mode=thumb --disable-multilib \
--with-no-thumb-interwork \
--enable-languages="c,c++" --with-newlib \
--with-headers=../../src/newlib-1.20.0/newlib/libc/include
make all-gcc install-gcc
The --enable-cxx-flags configure option might be additionally used to control the build flags of the libstdc++ (included in this step):
--enable-cxx-flags='-fno-exceptions \
-ffunction-sections -fno-omit-frame-pointer'
In general the same C++ compile flags should be used as they'll appear when building the intended target code.
6. Build GCC newlib with the cross compiler (Part2)
cd ~/arm-none-eabi-src/build
mkdir newlib-1.20.0
cd newlib-1.20.0
../../src/newlib-1.20.0/configure --target=arm-none-eabi \
--prefix=$HOME/arm-none-eabi --disable-multilib \
--disable-newlib-supplied-syscalls
make all install
A note about the --disable-newlib-supplied-syscalls option:
Disabling the default newlib syscall stub implementation is generally a good idea when you intend to compile for targets without using a linux like operating system, or no OS at all. It will leave you with linker errors on unimplemented stub functions you'll need to provide for newlib.
Removing the option will still enable you to override the newlib provided stubs with your own implementations.
Though, when you plan to use the cross-toolchain in conjunction with CMake, you should omit this option. CMake does some basic tests using the specified compiler definitions (e.g. from a toolchain.cmake file), that'll fail without the default stub implementations supplied.
7. Complete installing GCC
cd ~/arm-none-eabi-src/build/gcc-4.7.1
make all install
8. Build GDB
cd ~/arm-none-eabi-src/build
mkdir gdb-7.4
cd gdb-7.4
../../src/gdb-7.4/configure --target=arm-none-eabi \
--prefix=$HOME/arm-none-eabi
make all install
UPDATE
The same works pretty well for GCC 4.8.2 also.
I downloaded and built gcc 4.8.1 on my desktop, running 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04. I built it out of source, like the docs recommend, and with the commands
../../gcc-4.8.1/configure --prefix=$HOME --program-suffix=-4.8
make
make -k check
make install
It seemed to pass all the tests, and I installed everything into my home directory w/ the suffix -4.8 to distinguish from the system gcc, which is version 4.6.3.
Unfortunately when I compile c++ programs using g++-4.8 it links to the system libc and libstdc++ rather than the newer ones compiled from gcc-4.8.1. I downloaded and built gcc 4.8 because I wanted to play around with the new C++11 features in the standard library, so this behaviour is definitely not what I wanted. What can I do to get gcc-4.8 to automatically link to the standard libraries that came with it rather than the system standard libraries?
When you link with your own gcc you need to add an extra run-time linker search path(s) with -Wl,-rpath,$(PREFIX)/lib64 so that at run-time it finds the shared libraries corresponding to your gcc.
I normally create a wrapper named gcc and g++ in the same directory as gcc-4.8 and g++-4.8 which I invoke instead of gcc-4.8 and g++-4.8, as prescribed in Dynamic linker is unable to find GCC libraries:
#!/bin/bash
exec ${0}SUFFIX -Wl,-rpath,PREFIX/lib64 "$#"
When installing SUFFIX and PREFIX should be replaced with what was passed to configure:
cd ${PREFIX}/bin && rm -f gcc g++ c++ gfortran
sed -e 's#PREFIX#${PREFIX}#g' -e 's#SUFFIX#${SUFFIX}#g' gcc-wrapper.sh > ${PREFIX}/bin/gcc
chmod +x ${PREFIX}/bin/gcc
cd ${PREFIX}/bin && ln gcc g++ && ln gcc c++ && ln gcc gfortran
(gcc-wrapper.sh is that bash snippet).
The above solution does not work with some versions of libtool because g++ -Wl,... -v assumes linking mode and fails with an error.
A better solution is to use specs file. Once gcc/g++ is built, invoke the following command to make gcc/g++ add -rpath to the linker command line (replace ${PREFIX}/lib64 as necessary):
g++ -dumpspecs | awk '/^\*link:/ { print; getline; print "-rpath=${PREFIX}/lib64", $0; next } { print }' > $(dirname $(g++ -print-libgcc-file-name))/specs
I just had the same problem when building gcc-4.8.2. I don't have root access on that machine and therefore need to install to my home directory. It took several attempts before I figured out the magic required to get this to work so I will reproduce it here so other people will have an easier time. These are the commands that I used to configure gcc:
prefix=/user/grc/packages
export LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath,$prefix/lib
export LD_RUN_PATH=$prefix/lib
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$prefix/lib
../../src/gmp-4.3.2/configure --prefix=$prefix
../../src/mpfr-2.4.2/configure --prefix=$prefix
../../src/mpc-0.8.1/configure --prefix=$prefix --with-mpfr=$prefix --with-gmp=$prefix
../../src/gcc-4.8.2/configure --prefix=$prefix --with-mpfr=$prefix --with-gmp=$prefix --with-mpc=$prefix --enable-languages=c,c++
That got me a working binary but any program I built with that version of g++ wouldn't run correctly unless I built it with the -Wl,-rpath,$prefix/lib64 option. It is possible to get g++ to automatically add that option by providing a specs file. If you run
strace g++ 2>&1 | grep specs
you can see which directories it checks for a specs file. In my case it was $prefix/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.2/specs so I ran g++ -dumpspecs to create a new specs file:
cd $prefix/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.2
$prefix/bin/g++ -dumpspecs > xx
mv xx specs
and then edited that file to provide the -rpath option. Search for the lines like this:
*link_libgcc:
%D
and edit to add the rpath option:
*link_libgcc:
%D -rpath /user/grc/packages/lib/%M
The %M expands to either ../lib or ../lib64 depending on whether you are building a 32-bit or a 64-bit executable.
Note that when I tried this same trick on an older gcc-4.7 build it didn't work because it didn't expand the %M. For older versions you can remove the %M and just hardcode lib or lib64 but that is only a viable solution if you only ever build 32-bit executables (with lib) or only ever build 64-bit executables (with lib64).
gcc -print-search-dirs will tell you where your compiler is looking for runtime libraries, etc. You can override this with the -B<prefix> option.
I'm getting this error:
OpenCV-2.4.3/modules/features2d/src/freak.cpp:437: error: unable to
find a register to spill in class 'GENERAL_REGS'
After doing:
tar xfj OpenCV-2.4.3.tar.bz2
cd OpenCV-2.4.3
mkdir release
cd release
cmake -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RELEASE -D CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local -D BUILD_NEW_PYTHON_SUPPORT=ON -D BUILD_EXAMPLES=ON ..
make
The same procedure works on another machine. Any ideas?
You need to dig into the Makefiles to remove -O for freak.cpp.
UPDATE:
This is exactly how one should do it (tested with 2.4.3 and 2.4.4).
you need to edit
YOUR_BUILD_DIR/modules/features2d/CMakeFiles/opencv_features2d.dir/build.make
Search for freak.cpp. You find three blocks: Building CXX..., Preprocessing CXX..., and Compiling CX.... I just needed to change the Building part. The last line of that block looks like this:
.... YOUR_COMPILER $(CXX_DEFINES) $(CXX_FLAGS) ...
and if you check you find out that CXX_FLAGS has a -O3 in it. If you add -O0 after CXX_FLAGS it suppresses the O3. So your lines should look like this.
.... YOUR_COMPILER $(CXX_DEFINES) $(CXX_FLAGS) -O0 ...
This is at least working here!
I struggled with this for quite a few hours as well on my CentOS 5.x boxen, and here's my solution.
It's apparent you need to update 'gcc' but natively upgrading via RPM or just grabbing RPM's at random causing some serious config mgmt issues on your server. I don't have time to compile gcc/g++ via source right now either. After grazing out in the repo for a while, I found that there is, indeed, an 4.x release of gcc in the base repo.
Do this (or someone with 'root' to do it in case of OP who doesn't have access):
# yum install gcc44 gcc44-c++ -y
...CentOS/RHEL have bundled a preview RPM of gcc-4.4.6.
Then when you go to do 'cmake' to build your release environment, do at least the following (your cmake params may vary):
# cd /path/to/OpenCV-2.4.3
# mkdir release && cd release
# env CC=/usr/bin/gcc44 CXX=/usr/bin/g++44 cmake -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RELEASE -D CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/place/to/install/ -D BUILD_PYTHON_SUPPORT=ON /path/to/OpenCV-2.4.3/
That will give you a successful build of OpenCV-2.4.3 natively with CenOS/RHEL 5.x.
Had the same problem and solved it like wisehippy with one slight change:
# yum install gcc44 gcc44-c++ -y
# mkdir release && cd release
# cmake -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RELEASE -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/bin/g++44 -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=/usr/bin/gcc44 <OpenCV_Dir>
I found the problem to be solved once I updated my c++ to point to g++44, instead of the default g++ which was 4.1.
As root verify that the files are the same before doing this step, it may not be necessary for you.
diff /usr/bin/c++ /usr/bin/g++
There should be nothing returned if the files are the same. If this is the case, continue.
Backup your old file. You can delete the file as well because it's the same as g++, but I like to be careful.
mv /usr/bin/c++ /usr/bin/c++4.1
Create a link so that C++ points to your g++44. You could use symbolic link here as well.
ln /usr/bin/g++44 /usr/bin/c++
Done.